Health -   

1

Most admit to flushing leftovers, hair down toilet

A view of Toronto's first pay toilet on Wednesday, May 19, 2010. It helps answer the call of nature and it cleans up afterwards - all for the price of a quarter. (Nathan Denette / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Paul Mancini said, among other issues, his toilet wasn't installed properly.
A view of Toronto's first pay toilet on Wednesday, May 19, 2010. It helps answer the call of nature and it cleans up afterwards - all for the price of a quarter. (Nathan Denette / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

View Larger Image

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (33) Facebook   

Date: Tuesday Mar. 22, 2011 10:31 AM ET

Canadians seem to have trouble understanding what toilets are for.

Sure, we know they're for flushing away THAT stuff. But many of us are flushing away plenty of other things too, such as hair balls, leftover food, and cigarette butts.

The findings come from the fourth annual Canadian Water Attitudes Study. The survey was commissioned by RBC and Unilever and endorsed by the Canadian Partnership Initiative of the United Nations Water for Life Decade. Ipsos Reid conducted the online survey, polling more than 2,000 adults.

The survey finds that 72 per cent of Canadians use the toilet to get rid of things that could have been disposed of in other ways. Albertans (83 per cent) are most likely to admit to using the toilet as a garbage-can proxy; Quebecers are the least likely, at 65 per cent.

This is despite the fact that 78 per cent of us say we are trying "reasonably hard" to conserve water.

Each flush of the toilet uses three to 20 litres of clean water, depending on the kind of toilet we have – water that could have been put to better use. Strangely, Canadians seem to realize that, since the survey found that Canadians are pretty water-aware.

Eighty per cent of us know that the water in out toilet is just as clean as the water coming out of the tap. Three-quarters are aware that a full 45 per cent of water used in the home is flushed down the toilet. But only 40 per cent of us understand that electricity is required energy to treat and pump tap water.

"This data highlights, once again, that Canadians are not making the connection between their personal water use and the true value of water," Bob Sandford of the Canadian Partnership Initiative said Monday in a statement.

"They claim to care about conserving it, yet knowingly engage in water-wasting activities, including using fresh, clean water to dispose of garbage. Canadians need to understand that water is a finite resource and there are significant social and economic implications related to wasting it."

While Canadians may be aware of the need for water conservation, we do some pretty crazy things with the precious resource.

A full 46 per cent admit to leaving the tap on while doing the dishes, while 17 per cent of us say we like using water to hose down the driveway.

As for the cost of that water, more than 60 per cent of respondents say they don't have a clue how much their household pays for water.

But according to the survey, whatever it is, it's too high: about 70 per cent believe the price of water is high enough to discourage waste of the valuable resource.

"Water is a real bargain in Canada, which is another reason Canadians have no concept of its value," said Sandford.

"Compared to other developed nations, Canadians pay very little to have water delivered to their homes. In France, water costs four times more, and in Germany, almost seven times more. Not surprisingly, average daily domestic water use in these countries is less than half of what it is in Canada.

"Until Canadians make the connection between personal use of water and its true value, our water-wasting habits will continue."

The Ipsos Reid poll, conducted during the second week of January, involved 2,066 participants from an online panel. Weighting was employed to balance demographics and ensure that composition reflected the adult population according to Census data. An unweighted probability sample of this size would have a margin of error of plus or minus 2.2 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.

Comments are now closed for this story

Mur
said
0 0

We were put on this earth to keep it clean and to look after it. We can not waste water as it will come back to haunt us in future generations. God must be very disappointed and if God had to grade us he would give us F for failure. C'mon everyone lets do a better job.


realist
said
0 0

A good reason to have a dog: leftovers are never an issue :)


Lad
said
0 0

why is everyone here focusing on the 'food' side of this...because it's an easy target? YES - food becomes poop. now how about considering the rest of the junk that people dispose of in the toilet, for instance: chemicals/household products and solvents, antibiotics, anti-depressants, birth control pills, seizure medication, cancer treatments, pain killers, tranquilizers and cholesterol-lowering compounds - and not only do people flush this 'crap', but they also 'crap' some of it out. check it out, do a bit of research on it . These chemicals/drugs/substances can pass intact through conventional sewage treatment facilities, into waterways, lakes and even aquifers. Further, discarded substances often end up at dumps and land fills, posing a threat to underlying groundwater. Farm animals also are a source of pharmaceuticals entering the environment, through their ingestion of hormones, antibiotics and veterinary medicines, (most of which are introduced to the animals to simply make them grow fatter) Manure containing traces of such pharmaceuticals is spread on land and can then wash off into surface water and even percolate into groundwater. while some of these things would have helped the well being of those who 'flushed' it, it may not be so helpful to others who are unknowingly receiving it via their own water sources, so let's broaden our perspectives here.


philip
said
0 0

Yet another article mentioning water in Canada being a 'commodity' and 'basically free'. Rest assured there are people/companies out there that would love nothing better than to control this 'commodity' so they could make huge profits on water like is being done in Europe. And local and provincial governments here that are willing to consider anything to fill thier coffers. The difference in Canada is that so far the people of Canada own our water and we have to make sure it stays that way. The minute we let water become a 'commodity' like oil that is export price driven is the day we'll start paying for water by the cubic meter based on whatever the current world price for water happens to be. Similar to what happens with Alberta oil. As far as flushing items down the toilet, isn't that what trash bins are there for?


Recycling and Green SCAM!
said
0 0

PLEASE! Don't be telling us what to flush now either. You are already going through our garbage. This illusion of keeping a green earth is an illusion being created by corporations. These corporations outsource toxins to India and China. If I paid the city of Vancouver a small fee to look the other way as I dump my table scraps will that make everything all legit? Of course not - as ridiculous as that notion is, how ridiculous is it on a grand scale where TONNES of toxins are poured into lakes and streams away from our self-righteous eyes? Yeah, and thats why i dont go "green" because that sort of practice is intended to dillute some of the guilt being suffered by these corporations. Sorry, I'm done.


MercuryBlue
said
0 0

I've ALWAYS flushed (certain) leftovers down the toilet. Like unfinished bowls of cereal- that's not something I can throw down the trash without creating a majorly stinky mess, and if I put it in my sink it clogs it up and damages my pipes. So, down the loo it goes. There aren't MANY foods that go in the toilet in my house (it's either down the sink or in the trash), but there are a few that have always been 'toilet disposal only'. That's not likely to change in the future, either.


Trex in BC
said
0 0

My questions is, why are left-overs being disposed of in the first place?Freeze them for another meal another day. Problem solved.


Al in Halifax
said
0 0

What studies like this are doing is trying to instil fear and prepare us for paying for something that is abundantly available for the cost of the infrastructure. I would not be surprised to find the US special interest groups that are looking to commercialize fresh water, backing the study. The truth is I really am not concerned how much water I use compared to Germany and France or even the US. They are densely populated with small land masses with little fresh water compared to land mass and population. Canada suffers from neither of these problems.Another thing Canada has in abundance is fresh air. I’m sure if there was a way to commercialize it, there would be a study on how we over use it too.


Roadrobber
said
0 0

Yes, you can flush leftover soup down the loo but just make sure you take out any bones if required. Also, gravy can go. Whatever you do, don't flush old grease.


Mario
said
0 0

Here is a good one. Here in Thunder Bay our water system was being upgraded so the whole city was put on restrictions. It got the whole city to conserve water. Now a couple of years later they said they have to jack up the rates because people aren't using enough water. That's the way to get people to use less, charge them for conserving. If conserving doesn't save you money most people say whats the point.


Darlene in B.C.
said
0 0

Not everyone lives in the city ( thank goodness, as we need farmers, ranchers etc.) and they all have septic tanks. With just my husband and myself putting 'feed' into the toilet to the tank there is not enough of this food to keep the toilet 'working'. This 'food' is needed to keep the mechanics of a septic tank working.....like our body needs these little bugs in it to continue the digesting process... so what is wrong with the occasional undigested scraps being flushed? Isn't that better than using chemicals to do this job? The water usage fees ( operational costs..more to fill someones pockets) are like the Natural Gas fees....$7.00 for fuel and the rest are administration fees.....


Munro - Brampotn
said
0 0

You should see our cresent in Brampton. In the spring several people use the hose to wash away the little green things that fall off the maple trees, instead of using a broom. My neighbor also likes to spray out the curb by the edge of the road when it looks dirty. Yes, I have mentioned to him this uses a lot of water; can't call the police on him (not yet).


happy
said
0 0

Why not drain the liquid from the soup and dispose of the solids in the garbage? Better yet don't prepare more soup than you can eat and avoid the "what to do with the leftovers" problem.


Melissa
said
0 0

Too bad many municpalities won't allow garburators. By experience, much better than the "green bin" and cuts waaayyyyy down on that landfill. If it's food (barring obvious clogging properties) the toilet has always been the go to. I know it's hard, but think logically George....food become poop...


L-P in Markham
said
0 0

The real answer for toilestts is:CLIVUS MULTRUMI hate to boast of somebody else's equipemnt but this is better than even septic tanks since mostly solids come out of it. there is no flushing of any kind AND you do throw in wasted food as well.I've known about these beauties since the early 80's and I'm surprised environemtnalists have not jumped all over them already.BTW, I am not an environmentalist at all. Most would probably want to hang me for my habits...


ant ferda
said
0 0

ever heard of hydrological cycle?same water has been around for eons.quality - that's another thing!


dwayne-ottawa
said
0 0

does the RBC have nothing better to spend its money on? The next study should be what people wipe up with their toilet paper.


beverly.hartford in Richmond Hill
said
0 0

Jason, this is news because you are drinking this stuff! Yummy cigarette butts add flavour to your water.


Brad
said
0 0

I flush leftovers down the toilet sometimes. Not like a hugh amount but if its liquidy stuff then it gets flushed.


beverly hartford
said
0 0

Many of us in Ontario have septic tanks and have to be VERY careful what we flush down the toilet., if not we are faced with very expensive system replacements. We use the green bin for our leftovers and any other appropriate items. We return non-used pharmaceutical drugs to the drug store, never flush them. It is quite interesting to see new people move in on the street and 6 months later they have the service people in because they don't know how to live with a septic system. A good system is very environmentally responsible (a bad one isn't but that's always the case).


Fred N.
said
0 0

Wow.. Slow news day.


Bayite
said
0 0

... we had contractors who flushed water based paint and small amounts of plaste down toilet; and I could give you a list of other things people have put down the one here: a toilet is not a garbage pail !!! Also, we have a septic system and leftover food, dental floss, cotton balls etc. plug up the drainage system! Don't be so lazy - dispose of unwanted "stuff" properly !


lucieloo
said
0 0

George, did you ever try throwing away leftover soup in your garbage? pretty big mess..... I can throw it out down the drain but then I run the risk of having clogged drain..... what to do??????


Ryan, Guelph
said
0 0

@George. I'm thinking maybe soup. That's the only leftovers I can see flushing. Also, there is a mistake in the story. You can get dual flush toilets that use 3 OR 6 L of water per flush. I just installed a couple in our house last year to replace an old 20L flush toilet and a 13L flush toilet. Our city had rebates for installing more water efficient toilets that made it extremely affordable to make the change over, and toilets are ridiculously easy to install.


Jason
said
0 0

Why is this news?


JB
said
0 0

Well, how else do you dispose of near-liquid waste? Putting it in the garbage means if the bag gets a hole in it, it'll be all over the place. Besides, what already goes into the toilet is more or less digested food anyway.


rick
said
0 0

In todays economy most people eat their leftovers and then wait a few hours before sending them down the toilet. It is called pooping. Oh dear, can you publish a story with the word "poop" in it? If more people paid more attention to their own poop it would make life sweeter.


Tod
said
0 0

It doesn't surprise me,Alberta is made up of mostly conservatives, the me, me, me crowd that doesn't care about anyone but themselves. It's a thing that only an uneducated selfish person would do. Harper likes to hide things until he can flush them down the toilet un-noticed.


Don A. Sarnia, Ontario
said
0 0

"As for the cost of that water, more than 60 per cent of respondents say they don't have a clue how much their household pays for water."My last water bill was nearly $150 - it cost $7.75 for actual water used, and the remainder was "operating costs". If I had used more or less water was of no concern. that $140 would be the same either way. The city of Sarnia is wrong with the way they 'bill' for water usage. It makes conserving water useless - as long as you pay their fees. There is no incentive to cut back using this billing method.


Rod
said
0 0

That's why being on a septic system is the best. No sewer fees and you "must" conserve what goes down the drain. From our previous house that was on sewer we now save almost $80 a month on fees ! I think the government should throw a heavy tax on water usage. That's change these habits real quick.


Jarrett
said
0 0

I think I would like to install a grey water system for my toilet water consumption. It is absurd we use fresh drinking water in our toilets.


Bryan Frazer
said
0 0

So I should eat everything before flushing? But it all gets digested at the sewage plant and methane is produced which runs many sewage system plants. That is, I am recycling without trucks, bins or compostable bags!


George Carter
said
0 0

What the???? Flushing leftovers down the toilet??? That can't be right.....who in their right mind flushes leftovers down the toilet???


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Health Stories

Versha Prakash talks to Canada AM about the Trillium Gift of Life Network donor record, Monday, May 28, 2012.

Ontario organ donor agency sets new 1-day record

More   10 Comments 10    1 Video(s) 1

The labels of three Maalox products sold in Canada: Maalox Multi-Action, Maalox Regular Strength, and Maalox Extra-Strength

Supplies of Maalox dwindling across Canada

More