Health -   

1
Experts hope report helps cut hospital mortality

Experts hope report helps cut hospital mortality

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV News: Avis Favaro explains the landmark study
10p_hospitals
CTV Atlantic: Toby Koffman looks at the reasons behind the high death rate at N.S. hospitals
atv29_hospital
CTV Newsnet: CIHI releases the mortality rates
KW29_presser
Dr. Steven Jackson, chief of staff at Scarborough General Hospital, discusses his hospital's score
raw_dr_interview
Dr. Jaman discusses the study's findings
ctv_raw_jamar

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (37) Facebook   

Date: Thu. Nov. 29 2007 9:10 PM ET

Hospitals in Newfoundland and Labrador and Nova Scotia have some of the highest death rates in the country, finds a new report that, for the first time, compares mortality rates at hospitals across the country.

Saskatchewan, on the other hand, has some of the lowest hospital death rates, according to the report released Thursday by the Canadian Institute for Health Information.

The information comes from a calculation tool being used for the first time in Canada, called the Hospital Standardized Mortality Ratio (HSMR). The tool compares the death rates of patients treated at 92 larger acute care hospitals and 42 health regions in Canada, outside Quebec.

(Quebec results are not available due to historical differences in hospital data collection. And seven of the larger hospitals chose not to have their results published this year, because of concerns over their own data collection methods.)

The number of deaths in a hospital or region are compared with the average Canadian experience, after adjusting for several factors, such as the age of the patient, their health status upon admission and their gender.

An HSMR of 100 is the overall average rate. So a hospital or region with an overall HSMR greater than 100 has a mortality rate that is higher than the average; if it's less than 100, that suggests that its mortality rate is lower than the average.

The Cape Breton Healthcare Complex, in Nova Scotia, for example, had the worst score of any hospital that chose to have its results included on the list, with an overall HSMR of 137 -- though its ratio has dropped from 143 in 2004-05, to 129 in 2006-07.

The Regina General Hospital in Saskatchewan had one of the best overall HSMR in Canada, at 71.

Other hospitals with poor scores were:

  • Grand River Hospital, KW Health Centre, in Kitchener, Ont. HSMR: 130
  • Scarborough Hospital General site, in Toronto, Ont. HSMR: 129
  • St. Catharines General Niagara Health System, in St. Catharines, Ont. HSMR: 129

Other hospitals with good scores were:

  • St. Mary's General Hospital, in Kitchener, Ont. HSMR: 81
  • Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, in Thunder Bay, Ont. HSMR: 81
  • Moncton Hospital, in Moncton, N.B. HSMR: 83

On a region-by-region basis -- which included all hospitals in a jurisdiction, not just the larger health centres -- the five hospitals of the Cape Breton District Health Authority reported the poorest score with the highest overall HSMRs.

The nine hospitals in the Newfoundland and Labrador Central Regional Integrated Health Authority also reported a high average mortality rate.

The seven hospitals in Saskatchewan's Sunrise Regional Health Authority had some of the best scores. Second best was the province's Regina Qu'Appelle Regional Health Authority.

Aim is to see death rates fall

The hope is that the data from this report can be used to cut the number of preventable "adverse events" -- those hospital errors that can sometimes lead to unexpected death.

A recent study in 2004 found that 7.5 per cent of adult medical or surgical patients had adverse events in hospital -- about one-third of which were deemed preventable.

Most patients recover from these errors, but each year, between 9,250 and 23,750 Canadian adults experience a "preventable" adverse event in hospital and later die, according to the study, which was funded in part by CIHI.

Phil Hassen, CEO of the Canadian Patient Safety Institute says the HSMR will be an important new measure of patient outcomes.  

"What we want to do is have hospitals pay attention to this and begin to do work to reduce the number of... unnecessary deaths," he told CTV. "HSMR is an indicator that will focus people's attention This will then allow us to see a reduction in lives lost that should not have happened."

Already, the overall average HSMR in Canada has fallen by six per cent since the data began to be collected three years ago. This translates to just over 2,500 fewer in-hospital deaths.

But trends vary by patient group. For example, death rates for patients with heart attacks fell faster than those for patients with pneumonia. The five illnesses that had the highest numbers of deaths were:

  • heart attack,
  • heart failure,
  • pneumonia,
  • chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • septicemia (whole body infection)

Those patients who had higher odds of dying in hospital were:

  • Men
  • Those with chronic health problems (such as kidney disease or AIDS) in addition to their main diagnosis
  • Those who came in as urgent/emergency admissions

These factors were all taken into account in calculating the results.

The HSMR is calculated based on the illness groups that account for 80 per cent of all deaths in acute care hospitals. The death rates are then adjusted for other factors that would affect mortality, such as advanced age, having multiple illnesses at once, and whether or not patients were transferred between hospitals.

The hospitals and health regions included in Thursday's report are already aware of how their facility or region compares to others across the country. Some have already begun to make changes.

For example, the Saskatoon Health Region has begun introducing rapid response teams to prevent deaths in patients who find themselves in trauma outside of intensive care settings. They are also adopting practices to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia, to reduce medication problems and infections and to standardize wound and skin care.

Yet some hospitals have seen their numbers rise in the last three years. Windsor Regional Hospital has seen its HSMR go from 118 in 2004-05, to 109 the next year, to 133 in 2006-07.

The hospital chose not to have its results published in the report but did decide to hold its own news conference to explain what it says were mitigating factors that explain their numbers. The hospital says, for example, that its high death rate is become it often accepts transfers of the sickest patients across the region to its health centre.

Hospital CEO Martin Girash says the hospital is not content with its mortality rates and will strike a committee to review the numbers and will work to improve its score.

History of the HSMR

The HSMR has been used by hospitals in several countries throughout the world as part of efforts to track mortality rates over time and target areas for improvement.

Every country uses similar data and calculation methods, but each country's results are based on their own national mortality experience, not compared to one another.

The HSMR tool was developed by Sir Brian Jarman at the Imperial College in the United Kingdom. He says that since Britain started tracking its hospitals' death rates, numbers have fallen across the board.

"I think it's been very successful, because about 80 per cent of hospitals in England now use the data on a monthly basis," he told CTV News.

"You can pick out problems to do with mortality and monitor the changes you implement and then look at how you're getting on with that."

Hospitals can use the data to identify which departments of their hospitals have unusually high death rates compared to other hospitals' similar departments, he says. Hospitals can then begin to make changes by reviewing patient charts and organizing teams to review their hospital's clinical practices.

Comments are now closed for this story

CB anxious
said

Re; The Cape Breton Regional data... this hospital has a major problem with MSRA coupled with a very high post-operative infection rate that is not well known to the general public and has not been adequately addressed.


RadiologyCrisisInCanada
said

I am a healthcare worker in southern Ontario, more specifically an X-Ray technologist. I can tell you first hand that Canada is headed down a HORRIBLE slope. Bit of a long story here but bear with me and read carefully.
1st.
I graduated in 2000 from a northern college. Back then it was a 3 year condensed format(24 months straight - no summers off or vacation), which is an adequate amount of education for someone in a largely technical role. The average age of a Medical Radiation Technologist at that time in Ontario was 48 years of age. I assume largely that Nurses are in the same situation - meaning that the majority of the workforce will be retiring in the next 15 years at most(I'm being generous).
So what is the government(Including our regulating bodies) doing to try to prepare the healthcare system to cope with losing the Majority of our Workforce? X-ray technologists in Ontario now need a 4 year bachelor's degree. That is their solution... This plan of "better educating" our workforce is going to produce real hardships in the years to come.
Think about it this way. I can go to school for 4 years and become an Engineer, Lawyer, Teacher, and many other professions with much better income potential than my current profession. So how is placing HUGE student debt loads combined with an extra 2 years out of the workforce going to attract people into my profession?
You think a 6 month waitlist for an MRI or a 6-10 week wait for an Ultrasound/CAT Scan is bad now? Give it a few more years, though I'm not sure you will like the result.


Greg
said

Having experienced health care in Canada, the US and Spain over the last 18 months, I would suggest that we take a hard look at the private/public system in Spain. In my case, I found that complex cases like mine were handled in the private system, where straightforward cases were referred to the public system. The government of Spain realized a long time ago that the efficiencies of the private system in managing complex cases produced the best benefits overall, and they were willing to pay the private sector for it. The US system, while bureaucratic for insurance, was very fast for cash customers, with a excellent referral consult costing less that $1000. We as Canadians need to quit using the US as the only alternative, and look to other countries that have successfully blended private/public health options. The health care unions, who greatly fear competition, and the politicians who don't have the guts to force real change, are the big problems in this country. Then we will be able to reduce our measured mortality rates at all of our medical facilities, and get the best results from the increasing floods of money we are pouring into Canadian medicare.


Mo
said

I work in health care and am very aware of the study. System error is the third leading cause of death in Canada and United States no difference. The numbers are not acceptable no matter what part of the country we live in. Most hospitals in Canada are finally getting are acts together but much work needs to be done. Which is why studies like this are truly invaluable.


Todd
said

There is a lot of research that shows that too many people are dying from medical errors and the side of effects of pharmaceuticals. The point of this study is to determine where the most errors are being made and hopefully decrease them. It is not an attempt to compare the Canadian and American medical systems.


MO
said

You missed the point these #s are not a reflection of how good our health care system or bad is. They are a reflection of how safe our systems or processes are. Nobody goes to work wanting to cause harm to anyone. The #s indicate safer systems which other hospitals look for and then try and recreate the safer methods.


Mark H.
said

Yay for Thunder Bay's hospital getting recognition! It is too bad that there are hospitals with higher than average scores, but I am sure with time, all hospitals will lower their score and we will all have our excellent health care we deserve!


lisa h
said

None of these comments re canadian/US healthcare strike anything with me...I suggest you all speak with nursing case managers on both sides of the border to get the facts...its a vague survey, and while they take into consideration demographics, age, severity of illness, etc, did they happen to consider care directives (living wills)...as an aging population, esp, in the maritimes, I presume alot of people, have the " do not beat on my chest" in writing...add in the doctor shortage, ER closures, shortage of nursing home beds, and the hundreds of miles to acute care...do the math.. I'm sure the waiting time is much better in the US...take out 50 million people who have no health care, add the thousand more hospitals, and take into consideration, each hospital takes their own health care patients...if you are rich enough to have medicade, you go to the best of the best...and if you make peanuts, you only qualify for Kaiser insurance, so you go to kaiser affiliated hospitals....the line is shrinking fast


WANDA
said

I disagree with Jim. Perhaps the problem has to do with the standard of care being better in other parts of the country.
We should be concerned. Could there be other reasons this may be happening???????


Expat Tony
said

Well I just love em all! Had my first son in Nova Scotia - excellent care. Had my second in Ontario - excellent care. Lived with the NHS in England until 27 - what a load of rubbish (although the staff were generally good when you got to see them). All in all, I think the Canadian system is a good compromise between the NHS and US.


the McNabs
said

The number one reason we are not returning to Nova Scotia is the atrocious health care compared to here in Alberta.


Chris
said

Look at the regions that have higher rates,and they tend to be retirement areas, people had moved away from home and then went back. There is nothing truly broken with the Canadian system, it just needs some tuning. This article had nothing to do with US versus Canadian, it just stated where more people die by hospital, not region.

Get over it,it is the facts of life.

Mo
said

Who cares if our system is better than the States or not. Both still have plenty to improve upon, and wasn't that the point of the article in the first place? Constructive criticism is necessary in order to optimize our health care system, and this is something that most health care professionals hope for when they commit themselves to working in this field. I will eventually be working in the field as well, and I hope people never stop asking what we can improve upon.


Jim
said

A fact of life is that people die. This study just shows that in some parts of Canada, hospitals keep patients who are near death, while others send patients home to die, or never admit them to begin with. Maybe thats what they should be looking at rather than targeting the people in this part of the country who from my own personal experience give wonderful care.


MattFromKamloops
said

I find it interesting that people believe that privatization = less government cost and thus lower taxes. If you look at the actual figures, however, you will see that the USA spends much more on health care per capita then any other country in the world. http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/hea_spe_per_per-health-spending-per-person

namely because of the much larger administration costs from having many different providers. The Canadian system needs a fix, but I would look to Scandinavian countries instead of the USA for a template to mimic.


Rodney
said

DARREN: You say you've lived in Canada and the US so you have some insight. Does not appear to be that way.

The US spends 30% of its federal budget on health care (Canada its closer to 60%). Take that 30% difference off my combined taxes (wife and me) and that means my family would have to find full coverage for about $300 per month. Not really possible for two kids and two adults. In the US, an ever-growing number of people get jobs that do not cover medical anymore. One in seven do not have coverage.

Under Darren's scenario, most everyone who works gets health care covered, and those who don't, get it free. No problem I guess. The US model is not sustainable. Darren is more concerned with US bashing than telling the truth.

Canada's health care could be better, but Canadians fear that once the profit motive enters the picture, as it does in the US, people will get less and health care providers (companies, not doctors) will cause the costs to escalate.

I'm certain there is a better way than always looking south to solve our problems.


Ed from Alberta
said

They do not just come up with this stuff for fun, the bottom line here is NL/NS are falling behind and people have died as a result. In NL Danny boy will no doubt blame the Feds as in his mind they are respondsible for everything that goes wrong in his province. Well Danny boy Stephen H is doing just fine out west, our health care is just fine and there are thousands of NL residents out here that can vouch for that.

Socialism is killing us
said

More and more fearmongering from the likes of Mau and Kris. Socialism has never helped anyone but the welfare recipient who watches soaps all day. You can be in pain all you want for a week or a month or a year. Your choice. My choice is getting better, faster. If that means paying for it, great.


Caper
said

Like any stats report, there is likely a level of context that is usually not included. Often this context is needed to help explain what the number or numbers mean.
In this case the report shows Cape Breton has one of the highest ratios of people dying in hospital. However, if you look at the actual report on the CIHI site, you will see references to the previous use of palliative care information which impacted the Cape Breton number.
Obviously more people die in Hospital in C.B. rather than at home, or in a nursing home.
If you look at the health status of the District, the rates of chronic illnesses, like heart and respiratory disease are often higher than the provincial and national averages and the population is getting older. I also understand that more people are receiving end of life care in hospitals in Cape Breton than any other place in Canada. This shows the need for Palliative Care and in fact, Cape Breton's Palliative Care service is building a new unit.



Leo Fleming
said

As someone who has nursed in 3 Canadian provinces, 2 American States, and 4 hospitals in London, England I can unequivically state that the American Health Care System is far superior to Canada, in almost every respect.

And England, like most European countries, has a dual public/private system. It is far quicker to receive treatment in the UK than in any Canadian province.

One of the main problems that I see in Canada is that the performace of health care professionals goes both unrewarded and unpunished. Unions prevent incompetent nurses (and there ar eplenty) from being fired. And the money that is wasted in beuracracy pales in comparison to any other country.

bobmac
said

Darren, I agree in general with your comments about US versus Canadian healthcare. I have lived in each country for over 20 years and am currently in the US. After using both systems, my experice is that the actual US health care provided is much more aggressive in the prevention phases (testing, etc), wait times are next to none and the actual care and technology is excellent. The US health care delivery mechanisms and administration however are terrible. The Canadian system has unacceptable wait times and seems to focus resources on the treatment phase, however the health care delivery and administration is much more efficently run.

Overall, if you have healthcare in the US, it is second to none, if not Canada is the place to be.


Darren
said

I am so sick and tired of people bashing the US system when they know absolutely nothing about it other than the scare-tactic propaganda that is spoon-fed to them by our socialist government.

In the US, pretty much anybody that works has health care. Most of it is payed for by the employer. People on welfare still get health care, as every major city is required to have a public hospital; the fact that they are already on welfare does not impact them financially with medical bills, as most get waved.

I have spent a significant amount of time in both countries, and the US health care system is FAR superior to the CDN one. There are no wait times. They actually will try to find out what's wrong with you (unlike in Canada where their attitude is "come back when you are visibly dying"). It is not expensive, as the CDN propoganda will have you believe, and to anybody in Canada that is not on welfare you are actually paying significantly more in taxes to cover the health care of EVERYONE ELSE than you would have if you even paid for your own insurance in the US.



RTF article
said

Wow, did anyone even read the article? The study compares various hospital mortality rates to the averages across Canada (excluding Quebec, as noted in the article). Neither the study nor the article contains any information with which to compare American versus Canadian health care services, yet 6 of the 10 comments so far seem to think it does.....


Steve
said

The American health care system is great if you're rich or healthy.

I would take the Canadian system any day over every person for them self.

Canadians take our system for granded. In the States you need to get pre-approved for any procedure from your insurance company. The Insurance company can just wait till you die instead of paying for expensive procedures.


Terri
said

Just an FYI, the Cape Breton Regional Hospital treats far more people per capita than say St Catherines General. My Dad was a patient there so I know this first hand. We should look in our own backyards before bad mouthing a hospital we have no "first hand" knowledge of !!


Rob P
said

Grant, I think you have you are way off on your opinion. Most Newfoundlanders would kill to be working in NFLD. You do see a lot of Nurses moving away for work, but its not because of those great wages in Alberta, or for the amazing big city life style.

What I am saying is that Newfoundland has some really talented doctors and nurses. The reason so many people die is because we are an ageing population due to out migration of young people for work. Add that to the fact that you have people who have to literally get air lifted from their remote towns such as Southern Labrador to the nearest hospital in St. Anthony NFLD (which can take upwards of 3-4 hours) your death rate will significantly rise.

If someone living in Southern Labrador has a massive heart attack, stroke, or whatever, by the time they get to the hospital they are good as dead. These people choose to live there because it is their home, they know the risks they take on living in such remote places but it is well worth it as their quality of life there is much better than any city goers I know.



Cross
said

Perfection is impossible to attain…that’s a given…HSMR is also a given...it’s here to stay…a big “thumbs-up” for their efforts.
And here’s to you folk who have never lived in another country other than Canada…
From experience…you don’t know how lucky you are…that’s another “given”…!!

Cross



IAN
said

Why all the comments about U.S. health care? If one thinks our health care is better than that in, say Rwanda, is that a reason for not improving our system? I am staggered people can say 'well you didn't die so what's the problem'.


Zach
said

I am not sure how you can come to the conclusion that free health care is killing us. There are hospitals with low mortality rates, there are hospitals with high mortality rates. Studies in the United States will elicit the exact same comparisons, where lo and behold, people are left to die if they cannot afford to pay for medical procedures.


Kris
said

Hanna
You came close to dying and the service was "beyond bad"? Bad service to me, when pertaining to a hospital, is whether I died or not. Seeing as how you are able to type tht comment, I'd say the quality of care you received was quite good.

And as for Socialism is killing us comment... get real. Socialism is saving us. I'd rather have to put up with pain for a week, than have to put up with the interest on the loan I would undoubtedly have to take out to receive care in the US... all for the sake of a week, or a month tops.

Mau
said

To: Socialism is killing us...
What a ridiculous statement. How is it better in the US when your health care depends on your monetary value?
I prefer not so great care as opposed to unaffordable creating unattainable health care. The death rate is higher in the US. Only the wealthy have health care there.

IAN
said

I think the medical staff in our hospitals are great people doing the best job they can. I think they care and want to do the best for us. We owe them our gratitude. I think they are hampered by a socialist system in which the administration people care more about dogma and propaganda than anybody's health.


Grant
said

Having moved from Alberta to NS then to NL, I can say that this is not a surprise.
Nova Scotia was doing its best to make access to services difficult but NL has lost the cream of its crop to higher paying provinces.
In all sectors, the province relies on those workers whose fear of leaving is greater than the desire to be paid a competitive wage.
Do the best workers stay at the lowest rates of pay in the country, or is it just the best of whoever is left?

MH from Ontario
said

I recommand people to watch "Sicko" done by Michael Moore. They will understand how wonderful it can be to have a healthcare even if it isn't prefect. Guess what? American-style healthcare is wrong and not even close to being prefect either. Look into this before make final decision on healthcare. Canadian healthcare is good but it need fix.


Al
said

This to me is not a fair assessment for NL given our aging population and the proximity of hospitals to our mostly rural population. These hospitals have saved quite a few lives also.


Socialism is killing us
said

Hooray to public health care. You go to a Canadian hospital to die. I'd rather go to the States. I'd be in debt. But alive.


hanna
said

This did not surprise me at all. I came close to dying a few years ago from a condition that needed specific treatment. The care I received was beyond bad. I have come to find out since about the hospital's reputation in NS/

Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Subscribe!

MedNews Express newsletter

CTV MedNews Express

Sign up for our weekly medical newsletter, delivered for free to your inbox.

CTV.ca Blogs

Dr. Marla Shapiro

Health Blog

Check out what our guest medical experts and CTV health reporters are writing about.

Twitter

Avis Favaro Twitter

Follow us on Twitter

Follow CTV medical specialist Avis Favaro on Twitter.

Facebook

Like us on Facebook!

Like us on Facebook

Stay connected to the latest health news while you're on Facebook with CTV MedNews

Today's Health Stories

Versha Prakash talks to Canada AM about the Trillium Gift of Life Network donor record, Monday, May 28, 2012.

Ontario organ donor agency sets new 1-day record

More   10 Comments 10    1 Video(s) 1

The labels of three Maalox products sold in Canada: Maalox Multi-Action, Maalox Regular Strength, and Maalox Extra-Strength

Supplies of Maalox dwindling across Canada

More