Health -   

1
Michel Lavelle, of the Canadian Bottled Water Association, calls the study 'unnecessarily alarming.' He says commercial bottled water is not meant to be sterile, so the presence of bacteria in itself is not news. Sonish Azam, a microbiologist who worked on the study, speaks to CTV News at a labratory in Montreal in this undated photo. Researchers say some of the bacteria were at levels dozens of times higher than those permitted by the United States Pharmacopeia (USP).

High bacteria levels found in bottled water in Canada

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV National News: Avis Favaro on water testing
A group of scientists at a Montreal lab have made some disturbing discoveries regarding the level of bacteria in a number of popular brands of bottled water.
CTV News Channel: Ali Khamessan, lab director
While lab officials can't say the type of the bacteria found in several brands of bottled water, they do know that bacteria exists. Also, it is not yet known if there are possible long-term health effects from consuming the water.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (30) Facebook   

Michel Lavelle, of the Canadian Bottled Water Association, calls the study 'unnecessarily alarming.' He says commercial bottled water is not meant to be sterile, so the presence of bacteria in itself is not news. Sonish Azam, a microbiologist who worked on the study, speaks to CTV News at a labratory in Montreal in this undated photo. Researchers say some of the bacteria were at levels dozens of times higher than those permitted by the United States Pharmacopeia (USP).

Photos

Michel Lavelle, of the Canadian Bottled Water Association, calls the study 'unnecessarily alarming.' He says commercial bottled water is not meant to be sterile, so the presence of bacteria in itself is not news.

View Larger Image

Date: Tue. May. 25 2010 10:45 PM ET

A Montreal laboratory is raising worries about bacteria in bottled water, noting they've found "revolting" levels that could put certain vulnerable people at risk.

Researchers from C-crest Laboratories in Montreal decided to randomly test bottled water for bacteria after a fellow employee complained of a foul taste from some bottled water and became ill.

They tested a handful of popular brands (which they did not name) and found that more than 70 per cent of the samples contained bacteria at levels that far exceed recommended limits in the U.S.

Some of the bacteria were at levels dozens of times higher than those permitted by the United States Pharmacopeia (USP).

"There were so many that at first, we couldn't count. We had to dilute the samples," Sonish Azam, one of the researchers in the study told CTV News.

Azam and her team presented their findings to the general meeting of the American Society of Microbiology in San Diego.

The types of bacteria they found were heterotrophic, a category of bacteria that includes those that survive by consuming organic matter.

Regulatory bodies such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Health Canada have not set limits for the heterotrophic bacteria counts in bottled drinking water.

"Bottled water is considered to be a food product and is regulated under the Food and Drugs Act and Regulations. These regulations include requirements for microbiological quality, composition and labeling," a Health Canada spokesperson told CTV News in an email.

"Under these regulations, bottled water is required to be free of disease causing organisms. Like most foods, bottled water may contain naturally occurring bacteria which typically have little or no health significance.

"In numerous studies, heterotrophic bacteria isolated from water have been shown to be of no human health consequence."

According to the USP, no more than 500 colony forming units (cfu) per milliliter of bacteria should be present in drinking water. The C-crest team found counts in some of samples at 100 times those levels. In comparison, the average count for different tap water samples was 170 cfu/mL.

"Microbiologically speaking, tap water is purer than bottled water -- most bottled water," Azam said. "We didn't know this until we conducted the research."

The researchers stress that the bacteria they found "most likely" do not cause disease, but Azam says that's still unclear. She suggests it's possible that the bacteria they found could be pathogenic and pose a risk for vulnerable populations such as the elderly, pregnant women, infants, and immunocompromised patients.

"I cannot rule out that these organisms might be harmful, but I do not know," Azam said. "But in microbiology there is a rule: guilty until proven innocent."

She says many Canadians assume bottled water is safer than tap water and might be surprised to learn how many bacteria are in their bottled water.

"Bottled water has a price tag to it, [so we assume] that must mean it is safer and you are buying safety with that money," she notes.

Michel Lavelle, of the Canadian Bottled Water Association, calls the study "unnecessarily alarming." He says commercial bottled water is not meant to be sterile, so the presence of bacteria in itself is not news.

"When you say the word bacteria it sounds like it is dangerous. But you eat bacteria on salad and fruits all day long. And these are the same bacteria found in the water," he told CTV News.

He notes that the bacteria detected are non-coliform and non-pathogenic and don't do any harm, which is why regulators haven't set limits on these bacteria.

"They don't regulate these bacteria because they are not linked to disease," he says.

Still, Azam's team concedes that while bottled water is not expected to be free from microorganisms, they were stunned at the high levels of bacteria they found.

They were also stunned that there were not limits in Canada on levels of these microorganisms in bottled water.

"The cfu observed in this study is surprisingly very high. Therefore, it is strongly recommended to establish a limit for the heterotrophic bacteria count as well as to identify the nature of microorganisms present in the bottled water," she said.

With a report from CTV medical specialist Avis Favaro and producer Elizabeth St. Philip

Comments are now closed for this story

Mead
said

Note to the researchers from C-crest Laboratories - post the brand names. You cannot be sued for telling the truth, with proper documentation and proof.Post the brand names.


Rev
said

Heh, it's a pretty well known fact that bottled water has minimal filtering because duh duh duhh, filters cost money which cuts into profits. You know a company is gunning for every cent if they're too cheap to even install a UV light to kill off the bacteria.Unless this bacteria in the water is the same as that probiotic stuff in the yogurt commercials, I'll keep boiling my tap water thanks.


Kojak
said

Take a glass of cold water from your tap, and let it sit for 20 minutes. I would rather drink bottled water any day than the disgusting taste of tap water especially after it sits for 10-15minutes. There is no WAY on EARTH that it could be good for you.This is just a biased study to attempt to put fear into peoples minds, but really they just want to reduce plastic waste. It is pretty black and white.Dont believe it for a second. Just like they said circumcision reduced hiv transmission. No, it doesnt. That is a crock of b-o-l-o-g-n-a. Soap and water goes a long way, but they failed to mention that in their study.


Life-of-Pi
said

Bottled water like Dasani and Aquafina is a huge scam - tap water bottled for you - how dumb do you have to be to buy it? Labels are there to be read. There's a huge snob factor involved in buying water. We live in the country with the most fresh water in the world. I have absolutely no respect for people stupid enough to spend money to buy water brought thousands of kilometres on a ship from France (Evian and Perrier). I am loving this wake-up call.


Daniel from Toronto
said

Brita water it is then!


Jake
said

This is just a push for you to start drinking your cholorinated and fluoridated water so you can crank up the meter to pay more for your water usage. And also, "70 per cent of the samples contained bacteria at levels that far exceed recommended limits in the U.S. " I thought we lived in Canada. Why do we care what levels are considered acceptable in the US?


kc-bby
said

@CATHERINE....you drink 10 bottles of water per day? You spend $10 x´s 365 per year costing you $3650 per year that could have saved you on taxes and offered up a major contribution towards your retirement savings plan. Catherine, you spent all that money on water that is inferior to tap water. The Chemicals coming off the plastic oil based bottles themselves may in fact be promoting cancer. Let me, for the sake of this arguement, presume that bottle water is 1% cleaner than tap water....are you going to outlive people who drink from the tap? BTW, this winter I´m selling some snow, $20 per block of snow. Look me up!


MBRL
said

I agree with Mead, another conspiracy to get us to stop drinking bottled water!!!! Why was it so good years ago and now so bad? Soon it will be organic foods tun,, can't eat anything else than organic food, the rest is full of bacteria. Might I remind the world that it is because of our obsession with anti-bacteria things that we can't fight any deceases anymore....


KC-bby
said

We live in Vancouver and the quality of our water is about to get even better with the new $850 million dollar filtration plant that adds a UV filtration system. I still see people buying bottled water out here but I suppose these are the same people who would buy snow in the middle of winter. The ignorance of these people amazes me. They spend a couple of bucks or more every day through out the year on bottled water that comes from the same water shed and filtered for no damn good reason other than to confound people into buying water. The filtration system we enjoy in Vancouver eliminates 99.9% of the bacterium. We need to pass a law that prevents polluting our landfill with water bottles. Any city councellor want to take a crack at this?


karl
said

What do we know about this lab and the reason for this study, who commissioned this study and who financed it????If there is no evidence that this bacteria is harmful, why is this being reported. Surely if you are going to report on something like this, which attacks an entire industry by creating fear, there should be independent research that backs up the findings. I guess the independent research does not exist that is why this narrow study is the only data on this topic.Come on CTV, you can do better than this, what are you a Tabloid?


Alex Boudreau
said

I think what's important to note here is simply the fact that there is potentially too little regulation around bottled water.

What happened to good old water fountains in public places? I'm seeing less and less of that, to the profit of privatized water.

I don't know for you all, but having to pay that much for access to "clean" water is insanity.

Mead, I'm not sure how pointing fingers at brands will prove anything? Will most likely result in lawsuits more than anything else.


Charles Regina
said

No...Don't stick with your tap water...it contains chlorine and in most area's lead!Reverse Osmosis baby!!!


andrew t
said

So essentially, the pharmacy knows that certain brands of water contain potentially dangerously high levels of bacteria (a hundred times greater than in tap water) yet they will not report which brands of water might make you sick. This should make us as citizens and consumers angry (at the pharmacy/media for hushing the info, and at the corporations who silence them). Our right to health information about products we consume should have far greater importance than the corporate images being shielded. Since both Coke (Dasani) and Pepsi (Aquafina) have admitted that their bottled water actually comes right from public taps, it's probably a safe bet that their products are among the dangerous ones tested. Even if you aren't disturbed by corporations taking water from the earth and selling to the rich, these kinds of health issues ought to make you think twice about every buying a bottle of water.

Doug # BC
said

I'm with "watergirl" on this one.Of course that's easy for those of us getting our water from the reservoirs in the greater Vancouver area.We have what is likely the best drinking water on the entire planet.People in other areas may not be so lucky.Here,the only reason to use bollted water would be in instances where you're not close to a clean faucet or a fountain.Other than that,it's mostly the enlightened yuppy crowd that think bottled water is better. If these tests hold up,there should be concern among those who consume the product on a regular basis.Of course I always stand up for individual choice.THere should nt be a move to ban the water.Consumers do have a right to choose.But a wise choice requires full knowledge of both the benefits,and the potential risks.


FACT CHECK
said

What is the name of the company? An unnamed company and un-nmaed lables makes the whole story lack credibility.


adhdcanuck
said

Its not a conspiracy whats wrong with people on the internet. I was raised by a microbiologist, this is entirely likely.

They likely cant name the brands in a news article, but as it has been submitted at a medical conference it will be peer reviewed science.

I suggest switching to a home filtered system that also eliminates bacteria and viruses, or drinking tap water which is usually very safe and clean.

Bottled water is a bad idea.

Tea
said

Just a thought. We do a bit of fishing and if you put a dozen minnows in "tap" water it will kill them instantly. (try it yourself) . If you put them in bottled water they will survive indefinately! Why? Must be aerated (bubbler) in both cases. I know which I am drinking!


Catherine
said

Is this another so called scientific study, that is to put the fear of God into folks to give up drinking bottled water? If so it didn't work for me, I get more bacteria from sitting at a restaurant from the table and chairs than I get from my water. I drink 10 bottles a day, and am not giving it up. Folks, ever wonder how many chemicals you are drinking in tap water, nothing is pure, water comes from the earth? .


Bob Loblaw
said

I work in the municipal water industry and from what I know this is true. Bottled water is the biggest cash cow drink companies have ever seen. They buy the water at pennies a milliliter and sell it back at dollars a liter! Municipal tap water is extensively cleaned to make sure there is no risk of contamination. The chlorine that is in tap water just for an emergency such as a water line break. If you don't like the taste of your water just let it sit overnight and all chlorine will have dissipated. I am glad this has been brought to light as maybe we can finally move away from stupid bottled water.


CalgarySandy
said

I never stopped drinking tap water. A lot of bottled water is just tap water put through a biofilter. Dasani, by Coke, is the local tap water bottled for locals. To make it even worse, they do not pay any more for the water than I do. What a scam!


MAL of TO
said

If the test is solid then why not name the offending brands? And if the test is not solid, why release the results...... very incomplete article, could cause some panic.


PBW
said

As opposed to Mead, I believe the use of bottled water is a push to get drinking water into the hands of private industry as opposed to public utilities, and I see no reason to support such a move. I rarely use bottled water, and then only when tap water is unavailable, for example when flying. Why would I want to pay $1.99 or whatever for 500ml of water, when metered tap water (according to the article, less contaminated with cfb's that bottled water) costs a mere $1.91 per cubic metre, i.e, 1 million ml? It seems to me that we are better off with tap water, both in terms of cost and of safety.


Rob Pearson
said

I worked for a Pharmaceutical company for 7 years and our internal microbiologists tested water cooler water from 3 of the rental water coolers on site, that were hard plumbed from our tap water. The water that goes into the cooler is clean from bacteria but because the cooler shad filtration systems inside the cooler the filtration entity ( carbon filtration I believe ) grew it's own bacteria in very short time. The end product was 5 times higher in bacteria than was fit for human consumption. When we alterted the Water cooler company they replaced all 3 coolers with NEW but within one month all three coolers again were proven by the Micro biologists not to be fit for human consumption.I suggested they test bottle water companies product but there were too many to test so they never did however I am not surprised to here about the Montreal study.End of the day tap water is the safest it seems or boiled water. Cheers Rob


Patrick
said

Grow up Mead. Better yet, stop posting.


Anysia
said

The lack of regulation and standards for bottled water compared to tap water is one of the reasons I switched to filling my own water bottles from filtered water at home years ago. Having worked in a microbiology laboratory, I clean my bottle regularly--something many people fail to do because it "looks" clean (just like bottled water).I'd like to see a study of the bacteria counts in reuseable water bottles that many people carry around. I'll bet you money that the bacteria counts are not only higher than bottled water, but include pathogenic bacteria.For people who can't be bothered to clean their bottles regularly, bottled water is still safer.


Accremonious
said

In my final career B 4 retirement I hauled many loads of bottled water from several of Ontario's good spring water bottlers and also Mirabel in Quebec. Knowing where and how these operations are and work, I would be very surprised if any of their product was involved. I also hauled one load from a spring bottler in upstate New York where it was very close to the infamous Love Canal, but that operation was a very specialized process where they were making distilled water, then re-mineralizing and vitaminizing it to standards which included Ultra Violet radiation and filtering prior to the distillation. It was a grocery store specialty item and very expensive compared to bottled H2O. My wife and I regularly drink bottled water, but only from those spring operations that I know are OK. Read the label and if the bottle does not list the source spring, don't buy it. Furthermore, I challenge the authors of that study to publish their results with numbers and name the labels that those numbers came from.Truth in reporting requires the whole truth along with nothing but the truth. We are still waiting to read the results of that Guelph post grad student's master's thesis work where he found many residual pharmaceuticals in the waterways that several of our Southern Ontario cities draw their tap water from. Now that will be an even more important report to read! It apparently includes well known birth control chemicals, over the counter pain medications, and even prescription drug residuals. It may rival an American study in which many similar drugs were detected, such as fifty odd pharmaceuticals in the water for Philadelphia, Pa. Is any water source free of man made messes?


Rick in Vancouver
said

why don't they provide names?? why the secret?


BeaverFever
said

Not surprised in the least. Bottled water has always been a scam.


Mead
said

Is this true, or is this another anti-water bottle conspiracy to create fear by the environmentalists? Name the brands to prove this.


watergirl
said

I'll stick to my tap water!


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Subscribe!

MedNews Express newsletter

CTV MedNews Express

Sign up for our weekly medical newsletter, delivered for free to your inbox.

CTV.ca Blogs

Dr. Marla Shapiro

Health Blog

Check out what our guest medical experts and CTV health reporters are writing about.

Twitter

Avis Favaro Twitter

Follow us on Twitter

Follow CTV medical specialist Avis Favaro on Twitter.

Today's Health Stories

suicide, mental health, abuse DNA changes

Abuse may cause DNA changes that increase suicide risk

More   5 Comments 5    1 Video(s) 1

Office workers in their cubicles. (file)

Mental health at work: Creating safe workplaces

More   7 Comments 7    25 Video(s) 25

Bell 'Let's Talk' spokeswoman Clara Hughes.

Landsberg, Hughes say toughest adversary is depression

More   6 Comments 6    25 Video(s) 25