Toronto
16°C, Sunny with Clouds

 
1
Pregnant Dr. Tom Hannam, a fertility doctor, appears on Canada AM on Tuesday, July 8, 2008. New baby.

Male biological clock starts ticking faster at 35

Viewer

CTV News Video

Canada AM: Dr. Tom Hannam, fertility doctor
While biological clocks are usually only the concern of women, studies show men have a lot to worry about too with sperm counts starting to decline in the late 30s.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (8) Facebook   

Date: Tue. Jul. 8 2008 10:04 AM ET

A new study suggests men have a biological clock that starts ticking around the age of 35.

The French study, which involved more than 12,000 couples undergoing fertility treatments, found that miscarriage rates started to climb once men reached their mid-30s.

The miscarriage rate for women with male partners aged 30 to 34 was 16.7 per cent. It jumped to 19.5 per cent for male partners aged 35 to 39 and 32.5 per cent for men over 40 to 45.

Dr. Tom Hannam, a fertility expert, said the so-called "biological clock" has always been a big deal for women.

"It'll be interesting to see as this information comes out if men start to feel the same sorts of pressures," he told CTV's Canada AM on Tuesday.

Still, Hannam said most men will be fine into their early 40s.

"(A man) would start to really notice a difference if he did a sperm count when he was a younger man versus in his late-40s," he said.

Hannam said the study is helpful for couples because it's often solely women who take on all the responsibility when there is trouble conceiving a child or when there's a miscarriage.

"This is just another reminder that it's the couple that's going through this together," said Hannam.

Dr. Stephanie Belloc, who led the research team for the study, said the findings show older couples should consider IVF (in vitro fertilization) at an early stage if they can't conceive naturally.

"We believe that the use of IVF should be suggested to infertile patients where either party is over 35 years of age," said Belloc, according to a report in The Times Online.

Belloc discussed her findings at the annual European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology meeting in Barcelona on Monday.

The report is due to be published in the journal RBM Online.

Comments are now closed for this story

M. R. Monteiro
said

The study was about miscarriage rates with male partners over 30. This means presumably that the woman was able to conceive and that the miscarriage was not attributed to any other "female" factor or else this study would be blatantly ridiculous and unpublishable.


C. Krause
said

Definitely adds to the argument to having your children when you're young. Too many couples are planning their families "bass ackwards" and not thinking through the long term effects of having children late in life. Apart from the medical issues, couples waiting to have children when they're older need to re-think the situation and remember they maybe dealing with teen issues in their 60's.


Ryan
said

Greg, scientific studies are not all created equal. Eric's question is legitimate. As is where the sample of men came from. In this case it was from the doctors clients at the fertility clinic he works at. This paper is not yet peer reviewed and is ABOUT to be published. Its findings may or may not hold up to scrutiny.


Greg
said

Eric, every scientific study controls the variables to avoid the very problem you addressed. So they undoubtedly tested males age 30-34 for a wide variety of partner ages and ensured the same was done for all other age groups. That type of control is essential in all scientific studies to ensure meaningful results.


Mickey
said

I had my kids in my early 20s. A friend had hers in her late 30s. My last child will be gone in a year or so, and she has barely started sending her kids to school. I once mentioned that I will still be young enough to travel the world, but she already did that. So, there are two sides to every story.


Eric
said

Um.

Ok, it misses one important detail in their study though. How old were the women that these miscarriage rates were taken from?

I'd assume a man aged 30 - 34 had impregnated a woman likewise 30 - 34 (give or take a year) as most couples seem to be within the same age range.

If this is the case, does this conclusively show that men have a biological clock? Or simply maintains the idea of higher miscarriage rates as women age?


Alex sz
said

Dah

Other things drop too with age. That's why is the blue pill time.


Yoyoma
said

Another reason for put aside your career and start having children in your early twenties.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Canada AM Stories

Luka Rocco Magnotta, the subject of a Canada-wide search warrant, is shown during an audition for the reality TV show 'Cover Guy' in 2007.

Murder suspect auditioned for reality TV show

More   48 Comments 48    20 Video(s) 20

Gabriel Nadeau Dubois of the CLASSE, centre right, responds to reporters questions after negotiations came to a dead-end with Quebec's minister of education at the legislature in Quebec City on Thursday, May 31, 2012. (Jacques Boissinot / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Talks between Quebec gov't, students collapse

More  4 Video(s) 4

Many seniors live on meagre pensions that cover the costs of rent and food but leave them with little else for smaller expenses. (CTV News)

New charity aims to help Canadian seniors in need

More   9 Comments 9    1 Video(s) 1