Top Stories -   

Economic crisis forces boomer retirement delays

 Economic crisis forces boomer retirement delays

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (20)Add Comments Facebook   

By: Parminder Parmar, CTV.ca News

Date: Fri. Mar. 6 2009 6:10 AM ET

Dr. Maria Hugi has been doing shift work as an emergency room doctor in Vancouver for the better part of three decades.

She enjoys her work, but at 56 she's feeling the toll of long hours.

"It's really for young people," she said about the ER. "You're mentally and physically taxed."

Hugi thought she would retire in a couple of years, enjoy a slower life, read books she's always been too busy to get to, or maybe even head north to work as a doctor in a rural community. But then the economic crisis hit -- and all of her plans disappeared, along with much of her investment portfolio.

Hugi said her retirement savings portfolio has lost about 40 per cent of its value over the past year. She and her husband, who is also an ER doctor, have also taken huge losses on a home they own in neighbouring Washington State.

"Now it looks it's not freedom at 55, it's going to be freedom at 85," she said, only half laughing at a situation that has upended her retirement hopes.

"No way. I'm not making plans for retirement. My husband is 63 and he's not talking about retirement either. I'll work as long as I have to," she said.

The couple is among thousands of Canadians who are being forced to delay their retirement because of an economic crisis that has sent stock markets around the world tumbling.

An RBC poll released earlier this month found that 28 per cent of Canadian baby boomers are planning on delaying their retirement due to the economic downturn. Forty-three per cent of baby boomers polled said they will hold off retirement by one or two years, while 37 per cent said they will wait three to five years, according to an RBC media release. Another nine per cent said they don't know when they'll get a chance to retire.

Hugi said she's not surprised to find that increasing numbers of Canadians are planning to delay their retirements. She said she even knows of several doctors who have come out of retirement to work so they can make ends meet.

Hugi said she realizes she and her husband are better off than many other Canadians. But like others, she said it's difficult to watch her investments crumble.

"It's hard to lose money ... and reduce your lifestyle," she said.

Retirement strategies

Lee Anne Davies, the head of Advanced Retirement Strategies at RBC told CTV.ca their clients have become increasingly concerned about their retirement nest eggs -- and if they'll be able to maintain their lifestyles after they quit working.

"The closer that you are to your retirement date, the more likely you are to wonder if you have a large-enough nest egg," she told CTV.ca.

She said some Canadians are planning to stay in the full-time workforce for a few more years, but others are cutting back their hours or taking on less-stressful jobs. She said there are a variety of strategies Canadians thinking of retirement can employ to fit their goals and timing.

"You don't necessarily have to go into full retirement," she said, adding, "you can scale down the type of work you're doing."

Davies also noted that historically markets have bounced back - and investment portfolios in the years ahead, even for those in retirement, will not necessarily reflect today's market conditions.

"You could (also) adjust your thinking on the type of lifestyle you want, but that's not what a lot of people want to do," she said.

"But that would be part of the conversation (with financial advisers) ... do you still need to have a large home? Or could you work part time and pick up some health and dental benefits."

Like many Canadians, Hugi said all of the news reports have left her confused about when the economy may turn around.

"I don't know if the pundits are right, but a lot of them are saying it's going to be a long recession ... I don't know," she said, adding she's not confident she'll see her investment money bounce back to allow her to retire any time soon.

"It's money on paper in essence. But it's money we were counting on, money we were looking forward to," she said.

Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz
1

Add New Comment ( )

JD
said
0 0

I'm 50, single, white, female. I don't make much over minimum wage. I don't have a nest egg. My kids are almost done their post secondary ed. I am still going to enjoy some sort of retirement - semi, probably. In about 5 years I am going to cut my hours in half and enjoy myself. I won't be flying first class, but I'll be enjoying myself. The books that I enjoy reading may be from the library and they may be read in front of a campfire in northern Ontario, not on a beach in the Carribbean, but they will be enjoyed, nonetheless. Pragmatism. Look it up, folks. There are always people who have it worse than you do out there. Learn to enjoy what you have. Because the years of striving and stress may be all that are left to you, then what will your legacy be?


liz ottawa
said
0 0

to Miramichi kid. I am about to retire at 55 and I agree with your comment. fortunately I am in a position to do so because I will get a fed pension, but the biggest issue is that I have not incurred alot of debt. however some of us baby boomers are presently helping our kids with university etc, so their debt load does not permit them to leave, particularly if they like their job. but generally I agree with you that with the current market for youth drying up, that older workers should leave the workforce if they are in a position to do so, it only makes sense. some people work till they are over 60 even if they dont need to financially, and I just find that very selfish. in retirement people can always find new outlets to keep themselves busy. I plan to.


KJ in Kingston Ontario
said
0 0

With the worst job losses in 59 years in the US being reported today -- there may not be any way to 'delay' retirement -- regardless of needs or desires.


Spenc
said
0 0

So all my time spent worrying the last 20 years that I did not put enough away was for naught. The boomers are no further ahead than me after all their saving. How Ironic. Its as if I had been investing all along. Just goes to show you nothing is permanent. I still have 17 yeas left to work so we'll see how it goes!


Julius R, Sydney, Australia
said
0 0

It's just sad to think that you worked 30 or 40 years, then realized that you could not retire yet because the money intended to support your retirement had been lost in economic crisis. It just sucks.


AJW
said
0 0

I have no sympathy. if have worked for 30 years, you should have enough to retire. what was she spending her money one? a mercedes every year??????


CROSS
said
0 0

And what of those who did retire and then they were clobbered by this recession?
Try get your job back...no way...and searching for a new one is futile after age 60.


kate
said
0 0

I find it a bit of a joke to hear people whining about retirement and having to postpone it. First, let's get some perspective here. What these people are really saying is that their extremely high standard of life will have to be altered - it's not like they will be out on the streets begging for change. Maybe instead of flying to Florida for 6 months of the year, they can only do 2 months. Instead of living in a 10,000 sq ft house, they'll have to downsize to a condo. These people will have government pension and an RRSP payment - it won't be as high as it would have been or as high as the GM retirees but they will certainly be better off than the minimum wage worker who has to rely only on government pension. I wish the media would highlight the real poor instead of the upper middle class or wealthy who suddenly find themselves having to live like the rest of us peasants.


Shirlee - SK
said
0 0

Some people I work with have lost so much on their pension they are ready to hold onto their jobs for a couple more years. This is going to be terrible for the young people who should be stepping into these jobs.


Phil
said
0 0

I look forward to seeing Harper cleaning toilets at Tim Hortons when he's 70. It will be the first time in decades that we've seen a federal politician working in the national interest!


nc
said
0 0

Another sob story from well paid professionals.
I guess baby boomers do not want to lower their standards. I'm a boomer and I have come to the conclusion that we are the most cry baby and soft in the belly demographic.
The best thing for us to do is to get out of the way and let our children and grandchildren get on with their productive lives and we can sit back and do other things.


T-Dog
said
0 0

If two doctors don't have enough to retire on after 30 years practicing medicine, then they are just a couple of idiots.


KJ Kingston Ontario
said
0 0

When you are faced with half the retirement income you had expected to have --that's the simple reality. Of course this will ripple through the economy for the fading of our generation. Retired people will eventually have to cut out everything that isn't absolutely essential: travel, entertainment, dinning out, then dentist appointments, drugs, vacations, home repairs and some how close the gap between income and expense. That is how it is done. That retirement money is gone -- and there's no use expecting it to magically come back. In my view government regulation should have prevented RRSP money from being placed in unsecure investments. But it is too late now. If failed government policy hadn't led to artificially low interest returns on savings, then people wouldn't have been forced to choice risky investments just to stay even with inflation -- and most would have stayed in GICSs There's no shortage of blame to go around.


Scott in Kingston
said
0 0

So if rich doctors can't retire because of this economic bust, what about the rest of us who weren't pulling in over 140K/year?????


John S. in Vancouver
said
0 0

I think that this economic crisis is causing a lot of us baby boomers to rethink our priorities along with our retirement plans. It might be that we have to help support our families, or possibly our investments may have lost value or even disappeared.

While we may have to keep working, we need to think about what work we’re doing. Given that we may have to work long past what we thought was going to be our retirement age, we need to consider how we want work smarter. That means finding work that is less stressful, and perhaps less physically demanding; something that we can do through age 70 or beyond if needed. For some of us, that might mean cutting down on hours, or looking to a different work environment.

I think that key thing that we’re going to have to realize is that what we used to think of as ‘total retirement’ may never happen for us, and that way of thinking may be very difficult to accept.



DANIEL H
said
0 0

Yes there are many of us with the same plans to keep working. I have no problem with having work, but just did not plan on doing this till I'm too old to enjoy a retirement. Things will trun around, but the timing is not good for many of us. The thing is that we will still need all those benifit programs like health care from our emplyment past 65!


david sawkiw[saskatchewan farmer]
said
0 0

This is hard to believe!!A Doctor complaining about not enough money? General motors employees squealling about money.
Good to see some people waking up to the real world.
You know folks,,most farmers where I live have a 65th birthday and it passes like just another day.This has been the reality for as long as I can remember.The last time farmers actually got to retire with any money[or dignity]was probably in the seventies.
I don't want to seem nasty but,,,,,welcome to world of the workers who have provided the cheap food you all have enjoyed for most of your lives.


Roland Godin
said
0 0

Be confident the system works, it is making the needed corrections. Once government ,industry and our greed, hoarding and piracy, is controlled markets will recover.
Numéro-Brunswick


bob
said
0 0

The bankers, stockbrokers, and regulatory clowns who got us into this mess will be enjoying their well financed retirements whenever they like. The rest of us can work until we drop.


Miramichi Kid
said
0 0

I can understand those whom do not have a pension or retirement savings to withdraw from, but those who do, say provincial and federal government employees should be forced out at a specific age or number of years served to make room for the upcoming generations.


 

Advertisement

Contest

Most Talked about Stories

It is about time - as a grandparent I have watched our kids (who were allowed to fail although I do remember some nagging on our part) learn, I have watched our children now micro-manage their children. A big part of it is the fact that there are predators out there and an extreme reluctance on the parents part to alllow freedom that might result in the children becoming victims.

Harvey

Parents must learn to stop meddling, author urges