Health -   

1

Babies remember moments of neglect, study suggests

Baby
Baby

View Larger Image

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (7) Facebook   

Date: Wednesday Aug. 25, 2010 7:57 PM ET

If a baby is ignored -- even for a few minutes -- he won't remember it later, will he? That's the question Canadian researchers asked, and the answer may come as a surprise.

Psychologists at the University of Toronto Scarborough performed an unusual experiment to test the effects of "emotional deprivation" on six-month-old babies.

They asked parents of 30 babies to briefly ignore their six-month-old infants. The babies' mothers were asked to face the infant, who was seated in a car seat placed on a table. The mother was instructed to look at a spot slightly above the infant's head and maintain a neutral facial expression for two minutes, not smiling or cooing with their babies as they usually would.

They then played with them for two minutes, then ignored them again for two minutes, before playing with them again.

Next, the researchers took saliva samples from the babies to measure their hormone levels. They found that the emotional response in the infants was immediate, with the tests revealing elevated levels of the stress hormone cortisol.

To see whether the babies would remember the episode, the infants were brought back to the same experiment room 24 hours later, with the same researchers taking their saliva samples.

Although this time, the parents didn't ignore their babies, the infants demonstrated a distinct "anticipatory stress response" anyway, showing a marked elevation in cortisol.

That suggests that the babies were able to anticipate stress based on the expectations formed from the previous day about how their parents would treat them.

Another group of infants who were part of the two-day experiment, who acted as controls and weren't subjected to the parental-non-responsiveness, showed no changes in their cortisol on either day.

But the researchers also found that overall, the levels of stress hormones were lower on the second day compared to the first day, suggesting the babies were able to adapt to the stressor, a finding that the research team found interesting.

"The capacity to adapt to changes in parenting may be an evolutionary advantage that contributes to the reciprocal nature of the parent-infant relationship in humans," suggested the study's lead investigator Dr. David Haley, in a news release.

The results of the study are published in The Royal Society journal Biology Letters.

Experts say the findings are in line with what is already known about "attachment theory," the theory that children need a close relationship with at least one primary caregiver in order to develop normally.

Clyde Hertzman, director of the Human Early Learning Partnership (HELP) at the University of British Columbia, says the research helps explain the biological basis of bonding and attachment. He says it shows that children as young as six months have the capacity to remember stressful events in "intimate contexts."

"Most important, it helps us to understand why social and emotional deprivation in the first year of life can have profound long-term impacts on child development and mental health," Hertzman said in the news release.

Dr. Haley said researchers are only beginning to understand the mechanisms that allow babies to anticipate, remember, and adapt to unusual emotional events in an attachment context.

What remains unknown is whether the memories that trigger the anticipatory stress response are located in the mind or the body.

"It isn't clear where or how the information is being retained," said Megan Gunnar, professor of psychology of the Institute of Child Development at the University of Minnesota.

Rather than suggesting that "the child can 'think' about yesterday," she said, "I might shift more to the wisdom of the body (the child's stress system retains the experience)."

Comments are now closed for this story

Arla
said
0 0

Exactly Sam. Talk about reading a lot into cortisol levels! I don't know anyone who has a memory of anything at 6 months. What is the purpose of these experiments really?


Tono
said
0 0

This is all very worrying - especially as parents are required to leave their babies for significant portions of the day in order to serve the highest loyalty in this country: the employer.


Sam C
said
0 0

I will be interested in seeing the results of the five-, ten- and twenty-year follow up studies. Perhaps I just have no memory of being "briefly neglected" as an infant, or it could be that -- like a 4-year-old being told they can't have a cookie before dinner -- it didn't have any long-lasting effect. Sheesh!


Doug # BC
said
0 0

What worries me about studies like this is the special interest groups that will no doubt be lining up to impose more laws to dictate how parents raise their children.No doubt those who are lobbying for "free" day care will use this to further their demands.The nanny state is likely to become the nagging state if these studies are used by the social engineers. As to the study,I actually believe some of what it says.Babies do seem to be able to pick up on emotions and feelings that their parents are feeling.Why would we not believe they have their own set of insecurities. But I challenge the notion that parents should be there,all the time,for every little tear.I think you do your children no favour by doing everything for them,or giving them everything they want.I guess we all fell good by doing for our kids.But I believe they need to meet some challenges in their own ways.We learn to deal with our fears by facing those fears.We value things we EARNED a lot more than things we got for nothing.I think that people who are challenged,who face their fears and deal with them are more likely to grow uo confident that they can count on themselves in difficult situations.They will not be paralized in fear,or wait for someone else to do something every time something goes wrong. It's all about balance.Help your kids,but don't do it all for them.Challenge them,but don't leave then to struugle hopelessly for to long.Help them earn things they want,but don't give them every thing without some input by them. And most importantly,keep the government out of your parenting duties.It is your most important responsibility.People can help you,but no one else can do it for you.


Harald Hartunian
said
0 0

Very interesting. This kind of work is fascinating and is part of a research trajectory that will help us understand how to better care for our children. (And to the previous commenter: I would hardly characterize two-minute episodes of the mother assuming a neutral expression as prolonged periods of emotional torture.)


Brianna
said
0 0

I don't call sitting in front of your child not looking at them "torture". I left my child alone in her playpen so I could get things done like laundry or dinner, parents can't hold their children 24/7.

Fiend, AB
said
0 0

So they emotionally TORTURED 6 month old babies as part of a study, when any parent could tell you that if you start neglecting your infant for prolonged periods of time it will mess them up? What's next? Having a researcher come into the home daily to shock the child with a cattle prod in order to determine if the baby will develop a fear of strangers?


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Health Stories

Versha Prakash talks to Canada AM about the Trillium Gift of Life Network donor record, Monday, May 28, 2012.

Ontario organ donor agency sets new 1-day record

More   10 Comments 10    1 Video(s) 1

The labels of three Maalox products sold in Canada: Maalox Multi-Action, Maalox Regular Strength, and Maalox Extra-Strength

Supplies of Maalox dwindling across Canada

More