News Sections
Budget to devote funds for auto sector, infrastructure
CTV News Video
|
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
A A |
Email
|
Print
| Comments (42)
| Add Comments
Tweet
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Mon. Feb. 25 2008 10:17 PM ET
Finance Minister Jim Flaherty will unveil the federal budget Tuesday, and it's expected to include plans to help Canada's struggling automotive sector and boost infrastructure, sources have told CTV News.
Auto companies will be able to tap into a new fund of more than $200 million, so they can build more fuel-efficient cars to stave off sluggish sales and job losses.
"What that does is allow manufacturers to write off new machinery and equipment that they're purchasing," Craig Alexander, deputy chief economist for TD Bank, told CTV News.
The budget is also expected to include plans for a job-creating fund called Build Canada. It would devote $500 million towards roads, bridges and other infrastructure in the country's major urban areas.
Armine Yalnizyan, of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, said crumbling infrastructure is becoming a major issue in Canada's cities, along with poor public transit.
"We're operating in this bizarre period of almost Depression-era politics with mayors going to the federal government with cap in hand, saying, 'We can't deal with the pressures that are facing growing cities,'" she told CTV Newsnet.
Flaherty warned Monday that the budget won't have any major spending initiatives, but the government is expected to disclose a surplus with an extra $1 billion.
The surplus for the fiscal year ending March 31 will be $13 billion, a government official told The Canadian Press on Monday. It was previously thought to be about $11.5 billion.
At least two-thirds of the surplus will go towards debt reduction.
"We are doing spending, but we're doing spending in a controlled way, given the economic circumstances this year and next year," he said.
"People ought not to expect any big spending items because we have to stay within our means and be prudent and fiscally responsible, which we will be tomorrow."
The International Monetary Fund predicts economic growth of 1.8 per cent in Canada in 2008. Last fall, the IMF predicted 2.8 per cent growth for Canada this year.
Flaherty starts delivering his budget at 4 p.m. ET on Tuesday. He promises the budget will be balanced and that the government has looked for ways to cut spending.
In question period on Monday, Bloc Quebecois Leader Gilles Duceppe said he wanted to see the budget do something to help struggling manufacturing and forestry companies.
Prime Minister Stephen Harper said his government's corporate tax cuts have helped Quebec companies.
NDP Leader Jack Layton accused the Tories of helping big banks and oil companies at the expense of forestry, manufacturing and the middle class. He said one-third of a million well-paying jobs have been lost.
Harper said while there have been job losses in some sectors, job creation has far outstripped the losses.
The unemployment rate in January was 5.8 per cent -- a 33-year low.
"The problem the opposition has is it is not all doom and gloom out there," he said.
"This government is making sure that we don't just blow the spending in this country, that we keep this economy going," Harper said, adding tax and debt reduction will continue to be priorities.
With a report by CTV's Robert Fife in Ottawa
User Tools
Related Stories
Most Popular
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
This is just wrong but if I were to send something to the politicians I would have sent the brain!
Add New Comment ( )
Bern
0
said
0
Flaherty plunged Ontario into an never-before-seen deficit when the economy was GOOD. He can't manage our finances. Yes, the tax cuts only benefit the rich; whatever joker up there is insinuating that saving 2 cents on my coffee is significant is ridiculous. Our surplus is gone, and you didn't see mention of the billions that will be spent on military equipment we don't even use.
But whatever you think of the budget, if the Flaherty parrots could just stop saying 'prudence', it would be a lot easier to swallow.
Looks like Buckley's, tastes like.
Nicole
0
said
0
Didn't Flaherty just bring in income splitting for seniors and increase the disability tax credits, in addition to bringing in registered savings accounts for people with disabilities? It's always what have you done for me lately? Maybe giving me back more of my own money and allowing me to spend it as I see fit, in addition to reducing our debt for our children and grandchildren isn't good enough for some. Not to mention the hated GST (which Chretien promised to get rid of but never delivered on because he loved the windfall) and NAFTA which paved the way for all those surpluses not Liberal genius as some suggest. You also forget the massive cuts to provincial transfer payments which lead to significantly higher provincial income tax and massive cuts to medicare funding. Oh that Harper he's soooooooo scary - meanwhile Dion is flopping all over like a fish - him running the country would be scary!!
Dave
0
said
0
We need to keep paying down the debt like the last few governments have been doing, but we have to stop lying about how much money we owe.
Walter Orlowski
0
said
0
Good old John D., similary like Mr. Harper was somewhat reclusive, insensitive regionally, dominant and overall power hungry. With the country under his deploy,the unemployment lines swelled and were long in Ontario way back in the 1950's as I fondly recall.(In those days you had to line up at an office outside in the cold to receive a UIC check.... no mail delivery...there simply was no money left for stamps to send you the cheques during the Chief's stay!)
On a happier note,lest we not forget,that the old Federal Progressive Conservative Party died on the election table with Joe Clark with only 2 seats remaining. They had some credibility of sort. You have to wonder,where's good old Joe now? Why hasn't he been appointed to a position in the new "super" Harper Conservative Government like many others? Is he not a Conservative too?
Sadly,what has emerged is an assembly of Rooky Alliance/Reform and leftover burned out former Ontario Provincial Conservative all now practicing deadbeats pushing the money buttons at the Federal level. Like you guys blew it under Mike Harris& Ernie Eves on the Provincial level; minus 5.6 billion deficit dollars and a nearly demolished Ontario's health system (through Tony Clement's skillful handling of same)before being run out of the Province by the people of Ontario! Boy,would I like an accounting of how much money has been already sloughed off behind closed doors by Mr. Harper/Mr.Flaherty and to whom during your current term? Please do follow your own newly introduced Accountability Act....or does it apply to you?
Andrew
0
said
0
Bob Lobblaw
0
said
0
We must be able to kill more and more effectively to support the lies of the US war of terror.
Or more corporate welfare. Who cares about the poor, the uneducated, homeless, health care, infastructure.
We are starting to see why the Tories were not in power for over a decade.
Only incompetence could possbily have screwed up a war economy. The tories were given a gift of a well running econmoy only to fumble it and send it the other way.
ya, great leadership....
ya.....
Carol - HARPER EARNED MAJORITY
0
said
0
Bugets have Billions of dollars but about 3% wiggel room after health care and pensions etc so an election over 3% would be crazy.
DM
0
said
0
Andy in Cambridge
0
said
0
Great social commentary Lance
I don't think I could've said it any better
Mel Brass
0
said
0
Elections cost us a great deal of money.
The NDP are a Joke and the Liberals are not in a position to lead this country at this time.
It would be a waste of time to go to the polls at this time
GP
0
said
0
Its time to tax unsustainable greed.
Ray in Ontario
0
said
0
Vic
0
said
0
Those 'tax cuts for the wealthy' are a great encouragement for those pursuing post-secondary education. It reminds me that once I'm a doctor, I'll actually be able to keep some of the money I worked so hard to get to.
It's refreshing to see Flaherty being honest when he says that there will be a recession - he's being striaghtforward rather than blinding us - it gives me a lot of faith in the Conservative government and it will be nice to see the Conservatives get in with a majority.
Bernard Romanycia
0
said
0
306Student
0
said
0
I am very impressed with the sustainability and prudence Minister Flaherty has shown in his budgets.
His ability to deal with the Finance Portfolio get him an A+ in my books.
Dave laughing at Wes
0
said
0
O'Conner was a joke, hence why he was punted from his post...
Flaherty is a joke, first two budgets basically sucked the Canadian advantage the Liberals gave to him down the drain... He wasn't preaching the possible recession when he was cutting the GST, he simply ignored all the signs and forged ahead ignoring every single economist in Canada that a income tax cut would be more of a stimulas than the gst cut... Ignored the economist when they preached that Canada needs to become for effecient, and reducing a consumption tax does not help... Also note, the equipment you mentioned, our Senator in charge of purchases, did them through a no bid contract... Alberta would implode if Chretien had done that...
Lart from Above
0
said
0
Misty
0
said
0
Some ole Conseratives recycled crap.
Tanya Hill
0
said
0
Devon K.
0
said
0
1. Tax Cuts for everyone
2. Tax Credits for families
3. Large scale debt repayment
4. Restored funding to the provinces in several areas
5. No deficits
He has a record for the past two years and its a good one. Depending if you are right or left wing you may see it as great or not so good but I think calling it poor or bad isn't fair either.
As to the forestry industry - well there's nothing the government can do there. Seriously there's nothing they can do. Today a raw log's value is at a 30 year low. Lumber itself isn't much better. That's the market and there's nothing to do but wait till demand picks up. It will eventually as it always has. I know this because I build inventory and invoicing systems for the industry.
Would government help actually help? Nope. I've seen it before and it never does.
Mike Webster
0
said
0
Ian
0
said
0
Dean
0
said
0
Get a grip. It's the high income earners and corporations that provide good decisions and also provide jobs for people. If the corporations don't make profits, why would they want to stay in business in Canada and provide you and your family with an opportunity to feed and clothe yourselves. Let's see you put your house up and open a business. Would you expect any different.
Luc
0
said
0
VancouverDave
0
said
0
Get Riehl
0
said
0
Mark T
0
said
0
Wake up CANADA ! Wealth creation is not exactly a strong educational point in this country.
Mark E
0
said
0
Wes
0
said
0
The last two budgets have been good. I think that Flaherty is doing a good job. As for O'Conner as the Minister of National Defense, he did a good job. Having been a General he knew that we specifically needed the C-17, C-130H, the Leopard 2A6M, Chinook medium helicopters and was able to work well with the senior military staff. We finally got the equipment that we should have had years ago. This was much to the disappointment of the Liberals and their civillian staff that rake in the money carrying out worthless studies and redesigning requirments to buy from their friends. O'Conner served his purpose by knowing what we needed and getting it.
TONY
0
said
0
We can not leave this for the future generations.
Davey Legasse
0
said
0
Government stimulus of the economy has never worked and it never will work. Taking money away from people (taxes) to give to special interest groups and whiners - has ALWAYS led to unpleasant results.
RRR, Lethbridge
0
said
0
V. Joe
0
said
0
Lance
0
said
0
Zhimmy Kanada
0
said
0
As for the Finance Minister talking down about the economy. We need people that are real. Otherwise chaos occurs because then people aren't expecting problems. When you shift gears suddenly that is when mistakes and over reaction occurs.
The Canadian people are "mature" adults. Shouldn't they be treated like it? Or do you enjoy being lied to or bribed with your own money?
MRM
0
said
0
lk
0
said
0
Lance
0
said
0
Chris
0
said
0
I agree with the forestry sector getting a little extra help. The Americans and the softwood tariff hurt that industry badly.
This budget should be interesting to see!!!
Stephen Evans
0
said
0
Dave in Surrey
0
said
0
Worst Finance Minister Canada has ever seen, right up there with O'Conner as Minister of Defense...
raj
0
said
0