News Sections
Bush signs US$700B bailout bill into law
CTV News Video
|
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Fri. Oct. 3 2008 6:53 PM ET
With fears mounting of a deep recession that could spread to global markets, U.S. President George Bush signed into law a historic bill Friday afternoon which provides a US$700-billion lifeline to waning financial markets.
Bush said the law was essential in getting the country's sputtering economy back on track.
"We have acted boldly to help prevent the crisis on Wall Street from becoming a crisis in communities across our country," he said just after the vote.
Bush noted that the U.S. economy still faces "serious challenges" despite the massive fund.
"I believe government intervention should only happen when necessary," Bush told reporters in Washington on Friday.
Bush signed the bill into law on Friday afternoon, not long after the House of Representatives passed it by a count of 263-171.
He also worked to reassure taxpayers that they won't be picking up the final tab.
"In this situation, action is clearly necessary and ultimately the cost to taxpayers will be far less than the initial outlay."
Bush noted that while the government will soak up the financial sector's debts on Friday, those assets will go up in value as the economy recovers.
"And overtime, Americans should expect as much, if not all ... of the tax dollars back."
However, he warned that the bill's positive economic effects would take time.
"We'll take the time necessary to decide an effective program," he said, saying the bill's importance and timeliness are underscored by slumping job markets.
Though the plan, which was designed to renew investor confidence, is now law, the market reaction was mixed.
In Toronto, the S&P/TSX composite index lost 97.19 points to finish the day at 10,803.35. The late-day fall came after commodities helped push the index up by more than 400 points.
Meanwhile, the Dow Jones industrial average in New York dipped 157. 47 points to close the week at 10,325.38, and the Nasdaq composite index fell 29.33 points to 1,947.39.
The falling stock numbers were underscored by discouraging numbers from the U.S. job market and falling car sales.
According to the U.S. Labour Department, nearly 160,000 jobs were lost in September alone, marking the biggest drop in half a decade.
Before the vote, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called it a vote for "Mr. and Mrs. Jones on Main Street."
The measure will let the government spend billions of dollars to buy bad mortgage-related securities and other devalued assets from troubled financial institutions.
Earlier on Friday, a 223-205 vote paved the way for the bailout to pass by preventing members from offering amendments that could slow the proceedings.
Democratic and Republican leaders spent Thursday convincing their colleagues to vote 'yes' on the plan.
The American public has also been given repeated warnings that the economy faces a grave future and action must be taken.
"We all know that we are in the midst of a financial crisis," said House Republican leader John Boehner moments before he cast his vote to support the bill.
"And we know that if we do nothing, this crisis is likely to worsen and to put us into an economic slump like most of us have never seen."
Both candidates for the U.S. presidency, Barack Obama and John McCain, were busy trying to secure support for the deal by phoning reluctant lawmakers to ask for their help.
The Senate gave the plan a second life on Wednesday by voting 74-to-25 to approve the bailout.
They also attached extra measures to the bailout bill in an effort to sweeten the prospect of soliciting a 'yes' from some of the lawmakers who voted 'no' on Monday.
While the bill was a bi-partisan effort, some politicians still professed outrage over the bill.
According to Republican Representative Jeb Hensarling, the bill is tantamount to hypocrisy.
"How can we have capitalism on the way up and socialism on the way down?"
User Tools
Related Stories
Most Popular
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
Just hope the Government doesn't forgive the tickets and fines levied at the mass demonstrators.
Victor in Vaughan
Quebec, students to resume talks on tuition hikes
Canada AM is a production of CTV News, and is Canada’s most-watched morning news program.
Email
Comments are now closed for this story
Dave in Newington
said
The reason....
It was going to cost seven billion and was far too expensive
But when his pals needed cash....
Brent
said
United Socialist States of America
said
There is never money to help the poor . . . but always plenty for the connected class.
Randy in Calgary
said
Linda in Vancouver
said
While it is fair to say Bush's economic team should have done something a lot earlier,it also has to be remembered that it was the political left in the USA that started all this by pushing for home ownership for every American.Whether or not they could afford to pay for it.Democratic leaders forced that policy on a lot of banks that wanted nothing to do with "sub-prime" mortgages.
John McCain issued warnings about this debacle two years ago.Sadly,Obama and most others voted against McCains suggestion and the situation was left to grow and fester.
And No.It is not about the rich any more.Failures of some of these institutions would have a more devastating impact on the poor and the middle class than anone else.Though I concede a lot of rich people helped create the mess.
Really.American citizens deserve a lot better than this.
J-F (Ottawa)
said
Ben
said
Stephen
said
Bluenose
said
Democratic - 172 Yea, 63 Nay
Republican - 91 Yea, 108 Nay
Obama has to protect his friends from Fannie May somehow!You want "change", you are going to get it for sure.
Depression here we come shortly. Get the bread and soup lines organized.
james
said
They pretty much deserve what they get. This rescue package is a band-aid and the President said it himself "it will take time to have an effect". Of course, all recessions pass in time. This money is to make sure the remaining CEOs get their million dollar bonuses!
Lorne
said
This will do nothing for the economy.
Financial institutions will only carry on the way they have in the past.
People who are suffering financially now, will suffer that much more in the future.
So much for the Presidential candidates who said they would bring about change!!!!
It will not happen as the country is now deeper in debt and no monies available to bring in any types of new programs.
Obama's of the same stripe as the rest of the policticians.
Shamaro
said
They will need to begin stepping in and regulating their financial institutions, because by deregulating has caused them nothing more than a financial meltdown.
As for France, I believe thta there are going to be many countries who will follow them in supporting some sort of one world monetary system, a one world socialist system with the rules being set by one world central government.
After what has happened in France as well, I think that the government there has had enough with the greedy elite who have caused a near catastrophe from happening there.
Anyways, we'll see what happens.
Capitalism is EVIDENTLY killing us!!
said
MR in NB
said
Kind of like Obama? He has more money than he will ever need to spend, especially with the polls as they are now.
I am happy to see Obama win but lets be real, it isn't the money that got GW the presidency it was the RW core voters and they have a morality that cannot likely be bought with money (unfortunately?). Obama will win because of the winds of change (which are desperately needed right now). Money cannot buy everything, as upsetting and disturbing as this may be to some people.
Obama may be bad news for Canada to a certain extent, but he will give the US such a positive image abroad that it will boost them up - which will only help Canada in the long run.
I would like to see Palin learn some more and run in 2016 when Obama is done... now that is change I can believe in!
jburnaby
said
It is possible for government to regulate the financial sector more effectively without completely controlling every sector of the economy. Some people take a very simplistic view of economics - you're either completely free market, or you're completely socialist. In reality there is a wide spectrum of options between these two poles.
In every country with a functioning government, the state plays a role in the economy. Even in the free-market US, the government has been very active directing investment in certain sectors, such as computer technology and aviation, often through military spending.
In the past, capitalist governments have co-operated to manage the world economy. One example would be the Bretton Woods system, an international agreement which established fixed exchange rates between countries (unlike today's free-floating exchange rates, which can result in wild currency fluctuations). The system did have its problems, but it did provide a degree of stability while the world economy was trying to rebuild after World War Two. And it was done without the state taking complete control of every sector of the economy.
Over the past 40 years there has been a drive towards de-regulation, based on the assumption that government regulation interferes with the movement of the market. There is some truth to that - in Canada, government regulation has prevented our banks from being taken over by American banks. It may have interfered with the movement of capital, but on the other hand it has insulated us from the worst of the current US bank failures.
Regulation is like a seat belt. Does a seat belt restrict your movement? Yes. But if you're in a crash, you don't want unrestricted movement. Given our current market crash, it might be wise to put on some seat belts.
D'Aguiar
said
Ki-Som Victoria, BC
said
MR in NB
said
Why not do like me, and try to become one the rich? I am having a great time trying to make it. Like they say... get rich, or die trying! At least I have a realistic hope. There are a lot of lazy people out there (I know, they are the ones always late paying me their rent) and I am glad when the government does not take my hard earned money to pay to support them.
Robin the Hood
said
Ian- Alberta
said
Corporate socialism is fascism. ... The forefathers of the American nation have just dug themselves out of their graves and fled for more libertarian pastures. I am so thankful I am not a US taxpayer right now. 2500 bucks each thank you very much
GC
said
Nick in Gatineau
said
Doug BC
said
That said,and give the political realities,this was likely the only thing they could have done in a very short time frame.Still,it will be a long time before taxpayers in the USA get their money back.,And,until then,global economies are going to be much slower.
""mike" asks an interesting question.But I'm suspicious of the motivation of France.I'm not a big fan of socialism,and France in particular,but the EU i general,seem to think we all should join them on the path to socialism.
Personally,recent events have me wondering if the concept of globalization of everything is othing more than a passing fad.It seems to me,that,by harmonizing every thing on the planet to a single set of standards,it will be difficult to maintain national identities and cultures.And,any attempts to harmonize will certainly lead to the biggest powers setting all the rules.It would be difficult to avoid Russia,the USA,and China having the final say over everyone.
I thik sovereignty and cultures have values worth maintaning.
Jim
said
RAL
said
MaggieB, Peace River Alberta
said
Is this rescue plan going to help the American economy? I don't think so. This is another example of big business bullying Washington into doing what it wants with little regard for the American taxpayer.
Whoever wins the election on November 4th is going to inherit a huge debt and mess. Good luck!
j
said
This bail out teaches no one a lesson.
Share the blame
said
Everyone wants a nice home, but you have to have the brains to know what you can and cannot afford.
Gerald
said
If you think the free market is the cause of this mess, you're way off. Government manipulation of the housing markets has been going on for decades and it's what has caused nearly all of this malinvestment. Now banks can go back to making poor credit (or debt) decisions knowing they're getting bailed out.
This bailout is going to cause more problems in the future as it's just more price fixing and eventually we'll be right back to square one, only next time it'll be worse. The market needs to return to reality and government intervention will prevent that.
But still people won't listen to the Austrian School of economics and those who do are left shaking their heads as the business cycle continues to prove itself true and people call for more intervention and more socialism.
EMG
said
john
said
Jason H.
said
Capitalism isn't bad, it's the best we've got, but the best we've got isn't good enough anymore. Time to learn from the "free market", tell the True Believers to give their heads a shake, and create a transparent regulatory system that prevents the capital-owners from taking advantage of the rest of us.
Currency is just a points system, and if the economy collapses then everyone's score resets to Zero. It's in the best interest of capitalists to balance the playing field, if they want to maintain any of their power.
mike
said