Health -   

1
Skiers, wearing helmets, watch as others finish a day on the slopes at Mont Tremblant, on Thursday, March 19, 2009.  (Peter McCabe / THE CANADIAN PRESS) A sign warns skiers of the risks of skiing at the Killington ski resort in Killington, Vt., Dec. 1986. (AP / Toby Talbot) ski helmets, law, nova scotia

Make helmets mandatory on the slopes, doctors urge

Viewer

CTV News Video

Canada AM: Push for mandatory helmets
Dr. Natalie Yanchar, a pediatric surgeon, explains why there are so many serious injuries from skiing and snowboarding, and explains why she wants mandatory helmet legislation across the country.
CTV News: Devastating injuries from winter sports
More than 5,000 Canadians are seriously injured every year from winter activities. Now doctors are trying to target preventable injuries with the mandatory use of a helmet. CTV's Medical Specialist Avis Favaro has more.
CTV Edmonton: Call for mandatory helmet use
Pediatricians believe enforcing helmet use on the slopes will make a bog difference in the numbers of brain injuries.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (35) Facebook   

Skiers, wearing helmets, watch as others finish a day on the slopes at Mont Tremblant, on Thursday, March 19, 2009.  (Peter McCabe / THE CANADIAN PRESS) A sign warns skiers of the risks of skiing at the Killington ski resort in Killington, Vt., Dec. 1986. (AP / Toby Talbot) ski helmets, law, nova scotia

Photos

Skiers, wearing helmets, watch as others finish a day on the slopes at Mont Tremblant, on Thursday, March 19, 2009.  (Peter McCabe / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

View Larger Image

Date: Tue. Jan. 17 2012 8:58 AM ET

The Canadian Paediatric Society is calling for legislation that would make it mandatory for skiers and snowboarders of any age to wear a helmet.

In a position paper released Tuesday, the CPS cited research that shows snowboarding and skiing are the second- and third-leading causes of injuries related to outdoor winter activities, after hockey.

The agency pointed out that helmets can protect against many of these injuries, which range from sprains and fractures to head and neck trauma.

"People think that because they are an experienced skier or snowboarder they won't get injured. But they can't control external factors like the terrain or other skiers who might not be as experienced," Dr. Natalie Yanchar, chair of the CPS injury prevention committee, said in a statement.

"The risk is especially high for children and youth, who have increased vulnerability to head injuries and take longer to recover."

Yanchar said that with mandatory legislation, "governments can send a strong message that helmets are important and reduce the risk of brain injury, disability and death."

The paper cited a pooled analysis of research that showed skiers and snowboarders who wear a helmet are less likely to suffer a head injury. The data showed that a helmet reduces the risk of head injury by 35 per cent.

The statement said new laws would be especially beneficial to children and youth, who face greater risk of injury to their lower extremities and their head and neck, including severe head injuries.

The agency also dismissed critics who claim that helmets increase the risk of neck injuries, or encourage riskier behaviour in skiers and snowboarders. The paper cited research that failed to find a link between helmets and neck injuries, or risky behaviour.

Currently, Nova Scotia is the only province planning to make helmets mandatory for skiers and snowboarders. Effective November 2012, the province will fine skiers and snowboarders caught without a helmet on a ski hill $250.

The serious risks related to winter sports were thrust into the spotlight last week, when Canadian freestyle skier Sarah Burke sustained a head injury in a training incident at the Park City Mountain resort in Utah.

Burke, 29, remains in the Neuro Critical Care Unit at the University of Utah hospital in Salt Lake City. Doctors had planned to update her condition at a news conference scheduled for Monday. However, those plans were cancelled Monday morning.

According to the position paper, about 15 per cent of Canadians over age 12 say they strapped on skis or a snowboard at least once in 2008-2009.

However, there is little hard data on just how many skiers and snowboarders also don a helmet. Surveys of ski lift operators and skiers put helmet use in Canada at about 55 per cent.

The CPS issued recommendations to those who like to hit the slopes, including:

  • Wear goggles, and wrist guards for snowboarders.
  • Check equipment at the start of each ski or snowboard day, and adjust boots and bindings as required.
  • Don't borrow equipment and only rent from a reputable ski shop.
  • Take lessons with a certified instructor.
  • Never ski or snowboard alone.
  • Abstain from drugs or alcohol when hitting the slopes.

In a statement, the American Academy of Pediatrics said it "strongly endorses" the new CPS recommendations.

"Helmets have been demonstrated to significantly reduce the risk of head injury, and advocacy efforts should focus on the mandatory use of helmets," said H. Gary Gardner, chair of the AAP's council on injury, violence and poison prevention. "Pediatricians should counsel families that skiers and snowboarders should always wear a helmet, at all ages and at all skill levels."

Comments are now closed for this story

Chris
said
0 0

One thing i've noticed from the "Helmet" generation is they have no survival instincts at all. they have had a helmet and equipment on for any semi risky behavior they have ever done so the never developed the skills to protect their vital organs. they have poor reflexes and get serious injuries from simple accidents. when my horse tripped at a gallop and i flew off, my instincts forced me to put my arms up to protect my head and curl into a ball, to minimize injury. i got up with a few scrapes to my arms but no injuries. i agree with helmets for some things, but it starting to get ridiculous with this legislation. nobody is saying you can't wear a helmet if you want to. but leave me out of it.


Sissy laws?!
said
0 0

The number of "sissies" in our society is becoming alarming. Where are the risk takers, the independent people who know how to make their own decisions without big brother doing it for them?? I don't need the government telling me how to live my life, perhaps you do but I do not, never have and never will. I am capable on my own to figure life out. These people who think they can protect against every situation in life are deluding themselves. Risk is a part of life, everyday, everywhere you are there is risk and I do not want my government telling me how to live my life at every turn in the road. Enough with the sissy way of thinking folks. Stand up and be yourself.


Stem Christie
said
0 0

Skiing is a sport in which you can have an accident and it does not depend on whether or not you wear a helmet. You should not have to pay extra for health care if you're not wearing a helmet. I've been skiing for over 50 years. I bought a helmet after Natasha Richardson's accident on the Nansen at Mont Tremblant. There is ski etiquette whereby you use common sense and you don't exceed your ability by skiing out of control.it's stupid to say that if you have a helmet you're going to ski faster. Again, there is common sense and if yahoo skiiers are putting other people in danger, the resort has the right to take them off the hill, or the ski patrollers will caution them.


screaminguitar
said
0 0

Overlegislated says: Novices may wear helmets but experienced skiers/boarders should in no way be FORCED to wear anything they don't want to. So, as a 30 year veteran driver, I should be allowed to break speed limits, not wear a seat belt and ignore stop signs? No. Further, after 30 years of following every rule necessary in the construction trade regarding safety, I have a completely accident free record, no missed days or comp claims due to injuries. Despite the fact a majority of the rules I'm bound by at my job seem inane, almost irrelevant, they work.


powder king
said
0 0

We should also legislate clothing so we dont get hypothermia cuz we are all stupid in canada and need the government to watch us 24/7. next person that loses a finger from cold weather will kick start mandatory $1000 ski jackets...


Scott in TO
said
0 0

Those that refuse to be pro-active by protecting themselves wearing a helmet should be made responsible for their own healthcare. Why should the general population be made to pay for your childish poor and baseless decisions.


Crampdstyl
said
0 0

Anyone who is involved in their company's respective safety programs know that this is just preventative legislation, likely driven by the insurance industry. Example - you go skiing or snowboarding, and don't have enough "common sense" to wear a helmet. Someone previously said they would gladly pay for their own injuries if they get injured doing so - well, here we go. You're skiing, no helmet, and someone cuts you off, or you fall, or you go off course and into a tree, rock, or collide with another skiier and you receive a head injury. Now you're off work for a week, month, or more. God forbid, the injury takes you out of your job, or out of life. How do you plan on living now?? If you're not insured, you're screwed. Lawsuit? Who are you going to sue? The hill? They told you to wear a helmet (preventative safety), yet you made that choice. How about your child? Riding bike, and now eats soup with a straw - should AISH pay for that? Stop whinging about "over legislation" and see this for an opporunity to take care of your bodies.


Doug
said
0 0

Dumb idea that only protects those who don't practice, don't take lessons and who think they are skiing by going into a tuck ,screaming down the hill and then trying to remember how to stop.Great business for ski retailers who will make a lot of profit selling new mandatory equipment!


Aaron
said
0 0

Overlegislated, why not remove the bike helmet law? Or the hockey helmet rule? Screw it my car's seatbelt is uncomfortable so I shouldn't have to wear it. logic??


M
said
0 0

The alternative to wearing a helmut is the expensive care of a patient with a brain injury. I think it's a no BRAINER!


Brian from Edmonton
said
0 0

I'm a 57 year old that has skied for 40 years. First 30 without a helmet and last 10 with a helmet. I started wearing a helmet because my kids harassed me until I did. I hated it the first couple of times and love it now. It is warm, comfortable, does not effect peripheral vision or hearing. I feel more secure and protected - sort of like seat belts when they were first legislated. I hated wearing a seat belt and now when I get in a car it is automatic to do up my seat belt. I do not ski faster with a helmet than I did without one. I ski as fast as the conditions and my skills allow - wearing a helmet doesn't change that. Legislate it? Generally I feel that if an individuals actions can have a negative impact on someone else then society can step in to protect the innocent victim and legislate the conduct. If the conduct only hurts the individual doing the act then we should try to educate rather than legislate. What about children whose parents don't make them wear a helmet - maybe society has to step in and do what the parent should do. So maybe legislate that kids under 18 have to wear a helmet.


Prof. Pye Chartt
said
0 0

A "safety" argument can be made to support the wearing of a helmet for a multitude of daily human activities. (Spare us the goofy studies with their entirely predictable results.) The discussion/debate needs to sit squarely on acceptable personal risk and individual freedom in modern life. The prevailing logic will only have us strapping on cranial gear at our bedside, when we're "brave" enough to actually get up and move about the world.


Suzie
said
0 0

Two years ago, we bought helmet for every member ofour family. Great investment. I did not think I would like it but now I do go without. It is comfortable and warm. I don't think it should be mandatory but if you are injured and not wearing a helmet, maybe you should be responsible forthe cost of health care then. Just like your car insurance, if you are at fault then you pay.


John
said
0 0

It's obvious a lot of skiers are posting here. Let's make it that if you are injured without a helmet, you pay your own medical expenses. Also to the poster who says more people are injured slipping on ice when walking, of course that's true. Almost everyone walks on ice everyday but not everyone skies. Also when it comes to people skiing in areas that are out of bounds and get caught in avalanches, they should have to pay for all expenses or have insurance to cover the costs rather than us the taxpayer footing the bill


TEA from Sask
said
0 0

The Nanny State rears its beneficial head once again...I wish doctors would do their job and quit trying to be social engineers...


Overlegislated
said
0 0

I totally disagree. Novices may wear helmets but experienced skiers/boarders should in no way be FORCED to wear anything they don't want to. You cannot prevent every incidence of danger in your life or prevent every occurrence of harm coming your way with legislation. We are an over legislated, over governed nation and that trend needs to stop. Take your own responsibility to protect yourself and live with the consequences.


My Noggin - Ottawa
said
0 0

Absolutely a good idea. There are many on the slopes with equipment that is as outdated as the skis and clothing they wear, much like an old car with bald tires.


Sens/Habs Fan - Ottawa
said
0 0

Good idea to wear helmets. Have 3 small grandchildren who downhill ski and their mom and dad they do wear helmets. Even though it is for family fun there are many and not only children who can wipe out and plow into others going down the hill and cause serious harm. Wearing them for biking is mandatory, so for skiing it should be a no brainer.


Concerned
said
0 0

The helmet manufacturer's lobby seems to be very powerful - motorcyclists, bicyclists, hockey players and now skiers - soon it will be mandatory for pedestrians because you may slip on the sidewalk and and for car drivers because you could bump your head and curlers and figure skaters! Have I missed anyone? I am going out to buy some stocks!


AM
said
0 0

Nowhere in this 'study' does it state how many head injuries occur in a typical year while snowboarding/skiing. Shouldn't that be a number taken into consideration before mandating helmets? Is there really something to worry about or is this just another case of regulating just for the sake of it.

Using the case of Sarah Burke to force this point is ludicrous. She was not skiing or simply snowboarding. She is an extreme athlete and when she got hurt, she was not doing what the average Canadian does on the slopes.


Gundula Baehre
said
0 0

I would probably consider wearing a helmet while downhill skiing, but I sure would not want to have that be made mandatory. Also, I wonder if helmets might not interfere with one's hearing and/or one's peripheral vision (which could end up leading to more collisions and accidents instead of less). And another thing to consider is that skiers might actually end up skiing and snowboarding even faster and more dangerously if they are wearing a helmet (having a false sense of absolute security and safety). I do think that it would perhaps be a good idea for ski resorts to mandate that skiers (especially novice skiers) wear a helmet if taking official, paid lessons at the resort or ski hill, and mandatory skiing helmets for children are definitely an idea to consider. However, I would definitely not be in favour of making helmets mandatory for everyone.


RK
said
0 0

Thank goodness for the nanny state, without which we would have to rely on common sense! Want to legislate something? How about making motorcycles illegal, they are a far more serious health concern. I just lost another co-worker to these death machines, but luckily he was wearing a helmet so his corneas were intact for transplant. (Yes I know this article is about skiing, but I had to add my two cents.)


Infidel06
said
0 0

I was elated but surprised to find myself in agreement last month when I read that Jerry (Moonbeam) Brown, Governor of California, had refused to sign such a mandate, stating "not every human behavior requires a law."Under military rule in Afghanistan, we have ridiculous rules on bases, knee-jerk reactions by the base CSM to every possibility of someone getting injured and safety records and military officer's promotions impinged. We have soldiers wearing reflective belts during daylight hours, rules about wearing eye protection every time one steps outside, and soldiers getting sent to military justice boards for having a bottle of a sports drink in their barracks room, or dirty socks on their floor. It is ridiculous, and dehumanizing. This is the kind of thing we will continue to see if these nanny-state namby pambies get their way, with your life under their pompous thumbs.


iris mary shestowsky
said
0 0

It's my life I can do what I want - fine. As long as the head injury from not wearing a helmet actually takes you out and you don't become a vege on society. If you take that attitude then why do we have DUI's - no helmet laws then take this out too. I remember my dad and his friends when we were kids before the drinking while driving law and them drunk as hell behind the wheel. It truly is by the grace of God that some of us are still around. Sometimes laws are necessary to protect us from ourselves.


Tom from Calgary
said
0 0

40 year skier and I just bought a lid though not sure why after 39 accident free years. Its also a statistical fact that skiers wearing helmets have more general injuries than the helmetless skiers! The helmets give poor skiers confidence they shouldn't have. The old catch 22 cluase.


Karyn Climans
said
0 0

The legislation is long overdue. No helmet = No ski.


Canadian Bob
said
0 0

What ever happened to learning not to ski into a tree? Or going over jumps until you know what you're doing? There are bicycle helmet laws that go unenforced, so the ski resorts will be responsible? Why not enforce the wearing of helmets for people driving or riding in cars - head injuries occur there too. And people get hit by cars walking across the street and suffer head injuries... perhaps pedestrians should be forced to wear them? What about children falling out of bed? There's another place that helmets should be mandatory... while sleeping! C'mon people, people get injured. Now go smoke a cigarette and have a drink. You can find those in government approved stores everywhere!


Tony (from Azilda)
said
0 0

This common sense, but it ever this were to become law, it would no doubt be challenged by, say, a Sikh, who would assert it challenges his religious freedom.


obviousstatement
said
0 0

Not any society I am aware of ..... Well maybe except.....Media : paid to do soInsurance companiesSporting good manufacturersSociety says, we don't take our direction from bogus headlines


Death by Legislation
said
0 0

First off..... 1) Stop legislating my life to pieces.... next you'll impose enforced limitations on how many squares of toilet paper I can use to wipe my rear.2) The use of the word 'society' with a lower case s infers that the general public has embraced this concept, not a Society which is a lobby group.3) In spite of this, smoking is still legal and kills more people than the 2 or three that die on the slopes annually.


Shawn
said
0 0

You got to be kidding me!! I'm sick and tired of people wanting the government to make a law for this or that. It's my life. What right does anyone have to tell me I have to wear a helmet. I will gladly pay for any medical expenses out of my own pocket if I get hurt. Oh wait I can't cause we got this thing called universal health care. Where even though I can afford to pay myself I can't. Instead I'll have to wait in a line up for probably 6 to 8 hours just to see a doctor and then they will most likely send me home cause they are short on beds.


Rodger Dickerson
said
0 0

Here we go again - more nanny state, 'we know what's best for you' BS.Actually, more people are seriously injured walking on icy sidewalks in wintertime - perhaps we should force all pedestrians to wear helmets, too...


Long_Time_Boarder
said
0 0

I think this is a great idea and long overdue really. Over the past few years I have seen a vast majority of people wearing helmets on the hill, but making it mandatory would convert those last few people. Hopefully this will be in place for next season. For those of you who havent bought a helmet yet, get out there an get one! I only takes one awkward fall!


Homeslice NB
said
0 0

What a farce. I've snowboarded for 20 years and do not use a helmet. What's next .... asking people walking to the store to strap on their head gear ?


Mike from Timmins
said
0 0

Fact: people get injuries every day. It's called 'life'. You don't need safety and protective equipment for every single aspect or activity whether it be recreational or not. Last year I slipped on some ice and banged my head off of the ground while walking out to my truck; you don't see me campaigning for mandatory helmet use while walking outside in the snow. Their intentions may be good but I'm truly tired of all these safety nuts wanting helmets and pads for any physical activity that's beyond walking.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Subscribe!

MedNews Express newsletter

CTV MedNews Express

Sign up for our weekly medical newsletter, delivered for free to your inbox.

CTV.ca Blogs

Dr. Marla Shapiro

Health Blog

Check out what our guest medical experts and CTV health reporters are writing about.

Twitter

Avis Favaro Twitter

Follow us on Twitter

Follow CTV medical specialist Avis Favaro on Twitter.

Facebook

Like us on Facebook!

Like us on Facebook

Stay connected to the latest health news while you're on Facebook with CTV MedNews

Today's Health Stories

Drop the Worry Ball: How to Parent in the Age of Entitlement

Parents must learn to stop meddling, author urges

More   25 Comments 25  

Doctors at St. Michael's hospital in Toronto are using a device that can wash antibodies right out of a person’s blood in hopes of increasing the number of possible kidney donors.

Device could lead to more living kidney donors

More    Comments    1 Video(s) 1

Most Talked about Stories

It is about time - as a grandparent I have watched our kids (who were allowed to fail although I do remember some nagging on our part) learn, I have watched our children now micro-manage their children. A big part of it is the fact that there are predators out there and an extreme reluctance on the parents part to alllow freedom that might result in the children becoming victims.

Harvey

Parents must learn to stop meddling, author urges