Top Stories -   

1
About 500 people watch a video screen as British MP George Galloway is broadcast live from New York in the Metropolitan United Church in Toronto on Monday, March 30, 2009. (Darren Calabrese / THE CANADIAN PRESS) About 500 people watch a video screen as British MP George Galloway is broadcast live from New York in the Metropolitan United Church in Toronto on Monday, March 30, 2009. (Darren Calabrese / THE CANADIAN PRESS) George Galloway gestures after having crossed with his entourage from Egypt through the Rafah border crossing to Gaza, in Gaza City, Monday, March 9, 2009. (AP / Ashraf Amra) Dylan Penner, with Ottawa Peace Assembly, tapes a poster of British MP George Galloway on a downtown Ottawa street post on Thursday March 26, 2009. (Fred Chartrand / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

George Galloway moves to Plan B: video link

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV Toronto: Galit Solomon on the address
Controversial British MP George Galloway was able to address a Toronto audience as scheduled despite being refused entry to Canada by a Federal Court judge.
CTV Toronto: Chris Eby on the ruling to uphold the ban on George Galloway's entry into Canada
George Galloway will be speaking to Torontonians on Monday, but just not in Toronto. A judge refused to overrule a ruling by border officials keeping the British MP from entering Canada. Chris Eby reports.
CTV Newsnet: Hadayt Nazami, Galloway's lawyer, explains why the decision isn't a win for the government
The judge's ruling on Monday was 'interlocutory injunction' responding to Galloway's lawyers asking for a ruling before a decision is made on the merits of the case. The judge found the case is so complex, a final decision would have to be made on the regular court date.
CTV Newsnet: Bernie Farber, Canadian Jewish Congress, on the decision and whether this is an issue of free speech
The Canadian Jewish Congress welcomes the decision and points out that although it has occasionally been characterized as a free-speeh issue, it is not. The issue, they say, is about Galloway's alleged donations to Hamas, and the fact he will still speak via tele-link shows it isn't about the freedom of speech.
CTV Newsnet: Laith Marouf, Solidarity for Palestinian Human Rights on the next step for Galloway
Controversial British MP George Galloway will not be allowed into Canada to deliver a series of anti-war speeches, a Federal Court judge has ruled.
CTV Newsnet: Chris Eby with details on the ruling and what it means for Galloway's planned appearance
George Galloway had been at a New York airport, waiting to be allowed to enter Canada. The judge's decision prevents him from doing so, but he will still speak at a planned gathering via teleconference.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (231) Facebook   

Date: Mon. Mar. 30 2009 10:28 PM ET

A Federal Court upheld a decision to block outspoken British MP George Galloway from entering Canada, but organizers of his speaking tour had a back-up plan Monday: he appeared in Toronto via video link.

Roughly 500 people gathered inside the city's Metropolitan United Church to hear -- and watch -- Galloway speak on a large screen.

Although the speech focused on the war in Afghanistan and the most recent conflict in the Gaza Strip, Galloway frequently mocked Immigration Minister Jason Kenney.

Although the decision to block Galloway was made by Canadian Border Services Agency, Kenney has said he will not intervene in the ruling.

"Come out and debate me like a man, Jason Kenney," Galloway said at one point. The speech was broadcast from New York.

After a judge upheld CBSA's ruling, organizers for Galloway's speaking tour said they did not want to try to escort him across the border.

"We're not interested in doing anything illegal whatsoever," organizer James Clark, a peace activist, told The Canadian Press.

"Our expectations were such that we were already implementing Plan B, which was to make sure that he can still deliver the speech from a live broadcast."

Earlier Monday, Justice Luc Martineau delivered a 14-page ruling that upheld a decision by Canadian Border Services Agency to block Galloway, who is currently in the United States.

"A fundamental principle of immigration law is that non-citizens do not have an unqualified right to enter in Canada," wrote Martineau.

"The admission of a foreign national to this country is a privilege determined by statute, regulation or otherwise, and not a matter of right."

Parliament has given CBSA officers the right to determine who is admissible, he said.

Martineau wrote while there have been serious arguments raised against the decision to keep Galloway out, "a proper factual record and the benefit of full legal argument" are missing.

The applicants didn't meet the necessary legal tests for him to issue an order allowing Galloway entry, the judge wrote.

Earlier this month, border security officials deemed Galloway inadmissible saying he was guilty of providing material support for terrorism.

Galloway had been part of a caravan that had delivered humanitarian aid to Gaza following the Israeli military incursion there. He also gave a $45,000 donation to Hamas, which the government said in a letter to the MP is a banned terrorist organization in this country.

Last week, Galloway told CTV's Power Play that ambulances and medical supplies must be delivered through Hamas because they are the democratically elected government in the Gaza Strip. He also said he does not support Hamas.

The Canadian Jewish Congress praised the court's decision Monday. In a written statement, CJC Co-President Sylvain Abitbol said "Canadians fully understand that fundraising for international terrorism puts us all at risk here at home and endangers our brave troops fighting terrorism on the front lines overseas."

Laith Marouf, chapter co-ordinator for Solidarity for Palestinian Human Rights, and one of the organizers for Galloway's Canadian visit, said the British MP had no other option but to deal with Hamas.

"When (officials) enter Gaza, they have to deal with the democratically elected government of the people, which happens to be Hamas," he told CTV Newsnet.

"So even the Red Cross and the Red Crescent, when they go in and want to work in a hospital, they have to deal with the government that is there... It's a bit ironic that the Canadian Jewish Congress thinks that the Red Cross and Red Crescent and others are allowed to work in Palestine, but Mr. Galloway is not."

What's next for Galloway?

Galloway was initially scheduled to speak in person Monday night before a Toronto audience, followed by appearances in Ottawa, Montreal and Mississauga, Ont. in the coming days.

Organizers had been planning a solidarity caravan to meet Galloway at the border Monday morning.

"The caravan was planned before we knew the Federal Court decision would drag out until today," Marouf said Monday.

Galloway, who has previously spoken in Canada, most recently in 2006, is a controversial figure.

His opposition to the Iraq war got him kicked out of the British Labour Party in 2003, but he won re-election in 2005 running under the banner of his Respect party.

The Scottish MP's performance on Capital Hill in 2005 was one for the ages. He called the panel of senators grilling him about allegations he had accepted bribes from the regime of deposed Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein.

He called them a "lickspittle Republican committee" and accused them of "the mother of all smoke screens."

In 2007, the British parliament's lower house suspended him for 18 days based on allegations he had concealed his dealings with the Hussein regime with respects to a charity he had established.

Galloway said his attackers were being hypocrites because no British political party asked people who donated to them where the money had come from.

With files from The Canadian Press

Comments are now closed for this story

Conservattive Canadian
said

Terry S.

So if free speech isn't important, you won't mind if I tell you that you have no right to post here anymore. As you say, there are too many opinions anyway.


As for the government "caring" enough to impose its views, good point. Nothing better than a dictator to care for the people and tell them what to think. It makes being conservative so easy...


jay
said

TRENT
I know some people think the charter of rights applies to non canadians.That is not the case sao no free speech does not apply here.Should he have been allowed in yes and if he says anything then arrest him if not so no big deal.


Gord
said

This is not a question of freedom of speech. All of these people who think the government should allow George Galloway in would they open their arms to Osama bin Laden also? He also has a "point of view" and is just trying to help who he sees as being downtrodden. No I do think the government has a right and a responsibility to set criteria on who is welcome and just as importantly, who is not.


bad press
said

Yes we have the RIGHT to deny him entry...but did we not just draw thousands of people to his ideas by publicly keeping him out?

I don't think his words are a reason to keep him out, but if the allegations that he gave money to terrorist groups are true (and who knows..?) then he should stay out...

In any event this guy is little threat to us...it is funny to see us far right of the US all of a sudden...


AlbertaBoy111
said

John Rennie Wrote,
"Why is it that when an undesirable is not allowed in Canada - he/she gets to take us to Court at our expense in our country??????????? What would China, Russia or any other country do in the same instance - you guessed it....nothing!!! We should do the same!!!"

Thats exactly the point. Do you want Canada to be more like Russia and China? Really? Because I for one don't I think we should be moving as far away as possible from the way those countries govern themselves and the rights they take away from their citizens. I mean China blocks youtube whenever something on it disagrees with their party views. Is that what you really want for Canada? Guess it explains Harpers power base.


Cindi Latimer
said

so, by my understandings...hamas has been elected into power by the people of Palestine. Israel killed over 1200 palestinian people to get to Hamas at the beginning of this year, and the palestinians killed less than 20 Israelis. Now granted,Palestine was shooting in rockets (with no bombs attached), at Israel...for taking their land among other issues. And Israel used phosphurs bombs. A third of the 1200 palestinian deaths were children, some kids couldn't even talk after the ordeal. Galloway brought in aid to the people, and had to put the aid into the hands of the people who ruled Palestine, which were Hamas. Are we to stand by and shake a shameful finger at a man who brought food, medical supplies, firetrucks, ambulances and yes monetary support to the government of a people who have been attacked and left to live among rubble. Would we not want a government who could perhaps supply enough money to us to bury a loved one if we had loved ones killed in our own backyards for a war we had no say as to what we wanted. This government, the one our Canadian government calls a "terrorist" organization gave money to the Palestinian people for loss of a loved one, damages to homes, and more compensation for the hardships the war brought on them. The loss of free speech should be enough for us as Canadians to ruffle our feathers, but we need to open our eyes and look beyond age old beliefs, religion, finances and other nonsense and come to our own understanding of "human values" and what we need to do to make this a better world. Silencing a voice with a different song will only leave us biased, stunted and blinded.


TRENT
said

When the Americans started to get over-hyped and frightened at every little color-coded cue from their government after 911 I used to think Canadians were smarter than to fall for such fear-mongering but now I see we're no different than the Americans -- we're just as vulnerable to these kinds of spurious attacks.
This man gave aid to people who Western governments would let starve (or die under air assault).
He's no more a threat to our national security than George Bush.
But we should value the principle of free speech and we should be defending that principle.
Otherwise the Afghans and everyone else should 'consider the source' and decline our teachings.
Canada is supposed to stand on principle not cower to propaganda and fear.
I AM ashamed today!



bill from edmonton
said

If he wants into Canada, let him play by the rules. Same with anyone else, we don't kneel to your wishes, you want into Canada, you play by our rules or stay at home!!! I am sick and tired of Canada always bending over backwards for anyone who comes here. Suck it up and enjoy Canada with our rules!


Kathy
said

I did not hear all these groups screaming about free speech when an Israeli man was shouted down and not allowed to speak at one of our so called liberal Universities.


Terry S.
said

Who needs freedom of speech anyway? It's better to have a govenment that cares enough to impose it's belief system on the masses and keeps any distracting mumbo-jumbo from making us think independently. We have enough concerns allready.


This is Canada
said

He is not Canadain but a loud mouth like so many other protesters who probably don't have jobs, look for a handout and stand in line to protest. Why don't you protesters go to Iraq, Iran or other coutries and protest against them & see how far you will get. Maybe try China. This is our country and not Britain. Who the heck are you to waist our court systems to spread your opinion. Use whatever means you have to spread your opinion but don't waist our Canadian time and money to get into Canada. If by chance(which I am sure will never happen that you do get in, then by all means, when you leave, please take the protestors and supporters with you


Caden Toronto
said

CTV reported the Jewish Defence League of Canada "lit a fire" to get Jewish leaders to contact Canadian politicians to keep Galloway out of Canada. It saddens me, as a Canadian that I have a government that supports Israel and its occupation, and suppression of Palestinians.


Remarkable
said

All of you on here who want to let this guy in should realize that he is not a Canadian and does not have the born given right to enter this nation.

The Laws of this nation say that is a criminal activity if you raise funds for certain organizations that this nation deems as terrorists and this man has done exactly that.

For those of you who are new in this country, you must all understand, that this country is a peace loving nation, not a nation that is looking for someone like this man, who is just looking to create chaos.


This Is Our Land
said

As a Canadian, 16th generation on my mothers side and 10th on my fathers, does not want to see this man set one foot on my nations soil.

I'm glad the courts banned this man from entering Canada.

The law of this land is the law of this land and this man has given money to a terrorist organization and that is a good enough reason to keep this man from coming into Canada.


DJ
said

No one is denying him free speech. They are denying him entry due to his support of terror organizations as determined by Cdn law. Canadian Border Security Agency is responsible for the application of that law.

Yes, some will argue that this is some sort of right wing plot because he was allowed entry in 2006 so why not now? Rubbish!

More likely is that the last three years has proven that Hamas is only interested in terror and a change in governemnt policy, or process at CBSA has denied his entry this time.

MHB
said

I guess that the next time a peace activist needs to visit Canada, he has first to get a visa from the Israeli embassy in his country!. May be the Israeli government should have an office inside each one of our embassies to monitor who is in and who is out. This will actually save tax payers lots of litigation money and makes the process clear to everyone!.

John
said

He says he supports the Iraqi insurgencies attacks, even though many of their targets are soft( ie UN headquarters, assyrian christian churches, mosques and marketplaces). He has endorsed attacks on British troops even though the democratically elected Iraqi government is directing a gradual withdrawl of foreign troops on its own timetable.


Tom
said

Why would the news headline state that "the court side with the fed?" It is completely partisan and bias. What is that got to do with the Fed. Did the Fed stop Galloway entering our country? It was the immigration office that forbides his entry. The headline should be corrected to "The court side with immigration decision to forbide entry of Galloway."


CD
said

Whatever happened to freedom of expression? The Conservatives are out Neanderthalling the Bush Republicans. Canadians are smart enough to hear opposing views on controversial subjects with discretion, just like we will be smart enough to vote out Stephen Harper and his boneheaded government in the next election.


Rob
said

keep him out!


outrage with the minority always gettingtheir way
said

About time a judge buds out of decisions. We do not need people in this country that promote hate.


Tom
said

It is easy to resolve if it is a free speech issue.
1. Use a web cam and internet. Or
2. Galloway gives his speech to someone who is a resident here to recite his idea.
3. Use the old technology - telephone.
4. Sent out his script via email.
If people are so much into the free speech. He is blocked entry by the immigration, and support by the Liberal appointed judge. If the PM has a way to convince the Liberal appointed judges, he wouldn't have the tough time to jail the criminals.


Michael from Toronto
said

Galloway is only interested in stirring up trouble in Canada; either by making appearances or by whining about be discriminated.

Discrimination is not always a bad thing - we want to discriminate against people like Galloway. Discrimination also means being able to perceive differences. He can say whatever he wants but he is not a Canadian and does not have to be granted the privilege of entry.

We don't want your kind in Canada, Galloway. Get stuffed!


Jack T from Newmarket
said

To all the terrorist sympathizers who were counting on the judge overruling the CBSA - in the voice of Nelson Muntz from "The Simpsons".

HAH-HA!

Finally a judge who recognizes that they do not have the right to create law themselves and overrule the policies of the elected government, or the expert administrative decisions of the designated agency (in this case, the Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA)).

This decision reflects the opinion of mainstream middle-class Canada who did not want this terrorist fundraiser to be allowed into the country.


JT in Van-city
said

Fundraising for terrorist groups like Hamas and Hezbollah doesn't come under the heading of free speech. His little meetings with Hamas and Saddam only serve to lend legitimacy to criminal regimes who seized power. The money he collects at his speaking engagements will eventually be used for Road-side bombs and Suicide Bomber schools.

If he loves Gaza so much, let him go and live there and let him stay out of Canada! The money collected for the Tamil Tigers is embarrassment enough for Canada!


gandi
said

Until we bring down the Conservative government, we are going to face with stupid decision from Parliament hill. I mean, a guy who gave aid to people is banned as a terrorist??? He helped humans and the Immigration minister suspects him to be a terrorist? Is this a joke???

I am more worried about what our stupid government is going to do for us vs. George posing a "national security" threat!!!


javajim
said

God bless you, Mr. Justice Martineau. Thank you for allowing your wisdom to take precedence over pressure from a minority.


Rick
said

Trent:
"I am embarrassed to be a Canadian today."

Maybe when you wake up to your freedom again tomorrow you will be proud to be a Canadian again.


Sad
said

If you don't like what he has to say ... don't listen. How can you be so scared of his words that you would keep him out?


Gail (Hamilton)
said

The Court made the right decision. They applied the law that the government set out and didn't let special interest groups bypass it.


alberto zepeda
said

If he only wanted to help the people in Gaza with no other objective...don't recall his name in connection to Rwanda, Zimbabwe, or the victims of Hamas' rockets in Israel.
I don't buy this British version of Mother Theresa poster here want me to believe.
Freedon of speech here in CAnda is a right of the citizens of this country. In the same way that I would not be aloud to express my strongs opinoins publicly as a foreigner in a Musilm country, so it is here...that is if there is freedom of speech in those countries. Our freedom of speech is not the right to whosoever wants but to whosoever is.
Take care


Freedom
said

Its quite amusing reading the leftist 'freedom of speech argument. Its the same leftists who decided to be the thought police, gunning after anybody who disagrees with their ideology.

At last, a half decent court decision.


Peter in Edmonton
said

You guys can remind people over and over again that that this is a supreme court decision that has nothing -- absolutely nothing -- to do with the Harper gov't until you're blue in the face it wont help. Liberals can't face the truth people. They can't face reality. It just goes with the territory of being unrealistically idealistic and self-serving.


kc in alberta
said

To BC_Laura

I never said anything about Hamas or what they stand for.

I said my Canadian soldier husband fought for the ideals of free and unoppressed speech.

Please learn to read before you choose to speak.


jay
said

Trent
The issue is this is a very slippery slope were on.People claim this is all about free speech.Ok but are there limits say someone who has hates canada comes and and says his or her thing and causes a riot.When do we say no you can't come in.Now with that said i am not saying galloway would say anything and he does not seem to hate canada.But if he comes in then do we let everyone in.


Jasper
said

For those who really want to hear what he has to say, feel free to hop on a plane and go see him in England.


Concerned Canadian
said

Technically, the judge is correct- free speech is a protected right for Canadians, not for foreigners. It is up to Immigration officials to decide the grounds upon which Mr. Galloway can be excluded.

That said, it seems a bit absurd to argue that he is a danger on any grounds, unless it's the grounds that he's a danger to Conservative politicians support of the Gaza offensive. Canadian citizens will have to decide whether keeping Mr. Galloway out of Canada is appropriate or whether it is merely an act of cowardice on this government's part.

But there are other issues here as well- when Dow chemical wanted to sell its herbicide here in Canada, but was barred by a Quebec judge, the Conservative posters were outraged (see Friday's articles). This was apparently an infringement on their right to choose (even though they were "choosing" to pollute our mutual environment).

But if the government steps in an blocks people from speaking, then this is fine with them.

So you'd rather have Dow chemical be allowed to import poison than allow opinions different from your own? Keep our borders safe from thoughts, not potentially cancer-causing agents?

And what about all those complaints about "activist judges" that the right made when the Supreme Court struck down laws against gay marriage? Now judges interpreting the Constitution seems just fine- provided it supports a position you favour.

It guess it's possible to believe almost anything, provided you remain insensitive to your own logical inconsistency.



May from Ottawa
said

Deny Mr. Galloway .
Any one how supported Saddam’s Regime and still supporting other terrorist group like Hamas,… deserves this treatment.



Trent
said

To all of you who want this man out of the country ... I DARE you to actually listen to him when he reacts to this decision.
Maybe then you'll start to understand how poisoned your minds have ll become from this right-wing propaganda machine.
Shame on you for caving to this rot and not having the guts to stand for principle instead of what's popular.
Pathetic.

I'm embarrassed to be Canadian today.




PJT
said

After reading many of the comments here. I have become a little bit confused. I didn't realize that when I pulled up to the customs that P.M Harper was personally letting me into Canada. Wow!! He must be a very busy man because I personally know that some ports of entry have hundreds of vehicles lines up. I kinda assumed that is why there are immigrations laws and such. So to blame him is quite hillarious...


MIike from Calgary
said

This was a decision made by a CBSA in which Kenney decided not to interfere with, and the courts backed up. WE did not allow Martha Stewart into this country because of her criminal record, and what a threat she is. This not a freedom of expression/speech case either. Nothing is stopping him from delivering his speech, he just cant do it person now. It is time to grow up and stop blaming everthing on the government


marlin
said

Good for the courts. I'm sick of foreigners claiming the rights of Canadians. Of course the Government should have the right to block access to Canada.


Andy from Calgary
said

I like how right wingers like Tim from Calgary does not want someone who opposes the views of his side of the spectrum into the country. These are the same people who whine about the government interfering too much in our lives. Now the government is interfering in who can talk in this country and all the right wingers are all behind government action.
We are a free people … who should be able to be hear and say what we would like.


Prynce
said

Freedom of speech is a guaranteed right to Canadians enforced by our laws and according to our laws. Our laws pertain to Galloway no more then they pertain to an American. Galloway is not a Canadian, therefore he has no rights in Canada except as a visitor respecting and following our laws. Based on his past history of not following international requests and laws, I too would prefer not to give him visitor status in my home and Canada is my home too. I certainly wouldn't let someone with a history or support of violence in my own home, let alone in our Country.


Pat
said

Good!! Keep him out! I don't want to hear about him or what he's doing.


Stop and Think
said

Firstly, ignore the PR, ignore the media bias, and look at the facts. Google him if you must, but the man has done nothing wrong, has not come to stage a coup, but rather do what many before him and you have done; speak his mind. Whether you agree with him or not, the issue isn't free speech, the issue is our government being influenced by those with the most money and power.


Rick in SK
said

To "Hey Rick in SK"

What group is Canada at war with that Galloway has given support to, and in what form has that support benefited them?
Are you kidding??? Even Galloway doesn't deny doing so. Don't be lazy, just google it.


Rob
said

"Only the extreme lefties and anti-Americans want Galloway to give his little speech."

What an absolutely pathetic, narrow minded comment... Democracy and freedom of speech are seriously threatened by fascists in our country.


FreakAlert
said

It's a sad day for Canada and the men and women who gave their lives for a supposedly free country.


Ontario Taxpayer
said

I actually agree with Iggy....this guy is nothing more then a CLOWN!


Calloway can come chill at my place anytime.
said

And yet George Bush is freely allowed into the country.

Diane M.
said

People who think this is a freedom of speech issue are ignorant...simple as that.


draft anti-war protesters? WHAT???
said

Chris said "people who are against war should be drafed into the war."


Don't you think people who want Canada to be in this war and haven't signed up to actually go and fight it themselves should be drafted first?

What's a worse moral crime?

A) cheering others into a war that you yourself would NEVER actually sign up to fight in

or

B) protesting a war because you are fundamentally against it?


Come on! There is absolutely no question that category A deserves to be at the front lines far more than category B!


Darren
said

never more proud to be a canadian!!!


GJ
said

The pendulum swings both ways.. if you make the claims that he is giving aid to the "other side" .. then shouldnt Canadians have been banned from entering China because of allowing the Dalai Lama into Canada , and supporting him? Wasnt he welcomed as a "head of state" ?

This is a slippery slope, and total bs. I dont care one way or the other about this fool, and dont really want to hear what he has to say , but I do care about the muzzling of a person's voice via some arbitrary decision of a civil servant.

If the US see's fit to allow him in, given their nonsense at the borders, so should Canada, or are we taking the US's place in the stage of the world from the last 8 years and carrying it forward?



reidjr
said

Roger UK
Did your goverment do the exact same thing.


Alberta Believer
said

"The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society. (emphasis added)
This section is double edged. First it implies that a limitation on freedom of speech prescribed in law can be permitted if it can be justified as being a reasonable limit in a free and democratic society. Conversely, it implies that a restriction can be invalidated if it cannot be shown to be a reasonable limit in a free and democratic society. The former case has been used to uphold limits on legislation which are used to prevent hate speech and obscenity.[citation needed]"

Yeah ME.

Also in 2008 the Federal Court of Appeal said that Canadian Charter Rights do NOT apply to non Canadians residing outside of Canada.

The whole principle of free expression is lost on these left-wing loons who are failing in their attempts to make us see the "virtue" in their politics. These same idiots do nothing and say nothing with regards to the Human Rights Commissions which routinely trample the rights of Canadians here at home. See while they understand their own whacky politics, simple legal principles pass over their heads!



zombies vs. zombies
said

@PROF PYE CHARTT

"Mr. Galloway can address his flock of left-wing "anti-war" zombies and terrorist sympathizers by way of telephone or video feed. They can still have their political jollies."


Just as you right-wing "pro-war" zombies and terrorist ghost chasers can get your jollies by watching video feeds and still images of the war beamed in via the internet with its ever-changing justifications.

These video broadcasts are especially useful for war-mongering chickenhawks, because they get to cheer it all on from a safe distance knowing they'll never have to actually participate themselves as long as they stare blankly and chant "support the troops" with cult-like fervor.

Roger T
said

Our country and it's Gov't is more communist than China would be by banning freedom of speech.

Banning and restricting to a point where preachers can't speak is same as believing in communism within a party/country.

Let him speak his mind!


Chuck in NB
said

Nothing wrong here, this guy is not Canadian and he funds a terrorist group.
How can this be an argument.

He should not have access to our great country, period.


Herb
said

Canada is now officially an international embarrassment. But things are bound to get worse before they get better. We have a political mindset that labels people who have the ability to think and read as "elitists."


Rick
said

I have little sympathy for Mr.Galloway or support for his views. He also has freedom of speech in his country. He can feel free to say what you wish from there not My country.


Let's Get Real People
said

Hey all you Harper blaming people. Allow me to enlighten you. This was a judge making this ruling on the Constitution of Canada. I am stunned at how many people have no clue of the structure of government and law in this country. The only explanation is that the people blaming Harper are complete partisans. Let's remember that this judge was not put in his position by Harper, by by a Liberal government. How is it possible that so many people in this country don't realize that the law is the law? Not what they think is the law. This man has restricted free speech in his own country to others, and now expects to come to Canada, after supporting Hamas to spread his propaganda? Keep him out and that's that.
Canada is on a fast track to being a laughing stock of the world by trying to appease every person who crys. Enough is enough, already. I have to wonder if the people that want a "anything goes" society have any clue of what they are throwing away. My guess is...no. Sad!!


Leo
said

all you neocons should have your photos right beside the word "hypocrite" in the dictionary.


Roger UK
said

Well, i am very disturbed that your Government are not allowing Mr. Galloway in to Canada. I always thought that you were a Democracy. He is NOT a terrorist, he has a different point of view. He took on the Senate in America and won. Controversial yes but he always has something interesting to say even if you do not agree with it. What happened to freedom of speech in your country ? Or are you just afraid of some truths !


Rob in Victoria
said

I can't believe this. They let the murdering war criminal Bush into this country. He is responsible for the murder of hundreds of thousands of people and you people complain about someone who has never killed anyone getting into the country because you don't like his his politics. Where are your priorities? Do you not think for yourselves?


Jimmy Toronto
said

shame on Canada


chris
said

good. we dont need his kind. people who are against war should be drafed into the war.....


w. Joosub Mississauga
said

this is a very sad day for Canada. I would just like to inform the Harper government that neither Iran, nor Hezbollah or Hamas has invaded or occupied thier neighbouring countries. The same can not be said of Israel. I would also like to remind Canadians that 18 of the 19 high jackers of 911 were Saudi none were Palestinian or Irainian. If national security is really an issue, why didn't we attack Saudi Arabia and why can Saudi nationals enter Canada without restrictions. Common sense should suggest that all of these restrictions are about special interests.


KMC (Markham, ON)
said

Certain groups, and some people posting on here, are trying to make this a "freedom of speech" issue in order to create political mischief.

It is not a "freedom of speech" issue and he was not barred by what some, on here, have referred to as "neo cons" i.e. the Federal Government.

Galloway was barred from entry by Canada's Border Security Services, as they are required to do under Canada's antterrorism laws.

What Canada's Border Sucurity Services did, in barring Galloway was the perfectly correct procedure under the law.

Jason Kenney did NOT bar Galloway from entering Canada, he simply did not move to overturn the legal decision of Canada's Border Security Services.

Of course, the Ignatieff and the Liberals, the Bloc and that thoroughly unpleasant little man, Jack Layton, are trying to make it a "freedom of speech" issue hoping to gain some political points.





Brandon, Alberta
said

this has nothing to due with free speech. he is able to speak his mind and we are able to listen. the court ruled on immigration not free speech people.


cg
said

If he wants to make a speech, let him make it in Britain. We have enough of our own MP's mouthing off and don't need some other country's MP doing it.


mike
said

This is an embarrassment to Canada. The fact that we will not let someone in to speak just because they opinions are controversial sickens me. The war is clearly illegal (if anyone remembers way back when it started how it was declared illegal by international powers) and we will not let someone who is obviously standing up for peoples civil rights and liberties come and speak in our country to help us protect ours and raise awareness.
It's a sad day for Canada.


Mr Chillz
said

This special interest group involved in this has gone mental. They need to be stopped and dismantled at once.

I am disgusted with this special interest group. They are fueling more hatred for themselves and it is well deserved.


Roland Godin
said

Call a spade a spade...Bush not only supported Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein financially but also with arms of mass destructions.


JackR
said

Court sides with feds in keeping British MP out -

Good. Keep this agitator out of Canada. I can't understand why some of you leave your home countries because you're sick of the fighting and the discrimination and hostilities. And yet you want to drag us into this. What the hell is wrong with you people. Go home if you want to kill each other.


Not deluded in Calgary
said

A lot of pointless tax dollars spent on court proceedings.

Is he being kept out?

Not if he is still making the speach via video or over the phone.

His message is still being heard. The only difference is that his warm fleshy bits aren't here.

Surely those are the least important parts of the issues at hand here.

So a lot of money was spent to pretend to prevent something that is going to happen anyways. AND he got a boatload of free press he would not have gotten anyways.

Personally, I think he is laughing his ass off over the whole affair.


Vince M
said

Free speech advocates...

YOU as a Canadian have the Constitutional right to free speech in Canada.

Foreigners DO NOT.

Check your facts before spouting your left wing hatered.




Reg Guy
said

Thank you Adam and Chris in ontario for some intelligent input in such a widely misunderstood subject! Upholding the law has nothing to do with which party you support. It has nothing to do with free speech! He is free to speak to whomever wants to hear it. Just not enter Canada. Good onya Canadian border services!!!


Dunny from Manotick
said

Hamas is recognized by the UN as a terrorist group and he admitted to giving them cash. We don't need or want him or his type in Canada. Thank you, Government of Canada for keeping this scumbag out of our country.


Peter in Edmonton
said

I love the people blaming Harper when the Canadian Supreme Court first even hears Mr. Galloways complaint and then rules against him based on the Constitution.

Yeah yeah yeah. Same old don't-wanna-face-the-truth Liberals.


Glol Samudra
said

Selective freedom of speech. And our troops are fighting in foreign lands to spread democracy and free speech ? This Harper Government must love Taliban who also do not want free speech. Galloway may have made fool of himself but he has won - he has received more publicity about his ideas than he could have imagined.

What is the difference between Terrorism of Israel and Hamas ? Brutality and war crimes - committed by both but Israel is the worst devil.


fed up Canadian
said

We refuse entry to this individual for supporting terrorist groups as defined by our federal government .... yet we allow our own MP's to support (and continue sitting as members)this same type of group ..... I refer to a Toronto area MP coming out and supporting the Tamil Tigers publicly ...
I wonder why he wasn't reprimanded by the speaker of the house ... or is this a
double standard that we are expected to accept as Canadians ...
It's really time for an election .... we need a government that will represent the views and opinions of Canadians ..... not a government that cherry picks ..... who ever gave them that right ??? They seem to think it is their divine right to tell us what's best ... rather than listen and respond to our wishes and desires ....


Good Choice
said

Foreign national who is known to help out terrorists and found not legally allowed to enter our country. Let's hear the conspiracy theorists again rantig about that "neo-Con" Harper, etc. Isn't this getting a little old? The courts are correct in this matter.


Kevin
said

disgusting..

the only explanation is this is purely political.

Justice Luc Martineau should be banned from Canada. Please don't detain me indefinitely for that opinion.



relieved Canadian
said

Good call by the courts!! Keep that terrorist lover out of here.




Mike
said

Stephen Harper's views and opinions offend me, is there anyway we can keep his sorry butt out of the country when he tries to re-enter after his whirl wind tour of american media outlets.


Greg in the Hammer (the real one)
said

@Y

Galloway IS NOT A CANADIAN CITIZEN.

Hence HE DOES NOT have the right to say whatever he wants in our country.

Free speech does not include the right to support and raise money for terrorism, terrorist groups, or churches or social groups that support terror activities.


Robert - Mtl
said

How is this a freedom of speech or freedom of expression issue? He's not Canadian so he doesn't get that right coming into a foreign country.

A foreigner who wants to come to this country must ask for permission when they approach immigration. Not everyone can just show up at the border and unilaterally be given access.

Good on the Border Services Agency for denying him access. They are truly looking out for the interests of ALL Canadians.

We don't need another nut-head, propaganda artist spreading more trash in our country. We have enough of it, thank you very much...


Matt
said

This guy is denied access, yet the war criminal/tyrant George Bush was allowed in.


DCR-Toronto
said

Justice is served. Canada has now shown it will not let people in who support terrorists organizations. People can twist this all they want with the claims that he was helping with diapers, food, medical supplies, etc. However, it was not that at all. It has been proven this man gave tens of thousands of dollars directly to Hammas. Now they expect us to believe that Hamas, in all their compassion, gave that money to the people. I think not. This isn't about free speech. It's about stopping the promotion and propaganda of a terrorist. Simple!!!


Savant
said

No foreign citizen has the RIGHT to enter Canada. It doesn't matter if it is Galloway or Obama. Foreigners enter Canada because we allow them to, not because they have a RIGHT to enter. If he wants the 'right' to enter Canada, then he needs to become a Canadian citizen first.


Richard L. Provencher
said

HOORAH! My "rights" are now vindicated. I do not want this fellow to come into our country and spread his poisonous views.


Munro - Brampton
said

Let him speak. You don't have to see him or listen. This was a free country. There are two sides to a story. Any one these days can call you a 'terrorist' without much evidence. Banning people from a visit to Canada because some groups don't like that person is wrong. I say let 'free speech' live. Peace.


Pip
said

MDM in London says "Just let him in. It's an embarassment for the country that he wasn't in the first place."

Well, we have laws and regulations about who can be allowed into the country. The government and Galloway's lawyers made their presentations to the Judge and he ruled that "The applicants didn't meet the necessary legal tests for him to issue an order allowing Galloway entry."

That is our law, and applies to anyone entering the country. Ask any immigration officer: it is they who determine if a person may enter the country. In Galloway's case, foreknowledge was available for the minister to instruct that he be denied entry, a decision backed up by our courts.

What would be truly embarrassing is for a judge to deny our immigration officers the ability to do the job we as a nation pay them to do. Had the judge ruled in Galloway's favor, our borders would have been wide open for months, with every Tom Dick and Harry appealing their refusal of entry, until such time as either the Supremes ruled in favor of the Government, or, if against, until Parlaiment passed a law that would stand up to appeal. As it is, the law has been tested and upheld - so far.

In any case, it seems, according other news reports, that Galloway has already made arrangements to make his speech by video link. Perhaps, given his inflammatory past, he should have done that in the first place. But no, he is a radical politician - witness his 2005 appearance before a U.S. senate committee, and his suspension from the British parliament - and needs all the publicity he can get.

We are well off with his absence from Canadian soil.



Mario
said

Makes me wonder. What doesn't our regime, oop's government, want us to know?


Red X
said

The event is going to be a sell out and despite the reaction by the CJC the speaker will be streamed on them "interwebs" Free speech won despite Kenney's attempt to block Galloway...


Chris
said

Don't kid yourself - the courts and judges really don't have anything to do with it - the government is behind everything. They don't want him here because he goes against "the MAN" who the government works for.
Notice how anytime people go against the grain they are shut up - that's because "the MAN" doesn't want the truth out.


caper
said

Galloway! Bush! there is a difference! Oops, Bush is AKA harper!! That's right


Having my say in Ontario
said

Free speech goes both ways. Canada has the right to say that we don't need,want or support the kind of thought process or beliefs that Galloway preaches. So the Canadian gov't spoke, the Canadian people spoke & now the Canadian court has spoken. I agree with the gov't & the court, we do not need Galloway here. He will have to preach somewhere else.


Connie (Calgary)
said

Darn Liberal appointed left wing judges. D'oh!


Braden
said

Dear Tim, Canadians serve their country in many ways, not just being a part of the military... I pay taxes yearly which currently go to your pay or pension... If we were all like you and lived on government pay cheques, we would have no money to pay anyone... So how about you get off your high horse and stop pretending you are better than the rest of us, k!!!


hadan
said

Let him in.

Ignore the Zionest Lobby that kept him in.


Prof. Pye Chartt
said

TOO BAD; SO SAD

Mr. Galloway can address his flock of left-wing "anti-war" zombies and terrorist sympathizers by way of telephone or video feed. They can still have their political jollies.

(Aside: The fact that he roams the U.S., however, is quite noteworthy and troubling, politically.)

Mr. Galloway is one of these oppositional, confrontational, contrarian instigators who would fight and argue against gravity if he could successfully anger enough people publicly and garner the support of enough mush-heads.

Folks like him are clever manipulators, and enjoy the right of free speech and free association to further their UNDERLYING views and agenda. The Canadian Jewish Congress has had his number for quite a while.

He's an obnoxious clown without the honest balls to preach many of his REAL thoughts and beliefs.


Ryan in Burlington
said

This man is not a citizen and has no right to come into our country, plain and simple.

We can't push our beliefs in the faces of other people and countries and expect to be accepted under "their rights" or rule of law.

Responsibility has to be taken when exercising one's rights. People don't understand this and that is the exact reason this country and world is so completely screwed up!

There is freedom of speech and there is responsibility of speech. Until people understand that the two lie hand in hand, this kind of garbage will continue to happen.

Just get a grip! People who scream about "their rights" are the same people who have no clue what it's like to live without them.


BREID
said

My family have been on this side of the Atlantic for over 250 years, and NEVER have I been so ashamed to call myself a Canadian. We live for the freedom to speak out against foolishness...no matter WHERE it comes from...just because this man disagrees with the policies of Israel, does not make him an anti-Semite...nor does my calling Harper an idiot make me anti-Canadian.

Israel is a country that destroyed a weaker neighbour and this man cared and assisted those in need...last time I checked that is what we as Canadians are supposed to stand for. If his speeches are against war...WONDERFUL...war is cruel, nasty and hateful. We should all be anti-war, but for our brave men and women overseas..the 2 are not exclusionary


Mark from Brampton
said

I don't believe in complete Freedom of Speech. I also don't believe in supporting (verbally and financially) terrorists.

I would have preferred to see this gentleman arrested and thrown in prison for trying to enter the country - however just turning him away will do for now.


Ted
said

A tragic day for freedom of speech. The Jewish community should be ashamed of what it is behind in Canada and the US. We no longer have the right to the whole truth people, but we should keep sending our children to die for phoney wars supported in part by Zionist propaganda. This is the root of fascism. The problems in the middle east will keep escalating and people will keep dying and it will tragically effect Israel too in the long run.


Lisa
said

I guess "Father Government" thinks we are too stupid to think for ourselves, therefore we need protection from "undesirable opinions".
Free country? Free speech? No longer!!!!


Ms.Bell
said

What on earth is Canada thinking?? To Ban a 5 time elected British MP for delivering Aid to a humanitarian crisis is an outrage. How can a small number of Jews control our Canadian Governments international relations. Supporting Isreal should be considered supporting terrorism. Canadian Taxpayers will be the real victims of this travesty, draw up the court papers!


Brian B
said

We already have enough racism ,bigotry and controversey here in Canada without having to listen this character promoting his ideas .
Thank you judge for making correct decision


Dave in Surrey
said

I never heard of the guy till this all happened... Looks like he is famous and even more people will hear him now... In the information age, one does not need to be seen to be heard... Harper's attempt to shut this guy up, back fired as it only made his voice more credible and wasted a few of our tax dollars at the same time!!!


IRPR
said

From an Immigration perspective, he has no right to come to Canada. Foreign nationals have to meet certain requirements in order to be admitted to Canada. Security concerns and organized crime are sections that make him inadmissible. Ties to Hamas are enough to refuse entry. The decision was based in legislation. Inadmissible... simple as that.


BC_Laura
said

To "kc in alberta":

Have you checked what Hamas' idea of a free and unoppressed society are? Give your head a shake! If you think for one second that a society ruled by Hamas is free and unoppressed, I suggest you go live there and observe how well they treat their women. And you encourage a man who supports such an organization? SHAME ON YOU!


Reuben
said

To the people who keep complaining about the lack of freedom of speech and expression, read the third paragraph of the article again:

"The admission of a foreign national to this country is a privilege determined by statute, regulation or otherwise, and not a matter of right."

He has no right to come into this country and say whatever he wants. However, the people of Canada do, and they made their voices heard. But unfortunately for them, the government and courts disagreed. We may have freedom of speech and expression in this country, but we also have laws and rules.


ME
said

There has been much said about free speech. I think many of you have been watching too much American TV. Here is what our charter says and the court was with-in it's rights to ban Galloway

The constitutional provision that guarantees Freedom of expression in Canada is section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: ... (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication
Due to section 1 of the Charter, the so-called limitation clause, Canada's freedom of expression is not absolute and can be limited under certain situations. Section 1 of the Charter states:

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society. (emphasis added)
This section is double edged. First it implies that a limitation on freedom of speech prescribed in law can be permitted if it can be justified as being a reasonable limit in a free and democratic society. Conversely, it implies that a restriction can be invalidated if it cannot be shown to be a reasonable limit in a free and democratic society. The former case has been used to uphold limits on legislation which are used to prevent hate speech and obscenity.[citation needed]




Matt in Cornwall
said

I'm glad to hear that the courts sided with the feds on this one.


Chuck - Edmonton
said

I'm 100% behind the Canadian government keeping supporters of terrorism out of my country !


discover_bilderberger
said

I firmly believe that we as Canadians need to look at the bigger picture in situations like this. We need to dig deeper and really understand that left and right arguments are only appeasing political strategies. I wish that more Canadians would debate who has attended Bilderberg conferences such as Jason Kenney, Stephen Harper, Paul Martin etc..., this is not about censoring Mr. Galloway but it is the elite trying to control freedom of thought. As we continue to lose our identity in this Global world we will see much more of these types of Censorships. Let's wake up my fellow canadians, we need to let mr. galloway speak even if we don't agree with him for our own freedoms.


Kevin in Alberta
said

Finally our court system does something right! Thank you for Keeping this Bad News Bear out of Canada, we already have enough clowns in this Country. Thank you.


Sane & Reasonable Canadian
said

I am sick of hearing about this idiot. He's not welcome in Canada. End of story.


Ian K
said

The judge made the right decision.

Galloway could have given his money and the ambulances to the U.N., the Red Crescent or the Red Cross among others. Instead, he gave money etc to Hamas, an organization generally recognized as terrorist. Thereby, he freed-up Hamas money for arms purchases.

The fact that Hamas is the elected government in Gaza is irrelevant. If people decide to elect terrorists, we are not ethically or legally obligated to deal with that government or its proxies like Mr. Galloway.

Nor is this an issue of free speech. Canadians can listen to him via video-feed, or through the internet or through other news sources. No one is trying to censor him and prevent Canadians from learning about his 'ideas.'

We are are not constitutionally or morally obligated to provide him a platform within Canada itself.

Frankly, why would anyone want to hear the 'ideas' of a man who put in good words for Saddam Hussein? To do that is either a sign of incredibly poor political judgment - in which case, why trust what he says about Hamas or Afghanistan? - or he's publicity hound - in which case his sincerity on any issue is dubious.








Andre
said

I think he should have been let in but immediately arrested and detained if he promoted hate in any way during his stay in Canada.

The man definitely is a terrorist supporter but until he breaks the law in Canada, I am not sure how he can be kept out.


Spud Lite
said

"Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me."

The guy has already received a lot of attention. It might be interesting to discover whether it was warranted.

So let him in.


Alberta Believer
said

"This guy is at best a messenger of peace, at worst a verbose buffoon to his detractors, to whom he poses no threat whatsoever other than to challenge their ideas..."

Once again buddy, this isn't about the politics of your left-wing politics, it should be about the principle of freedom of speech. Again the right battle for free speech is here at home and it starts and ends with the Human Rights Commissions of this country. Go online find the one for your province and the federal Human Rights Commissions. There you'll see fines awarded against people for simply speaking their minds. Life time bans handed down against people, banning them from speaking on a particular topic. People being forced to write and then publish apologies, all in a supposed democratic country.

Forget about whether or not you agree with what was said or the contents of the message, the fact is simple as we are dealing with a baisc legal principle, that is the right to free speech. That right exists, however the right not to be offended does not exist in our constitution nor in our common law.

So if you wanna get mad about free speech, forget about Galloway, Bush or another foreigner coming to this country as they have no rights here and securing the rights of Canadians in Canada supercedes the rights of foreigners in Canada.

I don't care about Galloway, whether or not he's a terrorist, I couldn't give a damn. What I do care about is whether or not one of you will get hauled before a Human Rights Tribunal in Canada and forced to explain what you were thinking when you wrote a particular article. And boys and girls, this is already happening here at home.



J.C.
said

Obviously we do not have the full story behind the Border security's decision to reject entry to Mr. Galloway, yet some of these commentators are blaming the government (who merely backed the decision of the border security) and others tend to blame the PM for the rejection. The border Security are doing their job, so before we complain too much without having all the details, let's let them do the job they are paid to do. There is more to this story than meets the eye.


Doug Calgary
said

Here is a guy photographed supporting Hamas giving them aid. Now that hes in North America and has this circus following him around, why not do something productive for the cameras here, grab a shovel and start filling sand bags in North Dakota. News says there is communities needing help. Here is a guy with help, so lets see it put to use. With all that hot air this group has, I am sure they could fill plenty of sand bags.


Mary from Ottawa
said

Hey "Y" this was a COURT decision. Not the federal government's decision!!!


Gigi
said

being pro palestinian and delivering humanitarian aid does not a terrorist make... He wants to make anti-war speeches... Let him in.


dawn
said

welcome to free speech zone canada where you can say what you want as long as the harper bunch approve...


Bluenose
said

Common sense rules the day!
A breath of fresh air to see our system making smart decisions like this. This Galloway idiot should definitely not been allowed in, however if it was me making the decisions, I'd let him in, and have him met at arrivals, arrest him, and send him straight to Gitmo. The UK may let this nut case run around their country, but we won't.


JMB
said

"I may disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Voltaire

(actually likely written by Evelyn Beatrice Hall, but since it is always attributed to Voltaire...)


Paul R
said

It'a all about the money, Galloway can now not make any speaking fee's money in Canada. But there are probably some people who would pay to hear him talk over a phone.


dale
said

Keep the SOB out we don't need him.


BMM
said

As much as those on the left want it to be, this is not about freedom of speech. It is about who may enter our Country. One's actions have consequences and if Mr. Galloway sees fit to trot around the globe calling for the murder of our soldiers, the assassination of our leaders and the suicide bombings of civilians, calling them “morally justified” then he must face up to the repercussions of his actions.

In other words, he was not barred from entering Canada by our Border Protection Services in order to prevent him from speaking. He was barred entry because he is an avowed supporter of terrorism. And unlike what the left is saying it is not because he led an aid convoy into Gaza. It is because Mr. Galloway is an overt supporter of Hamas.

He proved that when he gave the leader of Hamas a personal donation of 25K BP and a gift of three personal vehicles (In return the leader of Hamas made him a citizen, passport included). This was not aid money it was money for Hamas (not the Palestinian government) to do with what they like....

G
said

Yet another reason why we are far from being free.


Bill in BC
said

So a judge FINALLY did something right. Upheld the right of Canada to deny entry to someone.

It's over. Carry on.


Leo B
said

Bye Bye Democracy


John in Vancouver
said

Why is this man still part of the British parlement? He should be in jail for assisting a terror organization


Wanda in NB
said

let the nut in the only people who are ging to see him are far lefties who such from the hind $%# anyway and dont do much for the country as it is.


Jon Halifax
said

You are free to speak all you want...that is until it violates the criminal code, i.e. anti-semitism. Hamas is a terrorist organisation, and he supports them (which is supporting the destruction of Israel). So all you supporters who like this guy, let Bin Laden and his followers in for their "free speech" as well.

Oh wait, when the real terrorists come to Canada, we will just blame the USA anyways...


Matthew
said

Only a Canadian CITIZEN has the constitutional right to enter the country. The decision is not based on what he will say but on his actions in the past.
People are combining two separate issues: free speech and immigration.


Terry
said

So long Canada -- I'll miss you.




Chris in NB
said

Most people seem to think that this is a "Freedom of Speech" Issue. The fact is that it is not.

Firstly: He is not a Canadian Citizen, thus, he has no "right" to enter the country. The Government has the duly elected right to determine who is and is not allowed to enter our borders.

Secondly (and most importantly): The Law is the law, and applies equally to both the lowliest commoner as it does to the most reverred politician. He gave money to a Terrorist Organization, ergo he supports Terrorism, thus: He is denied entry into Canada. It would/should be no different for ANYONE else who gives money to a Terrorist organization. They too would be persona non-grata.


Jim Lad
said

As a Scot who has a son in The Canadian Armed Forces, I say "Lock him up". He is funding the enemy.


T. Hull
said

I agree completely with the previous comment to all the aspiring fascists.

People tend to focus on patriotic flag-waving for the past and present killing-sprees-for-freedom that they fail to see the gradual erosion of freedoms taking place here at home, by politicians who fear and suppress dissenting opinion, and the like-minded citizens who vote for them.


Kevin from Windsor
said

Hamas is a terrorist organization. He is raising money for terrorists. Let him in and arrest him.

Hamas is not an underdog, not a humanitarian organization, it is a terrorist organization and hides behind civilians and ambulances. Anyone that supports them should be arrested.


James in ottawa
said

Keep him out we need unity not division.


Jude
said

Unbelievable. Such an obviously scrounged up accusation to satisfy the demands of a lobby group. All these comments from people who haven't even bothered to look into this guy and judge for themselves what he has said in the past give us a great taste of the electorate of this country.

Whether you like him or not, whether you agree with him or not; the issue is our 'leaders' making decisions on what we ourselves are allowed to believe, hear or speak about. And the worst part of it is, it's not even the government making the decision...it's a lobby group. Go go Canadian democracy.


chad
said

Funny how selective these "anti-war" protesters are when it comes to their support of freedom of speech.

Rioting and shutting out Israeli politician Benjamin Netanyahu at Concordia U. in 2002; violently protesting jornalist Daniel Pipes' speech at York U. in 2003.

Freedom of speech...


Kris D.
said

George W. Bush is responsible for more death and destruction than almost anybody on earth but we let him come here to speak freely and spread his message of BS. And rightfully so.

Did I want him in our country? No, but I understand that we are a free country and people have different views on things so I never complained.

This is just one more reason why Harper will never get a majority...



Tim from Calgary
said

Let the cryin' lefties cry some more over this. A good decision by Kenney and a better one by the court. Anyone who supported Hussein currently supports Hamas and speaks glowingly of the Taliban doesn't deserve the attention Galloway is getting.


Robert Brown Jeddore, Nova Scotia
said

It is frightening to see a judge and a government intimidated by a small group set on denying the Canadian people the right to assembly and free speech.
However, due to the incredible stupidity of the Canadian Jewish Congress and the Harper Govenment, this guy has received more publicity and support than if he had simply given his talks and then disappeared.


peter abonyi
said

The fundamental question here is freedom of speech. I do not believe that the government has the right to veto what the general public can and can't hear. If you don't like what he has to say, disagree- vehemently and in any forum, if you must.

If we as a society cannot bear any argument that challenges our beliefs or morals, then this experiment called democracy is over, done and finished. Our society requires the voice of dissent to work- it is how new ideas are brought forward and tested.

We have three clear choices, should we continue as a democracy; either challenge an idea on equal footing, accept it (provisionally, if need be), or ignore it and let the idiot flap his gums. If we choose to censor any idea that we find unpalatable, then what is this freedom that we are defending? I disagree with the man, but let him speak just the same.


Rob
said

Don't let him in! We don't want him.


Roadrobber
said

I wholeheartedly agree with the Government position and the decision of the Courts. This man does not have a right to enter Canada; it is a privilege. Canada does not need this man spewing his hatred in Canada. This is not a freedom of speech issue, it is a security issue. I'm glad someone is protecting Canada. Good thing the Liberals aren't in power.


SVCR
said

Good Call!
Let the British PM put up with him, not needed here!!!!


Simon
said

How sad that poisonous creeps like Kenney and Harper are in a position to ban one of the world's most engaging and interesting politicians from Canada.


Ally Jamie
said

So Bush and White Supremacists are allowed Free-Speech accept when it comes to someone who doesn't share the Conservative governments views.


Joe C
said

Evidence is strongly against Galloway. Video (link below) clearly shows he gave money to Terrorist Hamas. According to Canada and many countries Hamas is a terrorist organization.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IYFGIbaabTU

Banning Galloway from coming to Canada has nothing to do with free speech. But Galloway's actions does not mean we have to let him in. Canada has LAWS!!! And our Laws must be respected.

I am curious why these lefties are not on the streets complaining about Hamas shooting its citizens in the kneecap and poking their eyeballs out. Guess they were elected so its OK for the Lefties and various groups.


Kimberly from River Road
said

DAMN GOOD!!! People like him who preaches for fame and notriety at the expense of innocent people who die daily for terrorism, should not be allowed to Canada.
This has nothing to do with free speech.

Hope this is a lesson to our goons like the Liberals and NDP who are playing the same game.


kc in alberta
said

I guess anyone who bandages a bleeding child and does not first ask which side her father fights with is now considered a potential terrorist by some in this country.

I give money monthly to MSF (Doctors Without Borders) a group which does not ask for a politcal affiliation before dispensing needed medical aid.

According to some of you those doctors, Mr Galloway and myself may as well pack our bags and head for Gitmo before cooler heads close it down.

All for the heinous crime of caring for desperate human beings in trouble without pandering to political nonsense.


Anthony
said

Let him in. He is in the US, then if he were a threat they wouldn't have allowed him there! Our PM is so scared of a word this man will speak. Let him express his ideas. About Gaza, he organized the convoy and carried HUMANITARIAN AID to HUMANS, where an brutal embargo has been enforced for years. The children there need help.


Vince M
said

Remember it was not long ago Galloway led the charge to keep an elected right wing French politician from speaking in England.

I guess free speech is only for the Left.

How's it feel Georgie Boy?!




Ryan
said

If Canadian citizens are being persecuted in their own country by human rights commissions for their own speech, be it against homosexual marriage or against the Islamofascists, then the decision to bar Galloway is to be expected.


Diane M.
said

Has anyone read the Hamas charter? You might think twice about wanting him here.


Ken
said

Good, keep him out we have enough problems in Canada, we don't need another one. We should be concerned with more important items , like poverty and those sleeping on the street in your own towns. We need to get better focus on things that matter, then a wave maker.


Richard Feinstein
said

I can't believe the arrogance in our government.

I am going to attend his event tonight anyways and watch him via webcast in protest of the courts decision.

www.defendfreespeech.com


Jon in Burl
said

We have rules. This is not about free speach this is about our Goverments Rules regarding giving aid to terriost organizations and that is what Hamas is ... Mr. Galloway you are not welcome.


Mark
said

Excellent decision. We don't need ANOTHER blowhard with a selective memory of support for terrorists.

Look to NDP/Liberal bloggers to support this twit-the guy who supports Hamas and fawned over Saddam Hussein.

No thanks.


Dan from Northern Ont
said

AND STAY OUT.

Sheesh.


Dr. James Bradford
said

Freedom of speech can also imply we are free from having troublemakers coming in and causing a disturbance. George Galloway is free to speak whatever and wherever his heart desires, just not on our soil.

Canadians as a whole do not support terrorist groups such as Hamas. Some do however, which is why people like George Galloway are persona non grata in our country and let's ensure it stays that way.



MHB
said

The anti-war courageous voice of Galloway will get through despite the oppressive Canadian government and the failure of the judicial system to protect his rights. The decision to keep him out by this government is another medal on his chest! Very soon he will win the defamation lawsuit and the tax payers will pay millions for the blunders of the conservative government!


Dante
said

Good. We don't need his trash.


Stumpy
said

Who cares? What a waste of the court's time. The loonie left at work again.


Mocha
said

This individual is a terrorist and should be in prison


WayneEdmonton
said

I think at issue is the cash he gave them and not the humanitatian supplies. The cash could be used for rearmament and not medical supplies


Edmonton Jim
said

Whatever happened to freedom of speech. Guess Harper not only puts the gags on his MPs, but now he is trying to expert it! Talk about a control freak!


Baker, Ottawa
said

To kc in alberta

If you have people showing up at your house with baseball bats, you have more wrong with your approach to debate than anyone on this site.

Keep him out of my country.


John
said

The Government is obeying the laws they have put in place to protect you, I, and all other Canadians. We can not have a double standard in this country. I support the courts decision.


Plagio
said

George Galloway is a powerful force - an articulate, passionate and very knowledgeable critic of the war(s) in the Middle East; Zionists and neo-cons fear him and will go to great lengths to keep his voice from being heard.

Like the voices of Jimmy Carter, Noam Chomsky, Walt and Mearsheimer, Michael Neumann, Norman Finkelstein, Ilan Pappe, Robert Fisk, Uri Avnery, Eric Margolis and many others, Galloway's is very unpopular with the Israel Lobby and Evangelical Christians.

Harper, clearly, does not want Galloway to speak in Canada; but he is shooting himself in the foot - banning him will cost the Conservatives dearly...Harper and his lot are an embarrassment to all Canadians!




Hey Rick in SK
said

"This is about our right to prevent enemies of Canada (people who give support to groups that we are at war with)"


What group is Canada at war with that Galloway has given support to, and in what form has that support benefited them? Be specific. You seem to know so please enlighten us.


Terry
said

This government has to go, they're causing more damage to Canada than Hamas or the Taliban.





TD in TO
said

Freedom of Speech has its limits, as do the rest of our rights. Those of you who think that the universal catch-all, Freedom of Speech, is unlimited must read further the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. One person is not allowed to speak publicly about murdering another or the mass deportation of a minority group for instance.

According to the misinterpretation of the Freedom of Speech, anyone can do what I mentioned above because they have the right to speak their mind. It's basic logic, this is not a question about freedom of speech, it is a question about a man who openly admits to supporting terrorist groups coming to warp the minds of the young and misinformed masses at these so-called peace rallies where people get together and bash soldiers and politicians and other patriotic Canadians because they do not fall in line with what they believe in.

I'm not sorry to say, but people who support terror and hatefully speak about the government and our soldiers offends me. Am I not entitled to my right to speak, or does it apply only if it is anti-governmental? Because I have been bashed for my comments before because I happen to support the government.


Aspiring Fascists take note
said

It's worrying what's happening in this country. This guy is at best a messenger of peace, at worst a verbose buffoon to his detractors, to whom he poses no threat whatsoever other than to challenge their ideas...

And all he wants to do is talk, people.

Those who vehemently want to keep him out and silence all opposition to your right wing values, take a look at history. Bad, baaaad things have come from wishing for that...

Places where there has only been forced worship and idolatry to one absolute political ideal are terrifying and I hope you lot who are screaming to lock Galloway out never get what you're daydreaming about today.


Rick in SK
said

Mr. Galloway is free to speak all he wants. This is about our right to prevent enemies of Canada (people who give support to groups that we are at war with) from entering our country. He is free to spread his propaganda on the internet or in any paper or TV show that will let him.


Alberta Believer
said

"So the Arian Guards White Supremacists are protected by the police this March and allowed to march in Calgary and a war supporter is not?"

Mary the Aryan (correct spelling) Guard members are Canadian citizens and hence the Charter applies to them. George Galloway is NOT a Canadian and he does not have a right to our constitutional guarantees.

Its not about message its about the legality of citizenship. Free expression under section 2(b) of our Charter means that we should have to tolerate ugly messages by Canadians in Canada, but it does not mean that we need import said messages and messengers into the country.




Anne Streeter
said

What a lot of nonsense! Clearly this is a politically motivated decision because the Harper government doesn't like Mr. Galloway's anti war opinions and his support for the Palestinian people.

Mr.Galloway is a five term member of the British Parliament, he has lectured in Canada before and presently is lecturing in the United States & has addressed the U.S. Congress. Hamas is the democratically elected government in Gaza. The election was reccommended by the U.S and it's allies. As well, Jason Kenney's office was alerted to Galloway's visit by the Jewish Defence League - a terrorist organization according to the FBI and the U.S. State Department. I rest my case.



Alberta Believer
said

"And you think we have the right to free speech. Your government in action"

Well "Y" lets apply this desire for free speech to the 10 provincial and 1 federal Human Rights Commissions which routinely violate free expression in Canada.

Forget abour George Galloway who isn't a citizen. In Canada you could be fined for saying or printing something that hurts someone's feelings and that someone need not prove a damn thing.

The REAL free speech debate in this country begins and ends with the Human Rights Tribunals, as these dreadfull institutions will be here long after Galloway has left this country if he's allowed in.



Phineas from the Okanagan
said

Lets have the media report on just how much money given to Hamas goes to terror, and how much goes to ambulances (that are also used for terror). The bleeding heart liberal leftists really dont car about people or the truth. I am glad the government has barre someone from entering, didn think they had the gumption or good judgement to do this any more. What else is there about this Galloway the media isnt so interested in having us know?


Don
said

Let him in, and immediately deport him as persona non grata. I really enjoy comments by obvious lefties regarding their "freedom of speech". If this is what you want then move to the US or you could actually take the time and read the Canadian constitution. Your freedom of expression rights are written in the blood of sailors, soldiers and airmen. I doubt very much that any of you failed campus revolutionaries have spent a second in or contemplated service to your country. Crying foul to mommy is your only recourse when you don't get your way.


Ted
said

What a sad day it would be if Canada barred a man of peace and dialogue who supports and helps the innocent victims of war, ethnic cleansing and collective punishment such as is happening in Apartheid Israel ruled by far-right fundamentalists.


Paul
said

Our courts are so left leading that you get bet you bottom dollar this guy WILL be let in.

And frankly, this guy should have been let in. By banning him entry, your just giving this nut job free publicity!


Saladin
said

When the Israeli professor and peace activist Dr. Jeff Halper visited Canada recently, he mentioned a scary statistic. Since 1967, Israel demolished and destroyed over 60,000 Palestinian homes (yes, it is 6 and beside it 4 zeros!). If this is not state terrorism and ethnic cleansing, then what is it?. We do allow the Israeli officials who are orchestrating this systematic ethnic cleansing in and Mr. Harper meets them with hugs while blocking someone like Galloway who has only his words for defending the weak and the oppressed!. What a scandal!.


Bob H/Coquitlam BC
said

Keep him out. We have enough radicals in this Country without bringing in more. Anyone who supports him can leave also.


Keith in Brampton
said

To Evan in Athabasca:

The courts AREN'T overruling "elected officials"; the elected officials properly chose NOT to get involved.

This is a case of a civil servant following the regulations as he or she understands them, and the proper appeals process that follows from that.

It is only a big deal because Galloway's fans decided to use the media to hype the process for their own agenda.

I don't really think Galloway is a threat, and don't really care one way or the other if he is admitted.

But I think the media really needs to examine its own role in this; when they give such high-profile coverage about a Federal minister NOT interfering with due process, are they REALLY "reporting" the news, or serving as Galloway's PR staff?

(And before the accusations fly about my being a Tory hack, note that I tend to vote Liberal, not Reform...)


kc in alberta
said

To Paul in Ottawa:

My husband served 22 years in the Canadian military defending just what you are trying to prevent - the free exchange of ideas in an open, unoppressed society.

I would love to actually talk with you or anyone who tries to intimidate me but I would not give you my home address because people like you usually show up with a baseball bat to "discuss" differences of opinion.



reidjr
said

kc in alberta
I have a real big probleam how this is being played.Some are saying it sin the charter of rights But the charter of rights does not apply in this case.Then the bigger issue is galloway him self supported the move not to allow 2 people in the uk to speak.


Pat_from_Mississauga
said

How dare these anti-war people defend free speech. This is Canada - freedom of speech means agreeing with what ever Harper says! After all, only Harper knows what's best for you. End of Debate!


kc in alberta
said

Giving humanitarian aid to Palestinians does not automatically reflect support for terrorism or anti-semitism.

It only reflects compassion for some very oppressed civilians by people who can see through the enormous political rhetoric that clouds this issue to the suffering of innocents.

I haven't heard anyone accuse him of real terrorist associations so the grounds for exclusion seem pretty feeble.

It is unfortunate if his oppinions offend some people but that shouldn't be enough to silence him in a free society.

Let the man speak...


Joel Bain
said

Go away!


SK Doctor
said

Keep him out...letting him in provides credibility to anti-Western terrorist groups...


Mark
said

So let me just pose a hypothetical here?

Galloway gives money freely to Hamas, an organization that splits its time between ruling the palestinian territories badly and murdering Israelis willy-nilly.

Galloway is also charging a speakers fee, is he not? How can we be sure galloway won't give the money he raises from speaking in Canada to Hamas, which will then use to it to kill more Israelis?

Seems like the Canadian government is preventing someone from raising funds for a terrorist organization. Why has no one brought this point up before?


JackR
said

Well. Since this is our country and we have well defined laws against hate speech, keep him out. I don't particularly care what an antisemite has to say.


Cambob
said

Let him in so we can kick him out.
Much more satisfying that way.


Adam
said

We dont' have freedom of speech in Canada. We have freedom of expression. It's not the same thing and its moderated by other legal and constitutional implications.

It would probably be best to realize this isn't a freedom issue; it's an interpretation of foreign policy (and what is or is not terrorist). Incidentally, if a country elects a terrorist government, I'm not sure we're bound to work with them. So we should be arguing over foreign policy, not free speech.

If Palestine wants Hamas as their government that's totally fine, but we have the choice not to give them aid, or not to do so. If we choose to do so, we might be funding terrorism, and there are consequences. If we don't we might be hurting people who need it, and there are consequences with that. Thus our British MP chose to provide aid, and there are consequences (ie barred entry to Canada). Those consequences are for him easier to live with than not providing aid.

For what it's worth he should probably be let in. He's probably not all that relevant, sensationalistic though his views may be.


Rick in NB
said

These comments are very interesting. You post that i shoudld not be able to hear what Galloway has to say.
Yesterday the majority of you were berating CTV for stepping on your rights. Now you deny mine. My fine fickle friends. This doesn't look good on you.


Rog
said

It's not the court's business.
We elect people to make these decisions for us.


Sam in Vancouver
said

I am neither a lefty nor anti-American. My wife is American and I work for an American company. To me this is a freedom of speech and freedom of expression issue. The only reason he's being denied entry is because he supports the rights of Palestinians to live free of oppression. Only the pro-Israeli neo-cons have something to fear in Galloway...the fear of hearing the other side, since the neocons seem to ones who are controlling the discourse on the Palestine-Israel conflict.


Paul in Ottawa
said

Would all of you who insist he should be allowed in please post your home addresses so I can go to your home and tell you how our freedoms and liberties have been established and protected by people willing to go to war and fight for them. Certainly you wouldn't refuse me entry since you think such behavior so dastardly when the government does it.


R. Reynolds, Ontario
said

Evan in Athabasca: the courts overrule our elected officials' decisions because we are a nation of laws, with a constitution and a charter of rights that we cannot expect our officials, or even the voters themselves, to always uphold.




John Rennie
said

Why is it that when an undesirable is not allowed in Canada - he/she gets to take us to Court at our expense in our country??????????? What would China, Russia or any other country do in the same instance - you guessed it....nothing!!! We should do the same!!!


Mary in Calgary
said

So the Arian Guards White Supremacists are protected by the police this March and allowed to march in Calgary and a war supporter is not?


Jeff S.
said

He donated money to Hamas, a fanatical terrorist organization that advocates the use of murder and mayhem to acheive their objectives. Enough of the propaganda from the extreme Left suggesting otherwise.

Don't let him in.


Bill Steedman
said

Hamas routinely uses ambulances to transport terrorists using rockets and other munitions. There is film of them even using a UN ambulance to do this, no doubt driven by a sympathetic leftie serving with the UN office.
Hamas is an organization of murderers who impose their will on the population with an iron fist. They are anything but democratically elected. Anyone who opposes them is lifted from their beds and summarily executed as a "collaborator".


Since when are Judges Politicians?
said

Gee i thought we elected politicians to make decisions, not judges. If they Judge want to do this he should run for politics. If not he should keep his nose out of Government Policy. We need to start electing Judges and hold them responsible for their decisions. It is not the role of the judiciary to be activists.


Johnny P
said

Anti-Americanism?Doesn't exist.The world loves the USA and 0bama now,right?


O Cook
said

@Richard L. Provencher

I am in agreement with you. Too many times Canadians jump on the "Under Dog" Band wagon with their posts without doing the research or consider the history. If you need more proof just check out the other news story posts.

Freedom of Speech only gives us the right to our opinions, but... in Freedom of Speech publishers have the right to publish what they want, newspapers have the right to deny stories or ads in accordance to their agenda and the Supreme Court and the Goverment who are elected (supposedly) by the People have the right to decide what speech or literature is exceptable.

Like it not thats how it is or we all would be published authors.


Chris in Ontariariari-Oh!
said

Terrorist legislation is there to protect Canadian's from threat's or perceived threat's and if Hamas and Hezbollah are considered terrorist organization's then it only stand's to reason that if you financially support these organization's than you are aiding and abetting.The U.N. stated after the Gaza offensive by Israel that aid should be given to the U.N. relief agency or the Red Crescent for distribution,this move by Galloway was not only a contradiction of those request's but was a defiant gesture to Israel.What it does is further strengthen Hamas' position amongst Palestinian's and further hamper's peace talk's.Hamas' goal is for the annhilation of Isreal and anyone who support's this could easily be compared to the atrocity's that occurred during Hitler's extermination's of Jew's during the second world war.

Galloway not only gave the leader of Hamas medical supplies but the keys to three new cars and $45,000 in cash,what's that all about? Hamas receives million's of dollar's each year from such free speech loving country's like Iran and Syria each year so what's this money for?

This guy is an anarchist who has shown remorse at the collapse of the Soviet Union and support for other abusive and repressive regime's like the former Iraq and Cuba. We should be ashamed for giving the likes of Galloway the soap box to stand on to spout their view's. Look the guy up on the web and you'll see the controversy that surrounds this guy and you will think twice before you think this has anything to do with free speech.


Tim
said

Funny,
So many people talk about their freedom of speech. What have you done to earn that freedom? Hopefully you have served you country, province or community. I gave 36 years of service to my country and my freedom of speech says I don't want this guy in my country!


Galloway is in the USA.
said

If he is, as Jason Kenney would have us believe, a threat to security, then the USA is harboring a terrorist threat against Canada and Jason Kenney must launch all missiles against the USA.

Do it, Kenney.


Red X
said

Alberta accepted a right wing war criminal in Calgary earlier this month.

The IDL has an enormous amount of cash to lobby the Harper Gov't...

Galloway will speak to the audience in person OR by telecast. This whole Gov't bruha is simply providing more publicity...


Pete, Burlington
said

They need to keep this left wing loonie out of the country. I remember him when I lived in the UK and he is poison.


Will
said

My understanding is that he has already spoken in Canada on several occasions. It doesn't seem consistent to shut him out now, especially seeing as he's already stateside exercising his right to free speech. Seems like a knee-jerk reaction from an ideologically bound government to me.


Evan in Athabasca
said

DENY DENY DENY!!!

Why is it up to the courts to overrule the elected officials decisions time and time again!! The court is supposed to refer the person to the executive for analysis, for guidance, or refer the case for a policy to be created.... The courts and lawyers are getting to involved in the decision making process of this country and making bogus or imaginary laws.....


Richard L. Provencher
said

There is much talk of "freedom of speech" bandied about in the media these days. Well, I too am a Canadian citizen, a senior and proud of it. And my "freedom of speech" does not wish to have this man running around our country espousing his personal views about our democracy. If he is so enamored with Hamas and the way they do things, then go live among them. Be careful though, since they and the Taliban are similar in nature, as proven as one person went to report the news from their side of life and is now a hostage for fear of her life. We want positive people encouraging us not upstarts who have an axe to grind. It has already been reported in the media several times, Mr. Galloway was trying to prevent some folks from speaking in England, where he lives. And who is paying for the time and effort of lawyers fighting to give him his "rights" in this country? I hope it is not us.


MDM in London
said

Just let him in. It's an embarassment for the country that he wasn't in the first place. A terrorist? Please. He gave money to people in need. Regardless, the 'threat' he poses is as much of a concern to us as Iraq's weapons of mass destruction were.


MHB
said

Galloway is neither a terrorist nor a supporter of terrorism. He simply led a humanitarian aid convoy to help the devastated people of Gaza. To whom should he give the ambulances and the other aid material?. Of course, it must given to the democratically elected government of Gaza. He committed no crime unless our blindly pro-Israel governemnt classifies giving humanitarian aid to a Palestinian war-torn zone as a crime!. I find barring him a bad omen for freedoms in Canada. If these attitudes from the Canadian government are not stopped now, no one can tell what they will do next!.


Y
said

And you think we have the right to free speech. Your government in action


Tim from Calgary
said

Only the extreme lefties and anti-Americans want Galloway to give his little speech. Galloway, who has reportedly spoken his support for the Taliban, lacks any credit in my opinion and is just being used to whip up anti-war feelings and anti-Americanism by certain groups.


hindusan
said

Let him in


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest