News Sections
PMO paid former Clinton spokesperson $24,000
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Wednesday Sep. 16, 2009 5:39 PM ET
The Prime Minister's Office spent $24,000 to have a high-powered communications strategist advise the prime minister on U.S. media opportunities during April's Summit of the Americas.
Documents posted on the U.S. Department of Justice website show that the PMO paid Michael McCurry to "develop a media plan" for the summit held in Trinidad and Tobago, five months ago.
The PMO wanted McCurry to provide "communications advice around issues pertaining to the 2009 Summit of the Americas as they relate to the United States in order to effectively articulate the position of the Government of Canada," the documents state.
McCurry's contract also called for him to help the prime minister set up relevant interviews with U.S. print media and TV networks.
He was assisted by Scott Warner, a Virginia-based consultant who helped in outreach "to U.S. news media in furtherance of communications objectives of the Office of the Prime Minister of Canada."
- Read the contract here
During the Summit of the Americas, Harper gave interviews to the New York Times and Fox News, among other U.S. media outlets.
McCurry is a principal at Public Strategies Washington, Inc. -- a government relations and lobbying firm that counts corporations, universities, and trade associations among its clients. Warner is an associate of the same organization.
Documents on the U.S. Department of Justice website indicate that Warner did not have a contract with the PMO, and instead drew a salary that was paid by PSW. Warner verified to CTV.ca that he did not have a contract with the PMO.
McCurry was the press secretary for former U.S. president Bill Clinton from 1995-1998.
Warner has provided crisis management services to a number of high-profile clients including former NBA player Jayson Williams and the family of murdered Washington intern Chandra Levy, according to his website.
Prior to his appearance at the Summit of the Americas, the Prime Minister's Office paid another former presidential spokesperson for similar duties at the G20 summit in London.
Ari Fleischer, the one-time press secretary for George W. Bush, was paid $24,500 to provide "U.S. media advice" and "assistance in arranging United States media opportunities that advance Canada's International Economic Objectives."
Under the U.S. Foreign Agents Registration Act, both McCurry and Fleischer are required to disclose the details of their arrangements with foreign governments, which includes the contracts with the PMO.
With files from The Canadian Press
User Tools
Related Stories
Related Websites
Most Popular
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I fail to see just what a minister could learn by an on site visit that he couldn't get from people who are actual experts in the various fields of work involved. It is doubtful that he is any sort of nuclear engineer or expert in construction. Just another photo op...
Email
Comments are now closed for this story
Aongasha
0
said
0
Daryl H From Lethbridge
0
said
0
The contract above is between the PMO and PSW a contracting company.
PSW contracted the aforementioned individual, Scott Warner, to help with the summit.
So a consulting company hires a consultant, on behalf of the PMO, for some contract work and this is news?
There was no malice and backroom or hidden deals made as the information was readily available.
At the most here may have been some oversight on the part of Mr. Warner or PSW for neglecting to file a similar contract negotiated between PSW and Mr. Warner.
gar
0
said
0
Wayne in HRM
0
said
0
Streel
0
said
0
MAL of TO
0
said
0
G
0
said
0
Imagine if the Gun Registry (A simple web based data driven app) cost the 1-2 million it was supposed to!!!
Keep up the great work on gettting great value for wokr performed!!!!
Alan in Calgary
0
said
0
Ron
0
said
0
Independently Minded
0
said
0
Then why does the article then say - "Documents on the U.S. Department of Justice website indicate that Warner did not have a contract with the PMO, and instead drew a salary that was paid by PSW. Warner verified to CTV.ca that he did not have a contract with the PMO."
Interesting discrepancy, don't you think?
Warner himself is on record as saying he didn't have a contract with the PMO.
My question still stands...
RichardD, Kitchener
0
said
0
Ed
0
said
0
Ironically, anytime there is a large Thumbs Up in favour of the Conversvatives's actions or position, about five Liberal hacks - including SB - jump in and posit that: )"this site is obviously being overloaded by people in the PMO."
Here's what is funny. First, they never acknowledge the opposite could be true - Liberal hacks swamping the comments (which happens on a rival site) or B) that they themselves may be Liberal hacks, or C) that the preponderance of favourable responses may suggest something other than a Conversavative conspiracy. I think it is only fair to note - since Iggy signlaed his intention to bring down the Conversative govenrment there has been a marked (significant) shift in the comments ratio on this site (the other one is totally biased in favour of the Libs). Could it be that with 'election air" in their collective noses, the notorious Liberal backroom boys (and girls) are swamping this and other sites with Liberal favouring comments and Thumbs Up/Down clicks?
I realize this infraction pales in the light of the Liberal record on graft, decit, and manipulation. It's just funny watching SB et al skewing perceptions by using the tactics they have accused others of using.
Could it be - a Liberal conspiracy?!!!
Oh grow up
0
said
0
Jim McB
0
said
0
Perhaps he has a coaliton of the US and Canada on his mind now!
Trevor
0
said
0
Independently Minded
0
said
0
If taxpayer's money is being spent why was no formal agreement and record kept?
Is this the transparency the electorate was promised?
Just asking...
Bob
0
said
0
Iggy, how about you get your gang to get back to work on the hill and stop playing us Canadians for fools.
Dan
0
said
0
Rak
0
said
0
Kelly in Victoria BC
0
said
0
Ignatieff went to the States for a job position and he stayed there to fulfill his duties in that position - it's time for Harper to get over that; especially if that same country is Harper's go to place for sourcing out a resource to promote his own agenda.
Kelly in Victoria BC
ADM Saskatchewan
0
said
0
Jaz
0
said
0
After his bumbling and stumbling on world stage
0
said
0
Stuffing himself into a suit and offering his smile is not enough when dealing with leaders.
charlie
0
said
0
Jaz
0
said
0
Harper needed advice on his SOCIALISM job
0
said
0
IJ
0
said
0
Mark M
0
said
0
Shannon - Montreal
0
said
0
The rule is - don't go there unless you are prepared to play!
Gabriel in Ottawa
0
said
0
Is this supposed to be bad that our government seemed to pay a very small sum for the top expertise on a world stage?
Its not like Stephen Harper personally hired a completely unqualified person at an exorbidant rate with little or no work done in return for something completely irrelevant or meaningless.
Oh wait, that's because the Liberal Party is not in power right now and we do not have a bunch of missing funds ie. Sponsorship Scandal ie. Long Gun Registry (5 billion dollars for a few computers and some desks)...
But we have the provincial gov't with e-health and the OLG and the HST to remind us of how Liberals govern.
Shannon - Montreal
0
said
0
Of course, we don't have someone in the PMO qualified to advise on US media. The PMO could hire an American specialist for this, which couldn't be done for $25k. Then Harper's critics would complain 'an American was hired to work in the PMO, blah, blah, blah.
This decision represents clear action. The expense is tied directly to a purpose. Anyone who thinks this expenditure is excessive either: a) doesn't understand the cost of 'doing business'; b) doesn't understand the value of our US relationship (over $1 billion a day in bilateral trade); c) doesn't understand America's media obsession, or d) forgets we're a country - not a corner store!
Frankly, I am pleased and surprised they were able to find a consultant for this amount. Most firms would charge a lot more. I do business in the US. The rule is - don't there ifyou are prepared to play!
Paul, Shawinigan
0
said
0
Dollar Bill
0
said
0
Don in Vancouver
0
said
0
R
0
said
0
The issue is what here?
Novotny
0
said
0
Mark - Edmonton
0
said
0
PepperPot
0
said
0
Keith in Gibsons
0
said
0
Sly
0
said
0
Good Gooly Miss Molly
0
said
0