Health -   

1

Want a smart child? Wait 2 years before having another

Siblings Andrew, age 13, and Emily, age 10, right, at their home in Overland Park, Kansas, Wednesday, May 5, 2010. (AP / Charlie Riedel) These siblings will be ripped apart unless the immigration process for the two oldest is sped up.
Siblings Andrew, age 13, and Emily, age 10, right, at their home in Overland Park, Kansas, Wednesday, May 5, 2010. (AP / Charlie Riedel)

View Larger Image

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (9) Facebook   

Selected Comment

It takes 9 months to bring a person to this world. However, it's a life time work to acquire knowledge. Two years and you can have smart kids. What are the researchers smoking?

TC

Want a smart child? Wait 2 years before having another

talking about
Want a smart child? Wait 2 years before having another

Date: Monday Nov. 21, 2011 8:52 PM ET

If you want a baby who will grow up to become a star student, this might help: wait at least two years before giving your child a sibling.

A study out of the University of Notre Dame has found that when siblings are spaced more than two years apart, the older child fares better at reading and math.

The younger siblings, it should be noted, did not experience similar positive academic gains. However, they also didn't seem to suffer negative academic effects when born well after their siblings.

The researchers -- economist Kasey Buckles and graduate student Elizabeth Munnich -- say part of the reason for their findings could be the amount of attention older children receive in their formative years when the arrival of a little sister or brother is delayed.

"Our results indicate that spacing could be an important channel through which parents can improve child outcomes," the researchers write.

The study will be published in an upcoming issue of the Journal of Human Resources, but it is already making the rounds on the blogosphere.

The researchers point out that numerous studies have examined how the number of siblings in a family or their gender makeup influence educational attainment, IQ scores and future employment.

However, little attention has been devoted to the spacing of siblings.

The pair used data from the 1979 U.S. National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, which includes more than 12,000 respondents, and compared it to test scores from the Peabody Individual Achievement Test, which measures academic achievement in children ages five to 18.

The study noted that a one-year increase in spacing boosts test scores by 0.17 standard deviation (SD), or three times the effect of increasing annual family income by $1,000. In contrast, spacing of less than two years is associated with a 0.58 SD decrease in math scores and a 0.65 SD decrease in reading scores.

Comments are now closed for this story

Chris
said
0 0

Interesting... I'm the youngest of the two. Although there's a bit of information about this isn't true...


Lisa
said
0 0

Calm down, people. I find the study interesting, although many people will say that it's not applicable to them. It makes a lot of sense to me that extra attention to children at a young age helps promote academic achievement. My mother was an elementary school teacher and she use to say that children who did NOT have any siblings were always at the top of the class scholastically.


TC
said
0 0

It takes 9 months to bring a person to this world. However, it's a life time work to acquire knowledge. Two years and you can have smart kids. What are the researchers smoking?


amy
said
0 0

They used data from 1979? Did they even account for "any" confounding factors at all? Another garbage study put out there to generate research grants for more garbage study so people can create their own jobs.


kg1
said
0 0

to Professor Ontario 100% agree with you


Goldens
said
0 0

That is bull crap! My brother and I would be in that category and neither one of you would label as overly smart.


Paul
said
0 0

Huh. I guess my boys never got this news story. They are 11 months a part and both have Hons. Degrees and are doing rather well. They are now 24 and 25. Maybe it was because we actually spent time with them growing up and didn't leave it up to 'society' to raise them. Not one day in a childcare facility either.


dano
said
0 0

yey, another stupid study with zero credible evidence. Stick to facts CTV instead of this enquirer crap


Professor Ontario
said
0 0

Oh great, being the middle child in a family is without a doubt the worst spot to be born in but now all I need is my older brother to read this "study" and blame me for the failures in his life.Is life not simply what we make of it? why should I be held responsible for my older siblings poor math skills? I don't know who these research groups are but please stop your insanity! close up shop and find real jobs!


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Health Stories

Drop the Worry Ball: How to Parent in the Age of Entitlement

Parents must learn to stop meddling, author urges

More   25 Comments 25  

Doctors at St. Michael's hospital in Toronto are using a device that can wash antibodies right out of a person’s blood in hopes of increasing the number of possible kidney donors.

Device could lead to more living kidney donors

More    Comments    1 Video(s) 1

Most Talked about Stories

It is about time - as a grandparent I have watched our kids (who were allowed to fail although I do remember some nagging on our part) learn, I have watched our children now micro-manage their children. A big part of it is the fact that there are predators out there and an extreme reluctance on the parents part to alllow freedom that might result in the children becoming victims.

Harvey

Parents must learn to stop meddling, author urges