Health -   

1

Snacking behind expanding waistline in the U.S.

Potato chips are displayed on Wednesday, June 22, 2011.  (AP / Matt Rourke) potatoe chips Leslie Beck
Potato chips are displayed on Wednesday, June 22, 2011.  (AP / Matt Rourke)

View Larger Image

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (9) Facebook   

Date: Wednesday Jun. 29, 2011 9:54 AM ET

Americans are consuming 570 more calories per day than they did in the 1970s, according to a new study, and the culprit may be incessant snacking.

According to the co-author of the new study, while larger servings have contributed to the obesity epidemic in the U.S., the number of times a person eats per day combined with making poor food choices are what is tipping the scale for many Americans.

Steady snacking on high fat foods loaded with sodium and/or sugar is a major reason the average caloric intake since 1977 has increased from 1,803 kcal a day to 2,374 kcal, Kiyah Duffey told CTV's Canada AM on Wednesday.

The study's findings differ from previous ones, some of which suggest larger servings of unhealthy foods is the major contributor behind what former U.S. Surgeon General has called an obesity "crisis" in North America.

For years, supersized menus have been fingered as one of the leading causes behind America's expanding waistline, according to popular media and studies. In 2004, for example, Morgan Spurlock directed and starred in his Academy Award-nominated documentary "Super Size Me," a queasy fast food experiment which followed the American independent filmmaker for a period of 30 days while he consumed only McDonald's food. In the end, Spurlock gained almost 25 lbs. and reported experiencing mood swings and sexual dysfunction.

So what does 570 calories worth of snacks look like?

  • Granola bar (35g) 135 Calories
  • Cheese pizza slice (63g) 140 Calories
  • Vanilla ice cream (72g) 145 Calories
  • Potato chips (28g) 150 Calories

And the best way to keep tabs on caloric intake, said Duffey, is to choose lean meats and fresh fruits and vegetables.

Duffey, a researcher in the Department of Nutrition at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and co-author Barry Popkin analyzed data from U.S. food surveys collected from adults. The survey, which tracked the amount of food and drink consumed by individuals over a 24-hour period, was taken from a national cross-section of adults across the country from 1977 to 2006.

According to the study, which appears in the journal PLoS Medicine, the proportion of people who are obese in the U.S. has doubled since 1980, and a third of all adults -- more than 72 million people -- are classified as obese.

In Canada, the prevalence of obesity among adults is lower, according to Statistics Canada.

From 2007 to 2009, 24.1 per cent of adults were considered obese.

Comments are now closed for this story

Gerry
said
0 0

If you want to lose weight without counting calories, eat whole grains, lean meat and veggies. I dare you to try to get fat on that. Exercise is always good too but the reality is if you have a high fibre diet and you only get your carbs from natural sources, you won't be fat. Geeze it's almost like our bodies evolved to metabolize the food available in nature.


Dean from Toon Town
said
0 0

This article doesn't tell the whole story.. the human body needs to burn off those extra calories through physical activity to keep the extra body fat off. It's a simple equation of calories consumed vs. calories burned. Don't blame the snacking.. get off your butt & get active!


Prof. Pye Chartt
said
0 0

In other news: Those who stick a sharp pencil in their eye increase the natural odds of blindness. (Do we really need "scientists" to continue to inform us as to why people are getting fatter? Is the increasing percentage of overweight and obese people really a mind-numbing mystery? Has North American society signaled that it will get "thinner" as soon as the answers are available?)


Joe in Ontario
said
0 0

I have lost 10 pounds by just drinking 500 mL of water prior to lunch and supper, and cutting out after supper snacks. I am also taking a brisk walk almost daily for at least 15 min. You do not really have to buy into those different diets.


Fred
said
0 0

Sorry, is this something we don't know?


Jackie
said
0 0

It's not just the snacking- the size of portions is considerably larger than what one finds here in Canada. I just returned from a trip to New York, and it was pretty rare for me to be able to finish a meal!


Dixie from Alberta
said
0 0

At least if you are going to snack on such things as potato chips why not choose the BAKED ones. They are about 60% less fat and taste pretty good combared to an extra couple of inches around the waist. I just wish the companies that produce these would have them more widely available and lower the price.


Munro - Brampton
said
0 0

How people eat growing up and attitude make a difference. In Brampton I see many mothers around 18-22 with their little one in the stroller feeding them chips and Mcdonalds. If they get a taste for this how will they ever eat well when they are teens ?


Gorg
said
0 0

And what, this is something new? We were all learning and knew this in grade school 40 years ago before anything was ever thought of being labeled for nutrtional (or rather non-nutritional) content. I get a real kick out of these so called educated professional researchers who have a "eureka" moment of discovery. Come on now, it's been common sense for decades!


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Health Stories

The B.C. government is pledging $8-million in funding to improve school playgrounds. Sept. 2, 2011. (CTV)

Canadian kids get failing grade for play time

More    Comments  

Versha Prakash talks to Canada AM about the Trillium Gift of Life Network donor record, Monday, May 28, 2012.

Ontario organ donor agency sets new 1-day record

More   10 Comments 10    1 Video(s) 1

The labels of three Maalox products sold in Canada: Maalox Multi-Action, Maalox Regular Strength, and Maalox Extra-Strength

Supplies of Maalox dwindling across Canada

More