Top Stories -   

1
Finance Minister Jim Flaherty appears on CTV's Question Period on Sunday, Nov. 23, 2008. Finance Minister Jim Flaherty appears on CTV's Question Period on Sunday, Nov. 23, 2008. Prime Minister Stephen Harper speaks at his closing news conference at the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in Lima, Peru, on Sunday, Nov. 23, 2008.

'Technical' recession possible: Flaherty

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV News: Graham Richardson on the stimulus
Prime Minister Stephen Harper and the finance minister admitted the country is slipping into a technical recession, but provided strong hints the government will take action to stimulate consumer spending.
CTV's Question Period: Jim Flaherty, finance minister, on trhe future of the Canadian economy
Finance Minister Jim Flaherty will unveil some budget plans later this week, but he is not expected to dole out any cash to Canada's auto industry.
CTV newsnet: Peter Brieger, chairman and CEO of GlobeInvest Capital Management on what measures would stimulate the economy
There are a couple of areas in Canada's economy, including auto and housing where a slowdown has been coming for some time. In the short-term, the government can increase infrastructure spending and re-work the tax structure to stimulate the economy.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (57) Facebook   

Date: Sun. Nov. 23 2008 10:39 PM ET

Finance Minister Jim Flaherty predicts that Canada may be headed for a "technical recession" on projections that the country's economy will shrink both this quarter and the next.

Speaking Sunday on CTV's Question Period, Flaherty said he would announce plans to ward off a long-term recession in the economic update he is set to deliver on Thursday.

"We may well be in a technical recession the last quarter of this year and the first quarter of next year," Flaherty said. "It's quite possible that Canada will be below the line slightly in both of those quarters, which technically would be a recession."

Some economists define a recession as two consecutive quarters of negative growth. In the past, Flaherty has taken pains to avoid the word, only saying that Canada is not immune from the economic turbulence beyond its borders.

On Sunday, Flaherty said Ottawa may keep equalization payments to the provinces in line with the country's economic growth rate, as well as restricting growth in public sector salaries, to prevent a longer recession.

But when pressed on the issue of whether the government would run a deficit, Flaherty predicted that Canada would end the current fiscal year with a modest surplus.

He also said the government is planning to run a so-called operational surplus over the next two years, meaning the government would keep spending in line with revenue.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper echoed those sentiments while he was speaking at the close of the APEC summit in Lima, Peru.

Harper said the Canadian government is currently in a surplus and is not planning to run a deficit.

But he acknowledged that "there are occasions in which deficits are not only not necessarily bad, but in fact, they are essential."

Harper said he was open to the idea of injecting a large sum of government funds into the flailing economy over the short term, provided that any resulting deficit would be a short-term solution.

"We will only do that when we're convinced of two things," Harper said. "One is that any such government expenditure would obviously be effective, and the other is that we could engage in it in the short term without developing any long-term structural budget deficits."

Canada's parliamentary budget officer, Kevin Page, issued a report earlier this week that predicts a huge federal deficit if the economy continues to weaken.

Current conditions suggest a modest deficit of $4 billion next year and $1 billion the year after, Page said Sunday.

"If we see the economy weaker, and the forecasts are getting weaker, and we have contraction next year, we could be looking at a deficit as big as $14 billion," Page said during an interview on Question Period.

Page said temporary measures to stimulate the economy, in addition to the tax cuts the government has already rolled out, would send strong signals that the government is poised to avoid a long-term economic slide.

"I think the key principles of a good stimulus package, they need to be targeted, they need to be timely and they should probably be temporary," Page said.

Flaherty said in addition to maintaining the previously announced tax cuts, spending on infrastructure, which creates jobs, may be on the way.

"We're looking very carefully at ways in which we can get infrastructure funding out the door as quickly as possible," Flaherty said.

Comments are now closed for this story

L.A.
said

The threat of deflation or depression is probably as great as it was in 1929. The markets did not cause the depression. Government policies did. The $700B bailout by the US in fact only represents 2% to 5% of their GDP. Household assets in the US are well over $56T. The US debt is approaching 72.5% of GDP and that is the nightmare.
At the time of the Great Depression social programs such as welfare, medicare, unemployment insurance were non existant. The pain of our pioneers was much greater than anything people now can imagine. People today have no connection to the hard realty of the great depression or of WWII that followed. The fact that Canada may face hard times should be cause for us to eliminate waste in government spending, reinforce our resolve to strengthen the country in areas where it has to lead the economy, and to realize that none of today's generation have known hunger, cold or financial hardship such as was experienced in our forefathers' lifetime. We can not create wealth without real products nor can we tax or spend our way out of debt. Canada is blessed with resource wealth, and intelligent and well educated people. But in the end it is up to the people to determine whether they create works and jobs themselves and do for themselves or if they expect the government to be the provider of everything.



Tom Hawley
said

Alberta Roger:
You could not have been serious in your post.
Sure every person wants lower polution. Who wished for factory closures?
Our global crisis is in large due to the recent and over priced oil industry.
The only ones crying over the low price are the corporations.We as consumers welcome it.
I hope you can get an honest meal for your family.
Clear up those crying eyes so you can look for employment.


Shamaro
said

I understand in some ways why Flaherty isn't using the "R" word. A federal finance minister doesn't want to cause more stress on a battered market.

However, my opinion is that this is going to be a long hard recession that is going to knock the wind out of every portion of Canada's economy.

The world economy is going to suffer, however Canada's commodity based economy is going to be hit extremely hard the deeper this recession gets.


Dave in Surrey
said

"ARTIFICIAL surpluses, manufactured on the backs of taxpayers"

You may not fully understand what I am going to say, but it is called personal responsibility in repaying the debts you have put onto others... My generation didn't put us into the Debt we are in today, but my generation has begun to pay back the debt our parents put upon us!!!

Harper took that ability away from us, because of the cries of the selfous people who only think about themself and not the future... And now we are going to put our children deeper into debt because of foolish moves by Harper/Flaherty... You may remember when they decided to cut the GST and every single economist said it is wrong, but to instead cut income taxes to help our low productivity... We received a useless consumption tax when our problem was productivity, Harper was hining poliically rather than doing the proper thing...


Robert Halifax
said

Maybe the media, as a whole should focus on trying to bring more postive news, they're scaring folks not to spend....the goverment wants us to spend, but the media is twisting it around with so much negative vibes....NO wonder people are worried!!!

NOW it's coming as an excuse to lay people off, while the bosses of companies have their pockets full!


Bob in Harley
said

What about all the seniors who have little to live on but what they saved over many years of hard work? Who is looking out for them? Surely that crew at the CAW would stand up and help them rather than looking after their own selfish interests.

Don't be silly, stupid, of course they will once again put themselves first.


TaxMe, I'm Canadian
said

I suspect that the fate that befalls the U.S. will certainly befall Canada. Any other outcome would be unanticipated.


Eric
said

The Tories keep saying they didn't squander the surplus and that the GST cut stimulated the economy. Are they now saying it didn't work or things would have been really really bad without the 2 cents they gave us?


Larry I Onatio
said

The more our wonderful Ontario bashing "wonderful" finance minister talks, the worse things get due to his total inability to handle this job. He has proved time and time again to be out of control. Harper must turf him atonce and get someone that is capable of managiong these tough times.


Doug BC
said

As a ex Liberal I think the tories are starting to look and act like Liberals. I guess that will make me a Liberal again.


TVic
said

Right, during the election 'the fundamentals of the Canadian economy were strong' and now ir's a 'technical recession'. Why don't politicians just speak the truth instead of all this bafflegab!!


kc in alberta
said

hmmm...

in a "technical recession"

is that something like being "a little bit pregnant"?

in in both cases the real point is we've obviously been scre#d and it's very likely that the people responsible don't care and won't suffer to the extent that we will...

Mo
said

Let's stop partison attacks and give this government a chance. I initially didn't agree with tax cuts, but it's up to the government to get us out of this mess. If they succeeeded, great, they'll be our next government, if not, then we can attack them in the next election.


Jay, Ottawa
said

The Conservative supporters should be pounding the doors at 24 Sussex to ask Harper whether he was lying to them when he said there would be no deficit or if he just has really really bad people taking care of this stuff and they couldn't see this coming.

How many of us knew this was coming? I changed jobs in April 2007 because I saw this coming and wanted to be ready. If you think this is the worst of it, check out what Trends Research sees down the road. They're predicting complete collapse in the US and it reverted to an undeveloped nation with tax revolts. What will we do then when our biggest trading partner is undeveloped.


Jay, Ottawa
said

Lee in Calgary said, "Let's see where did PM Harper fritter away this grand surplus too? Cuts to personal, corporate and consumption taxes"

You might want to check the facts there Lee. Harper cancelled the scheduled personal income tax cuts in favour of the GST cut did he not?


KJ in Kingston Ontario
said

Right -- I have already lost about 50% of my retirement savings that it took over 30 years to save to this disaster, and it's a "technical recession"! Then maybe I can retire on a "technical pension".....


Jon in ottawa
said

what's up with these people? saying Harper squandered the budget surplus. Surplus = over taxing candains. something the liberals are famous for. Taking our hard earned money and giving it to people that don't want to work and large corporations in the form of a sponsorship scandal.
Stephen Harper gave the economy a 6 billion dollar boost when he lowered the GST to 5 %. that was his stimulus package to help us weather this storm, if there is one. I haven't really seen any signs of one yet,The malls and restaurants are full, I can still borrow money and we all know stocks go up and down , so whats the big deal if you go to a Casino you have to be prepared to loose your money, guess every one should have bought GIC's which I have and pay 5% so while everyone else is loosing money I'm doing just fine with my 5 % increase. NOTE PEOPLE there is no easy way to get rich, how many people do you know that made it rich in the stock market? If there is so much money to be made why are these fund managers still working? Don't you think they would all be rich,
retired and sitting on a beach down south. Stop beleiving everything they tell you. In the mean time say good bye to your retirement. How conveinient it happened at the same time we are going to have a shortage of workers. Not anymore. People will have to work longer. Makes one think this could actually have been planned. Convince everyone to put there money in corporations then have them loose it. The rich get richer and scares everyone to keep working.


Harper's been spending like there's no tormorrow.
said

For him, there isn't.

You're finished, Harper.

Biggest government spending ever. We can't afford Harper and his handouts for corporate cronies.

Chris Ont
said

Reese,
Your scenario has one problem, every country cannot export more than they import. It's imposible, let alone if Canada adopted this policy would be economic suicide. Tarrifs would be slapped on everything.

For those that think that if another party was in power and this economic down turn wouldn't happen, everything was rosey at the end of March, when the surplus would have gone to pay down the debt by law, there would have been just the last 6 months revenue. But we would have paid more for everything and most likely been in a full blown recession by now. Remember it is easier to be a critic than a leader.


edd
said

So all you NDPliberalites would rather have seen the elusive, so called 13 billion surplus (which cut personal, corporate, GST taxes, not to mention increasing provincial transfer payments and helping to outfit our stretched military), be squandered in some misguided Green Shift Plan. In case you don't realize it or don't remember it, Green Shift was the alternative. Jeez you guys make me wonder.


Alberta Roger
said

I just have to comment here as I see a real change in people and their lop sided thought. Say a year ago many wanted the Oilsands and construction everywhere to slow down or even stop. The enviorment was being destroyed buy all this great advancement and wealth we were making.
But look at many now crying because price of oil is down our wealth and savings has dropped out of sight and what has happened to our jobs. Well people wake up this is what you wanted less polution and factories shutting down or they will be soon and every one is so happy right!
Just what do you people really want. I know what I want and that is my job back so I can put an honest meal on the table for my family.


ex-Canuck
said

YES, I did vote for this, and I am very glad I did. Economic leadership, prudent actions and a firm desire to protect Canadian bank accounts, jobs and savings. Weathering the storm as opposed to irresponsible actions and statements. Yep, and I'd vote for them again...


Nick in Gatineau
said

Nice to know that we were told that there was no problem in our economy, that this was not predictable yet they have the numbers and are releaseing funds in accordance with those numbers. So....

Both deficit spending and creation is a sign that approved policy is based on functionning with a massive debt, even increasing it (the moment you have a deficit you increase your debt), whereas your deficit-debt ratio is 1-10. So if our debt is $ 400 billion, then the Harper govt. feels it is ok to run up a deficit of $ 40 Billion ? So how far is this govt. willing to go ? Spending on what ?

The infrastructure agreement that the G20 approved outlines spending for infrastructure that already exists. So the money will be spent uselessly.

So lie to us, run a deficit, increase our debt on projects that will never see the light...

My god that sounds conservative !!!


John E
said

Flaherty should be used to deficits. He lead Ontario into one as Provincial Finance Minister and it took year for the current govt to get the finanaces in order. At least this time Mr. Flaherty can't hide the deficit with magic marker.


Pip
said

I read a lot of these posts lauding the massive surpluses run by the Liberals.

My first question is, why should a government raise more money through taxes than is needed to run the government and have a small contingency fund? $10 billion is not a small contingency fund.

My second is, when will Canadians in general take responsibility for their own actions instead of expecting some sort of Big Brother government to do it for them? Too much government brings about dependence on that government, and a lack of personal responsibility, knowing that there is a publicly funded safety net for personal rash financial behavior.

Less government is better; how about trimming the fat, Mr. Harper? How about a cost-benefit analysis of every post in every ministry, doing one ministry per year? When feather-bed posts are eliminated, there would be a definite surplus - enough to satisfy any Liberal.

Lee in Calgary
said

Let's see where did PM Harper fritter away this grand surplus too? Cuts to personal, corporate and consumption taxes and huge increases in transfer payments to the provinces for health care, infrastructure programs, police services and did I mention debt repayment at an unprecidented level.

Did government spending increase...yes on the above items plus a much needed increase in military spending. For many years the Liberal governments under funded the provinces and federal agencies while racking up large yearly surpluses so they could look like rock stars simply left huges shortages at ever level which at some point had to be corrected. Now it's time for prudence until we get through a not made in Canada financial downturn and I'd certainly rather have the current government managing it than a Liberal government.


Bobyourunkle
said

I agree the liberals of the 90s and early 2000s put at a huge surplus but thats because they didn't spend money on anything of value. I say every time we have a surplus to spend it on something thats valuable to us as canadians. I wouldn't want to pay all those taxes so our money can sit in a bank and let those morons make money off of it. Don't taxpayers want to see things out of the money we pay in. For some reason it's only the conservative bashers that are saying we are gonna go in a recession. As far as I'm concerned, there is only one person to blame if we have a global recession and his name is George Bush. Hmmmm, I wonder if Bush also predicted a recession and took all of his money out of his investments and got it stashed somewhere.


Eric
said

The Conservatives didn't seen this coming when they took power 2+ years ago. In fact, I don't think any government could see this coming to the extent that it has, this is a global economic downturn. This started with the subprime interest rate in the states and the oil speculators were the straw that broke the camels back. Think about it! None of this really hit home until gas prices started to sky rocket. When your gas bill doubles something has to give because you have to put food on the table and pay the other bills. People stop buying other items because they can't afford it, the gas guzzlers don't get purchased because they can't afford the gas to put in them. Belts get tightened and everything starts to slide.

I hope that every single oil speculator is choking on every stinking penny they have made.

The only way to get this economy restarted is to get people back to work so they have money in their pockets. They have money, they will spend. When they spend, there is a demand, when there is a demand, factories build and hire more people. Bailing out big companies won't work unless they can sell their product and if consumers don't have the money, the product goes no where.

No point in blaming the government of today (Cons) or yesterday (Libs) there is no point. Point the finger at greedy people south of the border.


Prof. Pye Chartt
said

I always get a chuckle out of the people who just can't stand the fact that PM Harper and Finance Minister Flaherty won't cut their own heads off and run to the doom&gloom-thirsty media screaming "MASSIVE DEFICIT!" or "DEPRESSION!" or "WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE!"

It bugs the pants off all the Liberal coconuts that PM Harper is now globally regarded as the guy who has an economic clue and an economic plan for his country. (He was the "popular" dude at the recent G20 summit in Washington.)

Spare me all the nonsense about Chretien & Martin (and their ARTIFICIAL surpluses, manufactured on the backs of taxpayers and the provinces). It's touching to see that Liberal guppies are reading their self-aggrandizing books in which these two political buzzards claim credit for every positive thing short of sunlight.

@ "Reece":

Though I'm impressed that you're still working diligently to re-invent the capitalist wheel (even though capitalism isn't the problem, as the financial meltdown that precipitated this economic downturn traces directly back to the manipulation of U.S. financial controls by Democratic and Republican politicians!), maybe it's time to give the boogeyman a rest.

Furthermore, to suggest that protectionism is some sort of worthy "strategy" demonstrates an acute lack of economic and historical understanding. Good luck painting that pig a pretty colour. (You don't know Obama as well as you think, and you're not kindred policy spirits. Sorry.)


Jim
said

David in Surrey you are wrong. The previous Conservative government under Brian Mulroney put us and Liberals in position to weather the storm and pay down deficits over the past several years. If you recall Jean Chretian promised and ran his election campaign on the basis of getting rid of GST as soon as Liberals were back in office. Once back in he wouldn't do it and said that the GST was doing the job of paying down the deficit and would not cancel it. It was well known and announced be economists that Canadians would not realize the good that Brian Mulroney Conservatives had done until much later years. Those years are here and we're paying down the deficit. Thats why we kept the Conservatives in office again. And we haven't forgotten the swindle of AD Scam and the fortune lost there.


A. Conda
said

In checking various sources for economic outlook, they all end up saying that we are in for at least a year of deficits and more of the same. Any positive during that time will be ever so slight. Re the auto bailout, I don't see how we can prop up a money sinkhole in this atmosphere. GM and Ford manufactured the vehicles (truck and suv)where they had the competitive advantage. They couldn't compete in a market they couldn't win. What does that tell you?


Edmontonian
said

"there are occasions in which deficits are not only not necessarily bad, but in fact, they are essential."

Deficits are only essential in the event this is viewed as an asset to a potential buyer of our entire financial system. It is fact that our Bank of Canada is dumping our gold or silver to Russia which follows the actions of every G7 central bank. What other assets is the government handing over to the EU that they may or may not be mentioning?


Layton B in Moncton NB
said

A 'technical recession'? Is that like being technically dead? I wonder how many people will go technically bankrupt, and how many jobs will be technically lost? I'm sure this technical recession will lead to some more technical foreclosures.
It's interesting that during the election Flaherty and Harper said that a recession wouldn't happen, and when Dion demanded to see some action on the economy, he was panicking. I'm thinking that we maybe should have technically elected someone else.


Patricia
said

I think it is time to give serious thought to the economic system that we have in place and examine truthfully its' strengths and weaknesses. We may live in a capitalistic society but we can certainly tailor it's strengths for all... not just the 20% of the wealthy at the top of the heap. Regulating the markets and giving government more power to practice the politics of inclusion for all would be a start. There has to be a system in place which can and has the will to curb the riotous greed which got us here in the first place. I am tired of the wealthy playing with my money as if they were on a spending spree in a casino. We need to break them of their addiciton to greed! Maybe we should create a rehab for CEOs!


Richard in Victoria
said

Nice - give it a new name...'technical recession' and then people will believe that their current economic situation that bad.

Give me and the rest of Canadians out there a break, and stop lying. Sugar coated dung will always taste like dung - Mr Flaherty, a 'spoon full of sugar' will not make the medicine go down any better.


David Lang
said

Wow, I'm sure glad we're only in a 'technical' recession and not a real one. This means we will only be 'technally' broke. lol.


zwinky
said

I absolutely agree with Dave in Surrey...

Kevin Page is not elected and has no reason to lie, obfuscate, fabricate, gloss-over or otherwise "mis-state" the economic and budgetary forecast.

It is his job to present budget forecasts that are as accurate as possible.

This is aptly demonstrated by the fact that he does not use "black and white" numbers to descibe the future.

He presented a range of posible surplus and deficit numbers all based on the unknown "ifs" by which the economic tides might turn.

Being a politician who is almost exclusively focused on his own and his party's electoral future, Smilin' Jim Flaherty has plenty of reasons to fudge the truth and does not hesititate to do so when it suits him.

This has been amply proven by his past record as finance minister in Ontario.

I've said it before...I don't trust Harper, I don't trust Flaherty so I am conducting my affairs based on my own observations and those of individuals who don't have a reason to lie to me or a record of having done so in the past.



dmyster
said

agree with Kim in Calgary.
as for the surplus of 16 billion or whatever it is.. that is peanuts to what the losses in the stock market are and going to be. Buy Gold and be prepared for the ride of your life. No finger pointing cause it is a waste of energy.


Mark, Victoria, BC
said

They have said that this crisis will be over by 2010, so why doesn't everyone just go on as usual and accept a government deficit?! There is nothing wrong with a deficit to see a country through hard economic times. I know Mulroney sort of made it a dirty word, but a deficit is a totally acceptable option to ensure economic stability!

Joe the Canadian 2
said

Joe the Canadian: Yes we did vote for this and we are proud of it and ditto to you.

We are weathering the storm because to sail out in some unknown direction would be very expensive but I realize libs like to do that. Tax and spend; tax and spend.


barryh
said

funny,a month ago during the election,it was all sunshine and lollipops and now,it's a
"technical" recession..the cons are making it up every day,how pathetic...do they actually have a plan or not?
Lets revisted this question in six months to see how far the cons have lied to us


Lloyd Cam
said

I trust this government, Harper has an idea of economics, unlike most of the last Prime ministers, he is not a lawyer and besides what can we do, its the American economy that will get us out of trouble.


Kyle Rayner
said

Its really quite amazing that I still keep hearing people mention names of relics like 'Ill kill the GST and lie about that to get elected'Chretien, and spendthrift then tightwad Paul Martin.

Liberals put us in this position and the Conservatives are trying to pick up the mess and move forward. Its not exactly fair to blame the Government for everything. The Conservatives have been mum about the 'R' word because they are trying to keep Consumer confidence up.

The reality is the Government cannot fix everything that we the people- Consumers do. The reality in Canada is that many of us having been living beyond our means, and extending that lifestyle through a ridiculous Credit Card lifestyle that comes back to haunt everyone.

The Government didnt tell you to go and get that extra $25,000 Credit Card that you cant pay for anymore, the Government didnt tell you to borrow against the declining value of your home, and possibly this is where they failed.

Credit Cards and Banks should be facing much higher lending restrictions as the current model for lending has absolutely failed. Many of this Cards and Loans have been given out to people who could never afford to pay them back in the first place. That is criminal and it makes victims out of Taxpayers who live WITHIN their means.

I think people need to take a page out of FDR's playbook and realize WE are part of the problem. Irresponsible spending demands a responsible solution. Canada is not the United States and our economy is still in better shape. We are not living on a TV show.

Joe the Canadian
said

You voted for this Canada. You knew what these people were about. Inept, incompetant, ignorant and oblivious to the real issues.

As for Liberals, as a proud member of the Liberal Party, I blame the executives for allowing Dion to remain in power and suffocating our party. It's like the perfect storm of failed leadership all around eh?

As for the comment about "weather the storm"...why can't we chart a course out of the storm rather than just take whatever nature throws at us...oh that's right, that would require some degree of intelligence by our "leaders."

Reece
said

I think a hybrid form of mercantilism and capitalism is about due with a good dose of socialism on the side.

Mercantilisim demands that a state should be exporting more goods than importing so that foreigners would have to pay the difference. Under that tenent, the only thing we should be importing are things that we can't build or produce ourselves.
Any business that doesn't add value added features to their exports should be punished. Call me a protectionist all you want, but Obama is starting to see the benifits of that system during a time where there is a significant trade deficit with the Chinese. The Chinese don't give a damn about your jobs when they are trying to keep their own - including the Communist Party officials who aren't looking too good today as their own market is starting to slide and slide it will...into oblivion.


funkright
said

Deficit spending during slow economic times is not a bad thing, if it can soften the blow and guide the economy through this period. Once we leave this we can then go back to posting surpluses.


Jay, Ottawa
said

Let's not blame the people who signed up for unrealistic mortgages and just had to buy that new flat panel on their credit card with no plan on how to pay it off. Nah, it's not their fault. Clearly it's all the media's fault. Obviously if we didn't have access to information everything would be fine. Money would grow on trees, cats and dogs living together in harmony. Oh how wonderful it all would be if it wasn't for the media. After all, isn't ignorance bliss?


James
said

A technical recession may not be bad during these economic times. Our priorities need to be evaluated and we need to see how much economic growth we want or need for 2009. Infrastructure is crucial but higher taxes are not the answer this year.


Tom in Eastern Ontario
said

I think Page is the one being honest. The government is going to lose more tax revenue with businesses failing and people not earning salaries and the gov't ultimately will have to come up with some money to help industries out whether it's oil or automobile or the tech industry. Money is going to have to go out. Flaherty has failed to see the truth over and over again. I honestly thing Page is being realistic. it's not horrible it's realistic.


Reece
said

Flaherty wants us to spend more money even while he's unable to keep Canada's budget balanced. It's foolish to suggest we are going to make it through this storm and all will return to normal. Millions of people are losing their jobs in the US...no bank will loan those people any credit, and they won't loan any business money that is dependent upon people having jobs/money. The $700 billion + infusion is a failure and I predicted that long ago. What's Bush going to do? Order the banks to loan the money? To jobless people or high risk people? Why doesn't Bush just take the $700 billion and give it away since he's essentially asking the banks to do just that.

America's failure is Canada's failure and Flaherty does not seem to get it. We are NOT going to skirt a recession because we are going into a depression...that is my next prediction. I hate to toot my own horn but I've been bang on so far. I sold my shares in April saving a loss of 50% of my worth.

Flaherty is merely doing his job...he needs to give this false sense of optomism in hopes we'll spend money. This would only delay the inevitable as our output is grinding to a halt.

To those that want to blow your money on things you can't afford do so, don't insult people who want to be conservative with theirs. It's not the medias fault for reporting the truth.


Kim in Calgary
said

We don't need to wait for the lagging statistics to confirm we are in a recession....we are so let's deal with it now...and Mr. Harper said just a week before the election that Canada will not be in a recession - where did his advisors get their education!!! This has been coming for well over a year now....


Dale
said

If my little business goes belly up, will the Gov't bail me out too? It wouldn't cost as much.


Josh in Ontario
said

Let’s try not to rock the boat. Recessions and deficits are bad, but the government can't spend like crazy and expect to get us out. This crisis was triggered globally and will be resolved globally. Let’s not repeat the mistakes of history by getting into debt and slapping tariffs on everything.

Ann
said

Well there is not much we can do now.Just weather the storm. I think the media is making it out to be worse than it realy is.Thank goodness Canada will weather it much better than most countries.I for one don't think we should bail out the car industry unless they show they can sell their cars. Why are they still building cars and trucks that are not selling.they have thousands sitting in fields,but they want us to keep bailing them out .

Ryan from Calgary
said

People hear/read these things and stop spending. Isn't that a self fulfilling prophecy?

Dave in Surrey
said

Kevin Page is not running for election so he can tell the truth where as Flaherty is running and controlled by Harper so the odds of him telling the truth is slim to nill...

The basic fact is Canada had a 13 Billion surplus that Harper dwindled to nothing, leaving us ill prepared for the impending recession...

Conservatives Cancelled th building of much needed ships for the Coast Guard as there wasn't enough money, imagine 3 or 4 thousand people working at a dry dock would help? Imagine having 8 or 9 Billion in Surplus available to spend, how that would help the economy?

Chretien/Martin put us into a position to weather the storm, yet Harper squandered it...


RayL
said

Page has a crystal ball? He knows what the Government is going to do? The deficit, if it exists, will in large part be a managed number. Page is redundant.

Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest