Health -   

1

Genes can predict criminal tendencies: study

jail generic; prison generic; police custody generic; behind bars; crime; crime generic; police generic; jail generic; prison generic; police custody generic; behind bars; crime; crime generic; police generic;
jail generic; prison generic; police custody generic; behind bars; crime; crime generic; police generic;

View Larger Image

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (11) Facebook   

Date: Sunday Jan. 29, 2012 12:11 PM ET

Is that a gun in your genes or are you just opportunistic?

A new U.S. study suggests the line between a life of crime and an honest existence could have more to do with your genetic makeup than your environment.

Researchers from University of Texas, Florida State University and Sam Houston State University were looking to determine the role genetic makeup has in someone becoming a "life-course persistent offender" -- characterized by antisocial behavior during childhood that can progress to violence or other serious crimes.

They looked at 4,000 subjects with three different behavioural paths: life-long offenders, those who experimented with crime (often substance use and minor property offences) in adolescence and those who stayed on the straight-and-narrow. They found genetic makeup influences life-course offenders by about 20 per cent more than it influences temporary teen troublemakers.

"The overarching conclusions were that genetic influences in life-course persistent offending were larger than environmental influences," said Dr. J. C. Barnes, criminologist at the University of Texas and co-author of a paper on the study published in a recent issue of Criminology.

"For abstainers, it was roughly an equal split: genetic factors played a large role and so too did the environment. For adolescent-limited offenders, the environment appeared to be most important," Barnes said in a news release.

Their analysis did not identify the specific genes that might lead people down different paths.

"There are likely to be hundreds, if not thousands, of genes that will incrementally increase your likelihood of being involved in a crime even if it only ratchets that probability by one per cent," Barnes said. "It still is a genetic effect. And it's still important."

The issue of using genes to predict a person's behaviour is not without significant controversy, which Barnes noted in his paper.

After reading some promotional material on the study, University of Guelph's Joe Colasanti -- an associate professor of molecular biology and genetics -- pointed out it fails to consider the unique situations behind each crime.

"Researchers have to be extremely careful when trying to connect genetic factors to behavioural traits," he told CTVNews.ca in an email. "There are so many things to consider, i.e. What defines a criminal? How desperate does a person have to be to commit a crime? How many abstainers would commit crimes if they were subjected to desperate situations?

"I can't comment on whether they have controlled for these factors, but frankly I can't see how they could."

The paper also doesn't appear to account for epigenetics, an area of study that shows gene behaviour can be altered without changing the genes themselves.

"There is increasing evidence that exposure to environmental conditions during early development (in utero) can affect behaviour later in life," Colasanti said. "So that is something else that these researchers might keep in mind."

Comments are now closed for this story

dante
said
0 0

There is absolutely no evidence in existence that can prove this materialistic propoganda from a corrupt decadent science community living in the dark ages.


RDL
said
0 0

Malarkey. My Father had spent a considerable amount of time in a few of Ontario's penal institutions. If this is genetic then one could argue that my brother and I are bound for the same lot in life, as a predetermined criminals. This is about the choices we all make in life, plain and simple. I would submit that the vast majority of criminals are a product of their environment, and it is generational. So then what of me and my brother? We made a choice not to follow in our fathers footsteps. Our dad did not make the right choices in life and subsequently he had a debt to pay to society. Before he passed he said that he wished he had made better choices in life and he regretted what he done. By the way his father was not a criminal either. So if it is genetic then again I ask why am I not subject to criminal activities/tendencies? What is criminal is how much this study must have cost.


island girl
said
0 0

You might have a genetic predisposition for something but it is down down to the person's WILL to do it. Like a person predisposed to gain weight. They can lose weight by sticking to controlled portions. If they say, Hey it's in the genes and go hogwild it's still their own decision. Have people no willpower at all these days? Is everyone playing the role of victim?


PTO5607
said
0 0

Scientific evidence of what many have long suspected. I have known people who have screwed up golden opportunities to have rewarding careers by doing stupid criminal activities that cause them to get fired or worse. One fellow, who was very charismatic and likable, was given a good paying job as a construction foreman on a fairly big project. This would have led to bigger things for him. He was fired for stealing and selling building supplies from the site. The few thousand dollars he got made no sense considering the amount he lost when he lost the job. Some people are just predisposed to commit crimes, even when most of us would not. This does not excuse anyone, it's just more of a reason to have them kept away from the rest of us.


Scott M
said
0 0

I know for a fact that your genetic makeup can led to crime. I struggled with alcohol addiction for 25 years during those years the police were at my door weekly, Some studies in the US say that alcohol is involved in 81% of homicides, 76% of felonies, 83% of wife beating and 67% of child beatings so those predisposed to drink booze are more likely to commit a crime. After 25 years of failed attempts to quit I gave up on the medical community, for 25 years the doctors tried many anti-depressants on me to try to stop the anxiety sleeplessness & instant mood changes. 8 years ago I quit taking there advice I knew that marijuana produced the effects the doctors were trying to achieve so I started smoking pot, 1 joint a day has kept me away from booze and the police have had no need to come to my house in 8 years. Health Canada's web site says that marijuana works better as an anti-depressant for some because it works immediately prescription anti-depressants can take months before you know how your body is going to react. The prescription drugs have extremely bad side effects that always sent me out drinking. Thank god for marijuana, it saved my life. Alcohol killed my father at 49 years of age, my genetics was the reason for my alcohol addiction.


Prairie Boy
said
0 0

Who funds this dangerous garbage?


James kelso
said
0 0

So spending money on incarceration after the fact has not lowered crime rates significantly. We need to try something different. Since statistics show, Mentally healthy people commit less crime. We need to put our resources into mental health care rather than jails.


J.C.
said
0 0

I can just imagine those with criminal tendencies using this as another excuse for their behaviour and that "it isn't my fault - my genes made me do it!!" The truth of the matter is most of them just do not take responsibility for their own actions and will find any excuse for their behaviour other than their own selves.


Mq
said
0 0

Age old argument of nature vs nurture. People may be predisposed to certain tendencies, granted. But do not try and tell me loving parents, nurturing parents do not off set these tendencies. Their are just way to many variables in someone's life to make genetics the single guiding factor to behavior. This study has shown us nothing new, that I wasn't exposed to 20 years ago in university. Nurture vs Nature, like God vs Science, will be debated till the end of time.


David
said
0 0

Utter non-sense!! Criminal activity like all similar behaviours starts in the heart of man not the individuals genes otherwise we had better allow all criminals to go free because they are not responsible for their genetic makeup. This is a total denial of personal responsibility. This is laughable were it not so pathetic.


Gregg
said
0 0

So, we are going to get out of this: 1) Judges ruling a pre-existing medical condition and we'll have some nasty offenders running around unconvictable (as in the mentally ill) or 2) Condemned/Acclaimed at birth - see: Gattaca.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Health Stories

oxycontin

Saskatchewan joins push to stop funding OxyContin

More

Senior citizen

U.S. Alzheimer's strategy: Better treatment by 2025

More

CFIA generic

CFIA recalls cooked ham sold in Ontario and Quebec

More