Politics -
News Sections
Despite NDP input, Harper unlikely to alter budget course
Selected Comment
I also am a senior it would not bother me if I had to work until 70 so my grand children would have oas. To you whiners if you work longer you will live longer .
arty
Despite NDP input, Harper unlikely to alter budget course
talking about
Despite NDP input, Harper unlikely to alter budget course
The Canadian Press
Date: Saturday Feb. 4, 2012 10:58 PM ET
OTTAWA Prime Minister Stephen Harper is seeking opposition input into the next federal budget, even though he no longer needs opposition support to ensure its passage.
The budget, expected later this month or next, will be Harper's first since capturing a long-sought Conservative majority in last May's election.
Nevertheless, Harper has met with interim NDP Leader Nycole Turmel to discuss the official Opposition's priorities for the economic blueprint.
Turmel says she urged Harper to focus on job creation and not to cut programs and services which hard-pressed families rely on in tough times.
While Turmel believes Harper "understood" her concerns, it's unlikely he intends to act on them.
The budget is expected to slash as much as $8 billion from federal spending as the government moves to erase the deficit built up during the 2008-09 global recession and to set out a long-term path for ensuring the Old Age Security program remains sustainable as Canada's population ages.
On the latter score, the government is contemplating eventually raising the age of eligibility for OAS to 67 from 65 -- a move vehemently opposed by the NDP.
A spokesman for Harper called Friday evening's meeting with Turmel "very cordial" but gave no sign that the prime minister is prepared to change course.
Andrew MacDougall said Harper made it clear his government intends to "make the transformations necessary to sustain economic growth, job creation and prosperity, now and for the next generation."
MacDougall said Harper reiterated his intention to keep tax rates down, to make strategic investments in science and technology and to expand trade linkages.
Harper, who is about to leave on trip to China, also repeated his determination to "make it national priority" to enhance Canada's ability to export energy products beyond the United States, specifically to Asia.
Environmental concerns prompted the U.S. recently to delay a decision on approving TransCanada's (TSX:TRP) proposed Keystone XL pipeline, which would carry oilsands bitumen from Alberta to Gulf Coast refineries. Since then, the Harper government has vowed to speed up public hearings into the proposed Northern Gateway pipeline, which would transport crude oil from Alberta's oilsands to the coast of British Columbia, for tanker shipment to places like China.
The NDP, by contrast, is opposed to the pipeline and wants to roll back corporate tax cuts.
Turmel said she told Harper that too many families are worried about their jobs, too many are waiting for Employment Insurance and, with budget cuts looming, they know "it will be even harder for them to make ends meet." She urged him to ensure the budget "does not harm families or cut the services they rely on in these tough times."
She said she also told Harper he needs to work with the provinces to improve front-line health care services, rather than unilaterally dictate future federal funding levels.
Despite the apparent absence of common ground, Turmel's chief of staff, Anne McGrath, said Harper "listened carefully" to the NDP's budget suggestions.
"I'm not sure what the significance of it is going to be but I think he was definitely listening, he was paying attention, he was taking down notes, he was engaging in the conversation," McGrath said as she and Turmel emerged from the meeting.
"We're hoping that he will take account of the perspectives that we brought."
A spokesman for interim Liberal leader Bob Rae said Harper has not requested a meeting to discuss the third party's priorities for the budget.
"No doubt because we make ourselves very clear in the House," said Daniel Lauzon.
User Tools
Related Stories
Most Popular
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
It is about time - as a grandparent I have watched our kids (who were allowed to fail although I do remember some nagging on our part) learn, I have watched our children now micro-manage their children. A big part of it is the fact that there are predators out there and an extreme reluctance on the parents part to alllow freedom that might result in the children becoming victims.
Email
Comments are now closed for this story
Marilyn
said
Jean Andrews
said
King stephy
said
BobELee
said
Can we all say "1-term priminister"And even that is too much.
How many elections can you count?
boomer
said
RZ
said
Fran
said
Brian from Calgary
said
Mark
said
Dirty Harry
said
Stephen Baker
said
2ndiceberg
said
If the writer is a senior, his or her OAS has already been paid for by the very people whose pensions will be affected by this. Now that it is their turn and you are okay, they should be dumped on and called "whiners"?
Your grandkids will be fine. Every actuarial expert has already said that the OAS plan is stable far into mid-century. By then the little bump caused by the baby-boomers will be long gone. Your government is LYING to you. They need to cut pensions and health care so that they can go on shovelling money to their wealthy friends.
Ralph Bain
said
Those that support the conservative agenda will end up with the short end of the stick.
peter in mb
said
BD
said
Tbay
said
Dean in Abby
said
glimmertwins
said
whom have rec'd great tax breaks,
are going to ask their workers to
take a 40% paycut...they know there are alot of unemployed and eager
immigrants willing to do their jobs at a much lesser rate....
Piobairean
said
Greg Orbman
said
Patrick J YYC
said
lamorial
said
be planning cuts to OAS and CPP for seniors. This government has no shame! And we will fight back.
Stacy
said
Fran
said
testy
said
Rick O
said
halvor e bjornesttad
said
SRV
said
Occupy Harper's office and bring democracy back to Canada before Harper finishes the (Tea Party North) plan to gut our social programs and contiue the free ride for his corporate masters!
Lz in Edmonton
said
Lz in Edmonton
said
Bob in YYC
said
peter in mb
said
King Hughes
said
If what you say is done, who is going to pay for all your needs when you retire? Taxpayers?
Dr. Ted Siverns
said
There is perhaps a reason for the new prisons after all.
Taxpayer
said
DGRose
said
I'd like to see Harper go after MP and Senator pensions to roll those back a bit. I don't mind if they get pretty good pensions, but these gold-plated pensions they currently have are ludicrous and the biggest affrontery to funding OAS.
As for job creation, the Opposition - particularly the NDP - needs to stop attacking the oilsands at every turn. The oilsands are the biggest employer and they are powering the national economy. We are not a manufacturing nation, we are an exporting nation full of natural resources... Come up with viable alternatives or quit whining that you want to have your cake and eat it, too.
Erik
said
You haven't seen nothing yet, Theres no way we can support the vast amount of government services people are expecting, Heath care, OAS, CPP... If people didn't abuse them so much maybe they wouldn't be forced into this situation. If you think the NDP and Liberals can do any better keep dreaming, that money has to come from somewhere...
KJ in Calgary
said
Rick
said
Canadian Bob
said
Terry Hall
said
Luiz Marchese
said
ripcanada
said
Bumcrack USA
said
LG
said
Ottawa Jack
said
Brian in BC
said
ggcarere
said
Linda in Vancouver
said
Prof. Pye Chartt
said
Doug ^^^ BC
said
Canada Strong Economy
said
Canada is dead...and so are so many of it's people
said
Steve
said
Fairness, I understand, is not a topic of interest to the Harper government. He and his Conservative cronies are just interested in giving the rich more and more.
Keeder
said
D in Wpg
said
Ottawa Jack
said
Chris Vogel
said
mike
said
Dale
said
arty
said
Len
said
mike!
said
Mike
said
christopher Owen Sound
said
Once Proud Canadian
said
Stewie
said
arty
said
GHW
said
dualstrats
said
Raymond
said
Franck commonsens
said
sam
said
tob
said
Archiebunker
said
T E Payne
said
Steph
said
gregoryd`
said
Mike
said
Chris
said
Will
said
Prof. Pye Chartt
said
Canadian Bob
said
newt10ca
said
Alan
said
Kmacd
said
sandy ns
said
MDHinDC
said
Don
said
Hilton Shand
said
roy
said
Robert B
said
D. Vancouver
said
V
said
Keystone was killed for purely political reasons, not environment concerns.
If corporations are allowed to prosper they create jobs. Keystone would have created 10's of thousands of them if it were allowed but politics and activists got their way.
spencer
said
Smoke Rings - Ottawa
said
NS
said
Mary
said
Larry i ontario
said
Sang Riel
said
jasper12
said