Politics -   

1
Republican presidential candidate, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney stands in front of a foreclosed home in Lehigh Acres, Fla., Tuesday, Jan. 24, 2012. (AP / Charles Dharapak) Republican presidential candidate, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney smiles before a Republican presidential debate Monday Jan. 23, 2012, at the University of South Florida in Tampa, Fla. (AP / Paul Sancya) Florida Republican debate Republican presidential candidate, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, celebrates his New Hampshire primary election win in Manchester, N.H., Tuesday, Jan. 10, 2012.

Romney paid $3M in federal income tax in 2010

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV News Channel: Paul Workman in Washington
CTV's Washington bureau chief says Obama will address the issue of making the 'super rich' pay more in taxes, which will inevitably target Mitt Romney.
CTV News Channel: Reaction to Romney's millions
Patrick Basham with Democracy Institute discusses how critics are reacting to Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney making millions of dollars and what the impact will be on his campaign.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (19) Facebook   

Republican presidential candidate, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney stands in front of a foreclosed home in Lehigh Acres, Fla., Tuesday, Jan. 24, 2012. (AP / Charles Dharapak) Republican presidential candidate, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney smiles before a Republican presidential debate Monday Jan. 23, 2012, at the University of South Florida in Tampa, Fla. (AP / Paul Sancya) Florida Republican debate Republican presidential candidate, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, celebrates his New Hampshire primary election win in Manchester, N.H., Tuesday, Jan. 10, 2012.

Photos

Republican presidential candidate, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney stands in front of a foreclosed home in Lehigh Acres, Fla., Tuesday, Jan. 24, 2012. (AP / Charles Dharapak)

View Larger Image

Date: Tue. Jan. 24 2012 10:13 AM ET

Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney earned $21.7 million in 2010 but only paid about 14 per cent in federal taxes, according to records released Tuesday.

In addition to forking over about $3 million in taxes, records also show Romney gave nearly the same amount to charity -- about half of which went to the Mormon Church.

Campaign officials say the former Massachusetts governor will pay about $3.2 million for 2011, making his tax rate about 15.4 per cent. Those returns haven't been filed yet.

It's a revelation that ensures him a spot in the pantheon of wealthy American taxpayers and comes three days after rival Newt Gingrich made his own tax returns public. (Gingrich paid about $1 million in income tax, or about 31 per cent.)

Romney's Republican rivals have used his wealth to fuel attack campaigns since the race first began. Detractors have asked him to explain his work as head of venture firm Bain Capital and why he has some money sitting in investments in the Cayman Islands.

Earlier this month, a pro-Newt Gingrich ad campaign released a short film trailer painting Romney as a "corporate raider" who exploited American businesses during his time at Bain Capital.

"His mission? To reap massive rewards for himself and his investors," a narrator says in a trailer for "King of Bain: When Mitt Romney Came to Town."

The film was created by a so-called political action committee and not the Gingrich campaign itself but does little to extinguish criticism of Romney as a high-roller.

The release of Romney's tax returns comes after various media outlets saw a sample of the documents earlier in the week.

Speaking at a Monday night debate in Florida, Romney announced his plans to release the returns in full and said he's proud to prove that he pays taxes.

"I pay all the taxes that are legally required and not a dollar more," he said. "I don't think you want someone as the candidate for president who pays more taxes than he owes."

Romney's tax returns show about $4.5 million in itemized deductions and place him in the top one per cent of taxpayers, a percentage point made famous by widespread Occupy protests opposed to income disparity amongst other issues.

A counteroffensive?

In the past few days, the Romney campaign has come out swinging at Gingrich for his work with Freddie Mac, one of America's biggest buyers of home mortgages.

"While Florida families lost everything in the housing crisis, Gingrich cashed in," says a narrator in a pro-Romney advertisement posted online.

The video goes on to criticize Gingrich for earning $1.6 million in consulting fees from Freddie Mac, which it describes as the "scandal-ridden agency" that helped create the housing crisis.

Romney, however, has as much as $500,000 invested in the U.S.-backed housing lender and its sister entity Fannie Mae.

While the Gingrich campaign attempts to depict Romney as a "corporate raider," videos from the Romney campaign refer to his rival as a "Washington insider."

Opinions about Romney's tax returns flooded into micro-blogging website Twitter on Tuesday but one of the top "promoted tweets" was paid for by the Romney campaign. The message linked to the video criticizing Gingrich's time at Freddie Mac.

"Playing Newt at his own game. Nice!" one Twitter user wrote in response.

The wealth-related barbs come as Republican presidential candidates tear into one another ahead of Florida's Jan. 31 primary. As the Florida campaign heats up, Romney appears to be trying out a more aggressive tone.

With files from The Associated Press

Comments are now closed for this story

Doug ^^^ BC
said

This is a distraction by people hoping to start a class war to keep Obama in power. Yes,Romney made a lot of money.But he made it legally and honestly.Everyone knows that you pay lower taxes on investment income than you do working for it.WHY? Because investment income involves rsiks.Risks that cause you to lose money too.But more to the point,if more people invested,the entire economy would be a whole lot better off. Investors take the risks,AND they are also the ones who build everything. As to Romney himself, he did pay a low rate of tax.BUT,he gave away $7 million dollars to churches,cancer research,programs for kids, and a long list of good causes.That's another thing wealthy people do,that most of us cannot afford to do.How about asking all the other so called "leaders",to show what % of their incomes that they gave to charitable causes,and what % they kept? Wouldn't that be a fairer comparison? I support charitbable giving for one principle alone.That being,that when we send the money to government in the form of taxes,they get to decide which causes to support,and which ones to ignore. When we give to charity,it is "we the people" who get to decide what we support,and what we do not.In my view,that is infinitly superiour to a system of socialism,which allows government to intervene in our lives in ways in which they should have no right to do.


As I see it.
said

Mormons will try to use Romney as their poster boy to try and lend legitimacy to their cultist beliefs. Romney is every bit as deceived as the rest in that "religion". The fact he has a huge income is fine that is not what concerns many about Romney. His judgment is suspect.


Robert in Burnaby
said

It's pretty much proven up and down the board that Mormons are NOT a cult. The leader of the Baptist movement now makes sure he calls them a "theological cult" to continue to ensue fear amongst Evangelicals. His definition is that Mormons do not adhere to the "traditional definition" of God (that was laid out by the Nicean Creed in the 4th Century. So Mormons are being called a cult because they believe that God the Father and Jesus Christ are separate beings. That's a pretty weak accusation but the Evangelicals are holding to it and doing everything they can to twist Mormons into a "scary movement." And brainwashing amongst Mormons? Nope. Our Missionaries literally ask people to read one chapter in the Book of Mormon and to pray about it. That's the conversion process. Go check it out yourself: "3 Nephi 11". Does that brainwash you? No. So Mitt gave tithing to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. Good for him. The tithing funds are not misappropriated, are not stored in a bank collecting interest, and are used as dictated in one simple Bible verse. I'm really tired of "vote for anyone but a Mormon." I could spend all my life only ever doing great and wonderful things but in the end, because I am Mormon, I am scum of the Earth. Thanks.


LH
said

Making comments about his contribution to his church has nothing to do with him being a good, or bad, politician. I don't remember anything in either the American or Canadian constitution that says people must not have any religious beliefs to be in office. What is permitted is freedom of religion, meaning he can donate to and practice whatever religion he wants in his personal life, and we also have a separation of church and state, meaning that whatever his religion, it is separate from his governing of the country. If you don't agree with his religion, that is fine, but it has nothing to do with his ability to be president. Freedom of religion means all religions, not just the one's you agree with. As far as the taxes he pays, he donates to charity, that is a tax deduction, he also has write offs, regular people can take advantage of these as well. As long as he paid the taxes owed, that is all he has to do, no scandal here. However, I do agree that wealthier americans should pay more taxes, it only makes sense, but until they change the legislation, Romney has done nothing wrong.


Jay in Stoon
said

The longer these out-of-touch Republicans tear each other apart, the more fodder for the Democrats to use against them in the upcoming election. I really don't think there's anyone who will be able to beat Obama after this - doesn't matter WHICH side you support.


Im' not rich but...
said

Let’s not mix apples and oranges.These are taxes on capital gains. Money invested is already taxed when it is earned in the first place. Then you decide to invest it. (This is what grows the economy and creates jobs).If the investments are profitable you pay 15% on that capital gain and many times that money is then reinvested in the hope to grow more businesses, create more jobs etc.If your investment does not work out and you lose money, you can only deduct $3,000.00 PER YEAR. So weather you lose $3k or $3 million you can only deduct the $3,000.00So whether you think this is fair or not, this is the incentive to invest money. Without this incentive, investment will be reduced and the economy will suffer.In fact (and I am NOT a rich guy by any stretch) I think that the capital gains tax should be less and the cooperate taxes need to be reduced as well. (US businesses are taxed at the second highest rate in the world).This is the reason so many companies export their jobs. (it is not, contrary to belief, just the fact that many countries pay their workers pennies compared to what the US pays).Our tax system is a mess. It is too complicated with too many loopholes.A simple flat tax is the answer. Herman Caine had the right idea. Maybe his numbers need to be look at and tweaked but a simple tax code would fix a lot of our problems.


Greg - Signs and Wonders
said

So ? Meet the (potenital) new boss... same as the old boss.


JR
said

perhaps all the people who are complaining about the amount of taxes should look at whether they have paid any monies to charities, which is always tax deductible....you make it spend it in a good way to help by donations to charities or churches.....you will then move the amount of your income taxes down to 14 or l5 per cent the same as any politian....grow up people and get the right look on Newt......he isn't the most honest of men running for president......


PBW
said

Nicole - as Shakespeare puts it "A rose by any name would smell as sweet", though what either has to do with the taxes paid by Romney and Gingrich eludes me. Negative connotations of names is in the eye and ear of the beholder, and has nothing to do with capability. A Nicole I knew preferred Nikki: had no effect on her work performance. I seem to remember a study that showed that people preferred single syllable names in their leaders; thus many make abbreviations, as did Newton Gingrich. Others prefer their middle, as opposed to their first name, as does Willard Mitt Romney. Personally, I agree with Shakespeare.


Fools
said

Sounds about fair. After all, when the average person makes $21,000 dollars they only pay $3,000 in taxes. Oh wait. Lol. I hope everyone who is opposed to tax hikes on those making highest income in the country feel awfully stupid right now. Unless they are unable to comprehend where their tax rate stands compared to this 14%. Hint, it's MUCH higher than that. The average American pays over 20% on MUCH less income. But keep your heads in the sand. Keep defending their right to pay less than you do. I'm sure Romney spending it trying to get elected has had some trickle down effect. Fools....


Mike (Airdrie)
said

To Dave and WC:In response to your concern over a Mormon being in political office, this teaching from the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints may help:11 We claim the privilege of worshiping Almighty God according to the dictates of our own conscience, and allow all men the same privilege, let them worship how, where, or what they may.


Nicole
said

Has anyone noticed the wierd names of recent US politicians, or their kids? Newt, Mitt, Jeb... and then those Palin kids: Trig, Track, Bristol, and grandchild Tripp... Names of common objects are preferred to people names? Single syllable object names... Credibility, anyone?


Cynical
said

People should check on Canadian Tax law about what people pay on earned income versus investment income: they are taxed at different rates. So Romney gave a lot of money to charity and his church too: that is perfectly legal under both US and Canadian law - I do it myself to reduce my tax load. There are those who say there should be a single tax rate for everyone, meaning a fixed amount, say 20% off every earner, whether individual or corporation:that would only work if the Income Tax Act contained ONLY that provision. The moment you start allowing deductions you open the doors to abuse as pressure groups get exemptions made for this that and everything else - exactly what has happened since the first income taxes were levied. As for the difference paid by Romney and Gingrich: it may all come down to the type of income. Those on the left will (do) accuse Romney of being a corporate raider. On the other hand, Gingrich had a politician's salary for most of his life; what's the difference? neither actually produced wealth, only redistributed it in their favor.


Prof. Pye Chartt
said

A candidate's money and wealth are a political distraction for the media monkeys and obstinate lefties to toss around; nothing more. Unlike many Canadians, most Americans don't pucker their sphincter when discovering that somebody has a lot more cash and investments than they do. (The American Dream.) Now, as far as the Romney/Gingrich battle goes, last night made it clear that Newt is extremely articulate, sharp, and confident, and doesn't entertain crap or take cheap bait in a political debate. He stayed centered, and correctly acted as though Romney's desperate assault was beneath him. Gingrich actually has a presidential quality. (However, Obama surpasses him on that front.) Ron Paul still manages to knock people over with his piercing common sense, yet, his image is that of an elderly wizard, and his foreign policy and military-defense policy stances are somewhat troubling to a great many of his fellow Americans. Alas, no Republican seems to be in a position to dethrone Obama.


Dave
said

$4.1 million tithe to a cult.... and the US wants this blind guide leading the USA? Hard to get my head around that one then again look what they have now... USA has seen its best days and is on its way out. "Chinese for Dummies" will be the book to own in the coming years


john in Edmonton
said

Romney paid what he was legally supposed to. Millionaires Obama and Pelosi pay what they are legally supposed to. I assume George Soros pays his taxes. Don't make following the law a plank in your "greed" diatribe.


George V.
said

With that kind of income from investments he obviously knows how to create wealth, pay his taxes, help charities, and retain some of it for himself, which he is entitled to, These are the type of citizens the US desperately needs at this time, and with this economy. He is a shining example how the free economy works, and how there is an opportunity for anyone to be financial sucessfull in North American through, education, hard work, using your brain for something other than a hat rack, smart investing. Than again we always have our jealous critics.


WC
said

Romney can imagine what it is like to be the average citizen about as well as the average citizen can imagine what it is like to be worth hundreds of millions of dollars. And 1.5 million to the Mormons? If Romney gets in and pushes his brand of religion (they are all poison) we will see the divide between church and state overlap. What the people need is a REASONABLE person grounded in REASON who can think critically and see the plight of the common citizen.


Mq
said

Give him the job! He clearly would have a ground level understanding of the state of his countrymen and women. NOT! Just like when interviewing for a job, a reverse credit check should apply to politics. If you made, or make well above in excess to what the 'average' voters makes. You should not be allowed to run for office. How can you expect a man worth that much money, to care or put honest effort into the office for the sake of the average citizen. But like everything else, freedom and democracy is a lie. All smoke and mirrors for the Ivory collars to write and make policy to make their family(s) estate worth more, at the expense of generations of voters.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Politics Stories

Quebec student strikes, tuition fees, Montreal, Quebec

Quebec students, government to resume talks Monday

More   27 Comments 27    4 Video(s) 4

Newfoundland and Labrador Premier Kathy Dunderdale receives applause from party members as the House of Assembly opens in St. John's on Monday, March 5, 2012. (Paul Daly /  THE CANADIAN PRESS)

EI changes unfair to N.L., Dunderdale says

More   20 Comments 20    1 Video(s) 1

In this Monday, Sept. 19, 2011 file photo, Fereidoun Abbasi Davani speaks during a news conference at the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna, Austria. (AP Photo/Ronald Zak)

Iran says no reason to halt 20 per cent enrichment

More   8 Comments 8  

Most Talked about Stories

It is about time - as a grandparent I have watched our kids (who were allowed to fail although I do remember some nagging on our part) learn, I have watched our children now micro-manage their children. A big part of it is the fact that there are predators out there and an extreme reluctance on the parents part to alllow freedom that might result in the children becoming victims.

Harvey

Parents must learn to stop meddling, author urges