Top Stories -   

1
Rahim Jaffer leaves the courthouse in Orangeville, Ontario on Tuesday March 9, 2010. (Chris Young / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Rahim Jaffer pleads guilty to careless driving

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV National News: Daniele Hamamdjian reports
A court case involving a former Conservative MP has sparked much criticism towards the court system. Rahim Jaffer pleaded guilty to careless driving, but more serious charges were dropped, causing politicians and people on the street to ask why.
CTV Edmonton: Serena Mah with local reaction
A CTV correspondent in Edmonton shares local reaction to former Alberta Conservative MP Rahim Jaffer pleaded guilty to careless driving Tuesday and has been sentenced to a $500 fine
Power Play: Mark Sikstrom, ctv.ca
The executive producer of ctv.ca shares viewer comments in relation to Jaffer's ruling. Many feel there is a double standard and the general perception is that the 'tough on crime' Tories have looked after one of their own.
Power Play: Bains, Saxton & Comartin
Why were former Conservative MP Rahim Jaffer's charges dropped? MPs discuss the handling of the case and opposition parties question why the government has not commented on the case.
Power Play: Analysts on Jaffer's ruling
Former PMO communications director Kory Teneycke and Michael Ignatieff's former principal secretary Dan Brock weigh in on the perception of a 'two tier' justice system and whether a public inquiry into Jaffer's case should be held.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (71) Facebook   

Rahim Jaffer leaves the courthouse in Orangeville, Ontario on Tuesday March 9, 2010. (Chris Young / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Photos

Rahim Jaffer leaves the courthouse in Orangeville, Ontario on Tuesday March 9, 2010. (Chris Young / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

View Larger Image

Date: Tue. Mar. 9 2010 11:02 PM ET

Former Conservative MP Rahim Jaffer pleaded guilty to careless driving Tuesday and was sentenced to a $500 fine, while cocaine possession and drunk driving charges against the one-time anti-drug activist were withdrawn.

"I'm sure you can recognize a break when you see one," Judge Doug Maund told Jaffer in an Orangeville, Ont. court.

Jaffer refused to talk about his guilty plea under the Ontario Highway Traffic Act following his court appearance, but he apologized for the incident.

"I should have been more careful. I'm sorry. I know this is a serious matter," he said. "Once again I apologize for that and I take full responsibility for my careless driving."

The former Edmonton-area MP, 38, was charged last September with cocaine possession and impaired driving after being stopped by police officers for speeding in Palgrave, Ont., about 60 kilometres north of Toronto.

According to an agreed statement of facts, Jaffer was pulled over driving 93 km/h in a 50 km/h zone on Sept. 10.

The court heard that Jaffer told police that he drank two beers earlier that evening. He was driving to his home in Angus, Ont., in his Ford Escape when he was pulled over by police, failed a breathalyzer test and was arrested.

Prosecutor Marie Balogh told the court there was no reasonable possibility of conviction on the more serious charges of cocaine possession and drunk driving, saying there were "significant legal issues" impeding the case.

"The matter was carefully reviewed," Balogh told Maund.

Jaffer's lawyer, Howard Rubel, spoke briefly to reporters.

"The charges of driving over the legal limit and possession of any illegal substance has always been refuted and I think the withdrawal of those charges vindicates that refutation," he said outside of court.

Jaffer has 30 days to pay the fine and has already made a $500 donation to the Canadian Cystic Fibrosis Foundation.

Opposition reaction

The Liberals have asked the federal government to order an appeal in Jaffer's case. The plea bargain contradicts promises by the Tories to get tough on crime, Liberal MP Ujjal Dosanjh said.

New Democrat justice critic Joe Comartin suggested that Jaffer had received preferential treatment.

"On the surface it's very clear I think to the average Canadian that, had they been faced with the same set of facts, at the very least they would have had a trial," Comartin said on CTV's Power Play. "There's no way the Crown would have withdrawn this without a very clear explanation.

"Why was the cocaine possession charge dropped?" he asked. "No explanation has come forward at this point, and there has to be."

The plea deal sparked an angry exchange during question period in the House of Commons.

"What is the government's comment on a dangerous driver in possession of illicit drugs getting off with no record and a $500 slap on the wrist?" asked Liberal MP Anita Neville.

Justice Minister Rob Nicholson responded: "There would never be any political interference with any prosecution in this country."

Meanwhile the Prime Minister's Office offered little comment on the matter.

"I would simply point to the fact that it was judged and prosecuted under provincial law," said PMO spokesperson Dimitri Soudas.

Opposition parties have asked the Ontario's attorney general to clarify the court's ruling.

Jaffer was first elected as an MP in 1997 at the age of 25, and is married to junior federal cabinet minister Helena Guergis. He lost his riding in the 2008 election.

During his time as an MP, Jaffer became known for his tough stance on illicit drugs. He spoke in several Tory public-service announcements on radio that demanded stronger sentences for drug dealers.

Jaffer also found himself in a minor scandal in 2001. He made an emotional apology in the House of Commons after it was discovered he had an aide impersonate him on a radio show.

Guergis recently had to deliver a public apology of her own for "speaking emotionally" to staff at the Charlottetown airport in February. Witnesses said she berated Air Canada employees and yelled obscenities at security staff.

With a report from CTV's Daniele Hamamdjian and files from The Canadian Press

Comments are now closed for this story

Andrew in Alberta
said

As a few posters have already said, this was not a federal court, he's not an MP or a members of the PM's office so don't crap all over Mr. Harper...... these types of bogus deals get made all the time. With all the loop holes and technicalities that the oh so cherished Constitution & Charter of Rights created I'm not surprised a deal was made. Some poor street cop probably forgot to cross a "T" or dot an "i" and the defense lawyer will have jumped all over it. I doubt very much if the PM would risk his credibility by trying to protect this loser..... He was an embarrassment when he was an MP and I have no doubts the Tory's are glad to be rid of him.


dale
said

Now THAT is a good lawyer!


Mike Webster, Mississauga
said

Some of the ridiculously uninformed and uneducated posts here are pure comedy gold. FACT: He was not CONVICTED of impaired driving or drug posession. FACT: The crown WITHDREW THOSE CHARGES because in the words of the crown THERE WAS NO REASONABLE PROSPECT OF CONVICTION. FACT: Plea bargains happen in every court every day. The legal system would not function without them.FACT: There is NO EVIDENCE to prove ANY KIND OF preferential treatment by anyone.Get a grip people.


Lz in Edmonton
said

Who cares. This guy isn't in politics anymore and he gets all this press. Sure, his wife is in politics but again, who cares. As this being his FIRST offence, I am surprised he didn't get off without a warning like all the other people out there.


valerie
said

I spent the morning being taught about ethics, as mandated by the federal government...hmmmm...who to vote for next election...as a husband of my MP...she had to know something. Guess the rules and the laws are only for the less fortunate. My daughter got a speeding ticket..don't imagine she would have gotten the same sweet deal. Thought the caste society was gone....guess I will vote for ...OMG no choices left..


Mead
said

Ladies and Gentlemen of Canada: We have two law sytems in place - a secret system for politicians, and one for the rest of us. And judging from this article, the two systems are not equal.


jordan
said

bahaha thats hilarious, $500 fine is pretty nice for drinking and driving, what a joke


Stuart
said

Unbelievable. What ever happened to MANDATORY minimum sentances?.


Phillip M
said

What a sad but realistic show of the many different levels of Law. I'm aboriginal and it sickened me to see this report that this person had gotten off so easy! Never would happen if it were an Aboriginal. Hence the over representation of Aborignal people in the judicial system.


MAL of TO
said

Also for those of you elsewhere in Canada, we have a wonderful little thing called 'OOPS it's a 50 zone' in a ring around the GTA. Usually at the bottom of the hill on an 80kmh provincial highway just before the town [JUST before] the highway drops from 80 to 50 and the advanced sign is often missing [hello Omemee]. I think the 'not able to get a conviction' line is probably accurate, a major legal defense could be made for entrapment and illegal search. Besides, as many have mentioned..... this court is in the land of a LIBERAL Attorney General.


Robin
said

Judge Doug Maund, a federal Tory, was appointed in 2000 by Jim Flaherty, who was Ontario's Attorney General at the time.

POSS
said

"the cocaine and drunken driving charges were withdrawn" , you must be joking. Anyone else reading this article think they would get a break like this?....did'nt think so.

Isabelle
said

A double standard and a real joke... Sad for average Joes who would have had to pay a substantial fine and probably gotten a criminal record. Not impressed :(


Prof. Pye Chartt
said

Jaffer and Guergis have publicly demonstrated themselves to be an embarrassment, and of less character than any political party should cherish. Somebody in law enforcement and/or legal prosecution messed up here; for if a formal CHARGE of cocaine possession and a formal CHARGE of drunk driving both had to be flushed down the judicial system's toilet for technical reasons, then the public was disturbingly ill-served by those we employ to handle careless lawbreakers who threaten public safety.


You have got to be KIDDIN
said

I know the word FIX does not translate into the Canadian Justice System, so is this now a new edge to the phrase 'politically correct'. Impaired Driving and Cocaine Posession charges get changed to reckless driving. Yes.. Politically Corrected might be better?I can now vision Stephen Harper blaming the Police for this one. Any bets out there that the police officer that pulled this politician off the road will get a reprimand? Cocaine Possession and Impaired Driving charges get dropped.Speaking of wrong, Stephen Harper in recent time fired Zack the RCMP Commissioner and replaced him with a politician. Zack might of had it coming on his own but to alter history and place a politician in charge of the RCMP was and is wrong. It would be like replacing the head of the military with a bureaucrat. Mr. Harper wanted to and needed to control the national police force. Remember Brian Mul-it-around Mulroney was investigated by the RCMP and the Conservatives lots many votes. Has Harper supported the RCMP or Police lately? No....So getting to my point..... Zackardeelli (Sp?) was fired by Harper because he could not manage or control the RCMP. Harper then replaced him with a politician, so considering the Harper Rules, Harper should then be replaced by a police officer. ;) Then you would see some justice prevail and Rahim in rehab. Would the new Police Prime Minister close parliament, no, it would be opened for business 24/7.Why is not ok for a police officer to have a criminal record and OK for politicians? Oh Rahim does not have to worry about a record he got off...So Canadians.... start demanding more from your politicians and government. Canada deserves it!


Samual
said

Should have locked him up & thrown away the key. His emotional apology in 2001 obviously wasn't sincere.

Rick in NB, Ste Marie
said

@ Carl: Grow a skin. The judge himself told Jaffer that he was giving him the deal of his life. That statement alone is cause for suspicion. As far as the posts go on this site, you're fighting a losing battle. The judgment stinks of politics.


Val
said

Re: Rahim Jaffer pleads guilty to careless drivingI find this travesty of 'justice' disgusting. He was never charged with careless driving in the beginning, so how is it he pleads to that now. If he was charged with other offences then he should plead to those - all of them. Why make laws if they are not to be enforced. I agree that this case should be reopened and I will contact my MPP.


Sebastian
said

I would like to know why the drug charges were dropped!!!


g.tait
said

as i sit at home because of my dui,with no employment ,because of following government back on track and then listen to this guy get off with 500 bucks.he was driving over speed limit,and then they ask why do people not vote this is a double standard , sorry they can go **** them selves.........very very mad .unreal


Progressive in Alberta
said

"The former Edmonton-area MP, 38, was charged last September with cocaine possession and drunk driving after being stopped by police officers for speeding in Palgrave, Ont., about 60 kilometres north of Toronto. "Something's wrong here, how could he have been charged with cocaine possession in the first place if there was no chance of a conviction?


GEORGE
said

I don't care what court, Prov. or Fed. is in charge of this SPECIAL TREATMENT for those who are "in high places". It is crap!!!!! These deals for the high and mighty have got to stop RIGHT NOW!!!! This kind of treatment is one reason why politicians and "their friends" are, in these days, being held in low esteem!


Bob Right
said

He should allow us to shine a flashlight up his nose publicly to look for scar tissue. If he is so honest, he should have nothing to worry about.

Doug McDougall
said

This guy and his wife are unbelievable! They obviously don't respect the laws of this country. Yet, as parliamentarians they are responsible for making them. Hopefully, the ciitizens of this country can seek redress and have his case reviewed and have her charged for her breach at the airport. The PM has to be shaking his head over these two! Get rid of em!!!!

simple solution sally
said

It's this kind of obviously preferential treatment that leaves ordinary citizens gasping.It's bad enough that impaired driving amongst average citizens is treated as lightly as it is but when high level public servant drunk drivers are absolutely let off the hook with no consequences you know there is no justice that can touch the highly placed.

Doug in BC
said

We get this two tiered justice, kind of like pensions for members of parliament don't ya think. Just read today that the conservative changes to the justice system will cost us an increase of 60% in costs. HMMMM?

Carl
said

@Rick: The answer to your question regarding the reasons for the dismissal of the more serious charges is contained in the article itself, if you care to read it. The prosecutors conceded that they did not have enough evidence to proceed with the charges. We still have an evidence-based justive system, whether you like it or not. My point is that this has nothing to do with politics.

Carl
said

Judges of the Ontario Court of Justice are appointed by the PROVINCIAL government, not the federal government. You people who try to politicize everything are sickening.

bryan R
said

The whole legal system is a crime. A guy in my hometown charged & convicted with 10th & 11th impaired gets 6 months out in 3 because of time served before the new law took place. So 3 months for 10th 11th IMPAIRED.

David
said

Can we say different rules for different people? This is a complete joke. It's a sad sad society that we live in when you are dealt with differently depending on who you are!


Chris in Ontariariariari-Oh!
said

It has always made me wonder how our justice system works as many of these crimes are thrown out. Where I live we recieve a local publication and in it they list the charges and names that have gone through our local provincial court and it has always made me wonder at why so many charges are withdrawn by the crown prosecutors. There are charges for drugs, drunk driving, theft and assault etc. that get thrown out and I wonder is it the fault of the police?, are the charges too late to convict?. I guess maybe if the system is full maybe they plead out some of these cases if it is a first time offence. Anyway,let's hope that Rahim has put this behind him and can move on as this is something that will stick with him for a long time and will ruin any chances of ever getting back into public life. It's sad to see something like this happen to anyone regardless of their political affiliation and it appears to have caused some degree of personal strain on his marriage as his wife seems rather stressed as of late. Her job would be stressful enough without the added burden of something like this adding to it.

HKP in Vancouver
said

What a joke....$500 fine.....!!!!! Can't wait to hear from all the "rightwingers" defending this clown.....

Barb Bull Lake NB
said

Here we go again every thing is Mr. Harpers fault and the conservatives, Gee thanks to Mr. Harper I got a slap on the wrist for breaking wind in puplic place. because I am a conservative, I will have to be more careful on where I break wind I guess or the libs & ndp and media will want a inquiry.


Rick in NB, Ste Marie
said

@ Carl: Well maybe we can't spell, but some of us know that his wife is Helena Guergis. You know, the current MP, minister of state ( status of women ). Some of us want to know why the husband of a new reformed conservative isn't getting the " tough on crime " treatment that the new reformed conservatives preach. What makes your post more valid than that?


Retired in Burlington
said

Everyone should contact their MP's and MPP's and demand to reopen this case. The people who have had loved ones killed or maimed by drunk drivers must be in a state of disbeleif and sick to their stomachs over this blatant act of disregard for the general public. I guess when you have the power you can do as you wish, all others must tow the line. Shame on all of you crooked officals who abuse the system.


Brian
said

In a country founded and consistently ruled by powerful family compacts and blue-blooded cowardly oligarchs, in a country that has never seriously addressed business fraud and white collar crime, is it surprising that a federal cabinet minister's hubby walks? No. It's a bit off topic but the problem I have with the new found Canadian nationalism (on display during the Olympics) is how is creates mythologies that delude us into dismissing reality. We've got a long way to go and are as corrupt as anywhere else on earth.


Mommamerf
said

This smacks of interference from up high. What kind of pressure was exerted on the Crown to not proceed with a criminal charge and a drug charge? To end up with a plea bargain for careless driving? What a joke. No one gets a deal like this unless somebody really made it happen. It smells, really smells to high heaven.


peter
said

come guys don't you think a $500.00 fine was a bit harsh, i think it should have been thrown out of court and his expenses paid, with an apology. just kidding....


Carl
said

If you can't spell the name of the person you are talking about, if you haven't read the article well enough to realize that he is not a current MP, and if you have nothing but partisan slander to contribute to the conversation, then please don't bother making a comment at all.

Michael, Cambridge On
said

Once upon a time I drove on Ontarian Highway 401 on beautiful day and I came across the electronic message sign stated that DUI can cost you $5000.00 or something like that...This man sure can afford that! I think he ought donate more than just petty $500 for system that he just abused...

J from SK
said

This is disgusting. I'm a freaky lib who thinks no drugs should be illegal, as one should be able to choose what they do with their body... but impaired driving, be it on booze or reefer or cocaine, is wholly irresponsible and can result in the injury or death of innocent bystanders. Jaffar has shown that he has no regard for human safety or life. Shame on Jaffar and shame on his Conservative cronies! This is a travesty of justice.


JR
said

Amazing Canadian Justice System - drop all serious charges and plead to a nothing charge. Even speeding would have been more serious - fine wise! Obviously - Conservative Judges in action!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Anne Ontario
said

GRRRRR drunk driving ...... still easy on them ... 32 years ago my brothers best friend was hit by a drunk drive and left laying in the ditch while to guy went to the Drive-In where police found him and 32 years later they still get away with it . All the guy got was a slap on the hand then and now No change


Rickinclayton
said

Now I understand how the system works, there are laws for politicians and there are laws for us canadians, the only difference is we cannot get away with ours. pathetic way for these idiots to run a country yet we still vote for them.


Gunter from Ottawa
said

Any criminal lawyer will tell you that there are over 100 ways to screw up a DUI investigation. The real issue here is the Charter. There are tonnes of charges dropped every day because of technical breaches of the Charter.The safe guess (since the crowns aren't going to give more info) is that there were Charter breach(es) which could not be overcome. Probably section 7,8,9 or 10.ie. A breath demand because 'his breath smelled of alcohol' violates the Charter because any chemist will tell you that alcohol does not smell. That's why the police have to use the words 'smell of an alcoholic beverage'. That's just one of many, many, many examples.


ordinary joe
said

anyone seen law abiding citizen??


Dean in Abbotsford
said

So I guess now everyone else that gets caught in this same manner will be treated the same way? What a joke! People, elect our judges and we will then truly have real justice. Remember, judges are appointed by the party in power. Each party says they will get tough on crime, however, the laws are already in place for everything. The only thing missing are judges with the backbone to give proper sentences.


Carl
said

Glad to see all the Liberal commentators here are finally advocating tougher sentences. I guess they will say anything for the sake of partisan potshots. However, tougher sentences should not apply to those, like Mr. Jaffer, who have not been found guilty of any crime. The only people who know the facts of the case are Mr. Jaffer and the prosecutors, and based on what they know they have agreed to throw out the criminal charges. None of us knows what really happened, so any attempt to turn this into a partisan issue is just silly and baseless.


MikeInBC
said

PB I agree with you. It is our lax justice system that is to blame. As far as I know the Conservatives are trying to fix this. This is one of the areas in which I think the Conservatives are going in the right direction.


Stephen Strepsi, Montreal
said

Glad to see the Conservatives are getting tough on crime! Oh, wait... he's a Conservative... and got a slap on the wrist for DRUGS? Love to see how the hypocritical Conservatives try to spin this one without throwing him and his wife under the bus!


Gloria C
said

This is a disgrace. I wonder what would happen to me if I was caught driving drunk AND with cocaine in my possession. Yet another example of how government types enjoy a different set of rules than the rest of us. His wife has already shown her true colours, i.e. her belief the she is far above all us. To think a person of her character is a cabinet minister. What a great pair they make.....


LAC
said

If it was a regular joe no way they would have gotten just a fine. Driving drunk and possession of cocaine are serious offences but they just get dropped....come on. Plus all he apologized for is for driving recklessly.

PB_Toronto
said

This has very little to do with th governement wether you are conservative or liberal or whatever. This has everything to do with our lax justice system. I could care a less what he represents or what he does, I do care that for everyone that breaks the law it seems they can get a free ride in Canada.


Fred Phelps
said

Tough on Crime, what a joke......the law applies to Conservative Politicians and everyone else on paper not in practice. I guess when you have a PM that makes an election law and then breaks it with no consequence, the reasonable conclusion is that the law ends up protecting only those that pass it and not those who have to live under them.


DG
said

So much for tough on crime! The Conservatives are the biggest hypocrits ever elected! Harper's presence at the Games was a slap in the face for all struggling Canadians considering his extended vacation! And now this? Its just a matter of time before the Western Canadians wake up and vote for real leaders.


Catwoman 37
said

Wow I am surprised they gave him a slap on the hand.


Pete
said

Once again the system goes easy. It is obvious the crown felt they would lose the case and defence was not confident enough to pull out a win so they compromised. This effects all of us and here is why.. Rear end a car at a stop sign causing minor damage..Careless driving charge. Slide off the road in a snow storm... Careless driving charge. Insurance companies do not know the specifics of each case only that a careless conviction was registered. Jaffer charged with Impaired driving ends up with the same charge (Careles) as the innocent sober motorist and all of our rates go up. If the Police lay an impaired charge, the crown should fight for it, win or loose. This type of dealing does nothing but water down the system and hit the sober motoring public eqully as hard as a drunk driver.


Randy
said

A complete and total travesty of justice. Perhaps the judge was scared Rahim would sic his wife on him...


jimbo james
said

What a JOKE!~


p0d0
said

wtfrick?! $500 fine and withdrawn charges of cocaine posession?! i'm a conservative supporter but this is an outrage. i can't beleive i voted for this guy. why does a former MP not get treated like any other criminal in this country and get thrown in prison?i thought the conservatives were supposed to be tough on crime?


Dave
said

Obviously the Harper Tough on Crime talk is does not apply to Conservatives. The mighty arm of Harper can even control Provincial justice.


Crazy Jim
said

I first heard of Rahim Jaffer on CPAC in 2005 during the budget votes. This was a time when the Martin budget (and government) was hinging on a single vote. During every one of these particularly dramatic votes, he was goofing around and not paying attention. Other MPs had to get his attention to get him to stand up and vote. I didn't like him then and I don't like him now. He was an embarrassment to the Conservative Party and to the HOC. His riding did well to throw him out.


charlie
said

While I do not like the sentence, and think he got a capital B break, the Crown's position is that they could not proceed on the more serious charges because of "legal issues". Thanks to the Charter, these "legal issues" may, or may not, be issues which everyone can appreciate - although anyone finding themselves similarly accused would probably be only too quick to seize upon them and gratefully appreciate them - societal status notwithstanding. Maybe the cops screwed up, maybe the paperwork was deficient, etc. etc. - but that is not the fault of the Federal government, especially since the administration of justice, and the responsibility for the Crown's office is a provincial matter. Last time I looked, you were penalized on what you were found guilty of doing and not what you could have done, or probably did, or might have done or .... This is nothing that can be laid at the Federal government's feet - except in the fantasyland of the Harper haters trying to turn everything to political advantage. I trust that legislation will be brought in to strengthen the penalties in various criminal cases - and await the howls of outrage over the reduction of the "rights" of the poor criminals and how tougher penalties are not the answer etc. etc.- you can't have it both ways, no matter how hard you might try, folks!


Frank Buchan
said

No conservative supporter thinks this is acceptable. This is a prime example of why the justice system is broken.


Observer
said

Do you people honestly believe that Joe-citizen would have received a harsher punishment? If so, then perhaps a day in any criminal court is in order, where people convicted of TRAFFICKING drugs (this is possession, which has been all but decriminalized by the left on the west coast), violent crimes, etc get off with time served or sometimes literally an apology letter...this is the status quo, and not because a Conservative govermnent is in power.


Gord. Robson, Nova Scotia
said

Lets stick to the facts please. He was found guilty of careless driving in a Provincial Court by a provincial Judge. This has absolutely NOTHING to do with with Conservatives or Prime Minister Harper. Another fact is he isn't and wasn't a Conservative MP at the time of his being stopped by police. Please stick to the facts.


Curious
said

Did the cocaine the officer found magically turn into powdered milk?


Brandon, Alberta
said

WHAT A JOKE!


Don
said

$500...really. The guys is busted for drinking and driving he gets a $500 fine. The drugs probably cost more. I wonder what the tough-on-crime Conservatives have to say about this?


Jon In London ON
said

Anyone heard of the term "skin of your teeth"?


Aaron in Toronto
said

Is it being handled by the provincial court or federal court? If it is provincial then it is not Harper's fault. However, if this is not a textbook example of a two tier legal system then what is? How is it possible that he failed the test and have hard evidence but still won't charge him drunk driving? Someone better look into this.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest