Entertainment -   

Is 'fake news' informative? Study tests fun vs facts

Daily Show

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (19)Add Comments Facebook   

By: Andrea Janus, CTV.ca News

Date: Mon. Sep. 15 2008 4:50 PM ET

"One anchor, five correspondents, zero credibility."

You know it's not your grandmother's network news when one of the most popular information programs, The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, advertises itself with such a tagline.

But Stewart is no Walter Cronkite, "real" journalists don't know whether to be happy, or horrified, that his show has more viewers in the coveted 18-to-31 age demographic than any other nightly news program in the United States.

For years now, pundits have speculated that young adults are more likely to get political news from The Daily Show, and its spinoff, The Colbert Report, rather than from network programs.

Research has shown that between 48 and 60 per cent of young adults watched fake news shows to get information about the 2004 American presidential campaign.

The good news is, mock news shows are outrageously funny.

The bad news is, they leave viewers less politically informed than those who watch real news, a new study suggests.

Researchers from Ohio State University found television viewers who watch fake news programs are less informed about issues and candidates in election campaigns than those who watch network news shows.

Young Mie Kim, co-author of the study and assistant professor of communication at Ohio State., said both news and entertainment promote some knowledge gain, "but people who are exposed to news gain more factual information and learn more about a wide range of important topics than those exposed to entertainment media.

Kim conducted the study along with former Ohio State graduate student John Vishak. Their findings are published in the Journal of Communication.

Stewart and Stephen Colbert, host of The Colbert Report, are household names thanks to their irreverent portrayals of news anchormen.

Stewart's show has won a Peabody Award, one of journalism's highest honours, for political coverage. Yet it advertises itself on its website as, "The Daily Show with Jon Stewart -- it's even better than being informed."

In a study of about 85 people, Kim and Vishak found that fake news show viewers:

  • Retain more information about a political candidate's personal life and less about their positions on political issues.
  • Retain less information about political issues and processes compared to viewers of network news.

Mock news shows may not be the best way to learn about political candidates and issues because viewers watch the programs to be entertained, Kim said. So they may not be paying attention to all of the details.

Are comedy viewers also news consumers?

Megan Boler, a professor of media studies and philosophy of education at the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education (OISE) at the University of Toronto, disagrees and points to other studies.

A 2007 Pew Research Center study found that fans of The Daily Show and The Colbert Report rank high in surveys of public affairs knowledge, she said.

Viewers of the shows are already informed before they tune in, Boler said.

"The Daily Show is not watched to the exclusion of other sources," Boler said in an interview with CTV.ca. "In order to appreciate satire you have to have background knowledge. You're not going to have pleasure watching The Daily Show if you haven't been talking to your friends about what's going on, following other kinds of news sources."

Boler argues that Kim's study, which showed viewers 20-minute video segments from either NBC and CNN or The Daily Show about a Supreme Court nominee, fails to take into account how viewers gather news.

More people are getting their news from a variety of sources, including blogs and Internet media outlets, in an attempt to be more politically engaged, she said.

Therefore, reaction to a single news clip cannot accurately evaluate a subjects' political knowledge because it does not reflect the fact that people rarely gain that knowledge from a single source.

And the study ignores the fact that many viewers watch the programs online, which has spurred a whole online, user-generated media industry.

"Through that online watching there's a level of citizenship engagement where people can comment on it, they can link to it on their blogs, they can talk to their friends about it online, so there's an intense kind of community building," Boler said.

At the end of the day, the role of satirical news shows isn't to be a single source of information for viewers.

"Most people are aware that part of the pleasure of watching the Daily Show or Colbert is that it's making fun of news formats. It's doing that both in content and form," Boler said.

"It's doing that by pretending to be news and it's doing it by using clips from actual news and then making a joke about how straight news is doing its job. And it's urging you to ask questions about the role of media in a democracy."

Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz
1

Add New Comment ( )

Jeff
said
0 0

I watch both shows, and find that they are more likely to present the truth than the regular media outlets, even though it's disguised as humour.

Jon Stewart was a huge critic of the war in Iraq even when most Americans still accepted the Bush administration's spin. Colbert's satirical parody of Bill O'Reilly exposes his arrogant, ignorant viewpoint on a daily basis. It's amazing that O'Reilly can still show his face on TV...

Republicans, of course, have to dismiss these shows as "liberal bias" even when they turn out to be correct again and again. Things in the States have gotten so bad that the truth is now considered liberal bias. Amazing what lengths conservative people have to go to these days to preserve their illusions about the world. The ice caps aren't melting, the war on drugs is working, the world is only 6,000 years old, the American economy is in great shape, and Sarah Pallin is a good choice of VP because she's a hockey mom.

It must embarrass conservatives to see Stewart and Colbert ridicule them on a regular basis, but that's the purpose of good satire- to hold a mirror up to foolishness and ignorance.


Webstir
said
0 0

I was brought up knowing nothing but CNN.

I took it as the gospel.

I am pleased to say I have found the Fox News Channel
and their motto is fair and balanced and we report you decide.

ABC,NBC,CBS,PBS all are liberal outlets and it is a breath of fresh air to have an alternative.

I do not believe watching stewart etc is news at all.

I know alot of younger people who watch and base their opinions solely on these 2 shows and it is sad.

Between the major networks,most so called newspapers and the talking heads on the radio are all left wing, here in Atlantic Canada anyways they may as well be watching satire and comedy for their info.

Its sad indeed and these young people will be tomorrows leaders.

Sad state of affairs indeed.


Bret
said
0 0

I'm so sick of Republicans whining about liberal bias in the news. I watched an interview on CNN where they asked Palin point blank why she was for the Bridge to Nowhere until it was revealed as a pork laden scam, and her response was that John McCain's policies where to get rid of pork barrel spending.

When the right can simply dodge questions, give answers that don't apply to the questions asked, there is no liberal bias. That isn't news.

CNN where we ask the hard questions, and then accept anything anyone throws out as an answer.

Is there a liberal bias to the daily show and colbert report, certainly. Is it because the Republican party has a huge majority of political shenanigans? Yes.

They showed clips of Clinton when he did his "Well that depends on what you mean by 'is'" testimony.

I guess it's unfortunate for the republican party that more of the comedy gold is produced by their party. This is why the article doesn't include Fox's "Red Eye" news show.


Kevink (Montreal)
said
0 0

It seems these days anything found on a WEBSITE, TV, RADIO, News shows etc..., is always true and poeple unfortunately believe it.


Ernie in Pritchard
said
0 0

Laughter is the best medicine. John and Steven give me my daily dose and I thank them for it. They save the medical system millions of dollars. Pharmacare would go broke without them. They also have a huge fan base in not so coveted 60 to 70 crowd.


Prof. Pye Chartt
said
0 0

This story itself is a rather confusing conglomeration of debatable "facts." Let's hit the nail on the head...

-- Those who watch The Daily Show and The Colbert Report are more politically aware than the average dolt. (If you aren't politically aware, most of the humor is destined to sail right over your head.)

-- The writers/producers of these two shows also enjoy making fun of network newscasts and their continuing slide into foolish fact-fudging for the sake of puffing silly stories with little actual relevance.

-- The general public can only handle so much fear-mongering, slanted, biased, and redundant "news" each day; and these two shows are a refreshing resort to cut through some of the bogus nonsense we're bombarded with by legitimate organizations. Show me a "real" news junky and I'll show you an overly serious and depressing person who can't see the forest for the trees.

-- As part of the Hollywood left-wing entertainment machinery, these shows are a self-created opportunity for politically inclined talent to publicly voice their opinions while, at the same time, taking the odd shot at liberalism to appear somewhat balanced and comically sincere.


Kevin(BrockU)
said
0 0

As someone who is studying communications and political science at University, I can atest to 'legitimate' news sources as being misinformative and biased. It's called commercial media for a reason; they adhere to what their advertisers want (showing new stories that don't bash their advertisers). This is why it has been such a dilemma for the CBC. The CBC is suppose to inform Canadians of the truth, yet they take money from companies to advertise which can cause a bias.

As for The Daily Show, The Colbert Report, and Real Time with Bill Maher, they are all amazing shows. I'd rather be informed in a humourous way simply because no news is good news, esepcially when you actually listen to what's going on, so why not try and lighten it up a bit. Last year one of my poli sci profs appeared on a newscast and he went so far as to say he gets most of his news from The Daily Show and The Colbert Report, and he was one of the best profs I've had to date.


Mark E
said
0 0

I watch The Daily Show and the Colbert Report regularly and love the shows. But I also visit this site and several other news sites daily. The reason why I especially enjoy the "fake news" is simply because I have become so jaded with the BS that politicians try to fill us with and the slants that the main stream media tries to put on things.

At least "fake news" shows make all this frustration entertaining.


Rick in NB
said
0 0

Weve all been punked! Would any of you make a comment based on what Jon Stuart or Stephen Cobert said? The Media is making a mountain out of a mole hill. The Daily Show & Cobert Report are just a way to have a laugh at politicans. The fact that these shows are taking viewers away from traditional news shows is probably the reason for the artical. Lets face it if any show can get the kids to get involved in politics is a very good show.


KC
said
0 0

Jon Stewart isn't FAKE. He never lies. I hate to say it on this post considering it's CTV's own, but I have more faith in Jon Stewarts "fake news" than I have in the conventional media. CNN, NBC and the like are owned by General Electric...DEFENCE CONTRACTORS! ... The media needs to stop being so afraid of offending the special interest groups or Jon Stewart will become the only source where people feel they can trust.


Brad
said
0 0

Surely by fake news you mean Fox News, right?


Shannon, Vancouver
said
0 0

Wait! You mean to tell me that the news we get from the "repected" Canadian outlets are real???


me - anytown, usa
said
0 0

I think it's terrible how age is such an issue no-a-days. Attacking Ms. Mie Kim for being "Young", it just terrible!


Gary
said
0 0

Interesting study .. where did they find a "real" news program to compare against? I'd love to watch it. I haven't seen a "real" news program in over a decade.




Carson
said
0 0

Shows like The Daily Show and Colbert are not designed for people living in a vacuum, and this is a good thing. Whereas mainstream media fights amongst itself in trying to be "more unbiased", while failing miserably, TDS/CR drop that and admit they're biased, and then they go from there.

If you're looking at The Daily Show / Colbert Report complex as somehow a primary source, you're doing it wrong. Their shows are humorous analysis, and they are pundits, along the lines of Rush Limbaugh and Michael Savage. The problem is that traditional media has become so much about ratings, it's beginning to mix and match primary source information with analysis, so that unless there's a fast-paced and obviously event going on, like a hurricane, the truth gets muddied behind the "hard-hitting analysis" and it becomes difficult to tell which is which.

TDS/CR actually make fun of this, and have a strong point here -- they aren't a gigantic news network, they are two studio shows run on Comedy Central, and they don't do any actual reporting.

Comparing the two isn't so much as an ego boost for the Daily Show or Colbert, but a shot at the ego of networks, who while still doing their jobs, have become so intertwined with presenting entertainment to compete, have apparently lost focus on what it is they actually do, when compared to Comedy Central


Éric
said
0 0

This for mentioned study is actually a conflicting one. In 2004 the "National Annenberg Election Survey"1 Indicated the opposite. "(...) that Daily Show viewers could correctly answer more question about the (2004) Presidential candidates than viewers of national television news and newspaper viewers."

This is a good reminder that one must be critical of any study presented by the media because not all the facts are reported and also 85 participants is not a significant quantitative sample..

--
1 "National Annenberg Election Survey" (Press release), Annenberg Public Policy Centre (September 21, 2004), p.1.


What Credibility?
said
0 0

Sadly, even legitimate news sources stoop to omitting facts and misrepresenting a story to make it sound more sensational than it is to entertain us. This very site last week ran a story headlined "House Prices Slide" when really they'd gone up.

Our local paper just ran a story intented to portray a senior being bullied by bylaw officers. When I checked the story out there was far more to it than that and he was not unfairly targetted. The paper refused to clarify the story as its intent was to outrage people and they had to bend the truth to do it. Truth in journalism is dead!


Randy
said
0 0

What's the difference between fake news and the "Real News"?

Nothing, neither are impartial, nor factual only partisan Liberal opinions. Newscasters have dumbed down, believing we are too ignorant to make informed decisions.


Gail (Hamilton)
said
0 0

Everything today is about celebrity rather than the truth. Young people enjoy these shows because they want to be amused and the regular news is a turnoff with usually more bad than good news. Both of these shows take on a politically left slant and are rather funny considering how they present their misinformation, but I can laugh at them as well as with them.


 

Advertisement

Contest

CTV Programs

- Jon Stewart hosts a taping of Comedy Central's 'The Daily Show With Jon Stewart.' (AP Photo/Jason DeCrow, file)

The Daily Show with Jon Stewart

'The Daily Show with Jon Stewart,' led by Time Magazine's 'Best Talk Show Host,' has taken the world by storm

The Colbert Report

The Colbert Report

Ever since 2005, Stephen Colbert, now a D.F.A., has been dominating the fake news landscape.

Today's Entertainment Stories

Justin Bieber tweets about suffering a concussion in Paris, Friday, June 1, 2012.

Bieber laughs off fall, concussion worries in Paris

More  1 Video(s) 1

Matthew Fox talks to Associated Press during the launch of the new play 'In a Forest, Dark and Deep' at the Vaudeville theatre in London, Monday, Nov. 22, 2010. (AP / Sang Tan)

Ohio bus driver drops lawsuit against Matthew Fox

More