Politics -   

1

Ban on hired guns will complicate Afghan exit: PM

Prime Minister Stephen Harper delivers an announcement on the second day of his five day northern tour, in Churchill, Man., Tuesday Aug. 24, 2010. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS)
Prime Minister Stephen Harper delivers an announcement on the second day of his five day northern tour, in Churchill, Man., Tuesday Aug. 24, 2010. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

View Larger Image

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (20) Facebook   

Date: Wednesday Aug. 25, 2010 7:41 AM ET

Prime Minister Stephen Harper says a ban on private security contractors in Afghanistan will "complicate" Canada's military exit from the country next year.

Afghan President Hamid Karzai announced last week that all private security contractors had to end their operations within four months.

His decree came months after Karzai promised Afghan voters that he would close down all private security operations in Afghanistan by the end of November 2011.

It is believed that as many as 40,000 people are working as private guards in Afghanistan.

But Karzai's aggressive timetable to put private security contractors out of business has left Harper concerned about how Ottawa will protect the diplomats and aid workers who will remain in Afghanistan beyond next year.

"I will certainly concede that President Karzai's recent decision will complicate some of those choices in the future but I'm not in a position today to answer those questions but we are working on them," he told reporters Tuesday at a news conference in Manitoba.

At the moment, private companies provide security at four Canadian operating bases in Afghanistan, which has cost Ottawa $9 million to provide this year.

Foreign Affairs also uses hired guards, but it not publicly known how much money that department spends on private security.

Canadian troops are due to pull out of Afghanistan in July of next year, an exit date the Harper government has said has been set in stone by parliamentary mandate.

But Ottawa has yet to decide precisely what its involvement in Afghanistan will be after the troops leave, other than it will be focused on diplomacy and development.

A recent Globe and Mail report published government documents that suggest Ottawa intends to spend up to $600 million to prevent Afghanistan from becoming a "haven for terrorists."

With files from The Canadian Press

Comments are now closed for this story

Mark Smith (Montreal, PQ)
said
0 0

I'd trust the military, with all its doctrine, safety protocols, etc, then a corporate militia. The last thing this world needs right now is corporate militias. Is the military perfect? No. But their motivations and obligations are far far different than a corporate militia. Karzai may be a bad leader, but he's right on the money with this one, trusting foreign, government run military than free-market corporate militias that have little to no oversight whatsoever.And if that means that Canada has to stay longer than so be it. Our soldiers could use the real life training when it comes time to defend the Arctic from Russia and Denmark and others. This will produce good officers who can better train new recruits.


Citizen
said
0 0

I am proud of the Government and our Military for the job they have done in Afghanistan. We carried more than our weight, and despite the disadvantages we had when the Chretien government sent us in, we have overcome them. However, the government did say we will be out by 2011 and has been very clear with Europe we aren't staying despite their efforts to change our minds. They don't want to carry their own weight in the region while Canada carried more than its share. This move by Karzi infuriates me, because it is another slap in the face to the governments who have helped him all this time. I do not believe this should effect our timetable to leave. Leave two small squads of troops at our embassy for security, but they don't leave it. They will be in the safe zones around Kabul and that shouldn't be an issue. Karzi will realize his mistake when countries don't allow his stupidity to effect their decisions.


Vanc Guy
said
0 0

At some point the people of any country have to stand up and make it their own. If the Afghans don't care - they'll get the Taliban back and there's nothing we can do about that. Except next time we should only drop bombs and not send any troops. We've done our best and sacrificed our best - now it's up to the Afghan people. If they have any honour - they won't have taken this for granted.


JPC
said
0 0

Unfortunatly letting them "sink" as was posted before will only endanger us once again at a future date. Letting countries thrive as failed states are terorist havens does bad things to those that live there and worse things for us. Maybe not now but in years to come.


Zaphod
said
0 0

Get out of Afghanistan NOW!We have NO business being there and never did.


Pip
said
0 0

Simon says (rather like a child's word game) that ". . . either Canada leaves or Canada stays". I cannot envisage Mr. Harper not obeying the parliamentary decision to be out in 2011. He gains politically by getting us out on time, and if Liberals and NDP insist we stay he can point to their duplicity, again for political gain. As for toeing Obama's line, isn't that the Liberals' job? If Mr. Karzai wants to ban private guards - some companies there in hundreds, it is his right as "leader" of that unfortunate company to do so, even if it is a matter of "biting the hand that feeds you".


Jim in the West
said
0 0

Karzi should be removed, as he is as great an obstacle to the future of Afganistan as is the Taliban, but his issue with "contractors" is bit more murky. Modern mercenaries have far less...respectability and much smaller moral compasses than those that came before them. There was a time when mercs were professional soldiers AND good men.


CraigW
said
0 0

Hard to believe, Harper going back on his word.


Chris in Kingston
said
0 0

If we cut Afghanistan to the wolves and it falls, what does that say the 151 Canadian Soldiers and Diplomat Glyn Berry died for? Letting the people of Afghanistan suffer because you don't like the way Karzai is playing hardball is not a solution. He's only trying to show that Afghanistan isn't a puppet of the US/NATO to his people, thats why this private security ban seems very outlandish. It will complicate things, but our troops are the very best in the world, and the job will get done with or without private security.


NS
said
0 0

@ London Ont.Of course we could use our battle groups for base security, but then we would not have troops for quick reaction force, planned operations, escorting police, doctors, VIPs, escorting convoys, and regular army taskings. If you have no idea what you are commenting on, sometimes better to play the strong silent type.


Gaidheal
said
0 0

If we leave before we finish the job, then all who have died so far have died in vain.


HR
said
0 0

@KJ, He is the president of Afghanistan. He is and should be faithful to Afghans more than anyone else. It stupid to think because we invaded a country and "set them free", their administration must be puppets of our liking.


goldens
said
0 0

Harper wil have to give the security guards tempoary staus as Canadian Police overseas.Not a big deal!John Wilson, Bridgetown NS


Just saying, London Ontario
said
0 0

At the moment, private companies provide security at four Canadian operating bases in Afghanistan, which has cost Ottawa $9 million to provide this year.This quote alone says it all.Why are we paying this amount of money? We have troops in Afghanistan that can protect our people. I think our resources should be put to protecting our own.


J.C.
said
0 0

One has to wonder about Karzai and what his true intentions are. Is he trying to stop the forces from leaving or is there another agenda on his mind. I'm sorry to say but i think maybe after the 2011 exit of our troups we should stop all work as well as all diplomatic persons in that country and merely let them find out what the consequentions of their actions are. No sense wasting money on a country that seems to have no idea of what is needed to help them. Better to spend the money here in this country where it would be more welcome. Karzai's rules for help have been a continuous hinderance on the very countries trying to help.


Mark Palmer
said
0 0

We need to get out of there completely and now. Leave them to themselves. Not one more Canadian should die over there.


simon
said
0 0

"But many in the defence community have suggested the Harper government is waiting for a U.S. progress report on the war, expected later this year, before finalizing Canada's plans." OBVIOUSLY, our "Leader" is waiting for OBAMA to LEAD. Karzai, the Leader of a sovereign country has made his decision, No hired guns. Harper has a simple choice. Either Canada LEAVES in July of 2011 or Canada STAYS! As simple as that!


good morning
said
0 0

I odviously can not comment on what is going on inside of Afganistan, but what I can say is that: I think it is a very important mission, I trust the leadership on this mission, and I really hope something gets worked out so that the world is no longer in an us(the free/diplomatic) and them(the non-free/non-diplomatic) condition.


ed Nonymous
said
0 0

Canadians have died for a thankless country. Afghanistan needs to be cut loose... let them sink or swim with their own blood.


KJ in Kingston Ontario
said
0 0

It really puzzles me why Karzai is being allowed to kick sand in the faces of the leaders to which he owes his position as leader. He is more of a problem than solution to the problems there. His lack of legitimacy, corruption and incompetence handicap the NATO side in an already difficult, if not impossible cause. As has often been said before, there are probably only four possible outcomes in Afghanistan: lose big, lose small, lose fast or lose slow.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

CTV News

Soldiers with the Canadian Army's 1st Battalion Royal 22nd Regiment return to base on their final operation Thursday, June 30, 2011 in the Panjwaii district of Kandahar province, Afghanistan. (AP Photo/David Goldman)

Canada in Afghanistan

The latest news, photos and interactives from Canada's mission in Afghanistan.

Canadian Soldiers were injured when a Light Armoured Vehicle (LAV) Turret struck an on coming vehicle, outside Kandahar City, causing it to rotate 360 degrees wounding the two Canadian soldiers. (Cpl. Robin Mugridge / Department of National Defence)

Invisible Wounds

Angela Mulholland: Scope of injury toll in Afghanistan largely a mystery

Brain injuries among soldiers are often overlooked.

Blast-Induced Injuries

Brain injuries among soldiers serving in Afghanistan are often overlooked.

Doctor Louis-Philippe Palerme, right, from Gatineau, Quebec, is assisted by a Danish doctor, Captain Sacha Soelbeck, during a surgery at R3 MMU in Afghanistan.

Medical Advances

Soldiers survived injuries that, even 10 years ago, would have been fatal.

Cpl. Chris Klodt sits in a race chair. Klodt was shot in the neck July 7, 2006 during a Taliban ambush outside Kanadhar. The bullet was lodged in his spinal cord.

Soldiers Overcome Injuries

Wounded soldiers use sports to overcome injuries, adjust to their new reality.

Janis Mackey Frayer in Sperwan Ghar, Afghanistan

Kandahar Journal

Janis Mackey Frayer recounts sombre process of notifying next of kin.

Interactive

War Zone Medics

Lessons Learned

A number of the medical innovations that we now take for granted were conceived and tested during wartime.

Bios and Pictures

Casualties

Canadian Casualties

We remember those who lost their lives in Afghanistan since the mission began in 2002.

In Pictures

Canada's Last Days in Afghanistan

Concluding Combat

50 Pictures: Canadian troops conclude Afghan combat tour after a decade.

Kandahar transfer ceremony

Transfer Ceremony

In Pictures: Canada transfers control of Kandahar region to the U.S

Harper in Afghanistan

Harper in Afghanistan

25 Pictures: Stephen Harper meets with soldiers on his fourth Afghan trip.

Canada in Kandahar

Canada in Kandahar

30 Pictures: New tasks tackled as combat mission nears its end.

Operation Topak Shkar

Operation Topak Shkar

Canadian troops take on the Taliban in Operation Topak Shkar.

Today's Politics Stories

Quebec student strikes, tuition fees, Montreal, Quebec

Quebec students, government to resume talks Monday

More   27 Comments 27    4 Video(s) 4

Newfoundland and Labrador Premier Kathy Dunderdale receives applause from party members as the House of Assembly opens in St. John's on Monday, March 5, 2012. (Paul Daly /  THE CANADIAN PRESS)

EI changes unfair to N.L., Dunderdale says

More   20 Comments 20    1 Video(s) 1

In this Monday, Sept. 19, 2011 file photo, Fereidoun Abbasi Davani speaks during a news conference at the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna, Austria. (AP Photo/Ronald Zak)

Iran says no reason to halt 20 per cent enrichment

More   8 Comments 8  

Most Talked about Stories

It is about time - as a grandparent I have watched our kids (who were allowed to fail although I do remember some nagging on our part) learn, I have watched our children now micro-manage their children. A big part of it is the fact that there are predators out there and an extreme reluctance on the parents part to alllow freedom that might result in the children becoming victims.

Harvey

Parents must learn to stop meddling, author urges