Top Stories -   

1
Carleen Ho holds a bottle of Concentrated Tylenol Infants' Drops Plus Cold & Cough in front of her daughter, Rachel Ho, who is under two years old, at a home in Palo Alto, Calif., Thursday, Oct. 11, 2007. (AP Photo/Paul Sakuma) Fever

Fevers in children are no cause for alarm, say doctors

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV National News: Dr. Marla Shapiro
CTV's Medical Consultant Dr. Marla Shapiro reminds us that a fever can help fight off an illness.
CTV Toronto: Know if a fever is serious
Paulin Chan looks into how to know whether you should worry about a fever.
CTV News Channel: Jeremy Friedman, doctor
The chief of pediactric medicine at Sick Childrens Hospital in Toronto says parents are over-treating fevers in children. He says that not every fever needs to be treated and that a fever is good sign your child mounting an immune response to an infection.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (17) Facebook   

Carleen Ho holds a bottle of Concentrated Tylenol Infants' Drops Plus Cold & Cough in front of her daughter, Rachel Ho, who is under two years old, at a home in Palo Alto, Calif., Thursday, Oct. 11, 2007. (AP Photo/Paul Sakuma) Fever

Photos

Carleen Ho holds a bottle of Concentrated Tylenol Infants' Drops Plus Cold & Cough in front of her daughter, Rachel Ho, who is under two years old, at a home in Palo Alto, Calif., Thursday, Oct. 11, 2007. (AP Photo/Paul Sakuma)

View Larger Image

Selected Comment

Their little bodies have to learn to fight these viruses somewhere. All part of life. Too much parental interference could actually be harmful.

Diane

Fevers in children are no cause for alarm, say doctors

talking about
Fevers in children are no cause for alarm, say doctors

Date: Mon. Feb. 28 2011 6:11 PM ET

"Fever phobia" is rampant among parents of small children, says an American Academy of Pediatrics report that seeks to dispel some of the most common myths about fevers.

Parents tend to be overly fearful of fevers, resulting in unnecessary trips to the doctor, say the authors.

"Fever in a child is one of the most common clinical symptoms managed by pediatricians and other health care providers and a frequent cause of parental concern," they write in the journal Pediatrics.

A fever is the body's natural response to infection and can actually help a child's body fight the invading bug, the report says. Fevers can slow the growth of viruses and bacteria, and enhance production of important immune-system cells. So while they shouldn't be encouraged, fevers don't always need "fighting."

In many cases, kids' fevers are caused by viruses and they will go away without medicine and without causing a child over the age of three months any harm.

(Tiny infants under the age of three months are another matter. Parents should seek medical attention if their infant develops a temperature above 100.4, because young infants, with their undeveloped immune systems, can become very sick without showing obvious signs.)

The doctors say there is a myth that an untreated fever can lead to brain damage. They say there is no proof that low-grade fevers can lead to seizures or brain damage in kids, although temperatures above 41° Celsius (105.8 Fahrenheit) can be dangerous.

They also say there is no evidence that lowering a fever will reduce the illness.

Parents tend to over-treat fevers, the doctors note, pointing out that a temperatures less than 100.4 degrees (38 Celsius) is not even considered a fever.

Some parents will even wake up their sleeping children to give them fever-reducing medicine; that's completely unnecessary, the report says.

Dr. Jeremy Friedman of Toronto's Hospital for Sick Children agrees that parents are over-treating fevers, and advises them to look at a fever as "a sort of a burglar alarm."

"The fever is not the problem, but it is a sign that you should be looking to see what's causing the fever. So what sort of infection does the child have?" Friedman told CTV News Channel Monday. "Personally, I always tell parents not to treat the fever unless the child seems to be actually uncomfortable with the fever."

The report says that the primary reason that parents should offer their child a fever reducing medication, such as acetaminophen or ibuprofen, is to make the child feel more comfortable; it shouldn't be to maintain a "normal" temperature.

Friedman echoes the opinion of the report's authors, who advise parents to focus on the general wellbeing of the child to decide how sick they are, observing symptoms such as energy levels, lethargy and appetite as measures of whether they need medical attention.

"If your child has a fever and looks well, then you can relax," says Friedman. "If your child has a fever but is not playful, is not eating and drinking, is not interacting, is hard to console, that's when you need to seek advice from your doctor."

The report notes that while acetaminophen and ibuprofen are safe and effective when used as directed, "they should be used judiciously to minimize the risk of adverse drug effects and toxicity."

"Acetaminophen is the most common single ingredient implicated in emergency department visits for medication overdoses among children," note the authors.

They add that the medications need to be stored safely, since more than 80 per cent of these emergency visits are a result of "unsupervised ingestions."

Comments are now closed for this story

Rich
said
0 0

Anne...Your comment shows a complete lack of understanding and compassion. Please don't have children. We are concerned because we love our kids.


Outraged Mike
said
0 0

Years ago as a little toddler, my dad took me repeatedly to the Children's Hospital with a high fever and vomiting only to be sent home three times.

Finally a different doctor happened to be on shift and whisked me off to ICU "stat"; temperature was breaking 42 and I was barely concious.

Had my family not been concerned and gone to the DOCTOR who are PAID to listen to their concerns, I would have died: meningitis was the root cause.

Even today I have permanent damage because someone did not bother to listen; kudos to the one doc who took the time and listened.


MommaBear
said
0 0

Viruses are MUCH different then Bacterial Infections. Parent's KNOW their children. After 7 days of fever and 3 trips to GP, we finally brought our baby to Brampton Civic. More antibiotics were prescribed for his 'mild fever - 101), 3 days later we were admitted to Sick Kids for a week due to bacterial infection. These are our babies, and we will damn well bring them for treatment wherever we feel is best. Don't like it?? Ask us if we care.


Anne
said
0 0

I trusted an ER doctor who told me my daughter's fever was "just from a virus, it will go away in 5-7 days", just to find my daughter cyanotic in her room three days later, barely breathing, and FINALLY - after being transported by ambulance to Children's Hospital - she was diagnosed with severe penumonia. We almost lost her, a day before New Year's.

I agree that fever is not something to be scared of, but that only and ONLY if the underlying reason has been correctly diagnosed by the doctor. And if you have a hunch that something's wrong with your child, then by all means take him to the ER. Id' rather be safe than sorry, especially after what we've been through.

Many doctors don't even bother anymore to properly examine a child, they just assume the fever is due to a cold or something like that. It didn't matter that my child was complaining of severe tummy aches, all the doctor cared about, was the fever. Like I couldn't have treated that myself, at home.

So please stop blaming parents who bring their children to the ER for "just a fever"! You don't know their kid's medical history.


Kim
said
0 0

When my son was 9 months old, he had a fever of 104, had a febrile seizure and also stopped breathing momentarily. Tylenol would not take that fever away. He went to the hospital by ambulance but no one could figure out what was wrong. A few days later, the spots came out - baby measles. It is best to trust your gut feeling. I don't regret going to the hospital and if you are really worried about your child, it's best to get help.


murjoyd
said
0 0

For anyone who has had a child with Kawasaki Disease, fever IS a concern. Our little guy was very sick at 8 1/2 months. We were sent home from ER with fever symptoms even though he was refusing al food and liquids. Back the next day, this time with a real diagnosis. Parents know when their kids are really sick. He's now almost 3 but for him fevers indicate a problem. The last two persistent fevers were ear infections and bronchial infections. Not dangerously high fevers, but there were other issues of concern. Sometimes it pays to get the fever checked out!


Anne
said
0 0

Now would you all please stop crowding the ER's with your little darlings because they feel a little warm?


dannad
said
0 0

I didn't give my daughter medication once for a fever, we were riding it out, she ended up having a febrile seizure and stopped breathing, an hour long ambulance ride and several days stay in the hospital......some kids can't tolerate a low fever....mine is one of them


GHW
said
0 0

@JP in Saskatchewan: because a reasonable amount of low risk suffering is good for them and like the article says, it is the body’s way of fighting the virus. I’m not suggesting this is you but in general a completely sterile, dust free, medicated, overly worried over pampered upbringing is the worst thing you can do for your kids.


Concerned Parent
said
0 0

The last time an ER doctor told me not to be concerned about a low grade fever my child had for 9 days.....my child ended up back in the ER a day later with bacterial sinusitis, meningitis, and two strokes. I too was given the lecture about low grade fevers.Parents need to follow their instinct and that parental intuition needs to be taken seriously by medical professionals. I realize, not every case is the same.


Paul ~ Kitchener
said
0 0

This is welcome news to a lot of parents (especially mothers). This is information that many of us have known. A child should be "Monitored", & low grade fever is normal, & the bodies way of carrying out a normal fucntion to build anti-bodies. In the monitoring process it the fever continues to "Spike" and hold that level for a minimal period ot time then the "Doctor is to be Notified". In parenting, it does come with responsibilites, & that is to "READ & LEARN", how to raise a child ~ (Not Easy at times). Learning skills are best learned prior to pregnacny (when it is decided to have a chlid) & the nine months of building a life is a great time to "READ & LEARN". To many children are just birthed and dragged up ~ we see them every day.


Doug ^^^ BC
said
0 0

They're our kids.Needless worry and more concern than is due comes naturally because even if the sutation is normal,we don't like to see our kids in any kind of discomfort. But,"Diane" is absolutely right.These are things they have to go through themselves.It could even be that an overly worried parent can make the child even sicker than they reallyt are.Or,at least think they are. The next phase of parenting needs to teach parents that they do their children no favours by doing everything for them.Learning about other aspects of life,such as working and being self reliant,just as learning to fight off illness and bodily infections also make a children stronger. Like "Diane" said.It's "all part of life"


Jules
said
0 0

Now their are kids who have a bad reaction to fevers like seasures so lets not be so quick to say it's no big deal..it is a big deal for some kids. Monitoring your kids is the hightest priority!


JP in Saskatchewan
said
0 0

Diane, their 'little bodies' will still fight the bug even with these medicines...why would you let a child suffer unnecessarily?


fortunate to be here
said
0 0

There's a happy medium somewhere. I remember decades ago being delirious with fever when I was young with yet-undiagnosed pneumonia. No one thought to even take my temperature and it was several more days before I was taken to doctor. Parents should always monitor a fever carefully and watch for sudden spikes. It can be very serious indeed.


Carol in NB
said
0 0

I had always maintained when my children were small that if they had a fever in the 100.1 - 101.5 range, I monitored and waited. I never worried about low-grade fevers. The fever is there for a reason just like this article says - to fight off infection. You kill the fever, you kill the body's own defence to fight it. Simple as that.


Diane
said
0 0

Their little bodies have to learn to fight these viruses somewhere. All part of life. Too much parental interference could actually be harmful.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Subscribe!

MedNews Express newsletter

CTV MedNews Express

Sign up for our weekly medical newsletter, delivered for free to your inbox.

CTV.ca Blogs

Dr. Marla Shapiro

Health Blog

Check out what our guest medical experts and CTV health reporters are writing about.

Twitter

Avis Favaro Twitter

Follow us on Twitter

Follow CTV medical specialist Avis Favaro on Twitter.

Facebook

Like us on Facebook!

Like us on Facebook

Stay connected to the latest health news while you're on Facebook with CTV MedNews

Most Talked about Stories

It is about time - as a grandparent I have watched our kids (who were allowed to fail although I do remember some nagging on our part) learn, I have watched our children now micro-manage their children. A big part of it is the fact that there are predators out there and an extreme reluctance on the parents part to alllow freedom that might result in the children becoming victims.

Harvey

Parents must learn to stop meddling, author urges