Health -   

1
April Lewis found herself starting over when she was laid off from her job at age 57. (CTV) The Sandwich Generation is caring for elderly parents while trying to help their adult children financially. (CTV)

Aging 'Sandwich Generation' caught in economic vice

Viewer

CTV News Video

Lynda Steele on big squeeze for boomers
The Sandwich Generation is caring for elderly parents while trying to help their adult children financially. For these Canadians, Freedom 55 is nothing but a fantasy.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (8) Facebook   

April Lewis found herself starting over when she was laid off from her job at age 57. (CTV) The Sandwich Generation is caring for elderly parents while trying to help their adult children financially. (CTV)

Photos

April Lewis found herself starting over when she was laid off from her job at age 57. (CTV)

View Larger Image

Date: Wed. Nov. 30 2011 12:38 PM ET

For a growing number of baby boomers, the idea of an early retirement is nothing but a pipe dream.

One-in-six Canadian workers are now over the age of 55 and are working longer hours and not planning on retiring anytime soon.

Fifty-nine-year-old April Lewis, a self-professed "Zoomer," was laid off at two years ago after a 30-year career with Vancouver Coastal Health.

Like many people in her generation, Lewis is finding herself starting over when she should be thinking about retirement.

"I was devastated, absolutely devastated. Gobsmacked," she says of being laid off.

But the mother bounced back, landing a part-time job with CARP, A New Vision of Aging for Canada -- an organization that celebrates aging.

"I don't want people to say 60 is the new 40. Sixty is the new 60 baby – this is it," she said.

Lewis is the face of a growing segment of the Canadian labour force – people over the age of 55 still on the job trying to recover from the market meltdown of 2008.

They're trapped in the so-called Sandwich Generation, caring for elderly parents while trying to offer financial assistance to their adult children. For these Canadians, Freedom 55 is nothing but a fantasy.

"I don't think there's ever going to be that freedom -- we're going to need money till the day we take our last breath," Lewis said.

Tom Davidoff of UBC's Sauder School of Business is a little bit more optimistic about the future. He said Boomers have options these days when it comes to retirement plans, including getting a life annuity.

"[So] no matter how long you live, you're insured against outliving your resources," he said.

Davidoff also suggests home equity loans or reverse mortgages. The idea for both is to draw equity out of your biggest asset while you're still alive instead of leaving all that wealth to your adult children.

UBC researcher Paul Kershaw said many Vancouverites who purchased real estate in the 1970s and 80s made a wise investment into their retirement future.

"Even if you were paying high interest rates at the time, it turned out to be a great fortune for you because doing nothing nevertheless resulted in your housing value going up by almost 100 per cent," he said.

Would-be retirees might also consider purchasing long term care insurance. It can be pricey, but allows you to choose your future care setting, daily benefit amount and length of benefits period. It costs about $120 a month.

Lewis said boomers may be facing the squeeze but there's strength in numbers.

"The upside of it is, there are 14.5 million Canadians over the age of 45 and we're not going anywhere," she said.

Credit Canada said the one-third of Canadians who fall into the Sandwich Generation are taking fewer vacations, eating out less, working more hours and going into debt to support family members.

A recent survey during Credit Education Week found that two-thirds of Canada's Sandwich Generation are going into more debt in order to support their parents and children. As a result of the extra financial burden, more than half (55 per cent) said they expect to retire later than they had hoped.

Additionally, the majority – 82 per cent – said they aren't prepared or don't know if they will be prepared to support their elderly parents if the need were to arise.

Four-in-10 Canadians (39 per cent) in the Sandwich Generation said they were concerned they might not be able to pay for their children's education because they need to financially support their parents.

There are several online retirement calculators that can help you crunch the numbers to find out how long you have to work to save enough to retire.

With a report from CTV British Columbia's Lynda Steele...

Comments are now closed for this story

RWR
said
0 0

stephen - Obviously you are one of those 20 something whiners who want to blame everyone but themselves for their lot in life. Boomers take far more responsibility than you obviously want to.


Kathy Barthel
said
0 0

The Sandwich generation is definitely squeezed in many directions.Many find themselves suddenly divorcing in mid-life which has a huge and unexpected financial impact. Some did not get much in the way of financial advice from their parents since discussing money was something that many didn`t do in the past, and so they have learned by making mistakes along the way. Add the fact that our work culture is embracing contracts vs. staffing positions, lack of benefits and lack of pensions and you can see the financial challenges many boomers face now and in the future. One thing that many sandwich generation parents are doing is seeing to it that their children get the financial advice that they did not get as young adults. Fortunately this is even being taught in schools, something that never happened for boomers when they were teens.It is a challenging time certainly, but thanks to a greater amount of resources available to them, there is hope that many boomers will be able to have at least a modest retirement.


stephen
said
0 0

I am sorry you lost your job but, hey you baby boomers have ruined the future for the rest of us and you deserve some pay back. All you have done for decades was spend spend spend. Then you raise these 20s somethings to feel they are entitled to everything and you taught then to not except responsibility for their actions because you would not. You spent lavishly and saddled us with your debt well it's called karma.


Mark in Victoria
said
0 0

Yes it is the system that is at fault, not the fact that you own a house that is too big, have bought way too much junk that you don't need over the past 50 years, and have lived like your over consumption joy ride was going to last forever. I have absolutely no sympathy on the baby boomer generation. Generation ME right to the end.


mama
said
0 0

hey M.Dorgan, I am one of those "adult children" whose 57 year old mother just recently helped out due to both my husband and I being laid off. I would never expect her to do this but she did because she loves me and thats whats being a family is about, loving and supporting each other.She is also caring for her aging mother. Ive helped her finacially in the past and Im sure one day, I'll be looking after her and helping out my adult children too.


Doug ^^^ BC
said
0 0

Yours is an option we took "Avi". But I truly hope you are not advocating it as public policy.Life is not all about money.Many seniors have lived in their homes for decades.And many of those homes are located in what we call "communities" I call them communities because they are areas in which everyone knows everyone else, and everyone knows everyone else's children.In communities like that,people take care of each other.They keep an eye on their neighbours children.They are comfortable walking in those areas,in large part,because they know the people that live there.Socialists are often heard saying "it takes a village to raise a child". I would rather eat cake than be a socialist,but there is some truth to that statement.It's part of the reason that small town living has advantages that you can't measure in dollar terms. We moved because we wanted to move.I hate to think of a system where people were forced out of their homes,just because they can no longer afford to live where they have lived all,or most of their lives.I've seen it in Vancouver,where seniors were literally forced to move out of communities that they loved,just because the taxes were raised beyond their ability to pay in the last years of their lives. Losing your job when you are 50 is tough.It happened to me.I was lucky,and got another job. But it took a long time.When you get to 50 or so, you don't even get a lot of interviews.People hiring want younger,long term employees to grow with the business. But,hey.No one promised me life was going to be easy.In fact,my dad once told me that if it was easy,I wasn't challenging myself enough.


M. Dorgan
said
0 0

I am shocked that parents feel they must financially support adult children. This didn't happen "back in my day."


Avi Ickovich
said
0 0

Another option is downsizing, if possible, by using the excess equity of larger family homes to buy a condominium or townhouse outright. More specifically, this would allow seniors to have excess funds for emergenices, travel, and oofer greater support for their own parents and kids. It would allow the zoomers to retain their indepedence by living in higher density walkable compact communites. CARP has advocated Age-Friendly cities for reasons of affordability, senior mobility and independence.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Health Stories

Drop the Worry Ball: How to Parent in the Age of Entitlement

Parents must learn to stop meddling, author urges

More   25 Comments 25  

Doctors at St. Michael's hospital in Toronto are using a device that can wash antibodies right out of a person’s blood in hopes of increasing the number of possible kidney donors.

Device could lead to more living kidney donors

More    Comments    1 Video(s) 1

Most Talked about Stories

It is about time - as a grandparent I have watched our kids (who were allowed to fail although I do remember some nagging on our part) learn, I have watched our children now micro-manage their children. A big part of it is the fact that there are predators out there and an extreme reluctance on the parents part to alllow freedom that might result in the children becoming victims.

Harvey

Parents must learn to stop meddling, author urges