Health -   

1
According to the study, Calvin Klein Eternity perfume for women, for example, contained 14 unlisted chemicals. Giorgio Armani Aqua Di Gio for men had 17 chemicals, while American Eagle 77 spray contained 24 unlisted chemicals.

Perfumes filled with unknown chemicals, group alleges

Viewer

CTV News Video

Canada AM: Rick Smith, Environmental Defence
The executive director of Environmental Defence talks about the 'secret ingredients' that appear as 'fragrance' on perfume labels, and the allergic reactions and hormone disruptions they can cause.
CTV National News: Avis Favaro on the chemicals
A new study claims that a number of popular perfumes contain 'secret chemicals' that have been linked to sperm damage and hormone disruption.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (34) Facebook   

According to the study, Calvin Klein Eternity perfume for women, for example, contained 14 unlisted chemicals. Giorgio Armani Aqua Di Gio for men had 17 chemicals, while American Eagle 77 spray contained 24 unlisted chemicals.

Photos

According to the study, Calvin Klein Eternity perfume for women, for example, contained 14 unlisted chemicals. Giorgio Armani Aqua Di Gio for men had 17 chemicals, while American Eagle 77 spray contained 24 unlisted chemicals.

View Larger Image

Date: Tue. May. 11 2010 11:01 PM ET

A prominent environmental group says perfume makers stink when it comes to divulging the potentially dangerous chemicals in their products.

Environmental Defence, along with the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics, commissioned a study of perfumes sold in Canada. The group says the study shows that perfumes often contain a dozen of what it calls "secret chemicals" not listed on labels -- chemicals that can trigger allergic reactions or disrupt hormones.

The group tested 17 name-brand perfumes colognes and "body sprays" for men and women:

  • Giorgio Armani Acqua Di Gio 
  • Jennifer Lopez J. Lo Glow
  • Calvin Klein Eternity (for women)
  • Bath & Body Works Japanese Cherry Blossom
  • Britney Spears Curious
  • Calvin Klein Eternity (for men)
  • Quiksilver (for men)
  • Victoria's Secret Dream Angels Heavenly
  • Coco Mademoiselle Chanel
  • Clinique Happy
  • Abercrombie & Fitch Fierce
  • American Eagle Seventy Seven
  • Hannah Montana Secret Celebrity
  • Dolce & Gabbana Light Blue
  • Old Spice After Hours Body Spray
  • AXE Bodyspray For Men - Shock  
  • Halle by Halle Berry

All of them contained secret chemicals not listed on the label. On average, they contained 14 chemicals, some are which have been linked to estrogen disruption, sperm production disruption and even cancer, the group says.

According to the study, Calvin Klein Eternity perfume for women, for example, contained 14 unlisted chemicals. Giorgio Armani Aqua Di Gio for men had 17 chemicals, while American Eagle 77 spray contained 24 unlisted chemicals.

The study found the perfumes also contained an average of 10 "sensitizing" chemicals, which are chemicals that can trigger allergic reactions, such as nausea, headaches, wheezing, and vomiting.

The questionable chemicals include:

  • Octinoxate
  • Oxybenzone
  • Benzophenone
  • Diethyl phthalate (DEP)
  • Butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT)
  • Galaxoide
  • Tonalide
  • Musk ketone
  • Benzyl salicylate
  • Benzyl benzoate
  • Butylphenyl methylpropional

The report says that galaxolide and tonalide -- two synthetic musks linked to toxicity to the endocrine system – were found in 16 of the 17 perfumes. A recent cord-blood study by the Environmental Working Group found those two chemicals inside the bodies of most babies tested.

Twelve of the 17 products in this study were listed as containing DEP, a chemical found in 97 per cent of Americans that is linked to abnormal development of reproductive organs in baby boys and sperm damage in adult men.

Jane Houlihan, senior vice president for research at the Environmental Working Group, says these chemicals easily find their way into our bodies.

"Fragrance chemicals are inhaled or absorbed through the skin, and many of them end up inside people's bodies, including pregnant women and newborn babies," she said.

Environmental Defence's Rick Smith says none of the chemicals are specifically labelled, because of a regulatory loophole that allows companies to use the word "fragrance" on their label to protect the fragrances as trade secrets.

"All you have to do is put the word ‘fragrance' on your ingredient list and you can shovel dozens of chemicals into that one word," he says.

"There's no way for people to know what's in their favourite fragrances without sending these products to a laboratory. As a parent, I find that unacceptable," Smith added in a news release.

The group also contends that of the 91 ingredients identified in the study (either by lab tests or product labels), only 19 had been reviewed by the industry-funded Cosmetic Ingredient Review, and only 27 have been assessed by the International Fragrance Association (IFRA) and the Research Institute for Fragrance Materials (RIFM), which develop voluntary standards for chemicals used in fragrance.

Darren Praznik, of the Canadian Cosmetic, Toiletry and Fragrance Association, says the report is flawed.

"None of these ingredients are secret. They are well known," he told CTV News. "They have gone through intensive scrutiny within the industry's suppliers and regulators, like Health Canada to make sure consumers are not put at risk when they are used as intended."

Praznik says most of the products identified in the report are either on the label or are present in infinitesimally small amounts.

"Industry and regulators put a great deal of effort, in fact, in ensuring that ingredients that go into personal care products and fragrances are in fact safe when used as intended," he said.

Environmental Defence say this study kicks off its new "Just Beautiful" campaign, aimed at making cosmetics and personal care products safer and their labels more clear. It comes as the federal government reviews Canada's laws governing cosmetics.

The group also plans to investigate what chemicals might be found in makeup, perfumes, lotions, shampoos and soaps that Canadian families use every day.

The group says their mission is to see better labelling of all chemicals in perfumes, cosmetics and sunscreens -- most of which contain artificial scents -- so that consumers can better decide which to use and which to avoid.

Comments are now closed for this story

Dave
said

There does appear to be a problem relating to all products containing fragrances. Our local hospital has banned the staff use of perfumes and after shaves and requests visitors to not use them while attending the hospital. An ever greater percentage of the population is having allergic reactions and asthma as a result of exposure perfumes and after shaves and also to scented cleaning products particularly washing powders.


esther
said

Thankyou,thankyou,thankyou. People need to be more informed. I have been dealing with chemical sensitivities for a while. These toxic chemicals are not only in perfumes and body sprays. They are in airfreshners,fabric softeners(which also put formaldehyde in our water system) and deodorants. If there are any petitions to have these chemicals banned, sign me up.


gingin
said

excellent information. i don't use perfume or any scented products. it is most unpleasant being on an airplane that if full of overscented passengers! i suggest people email /contact companies and complain about not having more unscented and natural options.


Muneeba Siddiqui
said

Thankx for awearing us,we didn't know this truth before.it's our responsibility now,to aware and warn people around us, it will definitely decrease the problems arising because of these products.


former lauder lady
said

After working in cosmetics for a number of years, knowing the background, I stopped using the products including fragrance. Now its just essential oils for me! No chemicals and safe for everyone!


Melinda
said

Banning these products is not the answer. I do not believe all reports from ``Enviromentalists`` most of them are quacks! Imagine the body odor we will have to put up with, when they start to ban body wash, shampoo, conditioner, deodorant etc! That prospect I find offensive! I would imagine that the amount, and number of years of use, required to cause damage, would be longer than humans live anyway! Some people don`t use body wash enough now!Careful what you wish for!


Gray
said

Sadly, 1000 new chemicals are created each year. Of these only 15% are tested to see if they produce health hazards. While reading this, you could be exposing yourself to 850 new and potentially dangerous toxins in your immediate environment. We've really been let down when it comes to the safety and health of our children and grandchildren.


Earthwatcher
said

You are all lab rats...I use almost none of the products listed because A. I'm a man therefore I use one simple soap (it claims to be additive free) and only one hair product, shampoo. No deodorant, no gel no mousse none of that metrosexual stuff. I am clean and scent free, apparently almost chemical free as well.Lab rats


Christine
said

Do you know that when you smell something, you're also taking up those chemicals into your system?


Sylvia
said

Synthetic scents and perfumes cannot be put into the same category as the natural scents of nature. We need to guard that we don't throw out the therapeutic value of the scents of nature along with the synthetic counterpart. That would be devasting. My field of natural health is as an integrated aromatic sciences practitioner. This is where I use the therapeutic grade essential oils from nature that are both healing and scentfully delicious.
No chemicals, preservatives, fillers, binders, exenders, syntheitcs, colorings, or anything else that would harm the person using them. These oils are aromatic as well as medicinal. Therapeutic essential oils were the first medicine know and I would welcome anyone on board to try this incredible mode of natural health. By the way, I am not talking about aromatherapy. Feel free to contact me if you want to learn more truth about the power of essential oils and the value of their scents.

Theresa
said

Thank you Canada AM and Environmental Working Group for your research and exposing these products. Fragrances found in perfume/cologne and household products have are indeed harmful to ones health. It’s about time that we all get educated about how harmful these products are to people with allergies and sensitivities like asthma and Multiple Chemical Sensitivities. There are so many more products that need to be researched such as strong scented laundry soaps and fabric sheets/softeners such as GAIN, Tide, Tide with Febreze, Bounce with Febreze. People are becoming disabled from breathing in harmful toxic chemicals found in these products, has their health deteriorates with constant exposures and reactions. Canada has an obligation to keep their citizens healthy, so that we can work and raise our children and grandchildren in safe environments. Thank you again educating the public.


Sylvia
said

Let's not throw the baby out with the bath water. Synthetic is out and nature is in. Nature has provided for us the most beautiful natural scents that can be used as perfumes. These scents come in the form of therapeutic grade essential oils that are not adulterated, cut with extenders or blended with synthetic scents or compounds. Feel free to contact me and I will make available to you the joy and pleasure of nature's gift to us through essential oils.
I custom blend all 100% natural perfumes using only that what nature has provided for us. It is simply joyful and health promoting at the same time.


gnflen
said

We're talking low-dose exposures, people, and they all add up. We're not just spritzing ourselves once, we're doing it over days and years. Add to that the rest of the products we use in a single day and over our lifetime, combined with the pollutants in our food and drink and air, and that's a lot of chemical exposure.

We absolutely deserve to know what's in our products and to have proper regulation (and not some industry-funded panel, which is the case now) of them.

And we certainly shouldn't have to be chemists to figure out what to buy in the beauty aisle. I recommend you all visit and join the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics, www.safecosmetics.org and start researching safer alternatives at www.safecosmetics.org/skindeep


Vanessa
said

Thanks to Environmental Defence’s research and CTV for airing this segment! We really need these nasty truths exposed to better educate ourselves as consumers and to make better decisions on the products we buy. We must also send a clear message to government on the needs to change Health Canada's business of "protecting corporate interests" over public health. We are a developed nation - RIGHT?! Why can't we enjoy the same standards that Europe has in relation to consumer protection?


Unscented in Vancouver
said

Perfume rose to popularity in an age where bathing regularly wasn't an option and people needed to cover up the stink of themselves. Today, you can take a shower whenever you want. I really don't appreciate it when I can smell someone from two feet away, whether the smell is "pleasant" or not. Our senses are assaulted everywhere we go, whether by noise, sights, or smells, etc. Your perfume is an olfactory assault on my freedom, and I would argue that as the "victim" of your assault, my rights should outweigh your right to smell like a chemical factory.

I also don't think that labeling will convince people not to wear perfumes. It certainly hasn't worked with food. I would greatly support government intervention to ban harmful chemicals from cosmetic and home "cleaning" products, to name but a few. I want my future kids to grow up happy and healthy, not germ-free but riddled with immune and reproductive issues.


Tesa
said

It would be nice if they had named some of the safer products too.


rouquinne
said

The comment from the industry on Dr. Gupta's blog on CNN did raise a couple of questions about this "study" - the most important one being that it was self-funded and self-published.scientific standards require independent peer-reviewed studies be used in order to be unbiased.
I am reminded of the ONE study published that showed that sunscreen is bad for you in the face of hundreds sayng the opposite. what wasn't divulged is that the study was conducted on artificial skin - which is notorious for giving false-positive results during testing.there is always more to the story than meets the eye.and, no, i don't work in the cosmetics field.


Isabelle
said

I've known this for a long time, but I'm glad this is finally getting some media coverage.

Please remember that toxic chemicals in our immediate environment are not limited to perfumes - the same goes for those artificial air fresheners, as well as a range of other household products, including cosmetics, creams, and shampoos.

We need to encourage manufactures who produce perfumes and other household products that are NONtoxic!!

They are out there, but are still a minority (ex: Burt's Bees)



Pheesees
said

About time. Anyone with allergies has long known the toxicity of the chemical weapons sold to the unsuspecting consumer as "fragrances" or "air fresheners".

At one time perfumes were made of all natural ingredients. Unfortunately, lust for profit at all costs has made this a past practice.


D. Laws
said

thats the trouble with buying colognes vs buying a real perfume . you get what you pay for. I prefer perfume because it does not contain all these cheap chemicals...that's why perfumes are so expensive (and getting harder to find). If you pay only $10-$50 you are not going to get a quality product and most named on your list are good examples.


Arie
said

Finally, I have suffered for a long time with the after effects of perfumes. Terrific headaches and nausea. It turns me into a zombie for a day or so, after coming in contact with a lot of the perfumes from today. I hope something can be done to ban people for wearing some of these items which I think can be just as harmfull as smoking.


Helene
said

I don't think banning is the answer. We already have enough rules where the government tells us what's good for us and what's not. What we need is for the government to enforce transparency so we can make the decisions for ourselves.


M
said

Ha! These products are just as dangerous to people's health as cigarettes! Why people need to douse themselves and reek to high heaven is beyond me!Ban perfumes and like products from schools and the workplace to save the health of others!


j bean
said

I have a workplace associate that has MCS multiple chemical sensitivity. She is affected by any strong smell whether it is natural or not. After going through tests her Doctors told her it isn't a physical reaction to fragrance she is having even though her symptoms are real. So because she has a physiological problem with fragrance she is trying to have anything with a scent banned and is extremely vocal if she detects a fragrance coming from your direction.


cassy moes
said

Health Canada protects the health of the Industry, not the health of Canadians, otherwise it would have banned perfumes as their ingredients are toxic to humans and the environment.


Hanna
said

Even if the chemicals are present in infinitesimally small amounts we use a number of products that have the same ingredients or class of ingredients every day. It tends to add up. Many people don't use just one product such as shampoo or aftershave. We use shampoo, conditioner, soap/body wash, shaving cream, moisturizer, aftershave, hair gel/mousse, hair spray, sunblock and perhaps even a self-tanner now that we're approaching summer. Add to that make-up for women. We do this every day. Is it a wonder that cancers and a host of other illnesses are on the rise?


Maplebird
said

I have gotten rid of as many mainstream personal care products as I can. I will not even use most of the best-known baby products on my son because more and more scientific studies are showing that this stuff is hurting boys (in essence feminizing them). You should also watch the CBC documentary called "The Disappearing Male" - it asserts that our lifestyle has begun to cause the actual disappearance of healthy, fertile males in the population. You can also read the book "Not Just a Pretty Face" to learn more.

Perfume? It's the proverbial tip of the iceberg. But at least Canada has decided to catch up with Europe and start getting rid of at least some of these nasty chemicals.


Canadian
said

Thank you for telling the truth


kpanta
said

thank you for researching this important topic .. my daughter was sprayed with axe at school and basically went braindead for awhile from the reaction .. we knew that something bad was in axe .. all work places and schools and churches should ban these products ... i do not buy any of this crap anymore .. maybe that is why i suffer from allergies from using in my youth ... can you do a followup to cosmetics .. do they have loopholes too to add anything they like on skin products ...


Celine Ferris
said

FINALLY- a demand to provide consumers with the ingredients in these high-priced products. I stopped putting perfume directly on my skin years ago and instead put in on my clothing. Now I use perfume very rarely.


vivian
said

We should ban these perfumes like banning cigarette. They are more poisonous than cigarette. They will cause all sort of health problem to the next generation.


Joe
said

Marketplace did a program showing that the same problem (hidden chemicals) exists in consumables and cleaning products. Health and Welfare said they do not check but leave up to the manufacturer. This is unacceptable


Vera Griffin
said

This information is good to know. I'd like to know about unscented products. Is there some loophole that allows them to added unlisted ingredients in unscented products?


Simon
said

It's about time these products get safer. We are poisoning ourselves every day. Pthalates, parabens, petroleum products, etc. I'm so proud of our country making a stand on this issue.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Health Stories

Versha Prakash talks to Canada AM about the Trillium Gift of Life Network donor record, Monday, May 28, 2012.

Ontario organ donor agency sets new 1-day record

More   10 Comments 10    1 Video(s) 1

The labels of three Maalox products sold in Canada: Maalox Multi-Action, Maalox Regular Strength, and Maalox Extra-Strength

Supplies of Maalox dwindling across Canada

More