News Sections
Top Comments: April 19, 2009
By: Michael Stittle, CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Sun. Apr. 19 2009 7:51 PM ET
How do you solve a problem like Karlheinz?
The German-Canadian arms dealer has lurked in the shadows of Canadian news for years, occasionally emerging for a headline, and our readers either find him enraging or as dull as a phone book.
This week, Karlheinz Schreiber returned for a public inquiry into his murky dealings with former prime minister Brian Mulroney. Like a soft-voiced P. T. Barnum, he promised to reveal "seven scandals in one."
Finally, we would hear why he paid Mulroney in envelopes stuffed with cash, exactly what Mulroney did for that money, and when they made their deal.
But none of that impressed our first reader to comment on the story. "Sherry" wrote: "Boring ... This whole thing has had its 5 minutes of fame."
The second comment, from "P. Bussey," argued with the first: "This is boring and has had the proverbial 5 minutes of fame? Government ineptitude and the Self-Serving Corruption within it...is worth all the coverage/exposure it can get, to not only 'clean up' or 'clean out' those that think people vote for them 'only' to satisfy 'their greed' or 'own agenda,' but to make Government answerable to those that elect."
That set up a debate that simmered throughout the week. But one issue that troubles both groups is the sheer cost of the inquiry. According to The Canadian Press, the final price may be $14 million. That's 62 times the amount of cash Mulroney received from Schreiber -- or 46 times, depending on whether it was $225,000 or $300,000.
Mulroney called for the inquiry to defend his reputation. But the cost seems even higher if Schreiber is only promising "seven scandals in one" to stay in Canada. Germany wants him extradited to face charges of tax evasion, but he remains here to testify.
As "Oscar in Ottawa" wrote: "Mr. Schreiber will say what he has to in order to avoid jail in his native Germany. Mr. Mulroney has been found innocent of allegations of wrongdoing in the past pertaining to this. Mr. Schreiber's claims have allowed much needed tax payer's money to be bled from the government for this inquiry in favour of 'transparency.'"
We are also in a recession. What was once a large amount of money -- $14 million -- is now an obscene amount. For Canadians struggling to keep their heads above water, the inquiry is more wasteful theatrics from Ottawa.
As "Jason" wrote: "Is all the money spent to find the so-called truth from Schreiber going to help the economy get back on track or give jobs to those who need them, or provide better health-care for Canadians? No, it's just a political witch hunt that will only tarnish reputations here and there ... This should have been done the last time around; not having to wait so long with high costs that will do nothing for Mr. and Mrs. Canadian."
The inquiry has also become politicized. While Mulroney wanted the inquiry, some readers say it was forced on him by the opposition parties to embarrass the Conservatives. Others say Prime Minister Stephen Harper granted the inquiry to get at Mulroney, because of some perceived, undying division between the old Progressive Conservatives and Reform Party.
That last theory gained traction when rumours surfaced that Mulroney was no longer a member of the Conservative Party. And earlier, Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff had personally wished him a happy birthday while Harper did not. It confirmed what some Canadians believe in their hearts: Parliament Hill is a high school.
"Prof. Pye Chartt" wrote: "All good conspiracy theories are delightful, because they artfully defy basic logic and common sense. (Additionally, they provide politically biased instigators with a means to stick a plastic fork in someone's eye.)"
I will give the final say to "Robert Kury," who said the cost of the inquiry is not only understandable but necessary because it goes beyond one man's reputation and another man's purported fight to stay in Canada.
He wrote that in the end, the inquiry is about Canadian values and ensuring our elected officials conduct themselves honourably. Surely that's worth our taxpayers' money?
"I am not bored with all of the reporting of the Mulroney Schreiber affair," "Robert Kury" wrote. "I was shocked and became cynical of our government when this affair was not investigated properly in the first place. Those that complain about the cost of this investigation do not really understand the cost of our 'justice' system. The 'system' is expensive. What are the alternatives (??) and what are the costs?? ... The conduct of our government and what our government does with the information from this inquiry/investigation, are and will be just as important to Canadians as the investigation itself. Values are at the heart of who we are as Canadians."
User Tools
Related Stories
Most Popular
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
It is about time - as a grandparent I have watched our kids (who were allowed to fail although I do remember some nagging on our part) learn, I have watched our children now micro-manage their children. A big part of it is the fact that there are predators out there and an extreme reluctance on the parents part to alllow freedom that might result in the children becoming victims.
Email
Comments are now closed for this story
Bradford, James
said
Gomery didn't put one politician behind bars yet we all know that is where it originated from so how come nobody is in jail outside of the bureaucratic fall guys?
We never go to the bottom of this....why? Who is doing the covering up? Politicians, the RCMP or both? Something is fishy.
Concerned Canadian
said
I didn't say that Mr. Chretien was innocent of everything- I said that the Gomery Inquiry found no evidence against him in the ad scam affair. In this country, people are innocent until proven guilty. In Chretien's case, he has been "tried" and found innocent in Ad scam. Again, what evidence do you have to the contrary?
As for Mr. Mulroney, the investigation continues. We will have to see how the evidence comes out, won't we?
Red X
said
Would all the conservatives who benefitted from the Airbus purchases like "Britan" be criminally tried.
Note crown corp. Air Canada was eventually sold to privative interests...
Balgonie Bob
said
Robert Brise
said
Rick in NB
said
Are you Mary Higgins Clarke? She is a established fiction writer who can make any subject a monster.
Concerned Canadian
said
No, the Prime Minster I was referring to is Mr. Mulroney. Perhaps you haven't been following the inquiry, but he is the one accused, not Mr. Chretien.
Mary Clarke
said
He's still raking in cash,from all the trips he made to China, onthe tax payers dime,to set himself up for when he left office. And let's not forget,he was the P.M during adscam,where envelopes of cash,filled many pockets,and $40 Million is still unaccounted for.
spaz
said
prof pye Chartt only has a vivid imagination, and too much time on his hands.
Perhaps the cheapest way to hear the "coles notes" version of Schreiber's testimony would be to ship him back to Germany....and let him sing from the cell!!
Cara
said
Art
said
Prof. Pye Chartt
said
"Professor Pye Chartt,
Is there anything you don't know? CTV features you every week."
_________________
Well, Alex, according to my wife, there's plenty I don't know about not having an opinion. (An apparent "faux pas" at a cocktail party last evening.)
P.S. My phenomenal cerebral dexterity, lighthearted bent, and pointed logic is a cross I bear. Please don't hold it against me.
Balgonie Bob
said
Zoe
said
I was wondering the same thing lol
Concerned Canadian
said
WB Watters, MD
said
If we use the 62 times multiplication factor, as mentioned in this article, then this inquiry is analogous to a family spending $62.00 to locate a missing $1.00! Or a business spending $6200.00 o find a missing $100.00. Who, in their right mind, would ever consider doing this?
Alex
said
Is there anything you don't know? CTV features you every week.
Rob NS
said
Instead of stealing or covering up stealing, the PM takes chances with the Canadian public, like yesterday, by giving large investments or loans to Latin American. People who are educated, and people who know anything about Latin American, know that this is a great plan. Latin American is on the verge of exploding into a major player on the world oil stage. All stocks related to Latin America have been sryrocketing (recession excluded), and will again as the recession comes to an end. There has been offshore oil not even fully explored their, combined with cheap labour..(Not the CAW down their)...they will be doing great, and we will be a part of letting them get a firm footing...our ""Bailout loans"" could not go to more secure place...a thousand times more secure than a loan to the CAW...which is a blackhole for loans...
Michael (Ottawa)
said
We have a political system (both sides) which has demonstrated large scale corruption in recent years and we need to expose this corruption as a lesson to those leaders who would give into temptation which will always be there when you control the power of a nation.
Its imperative that we get to the truth of this scandal... we all know in our gut SOMETHING is not right. Hopefully by 'dispersing the fog' will we get to the truth.
Prof. Pye Chartt
said
Thus far, following this Inquiry has been akin to watching an unleashed dog at a park sniff its way around, in all random directions, looking for "evidence" of other dogs, squirrels, or chipmunks.
Schreiber's self-contradictions, loose and selective memory, and failure (inability?) to serve up "seven scandals in one" at this point has rendered the appearance of a farce in the making.
Yet, we wait...as, I, too, believe, the Inquiry serves a highly legitimate public purpose. In terms of final cost, for those tracking government budgetary and expenditure waste, $14M is peanuts.