Politics -
News Sections
Ottawa pulls funding for Canadian Environmental Network
Selected Comment
I'd like to know what this group has done before I start complaining about the government de-funding it. Saying it's for the environment sounds great, but what do they actually DO? Do they go out and plant trees? Do they buy land for conservation? What do they actually do!?
Tim
Ottawa pulls funding for Canadian Environmental Network
talking about
Ottawa pulls funding for Canadian Environmental Network
Geoff Nixon, CTVNews.ca
Date: Friday Oct. 14, 2011 7:03 PM ET
An environmental umbrella group wants Ottawa to reverse a decision to pull its funding, though the government says the move is necessary during a time of fiscal restraint.
The Canadian Environmental Network (RCEN) received notice Thursday that it would not receive $547,000 in core funding that the government had previously said it intended to provide.
Olivier Kolmel, the chairman of the organization's board of directors, said Ottawa did not give any warning that it would cut off its funding next year.
"If we would have had warning and we had known several months ahead of time, we could plan for some kind of transitional model, to move on to a different financial model," Kolmel told CTVNews.ca in a telephone interview on Friday morning.
The RCEN has existed for more than three decades and includes more than 600 member organizations from across Canada.
It has supported environmental groups with networking, communication and co-ordination services and helped the government arrange consultations.
Environmentalists denounced Ottawa's move, saying the decision to pull funding is part of a systematic Conservative campaign to weaken the green movement.
"Don't be fooled. This isn't about austerity. It's vindictive petty politics -- part of a systematic campaign by right-wing extremists to marginalize voices of the environment," John Bennett, the executive director of Sierra Club Canada, said in a statement.
With news of the abrupt funding change, RCEN is now scrambling to try to get Environment Canada to reverse its decision, while preparing for layoffs within the organization.
According to Kolmel, Environment Canada indicated in its notice to RCEN that it made its decision after conducting a review of the finances for grants and contributions within the government department.
A spokesperson for Environment Minister Peter Kent confirmed that the department would be pulling the RCEN funding.
"Environment Canada has decided not to enter into a contribution agreement with the Canadian Environmental Network this fiscal year," Melissa Lantsman told CTVNews.ca in an email on Friday.
"Responsible spending and sound management of tax dollars are important at all times. During difficult economic times, Canadians expect the government to be even more vigilant."
Lantsman said Environment Canada intends to move towards "a more direct use of web-based consultation" in future.
"The intent is to expand on these to not only provide comments on discussion papers, but to invite stakeholders to submit ideas or policy solutions on the Government's environmental priorities."
But Kolmel said that if the government cuts ties with RCEN, they will be losing out on a valuable resource that would be very costly to replace.
"We have been around for 30 years and we have millions of volunteer hours that have been given by our membership," said Kolmel.
Megan Leslie, the environment critic for the New Democrats, said the government cannot justify ending the funding for RCEN.
"The government has told RCEN that this decision is part of a cost-efficiency plan, but given the important role this organization plays, cancelling their funding will likely have expensive, long-term consequences," Leslie said in a statement.
"This decision just doesn't make sense financially, and it will endanger the health and sustainability of our environment."
User Tools
Related Stories
Most Popular
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
It is about time - as a grandparent I have watched our kids (who were allowed to fail although I do remember some nagging on our part) learn, I have watched our children now micro-manage their children. A big part of it is the fact that there are predators out there and an extreme reluctance on the parents part to alllow freedom that might result in the children becoming victims.
Email
Comments are now closed for this story
Hilton Shand
0
said
0
david
0
said
0
Jules in Ottawa
0
said
0
we CAN'T afford to support environmental orgs - we CAN afford the many person hours it will take to set the procedures for, and install photos of the Queen, in every Cdn embassy worldwide.
we CAN'T afford scientists at Environment Canada - we CAN afford to add "Royal" to letterhead, uniforms, and documents for our Army/Navy/Air forces.
we CAN'T afford the jobs at Consulting & Audit Canada (that are now gone)- we CAN afford to spend tax dollars promoting the rights of the Cdn flag (which was never in jeopardy to begin with)
Just some of the Cans and Cants of Cant-a-da
Ned
0
said
0
Mike
0
said
0
NS
0
said
0
beetlebaum
0
said
0
verheek
0
said
0
A time of fiscal restraint can do without the inflated green movement that only was possible during the illusion of massive wealth before the economic crash.
Wind and solar energy are fine for small setups but a disaster for replacing fossil fuel and nuclear plants.
Jim McB
0
said
0
grizz
0
said
0
NEW TAX, NEW TAX, NEW TAX !!!!
0
said
0
Kevin
0
said
0
Dave in Edm
0
said
0
Tridus
0
said
0
Priorities, people!
Prof. Pye Chartt
0
said
0
NS
0
said
0
@bob the western yahoo
0
said
0
Prof. Pye Chartt
0
said
0
Axel-BC
0
said
0
Phil in London
0
said
0
Steve, Bolton, Ontario
0
said
0
Why don't you grow up and save the outdated provincialism for the kids.
beetlebaum
0
said
0
Marlene in Toronto
0
said
0
You just prove how ignorant and clueless many of you CON supporters can be: Stephen Harper was born and raised in TORONTO, ONTARIO. He later moved to Alberta where his only job was as the mailroom boy of an oil company where his father also worked. It is no wonder he has no problem whatsoever of attacking Environment Canada and the green movement while spending OUR money doing PR for the oil industry, which is also subsidized by OUR money.
BTW: when the environment in Alberta is inevitably ruined, as the oilsands are not properly monitered, and you or your children have no clean air or drinking water, remember which PM you think is the "best".
Will
0
said
0
Amazed and Confused
0
said
0
canada4
0
said
0
Bob,Calgary,Alberta
0
said
0
Sb
0
said
0
Jeff in Ontario
0
said
0
Laurie
0
said
0
Kevin Wallace
0
said
0
Jane Canadian
0
said
0
Surprise, surprise
0
said
0
Russ
0
said
0
vytasek
0
said
0
Umbrella organisation, providing what again ? Communication?
Your Boss
0
said
0
Roy
0
said
0
Kevin Wallace
0
said
0
clane
0
said
0
Donna in Ottawa
0
said
0
beetlebaum
0
said
0
leftwingpinko
0
said
0
Exanime
0
said
0
"Ironically, yesterday's news also carried a story about another "environmental" initiative, which the government deemed worthy of generous support: the "Canada School of Energy and Environment," based in Calgary. That organization received $15 million from the federal government and a good part of its vocation has been, in the words of Postmedia News, "to clean up the dirty oil image of Canada's oil sands and provide the public with a more balanced view of its environmental performance"
DKJD
0
said
0
Ken
0
said
0
Meme Mine
0
said
0
How "childish" as history will call climate blame. Oh, and you scientists?.........Thanks for the pesticides and germ warfare and deep sea drilling technology and land mines and 25 years of needless CO2 panic. As for you mainscream news editors, no suprise there.
Kim
0
said
0
Ivan
0
said
0
RGO in Montreal
0
said
0
Goetheman
0
said
0
slucas
0
said
0
Robert777
0
said
0
d in l
0
said
0
Colleen in Alberta
0
said
0
mocusty
0
said
0
lc
0
said
0
Rob
0
said
0
That'll pay for two cabinet minister fishing trips.
How about cancelling the CF-35 boondoggle and saving some serious coin?
John MacDonald
0
said
0
Kevin in Alberta
0
said
0
Dilys
0
said
0
G.S.
0
said
0
A CONSERVATIVE CANADA MEANS A BETTER CANADA!!!
TEA from SK
0
said
0
Maggie Ottawa
0
said
0
BlueGreen
0
said
0
Jeremy in Thunder Bay
0
said
0
Robert Burgess - Whitby, Ontario
0
said
0
Paul
0
said
0
Ivan
0
said
0
Salt and Vinegar
0
said
0
Reece
0
said
0
hv
0
said
0
Get rich quick
0
said
0
X con
0
said
0
havee
0
said
0
Dev53
0
said
0
Keep Cutting
0
said
0
Taylor
0
said
0
ZaZa
0
said
0
Matt in NB
0
said
0
Jean
0
said
0
charlie
0
said
0
Craig from NS
0
said
0
W
0
said
0
devils advocate
0
said
0
Prof. Pye Chartt
0
said
0
G
0
said
0
Andrew in Vancouver
0
said
0
Prof Bar Graph
0
said
0
Fill ur Boots
0
said
0
robins111
0
said
0
Paul R
0
said
0
JDF - Calgary
0
said
0
Bob,Calgary,Alberta
0
said
0
The_Central_Scrutinizer
0
said
0
After all, it's not as if the environment is important to us, eh?
Not when compared to The Almighty Dollar.
I'd sooner see my tax money spent on environmental concerns than on politicians obscene salaries.
Save money on your own pay, not on things that can harm us all.
Disenchanted
0
said
0
Adrian from Hamilton
0
said
0
Mark
0
said
0
Piotr
0
said
0
The cut was motivated by the ideological, not financial reasons, because financially it is penny-wise and pound-foolish - it will result in the loss of low-cost independent environmental expertise - any replacement either by the government or the academia, not even mentioning by the consulting industry, would cost and order of magnitude more (replacing part-time minimum wage people with fully paid and pensioned or the private consultant's fees).
The net effect will be that the big business will be able to do whatever they want without even a pretense of an independent public scrutiny - which in the end will cost _us_ - the spill in the Gulf did cost much more than the price of the proper environmental regulation which would prevent the spill from happening in the first place.
Thus, penny wise, pound foolish.
But the conservatives were never about fiscal responsibility
(the last conservative finance minister who left the Canada's finances in a better shape than he inherited - lived in the XIX century), but always about ideology and bending over for the big corporations funding their years of expensive attack ads.
Carl
0
said
0
Jim in Ottawa
0
said
0
Jkuz
0
said
0
sam williamson
0
said
0
If you can't even get 10,000 people to donate 50 bucks a year, then it's not as important as you think.
NoContest
0
said
0
d_abes in Saskatoon
0
said
0
MDA, Lethbridge
0
said
0
Lance
0
said
0
Gerry
0
said
0
Dan from Northern Ont
0
said
0
Carl
0
said
0
George_Piskor
0
said
0
Michael (Ottawa)
0
said
0
D IN L
0
said
0
Ya Its Me
0
said
0
Canadian Mike
0
said
0
MDell
0
said
0
d_abes
0
said
0
Dead Wood
0
said
0
Nathan
0
said
0
Anne
0
said
0
Bob Frank
0
said
0
Thank you on behalf of the educated portion of Canadians.
Joe Canadian
0
said
0
About Time !!
0
said
0
Rosie
0
said
0
Tim
0
said
0
Paul
0
said
0
Will
0
said
0
Rob
0
said
0
BuzzerKiller
0
said
0
No God No War
0
said
0
gavbo
0
said
0
mh
0
said
0
montrose
0
said
0
JD, Ottawa
0
said
0
Cynical
0
said
0
JP
0
said
0
steve
0
said
0
scottj
0
said
0
Joe Canadian
0
said
0