Politics -   

1
Copies of Britain's former Prime Minister Tony Blair's book are seen displayed at a bookshop in London, Wednesday, Sept. 1, 2010. (AP / Kirsty Wigglesworth) A copy of Britain's former Prime Minister Tony Blair's newly-published book is seen outside a bookshop in central London, Wednesday, Sept. 1, 2010. (AP / Lefteris Pitarakis) Britain's former Prime Minister Tony Blair, left, stands beside then Prime Minister Gordon Brown in Northern Ireland at St. Paul's Cathedral in London, Wednesday Sept. 10, 2008.  (AP / Matt Dunham) Former prime ministers Jean Chretien, left and Paul Martin meet at the Liberal leadership convention Friday, Dec. 1, 2006 in Montreal. (Tom Hanson / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Blair memoir draws parallel to Chretien-Martin feud

Blair memoir draws parallel to Chretien-Martin feud

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV National News: Tom Kennedy on the memoir
Former British prime minister Tony Blair has released his memoir, and it contains some stark revelations involving his Labour Party rival Gordon Brown and former Canadian prime minister Jean Chretien.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (9) Facebook   

Copies of Britain's former Prime Minister Tony Blair's book are seen displayed at a bookshop in London, Wednesday, Sept. 1, 2010. (AP / Kirsty Wigglesworth) A copy of Britain's former Prime Minister Tony Blair's newly-published book is seen outside a bookshop in central London, Wednesday, Sept. 1, 2010. (AP / Lefteris Pitarakis) Britain's former Prime Minister Tony Blair, left, stands beside then Prime Minister Gordon Brown in Northern Ireland at St. Paul's Cathedral in London, Wednesday Sept. 10, 2008.  (AP / Matt Dunham) Former prime ministers Jean Chretien, left and Paul Martin meet at the Liberal leadership convention Friday, Dec. 1, 2006 in Montreal. (Tom Hanson / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Blair memoir draws parallel to Chretien-Martin feud

Photos

Copies of Britain's former Prime Minister Tony Blair's book are seen displayed at a bookshop in London, Wednesday, Sept. 1, 2010. (AP / Kirsty Wigglesworth)

View Larger Image

Date: Thu. Sep. 2 2010 8:56 AM ET

Rarely do political relationships mirror each other the way former British prime ministers Tony Blair and Gordon Brown and former Canadian prime ministers Jean Chretien and Paul Martin did.

The closely drawn parallel was something Blair noted too, in his memoir, "A Journey," released this week.

Much like how the sponsorship scandal dragged down Martin after he succeeded Chretien, Blair said Brown blamed him for the House of Lords donation scandal that threatened his new prime ministership.

Blair, the longest serving Labour prime minister in British history, said Brown "was in a venomous mood" when they met to discuss the transition of power.

"I can truthfully say it was the ugliest meeting we ever had.

"To be fair to (Brown), for some reason he thought this whole donations business had been a way of my leaving him with some frightful scandal, a sort of ticking bomb that would then wreck his leadership in the same way, as he put it to me, Jean Chrétien had done to Paul Martin in Canada," Blair writes.

"It was all nonsense, of course, but I think Gordon may have genuinely believed it," he added.

Martin had levelled similar accusations about Chretien in regards to the sponsorship scandal that eventually cost the Liberals in the 2006 election loss to the Conservatives.

Blair said he identified closely with his Canadian counterpart.

He describes Chretien as "a friend" and said the former Liberal prime minister "a very wise, wily and experienced old bird, great at international meetings, where he could be counted on to talk sense, and, as Canadians often are, firm and dependable without being pushy. All in all, a good guy and a very tough political operator not to be underestimated."

Blair also asked Chretien for advice, such as during an outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease in England.

"Watch that, young Tony, watch it very carefully. That's trouble," he recalls Chrétien telling him.

Blair has little to say about Martin however, despite their time in power overlapping for a little more than two years.

With the Canadian government under Chretien deciding not to join the Iraq invasion in 2003, Blair appears to be done discussing Canada, particularly when Martin became prime minister later that year.

Blair became prime minister in 1997, winning in a landslide election, and stepped down in June 2007. Like Chretien, he won three consecutive majority elections.

At 43, he was elected one of the youngest prime ministers in British history.

While he was initially elected on a largely domestic platform, such as carrying out regional devolution, the North Ireland peace accord and introducing the minimum wage, Blair's legacy will be shaped around his foreign and security policy.

Under Blair, British troops took part in both the Afghan and Iraqi wars, and his foreign policy was closely tied to the United States in the "War on Terror."

Comments are now closed for this story

Rick in NB, Ste Marie
said

It's gotta be tough being a new reformed conservative. Every time any world leader speaks about great Canadians they know or knew, it's always a Liberal. Come to think of it, what have the new reformed conservatives ever done to gain world recognition? Excuse me, i forgot the two billion dollar tea party, i'll never forget " Harper's Bizarre ".


Doug # BC
said

Ah! The good old days of Chretien and Martin.I think "Kowalski" has is right.If they made a movie of that time,it would have to be titled "Stan and Ollie Take Canada". Still,I'm not convinced the sponsorship theft was the sole reason Martin got the boot.While I am sure it helped get those clowns out of the drivers seat,less vote splitting on the political right surely played a part.Chretien and Martin had an easy ride because of the rise of the BLOC and a divided conservative vote.I think the last straw for me was when Chretien promised to retire,but then hung on for dear life.Of course Martin did himself no good by flip flopping on the promise to ditch the GST.And of course a finance minister who avoided taxes in Canada by running his business from off shore hardly improved the optics. It's disappointing to say this,but Canadians haven't had two decent choices in a federal election since before Trudeau's reign of terror and destruction.While I still believe Harper is the best choice on the ballot,I find it hard to believe he would be PM if there were any brains at all in the Liberal Party.How humiliating for Liberals to see thay can't even beat Harper.A decent man, but with all the charm of a house plant. Still,warts and all,I doub very much that either Brown or Chretien initiated what essentially was a "scorched earth" program for their successors. The only time I've really seen that was when the BC NDP saw they were in trouble almost a decade ago.They paid off all their lobbyists and public sector union buddies on their way out the door.A program that BC taxpayers are still paying for.


Pip
said

Interesting that Prof Pye Chart deliberately misquoted the article with regards to Foot AND Mouth disease, a very serious disease, as any stock farmer can attest. As one othe poster noted re Martin : . . . if you don't have anything good to say -- don't say anything at all." In the case of Foot and Mouth disease, Chretien was correct (much as I dislike THAT idea), as a very large proportion of the British cattle and sheep herd was destroyed in an effort to keep the spread of the disease down. Canada benefitted from that, selling live cattle and semen to help the beef industry over there.

Will
said

Prof: I couldn't have put it better myself. Although I think that Iggy is putting himself in contention for the same award.


Jim
said

I can see the comparision between Brown and Martin on this level, but there is an element to the Martin-Chretien story that isn't prevalent here. Chretien over-stayed his welcome, and the in-fighting cost the Liberals dearly. There is a time for everything, and Chretien should have stepped aside halfway through the third term so that Martin could have the shot he deserved at the title. It was, after all, Martin's fiscal policies that made Chretien so electable.


Bernadette
said

When Government is cought stilling tax payers money like Liberals did in the sponsorship scandal they are done like a Turkey. That was what dragged down Paul Martin after he succeded Chretion. And The samething happen to Tony Blair, Previous British PM. said Gordon Brown, BritishPM. He blamed Tony Blair for for the house of Lords's donations scandal.


Prof. Pye Chartt
said

I love that Chretien advised Blair with regard to foot-in-mouth disease. (Linguistically-challenged Chretien suffered from the political version himself, on an international scale.) I'm sure it comes as a bitter disappointment for Liberal supporters that Blair has nothing notably positive to say about financial "wizard" Paul Martin. (I didn't expect him to pay homage to the prevailing propagated myth, but, I thought perhaps he'd at least acknowledge Martin's excellence in creative accountancy and fiscal magic.) Oh, well. It was nice that a former British PM tipped his hat to one of our Liberal commanders, once actually voted "Canada's Most Embarrassing Person." Gives me a prideful tingle.


Kowalski
said

What is this, another liberal kumbaya story? So Blair and Chretien had a lot in common. Thats for sure. Both stripped their citizens of their rights and put them under the thumb of a corrupt socialist regime.


KJ in Kingston Ontario
said

So in respect to Paul Martin, I guess Blair decided to adhere to the well known principle of: if you don't have anything good to say -- don't say anything at all.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Politics Stories

Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper and his wife Laureen hold a panda bear at the Chongqing Zoo in Chongqing, China Saturday February 11, 2012. (THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld)

Prime Minister Harper wraps up visit to China

More   4 Comments 4  

Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper delivers a speech in Beijing on Wednesday, Feb. 8, 2012. (Adrian Wyld / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Harper changes gears in China to focus on education

More

Most Talked about Stories

I think he was pushed to take matters into his own hands. I have a teenage son and if he was involved with a drug dealer I would be furious and try anything to save him like this father did for his daughter. Why do police often say they can't do anything until it's too late? Whether it be a drug dealer or an abusive spouse, the police can't seem to do anything until something really bad happens. In this case they could have raided the drug dealers home and arrested him. The whole town knew what was going on in that house but yet the police chose to do nothing. Release this man and give him a medal for doing the right thing by his daughter. I can't wait to see the episode on W5, I will certainly be watching this one.

Shelley

W5: How far would you go to save your child?