Politics -   

1
British MP George Galloway gives an interview to a television station in London, Friday, Jan. 29, 2010. (AP / Alastair Grant)

Hearing into ban on Brit MP Galloway delayed

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV News Channel: Tom Clark, host, Power Play
MPs focused on the secrecy surrounding the alleged lobbying of former MP Rahim Jaffer, as well as a hearing into the ban on British MP George Galloway that has been delayed until Wednesday.
Question Period: NDP Leader Jack Layton
The NDP questioned the government involvement in denying British MP George Galloway entry to Canada, as well as further asking about the alleged lobbying activities by former MP Rahim Jaffer.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (54) Facebook   

British MP George Galloway gives an interview to a television station in London, Friday, Jan. 29, 2010. (AP / Alastair Grant)

Photos

British MP George Galloway gives an interview to a television station in London, Friday, Jan. 29, 2010. (AP / Alastair Grant)

View Larger Image

Date: Mon. Apr. 26 2010 8:12 PM ET

A Federal Court hearing to examine why British MP George Galloway was denied entry to Canada has been put on hold until Wednesday.

Galloway's lawyer, Barbara Jackman, suffered a foot injury before a hearing scheduled for Monday morning, which sparked the delay.

She was taken to hospital. It's unclear how the injury occurred.

The hearing is supposed to examine why Galloway, an outspoken advocate for Palestinian rights and critic of the war in Afghanistan, was barred from entering Canada in March, 2009, ahead of a four-city Canadian speaking tour.

Protesters on both sides of the issue got into a shouting match outside the Toronto courthouse where the hearing was set to be held.

An alliance of peace groups chanting about free speech squared off against other groups that waved Canadian and Israeli flags and screamed: "Stop supporting terrorists."

James Clark was protesting as a member of the Defend Free Speech Campaign.

"This decision to ban George Galloway was political interference that has attempted to stifle discussion about what is happening in Gaza, what's happening in Afghanistan," he said.

"This could be a precedent-setting legal case that has an impact on whether or not the minister will continue to intervene in the free speech rights of Canadians like this in the future."

At the time, the government said the decision was made because of allegations that Galloway had financially supported Hamas, a group that Canada defines as a terrorist organization.

The Canada Border Services Agency said Galloway was not allowed into the country because he was involved with an aid convoy of clothing, medical supplies, relief money and vehicles to Hamas, the elected government in Gaza. The agency also said he had donated of three vehicles and $44,000 to Prime Minister Ismail Haniya.

On Monday, Galloway described the ban as an "entirely bogus construction by a very right-wing and fanatically pro-Israel Canadian government," during a talk-radio interview.

It "defies common sense and logic" that he is able to travel in the U.S. and can sit in the British Parliament but is unable to enter Canada.

The case sparked an uproar about freedom of speech, and led to questions about whether Kenney's office played a direct role in the decision.

Several internal emails leading up to the ban reveal that Kenney's office opposed his visit. The minister's spokesman, Alykhan Velshi, wrote that Kenney would not reverse the ban because of "the kind of things George Galloway advocates."

On CTV's Power Play, Tory MP Rick Dykstra denied that Kenney's office exercised any undue influence on the decision to keep the British MP out.

"This is the CBSA's responsibility," Dykstra said on CTV's Power Play. "At the end of the day, whether you're providing information, whether you're providing advice, whatever you may be doing. The CBSA has a final say."

Galloway has denied supporting terrorism. In comments he made recently to the Globe and Mail, he insisted that he didn't give money to Hamas. He said he gave it to the ministry of health in Gaza to pay the salaries of doctors and nurses who hadn't been paid.

He called it "a symbolic donation" and said he remained proud of it.

Galloway told the newspaper that he believed the real reason he was denied entry is because the Canadian government is afraid of his views on Afghanistan.

"The Canadian people know that the blood of their soldiers is being spent and the treasure of their treasury is being spent in a doomed enterprise," he said.

Barred from entering the country, Galloway was able to address Canadian supporters by video link about his opposition to the war in Afghanistan and his humanitarian support for people in Gaza.

His supporters tried and failed to win a last-minute emergency injunction to allow Galloway into Canada. Still, the Federal Court decided that the case was worthy of a full hearing.

With files from The Canadian Press

Comments are now closed for this story

Earl T Brown
said

Any sob who has been friends of dictators , terrorists and tyrants is more than welcome to have his say ..... from the comfort of his own damned country!! Stay the hell out of Canada.


Streel
said

Let the man speak. What are you all afraid of? Isn't this why our ancestors went to war?


Robert Brown
said

When the Zionist organisation "Irgun" whose leader was Menachem Begin, a future PM of Israel,bombed the King David hotel in Jerusalem in 1946, killing 91, they were called Freedom Fighters, as were the Hungarians in the 1960's when they rose up against the Soviets.When the democraticaly elected government of Gaza rise up against their Israeli oppressors, their leaders,Hamas, are vilified as terrorists.Go figure.


j. brown
said

Maybe Kenney should look to what the future will bring before he has such a knee jerk reaction to someone like Galloway. Saying in the Commons that he gives tens of thousands of pound to Hamas who kill innocent people, when in fact he was just paying the wages of doctors working in the West Bank, is shameful and misleading.But that is the small minded Conservative way judging by their campaign ads. Always attack with misleading information and let the uneducated, simple-minded voters jump at the bait.Guergis fiaco, Galloway fiasco, the G 20 fiasco coming up. God bless the poor police officers who will have to do Harper's dirty work in Toronto.


Karl
said

If we let the PM of Israel or the US President in Canada, why not let this man in order for ALL OF US to hear the other side?


Fred - Brandon MB
said

Galloway has the right to speak freely at home. We have enough trouble makers and hate-spreading, terrorist-loving nut-bars already. He is not welcome here.


canadian reader
said

See ochaopt.org, the UN's Protection of Civilians Weekly Report.Perhaps begin with April 15, which includes information about the IDF entering primary schools. I care. End the siege of Gaza.End the occupation of Palestine. Israel must comply with the 1947 resolution which gave it status.


Acroyear
said

@ Rick: I personally believe that no one should be allowed to stand on a street corner and advocate the murder of innocent Israelis...or Palestinians… or Martians for that matter. Same as you’re not allowed to yell “Fire!” in a crowded theater. While I feel that judges and some political boides have too much power to curb free speech, there does have to be SOME limits: If you feel stopping someone from using free speech to provoke a murder or even a mass murder is wrong then you are entitled to your opinion and I will take it under advisement. I for one see a huge difference between stopping that and the “censorship” of what is simply an unpopular opinion. Having said that? I still think no one person should have the power to decide which is which. It should be a matter of clearly defined federal law, not the ‘opinion’ or prejudices of any single person.


dean in NL
said

this is not a question of free speach. it is a question of terrorism and the supporters of terriorism. this man proudly proclaimed that he had given donations to the government of the gaza strip that being hammas. hammas is a terrorist organization dedicated to the erradication of Isreal and the convertion of non believers to islam by the sword. so no a dirty terrorist lap dog is not welcome in free countries.


James in Toronto
said

I am an extreme progressive. I am the very definition of left wing. Yet I cannot think of any reason why we should allow this bozo into our country. What purpose would it serve? This is one of the few things are government is doing that I am 100% on board with.


Rick in NB, Ste Marie
said

@ Acroyear, as soon as you use the words " as long as he isn't " or " as long de does not advocate ". You are guilty of censorship. That it thats all.


L
said

I agree with free speech, but I also agree with our country's right to not allow terrorists or those who support them into our country. This is being made into a free speech issue instead of a terrorist issue. When Coulter came to speak everyone was quick to point out our hate laws etc., we also have anti-terrorism laws which must be abided by. If this guy supported Hamas, which is what he was accused of, then don't let him in. If he can prove he wasn't, and that the charity he supported was a legitimate organization and not simply a front for support of Hamas, then let him in. However, I would rather our government take the time to find out if he is supporting terrorists rather than let him in just cause he says so. Entering Canada is a privilege, not a right, and our government has the duty to protect us from potential terrorists or their supporters. Its already too easy to enter Canada, the more vigilance the government shows the better.


LP
said

@Peter in MBRead the article, there were a bunch of right wing protesters at the court house. The way you people talk you would think it's 1952. Hollering about a proud white gun toting conservative, doesn't make you look like a nut. I'm going to go throw up now.


Bert, Elmira
said

It's funny to see the liberals supporting this doorknob, while in the same breath they yell & scream about Ann Coulter. Do as I say, not as I do, I guess.


LP
said

What a sad, sad country we now live in. It has been known since he was first denied access to the country that the money he donated was to a hospital in Gaza. But then again who has time to check facts, right? Are we being taken over by confederate flag waving Americans? Oh, wait the U.S. let him in. @ Mr. Chartt. You are right I should probobly stop reading your comments, you make me sick.


Jim in Ottawa
said

This is not a 'freedom of speech' issue. Nobody is preventing Mr Galloway from expressing his views no matter how disturbing they may be. The issue here has to do with violating Canadian laws with regards to providing financial support to a terrorist group that is banned in Canada. I encourage all posting their opinions on this site to please be objective and mindful of that basic fact before posting off-topic biased nonsense onto this site.


Dr. M
said

It's true to argue that Galloway doesn't have a right to enter Canada- no one does, unless he/she is a Canadian citizen. That said, this issue isn't about Galloway's right to speak, but about our right as Canadian citizens to listen to whomever we choose to listen to, a necessary corollary to the right to speak. I don't want this government, or any government, to decide for me whom I can listen to . As for the charge that he supports Hamas, I don't see how that's the same as giving money to doctors and nurses, a purely humanitarian gesture. In any case, why should the claim that someone supports a "terrorist organization" mean that that person has no right to speak? Maybe we should listen to what so-called "terrorist" supporters have to say- it might make us more informed about the relative merits of the arguments from both sides. I'll make up my own mind, thank you- I don't need the government to do it for me.


back and to the left
said

Prof. Pye Chartt, I know of two misguided drama queens on the political right. Ann Coulter and you and it is a toss-up as to who should be wearing the tiara. What would ctv.ca be without Prof. Pye Chartt's daily whimpers?


Allan Eizinas
said

The latest evidence on this Galloway fiasco is that Jason Kenny, that right wing Reformer in Conservative cabinet clothing is the one who put the stop to the visit. Jason pointed his finger at the Canadian Border Services and claimed that it was the usual “process’. The C.B.S. points their finger back at him and has documentation to prove political interference form Kenney. I guess those old Reformer’s figure they will dictate who Canadians can listen to and who they can’t be trusted to hear. Pity.


Acroyear
said

@ Rick in NB...think you miss understood me bud: I assume you refer to this line: "(if not as wide ranging as I'd personally like) " What that means is that I think there should be WIDER and MORE free speech in this country. Government and the Judges can clamp down it far easier than they should. I am saying I completely disagree with Galloway... but this is a democracy... and so long as he isn't advocating terrorism (which from what I've seen and read for myself he isn't) than he should be allowed to say whatever he likes. I sure as heck am no fan of any one person being a sensor...hell I don't trust a committee to do ti right, let alone some civil servant, no matter how well intentioned!


Dean in NL
said

Free speach? i dont have a problem with his "message" he is entitled to his opinion. I happen to not agree with him and it is my opinion that he is a freaking idiot. but that's my opinion. as for the reason he has been denied acces to Canada, if you give money to a terrorist organization, even as a "humanitarian" gesture you are supporting terrorism. if you actively support terrorism with money, material, or other means you are actively working against our men and women in uniform who are waging a war on these scumbags and you are not welcome in our country!


Sue McPherson, Oshawa
said

Pam wrote: "Just because the US let him in doesn't mean we have to do the same thing."No of course not. But he is a member of the British Parliament. He's not going to kill anyone. He's not a terrorist, and he does have an explanation of where that money was going, that some Canadian made a point of saying it was to support terrorists. The US let him into their country. They know he's not a threat. Somebody has made an unsubstantiated claim here and Immigration decided to go with it.


Pam
said

Sue - in OttawaJust because the US let him in doesn't mean we have to do the same thing. This has been proven before with other people that we have let in and then the US have a great time making fun of how Canada is so slow in recognizing the bad. Remember all the bad publicity of 911. They forget that they also let in undesirables. How many of you have lived through a war caused by antagonists. HMM! Hitler maybe??!!


David Cohen
said

Reading most of the comments actually sadden me, as I only knew my society and culture as a culture that charish freedom and a society that was proud of the thoughts of our very founders. If I may quote Voltaire saying, "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." This is what has made us what we are today.


Fred - Brandon MB
said

He has no right to come into this country as a foreigner. He can ask permission, and we can say "no". He has no constitutional to come to Canada and spread hate.


Rick in NB, Ste Marie
said

@ Acroyear, so your saying that George Galloway should be allowed to speak, but only if you're the cencor. You have a unique understanding of free speech Acro.


allan
said

Galloway supports terrorism, which doesnt mind killing children, women, the elderly, anybody that cannot defend themselves, therefore his supporters who want him to speak here, also support terrorists, period. They would welcome Adoph Hitler, Osama Bin Laden, etc,. It is time we stuck up for what is right and do not give these cockroaches a platform to spread their vile.


Mark
said

Some people are comparing Coulter to Galloway. But Coulter has not given financial support to UN recognized terrorist organizations. Galloway has and has proudly admitted so. To compare the two is wrong. But then again, try and tell a leftist that.


Peter in MB
said

@ Prof. Pye Chartt Its funny how all the left wing liberals / (special interest groups) always seem to have time to protest People like Ann Coulter. Wow it must be nice to have all this spare time. I myself being A white male, right of center, gun owning conservative, would love to set up a protest. But I don’t have the time or money because I am always working 40 hours a week and have a mortgage to pay. I guess that’s why there are no “attention-seeking mass of tender-hearted and misguided drama queens on the political right” because we are to busy working to care.


Craig
said

If you let Ann Coulter in, George Galloway should also be allowed.The right in this country is so hypocritical.


Johnnie Oil
said

I just hope the Ottawa U free speech deniers and the Regina 16 greet him the same as they to Ann C, but I doubt it as it's cool for the liberal elite left to support terrorist groups and to condem isreal, christians


Edmonton Vic
said

Why do we want him here? Is his country so perfect that he has to come over here to tell us how bad we are? Sir stay away and oh by the way if you do come here can you take the CBC & The Toronto Star back home with you?


Jim
said

Why would he come to Canada now, when he's facing an election?


Carl
said

This is not an issue of free speech. He was not banned because of his offensive and foolish beliefs. Rather, he was banned from entering Canada because he has provided material support to a banned terrorist organization. Such laws must be applied equally. Being a British MP does make one exempt from Canadian law.


Durward
said

This has nothing to do with free speech, Galloway finances terrorism.Let him in but only as a private citizen with no diplomatic immunity then arrest the creep for financing terrorism and send him back in chains as a message to other European far left-wing terrorist supporting idiots that you are not welcome in Canada!


Wade Ens
said

Look at his crowd what a fan base.


Tyrone: Keep Gallowa OUT
said

Even the Liberal party of Canada accused Isreal of War Crimes then apologised later trying to play both sides of the fence. Those courting the Muslim vote like Galloway and the Liberal Party just have to accuse Isreal of War Crimes etc. The fact is if the Palestinians laid down their arms there would be peace, if Isreal laid down it's arms there would be genocide. Iran funds the Palestinian terrorist organization Hamas and Hezbollah to tie up resources of the western world to keep the cash following the terrororists have to lob bombs into Isreal. The terrorists doing this just do it for money and Iran does it so the resource stealing senate of unelected senators the Komanies can keep stealing.


T. Hull, Toronto
said

It would be interesting to cross-reference the commenters who vigorously defended the cause of "free speech" during Ann Coulter's recent visit, but who will now insist that George Galloway be barred from entering the country.


peter in MB
said

If you are invited to a dinner party and think you have the right to be belligerent, rude and insult the host and the other guests then don’t complain when don’t ever get invited back. It amazes me just how many people in this country quote the charter of rights a freedoms (free speech) but seem to not read or understand a section called “limitations”


Prof. Pye Chartt
said

Only a political bubblehead draws a direct parallel between Ann Coulter and George Galloway. Mr. Galloway was disallowed entry into our country based upon allegations that he financially supported a terrorist organization (Hamas). His views weren't the issue. For her part, owing to her natural bitterness (as an American) over 9/11, Ms. Coulter regularly puts forth anti-terrorist sentiment that fingers Muslims as "owning" the threat, and the Muslim community at large as quietly avoiding any responsibility to "out" extremist members. (Her famous line, in context: "All Muslims may not be terrorists, but all terrorists are Muslim.") Labeling this position, along with sharp humor directed at despised liberals and lefties, as "hate" is goofy and displays an ignorance of "hate speech" in Canada as defined under law. If no credible facts and information support the claim that Mr. Galloway is/was a financial supporter of Hamas, then I suspect he will be speaking on our soil soon enough...at which time you likely won't see an attention-seeking mass of tender-hearted and misguided drama queens on the political right (there aren't any) physically wigging-out over his public thoughts and opinions.


Donna
said

Its funny how they allow a racist like Ann Colter to speak in canada and spread her crap but they wont allow Galloway in.He knows the world,he knows the truth but the Harper government I guess doesnt want to hear the truth.Strange.


SANDIE_b
said

do we really need that kind of trouble here?? let him stay where he is.


A. M.
said

What's wrong with our beloved country?We allow pro-war, pro-hate, pro-racism speakers in our UNIVERSITIES, and we prevent anti-war, anti-racism, peace activists & humanitarians from entering the country?I thought I was in Canada....


Sue McPherson, Oshawa
said

Looks like some people are scared of what Georger might say, and how Canadians might take to him. He's a member of Parliament in the UK, and was able to travel in the US. What is the matter with Canadians? Let him in!


Dan from Northern Ont
said

When you give money to organizations shunned by the international community, don't expect the red carpet.


10-78
said

Why do we (Canada) have to extend "Freedom of Speech" to a visitor? Galloway can say whatever he wants at home and from home (TV/Internet) but if we as a country decide he is not welcome to say it on OUR soil then, too bad for him. This is not a case for the courts. The government made a decision based on the fact that Canadian's don't support terrorism (Hamas). I don't see a significant number of Canadian's that want him here and our government has made a decision based on this.


SWD
said

Sure, why not. This is what freedom of speech is all about. If they start to ban Galloway now, who will they ban in the future and on what grounds. Debate always requires two parties. If you stop one side of the discussion then you might as well put on jack boots and do the goose step!


Hugh---PEI
said

Hey Jim: I do not know this man or you , but I would have to assume that there are people who would want to hear what he has to say as about as much what you have to say . Try to have a nice day.


Gerry
said

Keep Galloway away i see the left wing eastern canadian media would like him in the C.BC.send them both away.


Acroyear
said

I have seen his speeches, and I disagree with virtually every word he says, at least the words I have personally seen and heard. Having said that we do have free speech in this country (if not as wide ranging as I'd personally like) and he should be allowed to speak. So long as he does not advocating supporting the terrorists Hamas but rather says to donate directly to legitimate Palestinian relief funds to give humanitarian aid than I have no problem with him saying that Afghanistan is waste of lives and money. I disagree...but a healthy democracy needs to air all sides of an argument so we can make informed decisions.


Dallas collins
said

Yes please stay in Britain,another waste of tax dollars going to court.


bill in Ottawa
said

And yet there was such an UPROAR when people protested against a bona fide conservative hate monger like what's-her-name who blatantly insulted our entire country and our values....nice...where are the the vitriolic free speech advocates now?


Francis
said

I care about people being free to say what they want to. If you ban one person, you virtually ban everyone.


Jim-Surrey
said

Oh tell him to stay in Britain, does anyone really care what he has to say?????


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Politics Stories

Quebec student strikes, tuition fees, Montreal, Quebec

Quebec students, government to resume talks Monday

More   27 Comments 27    4 Video(s) 4

Newfoundland and Labrador Premier Kathy Dunderdale receives applause from party members as the House of Assembly opens in St. John's on Monday, March 5, 2012. (Paul Daly /  THE CANADIAN PRESS)

EI changes unfair to N.L., Dunderdale says

More   20 Comments 20    1 Video(s) 1

In this Monday, Sept. 19, 2011 file photo, Fereidoun Abbasi Davani speaks during a news conference at the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna, Austria. (AP Photo/Ronald Zak)

Iran says no reason to halt 20 per cent enrichment

More   8 Comments 8  

Most Talked about Stories

It is about time - as a grandparent I have watched our kids (who were allowed to fail although I do remember some nagging on our part) learn, I have watched our children now micro-manage their children. A big part of it is the fact that there are predators out there and an extreme reluctance on the parents part to alllow freedom that might result in the children becoming victims.

Harvey

Parents must learn to stop meddling, author urges