News Sections
Reports of wind farm health problems growing
CTV News Video
|
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Wed. Apr. 22 2009 9:57 PM ET
More people are coming forward saying they're experiencing sleep problems, headaches, and heart palpitations caused by living near windmills.
Ontario physician Dr. Robert McMurtry told a news conference in Toronto Wednesday that while wind energy may offer a cleaner, more efficient way to generate electricity, those who live near the giant turbines are suffering through serious health problems.
McMurtry, a retired orthopedic surgeon who used to be an assistant deputy minister of the Population and Public Health Branch of Health Canada, decided to look into the health effects of windmills with the help of Carmen Krogh, a retired Alberta pharmacist.
Krogh and a group of volunteers distributed questionnaires in areas near wind farms, asking residents to describe whether they have experienced any effects from the turbines.
Of 76 people who responded to their informal survey, 53 reported at least one health complaint. They complained of:
- headaches
- heart palpitations
- hearing problems
- stress, anxiety and depression
He reports that one resident had to be admitted to hospital with an acute hypertensive episode. Another experienced atrial fibrillation (abnormal heart rhythm).
"There is no question that they are genuinely suffering, and more people are at risk if the rules are not changes substantially," McMurtry told the committee.
Krogh's survey revealed that most of those who complained of health problems lived within a kilometre of a wind farm, while those further away were less likely to experience health problems.
The turbines don't appear to affect everyone equally and it is not clear what causes the health problems in some people. Some suspect that the constant, low frequency noise and vibration from the rotating blades may be what cause the problems.
But research into the problem is lacking. That's why McMurtry is calling on governments to conduct a lot more studies into the turbines' effects on the health of nearby residents.
"There is no epidemiological study that has been conducted that establishes either the safety or harmfulness of industrial wind turbines. In short, there is an absence of evidence," McMurtry told an Ontario government committee Wednesday.
The committee is debating The Green Energy and Green Economy Act, 2009, a bill that would enact standards for renewable energy projects, such as standardized setback requirements for wind farms.
McMurtry told the committee that until there are rigorous epidemiological studies of the health effects of wind turbines, Ontario should not go ahead with any further construction of wind turbines.
Wind power advocates contend that studies have been conducted in North America and other parts of the world and they show that residents who live near wind farms have few complaints about them.
Sean Whittaker, vice president of the Canadian Wind Energy Association, said these studies "have really come to the same conclusion and that is there is no evidence that wind turbines have an impact on human health."
Whittaker told CTV News that research he has reviewed shows that the percentage of people who approve of wind power increases the closer you get to a wind farm.
Barbara Ashbee is not one of those people.
Ashbee lives in the shadow of 11 of the 45 giant wind turbines at the Melanchthon wind farm near Shelburne, Ont., about 100 kilometres northwest of Toronto. At first, she liked the idea of living near a green-energy facility.
"I thought it was a great idea for the environment," she told CTV News.
But the day the turbines started running, she and her husband, Denis Lormand, stopped sleeping.
"They are so loud we didn't get any sleep. You can hear them in the bedroom. There is also a hum and vibration that permeates the house," she says
All that deprivation started to lead to cognitive abilities, she contends.
"My memory now is horrible," she says. "It's terrible to go night after night without sleep. We go to bed 7 p.m. because we don't know what the night will bring."
Her husband also suffers from tinnitus, which causes a constant whining sound in his ears.
With more construction at the Melanchthon wind power centre expected to bring the number of turbines at the facility to 133, the couple says they would love to sell their house but can't.
"Between the noise and the vibration, we couldn't put a For Sale sign here. There's no way," says Ashbee.
Ashbee says she has no problem with the concept of wind farms, but she says they simply shouldn't be built near residences.
"I thought they were wonderful, but they're not. There are big problems and they have to get sorted out," she says.
With a report by CTV medical specialist Avis Favaro and producer Elizabeth St. Philip
User Tools
Related Stories
Subscribe!
CTV.ca Blogs
Like us on Facebook
Stay connected to the latest health news while you're on Facebook with CTV MedNews
Related Websites
Most Popular
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
Please let's not even entertain any protectionist responses to this issue. Canadian consumers go south to shop because of the cheaper prices. How about resorting to competitive pricing as a solution...that will keep Canadian shoppers at home.
Email



Comments are now closed for this story
Mark
said
How....Dalton McGuinty and David Miller-esque.
'nuff said.
Concerned in Rural Ontario
said
mark
said
Too bad. It's unfortunate that misinformed environmental leaders have bought into this end justifies the means approach.
Many of us hoped renewable power would empower people and give meaning and force back to our democratic environmental processes. Unfortunately, the wind lobby seems to have adopted the build it at all costs approach of other dominant energy players like nuclear and oil.
Hopefully - the public will discern between the lobby and the public interest advocates before all the environmental laws are rolled back and citizens have no power to influence or protect their communities from energy interests - renewable, nuclear, fossil and hydroelectric.
mark
Kay, ON
said
I think a 5km clear distance from the closest house would solve the problem. In the meantime, those people that are badly affected by the already built windfarms must be compensated by the government(Prov/Fed).
MineItNow
said
Owen
said
Flo
said
Barpl-P
said
Posters are failing to mention the physical effects such as vibration and wind noise. No way you can discount that now.....
Mark
said
Pip
said
It is time that news organizations actually checked the facts before publishing something as amateurish as this piece. Please, do not insult the Canadian public with such drivel. Redo the entire study - with a control - so that a statistical comparison can be made to validate the results. Without the control, it is simply advertising or propaganda.
brian from lethbridge AB
said
I've worked in the oil industry for 10 years and thats almost exactly the same list of complaints I've heard from several residents around the facilities I work at.
In every one of the complaints I've worked to deal with there was ALWAYS an underlying motivation. usually quality of life, (too noisy/wreaking my view) or more ususally money.
I understand people should be compensated for inconvienience but they sure they loose credibiltiy when I see them driving a new pickup the week after they got their check
Always theres a history of medical issues to justify the complaint. But Always there's an underlying motivation ususlly not medical or health.
Keith Fisher
said
fez
said
Alternatively start R&D into making the turbines quieter..
Dan the MAN!
said
Lets open a nuclear facility instead of these wind farms and bury the crap from it for thousands of years to come.
Another solution, hand out free Tylenol and ear plugs!
Bob from Ottawa
said
That is the most ridiculous piece of pop-science journalism I have seen in a while.
Sorry CTV, but please do some real investigation first before you get everybody excited.
Gini
said
Ron in the West
said
MRC in Ontario
said
Nancy: Toronto SkyScrapers kill more birds
said
The Liberal fantasy of employing Canada was insulting to our intelligence.
Protect the birds and protest windmills.
Chasmo
said
-In the United States, turbines kill 70,000 birds per year, compared to 80,000 killed by aircraft
-57 million killed by cars
-97.5 million killed by collisions with plate glass
-hundreds of millions killed by cats.
-An article in Nature stated that each wind turbine kills an average of 4.27 birds per year.
Andrew
said
Same symptoms but where's my windmill?
said
Zamboniguy
said
Oh the humanity!
karol
said
Mike in Ontario
said
Vince M
said
Carcass counts at the base of windmills indicate windfarms in Canada kill 200,000 birds a year (google it). Makes the Oilsands 500 tailing pond ducks look like a minor incident.
give me a break Natty
said
With what I've seen and heard to date, the crux is Something New must be contested.
So, Prescribe a 2 Kilometer skirt around Wind Farms,DOCTOR. Duh!
Who Paid for this "Study" anyway??
helgi Saskatchewan
said
M Anderson
said
Ron in the West
said
Garry in NS
said
dm
said
fireflicker
said
Be ashamed of yourselves people; not just for your disagreement but for your junvenile comments.
Maybe these turbines cause problems for some people....until further studies are done I'm not ready to dismiss it like a joke. Grow up!!!
Ronald in Toronto
said
Doug BC
said
There are quite a few dedicated environmentalists who have doubts about wind turbines.Let's just make sure we get this right BEFORE most of the money goes out the door.If it is going to have problems,it's best we find out as soon as possible so we can look for other solutions.Wasting money here would limit our ability to fund other options.
New World
said
I'm not diminishing the problems these people are having, but I do see a lack of a responsible study. When you go looking for a something you will find it even if it doesn't exist, sort of like seeing a human face on Mars, the moon is made out of cheese or space visitors carved on ancient monuments (or numerous other myths).
Also it has been noted that people in Southern Alberta notice an increase in Migraines when the chinook winds blow, has this been taken into account?
Ben, Edmonton
said
Passing Wind
said
farmer fred
said
Your ignorance betrays you. Only those living on the actual land where a turbine is located get any kind of reimbursement. You live a bit away, and tough luck.
All energy comes at a cost. Where I live there are hundreds of turbines going up. When they first arrived I was excited to see them. Now having lived with them for a few years I have begun to realize they are not all they are cracked up to be. Yet the Ontario government, where this story is focused will not allow environmental or health examinations to be a consideration in their siting. They have even gone to the extent of over-riding local municipalities attempts to place them in places less upsetting or damaging to the local community.
Wind power is big money, backed by big industry. It is not the green future many of us hoped for.
Ridiculous
said
john the turbine
said
Honestly people....wake up. The turbines obviously cause a problem, lets listen to what the people that are affected say about them. If you are so unaffected by these monsters then buy their homes and shut up.
Lets Get on With it,
said
I am think Canada as big as it is with as much wind as any place is 20 years or more behind the world in using this for our energy needs.
Leave me alone
said
Steve the Pundit
said
Here's the difference: our current methods of power generation represent sunk investment costs with no means to feasibly replace the power they generate if they're taken off-line. Further, coal and nuclear plants, generally, are not located directly in someone's backyard, as these wind farms often are.
There's already strong evidence that the frequency coming off of high tension lines causes health problems; not a big stretch to implicate humming wind turbines.
Until there's a genuine understanding of what the potential long-term health effects are, there should be a moratorium on these wind farms, especially in close proximity to residential and inhabited areas. Unless future governments want to accept the burden of lawsuits generated from health concerns caused by wind farms...
BC Pensioner
said
What a load of 'Crock'.
I don't know why I keep reading this stuff. Then I look at the calendar to see if it's April 1st.
Mark from Thunder Bay
said
Open your minds but remain questioning
said
Granola
said
Nick
said
Marty in Ottawa
said
Solar panels give me nausea.
People make me sick.
The world is nuts.
explain please
said
dust-in-the-wind
said
Come on folks, Canada is a really really big country. If you can't find a place to build these things and keep them away from populated areas, you must not been outside of down town TO.
As for the "study" that Dr. McMurtry did, I am glad he was only a foot doctor and not something important like a heart or brain surgeon. 76 people interviewed with no control group etc. what kind of a scientific study is that? Instead of getting a pharmacist (and I don't see the link here, only really funny punch lines), he should have worked with a statistician, or actuary, or high school math teacher or someone that knows about numbers and how to collect and interpret them responsibly.
I'm not saying that there can't be negative effects from turbines, but pleeease show me some legitimate data. If there is a problem, find somewheres else in our 9,900,000 square km country to putting where they won't negatively impact the living population (I hear Ottawa meets the criteria).
wind farms are not part of the solution
said
In addition to human health issues is the decimation of migatory birds. Wind farms are keeping these deadly stats closely guarded.
We want to keep as much of nature, as natural as possible. Why would we want to build wind farms on pristine skylines? These are the most ugly looking additions to a landscape one can imagine.
The costs of producing power from wind farms are not competitive with hydro, coal, nuclear ...... why do we persist?
The EU countries do not have the abundant fossil fuels that other countries have. The EU countries import 40% of their oil and natural gas from Russia. There is a huge political game being played out in the EU and Russia. We, in North America do not need to be a part of it.
Lets find ways for cheap energy sources.
BAHHHH to Wind farms. Save the birds and human health.
Larry the science guy
said
fuelly
said
Alex (Toronto)
said
ron
said
SK Prairie Boy
said
Les in BC
said
People can live beside waterfalls, rapids, highways, large volume traffic streets and even rock crushers and they soon become used to the sounds and it does not effect them.
I think they are reporting the whiners without looking into the average issues that affect a cross population of people compared to these people who have reported all these health symptoms.
BMac
said
"If wind farms are truly causing harm to people that is nearly as bad as problems to the environment caused by the petroleum industry."
Yeah Albertaboy! Let's just build new coal plants! Why not meet our energy requirements by burning endangered species?! It's 'basically' the same as wind power, right?
*Rolls eyes*
DC in AB
said
Rick in NB
said
Remember thalimide was the best thing a pregnant woman could take for her nerves in the 1950s.
Tono
said
I've never liked those windmills. I've always thought that they were visually pollutive, and that they take up too much space.
JP
said
A buzzing noise all day and night would drive me insane (I've dealt with that before with a neon sign outside my window...god awful)
This really sucks for people living close enough to the wind turbines.
Prof. Pye Chartt
said
- headaches
- heart palpitations
- hearing problems
- stress, anxiety and depression
________________
Big deal. This happens to me every time Michael Ignatieff speaks (lectures) publicly.
When I change the news channel, I feel better instantly.
----------------
Seriously, put this "report" back in the oven and serve it up after it's cooked. The results strike me as psychosomatic gobbledygook.
I want Dalton McGuinty to live in a field of windmills for at least 5 years...and then we'll run some tests.
MAL
said
This article needs to be filed under 'grow up'. Obviously living under a mega fan will be troublesome, they should be placed in areas with sound buffers etc. until technology catches up to safety.
I live 250 yards from the DVP and the sound buffers are great, emergency vehicles and trucks using engines as breaks not withstanding. lol
Researcher for Unbiased Truth
said
Neil A.
said
LS Brew
said
Brain (pinky's twin)
said
Michael Schwartz
said
a study is just a study
said
Windy EarAcres
said
tommyflash
said
Mike
said
Sean H in Ottawa
said
A more accurate informal survey would have been to ask for health problems spanning the last 5 years and see how many of the people surveyed have the same symptoms over the same time periods. There should be no mention of the turbines in the survey. People will lie if they think that it might get rid of the ugly turbine they've been grumbling about at the townhall meetings.
Tinnitus? I guess that's possible... but they usually do noise assessments. If not, get them to measure the decibel level. There are clear rules about how loud things can be. These things are far from silent but it's a whooshing sound. I've heard them. I found the sound to be easily ignored.
As for not being able to sell. I don't believe that at all. There are plenty of people that would probably pay a premium to live there if you could ensure them that your house actually makes use of the energy generated by the turbines.
kjo
said
Windy Man
said
It's all about the statistical significance. I'm sure we can find the same health problems around public parks, cities, and around Loch Ness...
Joe in Huron County
said
Most people do not choose to live by these turbines, the farmers are the ones who own the land and the companies who finance the turbines decide where to put them. Most of these problems are from people who have had turbines installed close to their homes. I have worked beside turbines for the day and the constant noise drove me crazy (this was on a calm day) imagine hearing this day in and night.
Only those who own the land get any payback from a turbine so no they don't get a discount.
Jason
said
Jason-TO
said
jimmy-vic
said
John F
said
Skeptical in Edmonton
said
Richard in Ontario
said
tmc2318
said
Ted
said
I question the mention of unnamed "research" and "studies" used on both sides of this argument.
If there is evidence, then publish the URL so we can all read it and judge for ourselves.
How about offering some interested members of the public a sleep over in the affected area?
Sylvain Ottawa
said
This story and the "report" is so misleading. I suffer from tinnitus, headaches and a heart arrhythmia. I live nowhere near wind farms, power lines or nuclear waste. So what am I to make of this.
I would contend that if you sent the same survey to 100 random people you could come up with similar results.
You can make a survey say just about anything you want. Some aspect of psychology is at work here. Make a big deal about the wind farm then give your sample source a series of questions.
If wind farms were as bad as this story contends the Dutch would be a very miserable population given the thousands of windmills that dot that country.
Peter Legend
said
Life does go on after all
Jonzo
said
Rick
said
AlbertaBoy
said