Canada -   

1

Harper's senior bureaucrats rack up hefty airfares

Prime Minister Stephen Harper departs with wife Laureen from Ottawa on Friday, November 11, 2011, on route to Honolulu, Hawaii.
Prime Minister Stephen Harper departs with wife Laureen from Ottawa on Friday, November 11, 2011, on route to Honolulu, Hawaii.

View Larger Image

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (77) Facebook   

Date: Sunday Feb. 12, 2012 8:44 AM ET

OTTAWA — Stephen Harper's senior bureaucrats have been racking up some hefty airfares at a time of government restraint and controversy over travel.

Travel expenses recently posted for the final quarter of 2011 show executives at the Privy Council Office, the prime minister's own department, paid costly fares last year on some of the most competitive routes to Europe and elsewhere.

Return airfare to Great Britain cost taxpayers $6,855 for Rennie Marcoux, assistant secretary to cabinet, to attend a week-long "cyber" conference in London last October.

The clerk of the Privy Council, Wayne Wouters, paid almost as much for a round-trip flight to London -- $6,625 -- for a public-service summit in November.

William Pentney, deputy secretary to cabinet, spent $3,566 on airfare to attend another international summit in London last June.

Paris, another popular European destination with plenty of airline competition, was also a favoured spot for Privy Council bureaucrats, who paid sky-high prices to get there.

Yvan Roy, legal counsel to Wouters, billed taxpayers $4,607 for a round-trip flight to Paris last October. The posted expense report does not explain the purpose of the trip or provide related costs, but a spokesman said it was for a conference hosted by the French government.

Another senior public servant in Harper's department -- Joseph Wild, assistant secretary to cabinet -- spent $4,367 on airfare to an OECD conference in Paris.

The Irish capital of Dublin was also the destination for another hefty fare -- $5,117, paid by Kristina Namiesniowski, assistant secretary to the cabinet. She was there to learn about "e-government."

The jetsetters at Privy Council Office racked up other pricey airfares for several multi-stop trips overseas, making it difficult to compare prices directly.

Ward Elcock billed a whopping $15,278 to fly to four cities in Australia and New Zealand last October for two weeks of "meetings." Elcock was travelling as the prime minister's special adviser on human smuggling.

Harper's national security adviser, Stephen Rigby, was a frequent flyer last year -- a five-day visit to Singapore in June set taxpayers back $10,719 in airfare alone.

And Rigby's week-long visit to Munich and London cost the treasury $6,733 in airline tickets.

All these travellers were public servants flying commercial, rather than the political staff who work inside the Prime Minister's Office, which is part of the Privy Council Office.

Harper and his political staff typically fly on government-owned aircraft, rather than commercial airlines, largely for security and logistical reasons.

The Harper government was embroiled in several travel-related controversies in 2011. CTV News reported in September that the chief of defence staff, Gen. Walter Natynczyk, spent almost $1.5 million since 2008 flying on government-owned Challenger aircraft, once to a Caribbean holiday.

And late last year, it was revealed Defence Minister Peter MacKay called in a military search-and-rescue chopper to take him from a vacation at a Newfoundland fishing camp to a nearby airport, from which he flew to a government announcement in Ontario.

The Natynczyk controversy triggered an internal memo to Harper, dated Sept. 29, outlining a cat's cradle of rules for travel spending and use of government aircraft.

The six pages of detailed policy were reviewed "in the context of recent and periodic media attention on issues of government travel," says the document, obtained by The Canadian Press under the Access to Information Act.

It notes that most senior public-service executives, such as those in the Privy Council Office, can take advantage of higher-cost business-class fares if the trip is 850 kilometres or more one way -- which applies to overseas destinations, including Europe. Ottawa to London, for example, is almost 5,400 kilometres.

None of the posted airfares for Privy Council Office executives in 2011 indicate the fare type. Economy return-flights from Ottawa to London booked three months in advance currently cost about $1,200, while business class is about four times as much.

The memo to Harper cites a temporary cap on business-class travel imposed by the 2009 federal budget, which banned these higher-class tickets for flights of less than two hours for senior executives in the public service.

"While the travel cap is no longer in place, organizations are still expected to restrain spending growth in these areas, consistent with the Budget 2010 restraint measures and the Budget 2011 focus on improving the efficiency and effectiveness of government operations and programs," says the Sept. 29 document.

"The Government has clearly taken steps to reduce spending associated with travel and appropriately placed the onus on deputy heads to manage this reduction, including a reduction in the use of business class travel."

The memo is signed by Wayne Wouters, the clerk of the Privy Council who billed taxpayers $6,625 for a flight to London in November.

As the equivalent of a deputy minister, Wouters is subject to a looser set of travel rules. They allow him to use business class entirely at his discretion, without any requirements of minimum distances or flight times.

For most of the public service, business class is allowed only if the air travel lasts more than nine hours.

First-class travel, the highest-grade, is generally forbidden except for cabinet ministers who can book first-class for overseas flights in some circumstances, "such as when ministers are obliged to conduct business shortly after deplaning."

A spokesman for the Privy Council Office, Raymond Rivet, says all of the flights booked by department executives in 2011 "were purchased using the government approved travel supplier and in compliance with government directives."

"For some of the travel, economy class was used for the airfare portion within Canada," he added.

Travel costs for the Privy Council Office, including travel, meals and accommodations, were $2.6 million in 2010-11, down from $3.2 million in the previous year. In the first 10 months of the current fiscal year, travel costs were $1.7 million, Rivet said.

Comments are now closed for this story

phillip
said

Awful....
I suppose money grows on tree here in Canada ! ! ! !

How about the pandas they are receiving from China, $1 million a year to rent these 2 + food

They must think we have bags of endless money

Voters - wake up and smell the roses, but they are all alike

so whose next on the list ????




simone
said

How much does it cost for 2 pandas to fly 1st class?I don't care which political party does this inane spending. Just stop it. We are asked to reign in spending.They are collectively a "don't do a I do but do as I say" cartel.


Mystery woman
said

Now this is ridiculous, there is such a thing buying your tickets at lower airfares, or seat sales.Even hotels are looking at offering their clients better quality , neutral priced packages.This govt is just burning your money . The only time airfares are high is when people travel internationally. And even that, is not $6,000 with a return ticket.And even now, tour operators, travel agencies, etc are trying to sell neutral priced packages. Including for Business Travel.Want proof , phone a travel agent, or go on expedia, find out for yourself.


lmack
said

Gee, we wouldn't want our politicians' travel to appear cheap in comparison to their European counterparts - whose economies are all in such FINE shape.
Governments need to be the leaders in cost savings, haven't they ever heard of Skype?


LP
said

The unnecessarily overpriced flight spending aside. The burning question for me is, why in the H$LL are we paying for their food. I understand them not being responsible for paying their (atrociously priced) air fare, and I'm sure their accommodation was no less luxurious and over the top. But to me it seems no matter where they are they have to eat and it costs money. When they're in Ottawa do we pay for their Kraft Dinner*, or cover their cost to dine out for regular domestic (and personal) purposes. It seems to me that they should have to pay for their own food no matter where they are in the world.


BWT
said

PM's marketing trip to China is a SUPER opportunity for Canada and Canadians- Just not crazy about the grey goose heflew in - How about jazzing up the colors of the air transportation for our PM? maybe something along the lines of a Canada Goosewhich has a little more distictive colors


Claude
said

WOW I love how you people defend the spending of Tax money.. Did you bother to read the article.. These were competitive routes in many cases that should not have costed more than $1500.00 but were in the $5000 to $6000. Keep defending such actions and our country will be bankrupt soon., This has no party stripe attached to it so keep bashing away blindly.. What a bunch of Lemmings..


simone
said

With technology being what it is in this day and age there is no reason to be globe trotting on our dime.The tax payers are paying for pretty lavish holidays. The financial trimming must start at the top...MR.HARPER and his band of thieves.Pandas -are you for real?????Governments have lost all credibility with their "do as I say not as I do" mentality.


Tuttle
said

Just cut services to those in need to pay for their flights, because Harper can't raise taxes after claiming we could afford those cuts to profitable corporations. LOL what a joke !!! The budget was balanced and there was a surplus when Harper got into office, but who judges a person by what he does instead of what he says eh? Where did all that extra money go were talking 10s of billions of dollars.


WSV
said

I would gladly pay those prices for business class or better tickets to Europe. Quite frankly, I want to know where these people are doing their shopping, let me in on these deals!Of course, when the Liberals were in power they always flew coach on Aeroflot or were stowaways on some other transport aircraft, right? We shouldn't even worry about the millions that were spent by prior governments.


stan
said

For someone who has spent a career travelling for business these air fares are not unusual. The majority of major companies globally allow all staff to fly executive class when the duration of the travel exceeds 6 to 8 hrs. It is a question of ensuring the health and capability of the traveler. This is particularly essential when the traveler is making many trips during the year. Business travel is not vacation travel. In my business I made sure that my staff went business class because I wanted the best from them when they arrived.


David Fraser Nanoose Bay BC
said

I wish people would look beyond their noses and look at the bigger picture. If we want to expand our trading partners it takes a number of senior government and business executives to bring all things together. Yes it costs money but in the long run it will be well worth it. Of course the NDP and the few Liberals left in the HOC would complain only because it wasn't them in China. Maybe we could swap Liberal Bob for the Pandas!


JGL in Sask
said

Ok people since its Harper's people doing it its simply the cost of doing business. If it was some former Liberal found to have these atrocious expenses I would be ripping the Liberal party and all those associcated. Because its harper though its ok.


sandra
said

I understand they have to travel but if there is a seat upfront then put them in it but i am against using my money to by 4-6ooo for them to sit there as coach is just as good and yes I do expect them to sit with me as I am know different than you..actually they might actually get a sensible conversation from us normal folk..so when I get to sit first class in october to hawaii yes my areoplan points! I will enjoy but its first time and I travel three times a year!


Adrian from Hamilton
said

"most senior public-service executives, such as those in the Privy Council Office, can take advantage of higher-cost business-class fares if the trip is 850 kilometres or more one way ... For most of the public service, business class is allowed only if the air travel lasts more than nine hours." RHIP. Maybe it is time all public servants follow the 9 hour rule. 850 km means anything further than Ottawa - Toronto or Ottawa - Halifax qualifies for business class.


mark stever
said

Interesting how the world of Harper economic's works again. Clearly there is more that sufficient funding for deliberately decided purposes, while no funds at all for others. Restraint is being directed many in the electorate, while it is barely a passing thought to those in halls of power. How can we look at this government in any other light than the ones we so bitterly complained about inthe past?


John ON
said

Assistant secretary to cabinet is a senior bureaucrat?? Only ministers should fly executive class.


Dorward
said

Why not attend the e-government conference using e-conferencing?Although the travel expenses themselves seem reasonable, the reasons for travel seem a tad absurd.


Chris
said

Do lifeties want Harper to take the bus to Vancouver and a boat to go to China?


Concerned
said

How come the government who is telling us to tighten our belts isn't. Shouldn't it be lead by example. It's obvious that reality hasn't set in to them yet. As I suggested before in a post, there needs to be more stringent rules and regulations surrounding expenditures including trips out of province. It seems that most of these conferences were not necessary. If you can't learn politics in your own country I suggest someone has to say no to out of country trips. In addition these people our only assistants to the prime mininster, they don't need to know about the ins and outs of the government. Somehting is seriously wrong here and I think we need a plebiscite or referendum to uphold these issues.


Andrew in Dundas
said

Wow, I think there are a lot of very jealous people out there. Those complaining about the Harper Government's 'lavish' spending are likely the same people who support Obama. Look at his Government's record on travel expenses... and all other spending. Read the last sentence! Travel expenses are down year over year. You don't know how good we have it...


CHP WLOO
said

Did no one read the last paragraph?Privy Counsel travel costs dropped from $3.2 m to $2.6m to an estimate $2.0m this year.That is a $1.2 million or 36% saving over 3 years!I call that a very positive improvement, a good thing!Headline should have read: "Government cuts travel costs 36%" Instead we have the misleading headline. Of coarse, that would not fit the "political agenda", now would it?


Island Man
said

OAS cuts are needed because we have a crisis looming in the bureaucrats travel budget. Good Bye Charlie.


jack
said

How else are we going to get Pandas?


NS
said

A non story here.. well, one actual story.... Canadian press sensationalize government spending to stir up left wing loonies on Sunday morning!


fisherwomen
said

i think they sould be a shame of themselves,,people starving and them doing what their doing..shamefull is what i think


libertarian
said

What, are you consters all in the same room somewhere in Ottawa, just typing away like mad as Baird or someones spews out saucy little defence quips to use? All your responses are the same! This is hilarious. Keep 'em coming!


True North
said

Face it people the taxpayers gave them a majority and they can do what ever they want. You have to realize that every one is equal just some are more equal than others. It is typical that the ruling party in Canada promises belt-tightening which is intended for the employees of the Government of Canada but the politicians and their support staff there is no such rule or plan. Disgusting as it sounds there is nothing you can do when the pigs are at the trough!


Mark in Newmarket
said

hmmmmm....lets see. You are in Ottawa and need to get to Vancouver in less than 24hrs for government business, but government business has kept you in Ottawa. So, how are you going to get to Vancouver in 24hrs? Drive a car? Take the train? Either one of those will take you 4 days or more if you drive around the clock. The only way possible is to fly. Boys and girls you may have forgotten that Canada is the 2nd largest country in the world, this isn't Europe where you can go from one country to the other in a matter of hours. All our government officials need to fly to their destinations, whether Liberal, Conservative, NDP, they all need to fly when it comes to these great distances. This whole cost of fllight issue is an issue that is repeated time after time under every government that holds office in this country. So please, lets move on from this issue and go after issues that are actually meaningful.


Andrew Martyn
said

It seems that the Harper government will be engaged in extensive damage control in the next few days until this hullabaloo dies down and/or is replaced by another headline.


PeterWills
said

Finally, a use for F-35s. Trans-ocean taxis. Not only that they can replace helicopters as they are faster (just barely). Problem solved.


Matt F Barrie
said

As a tax payer honestly, regardless of political views all I am fine with this. These individuals have jobs to do, contrary to popular belief their jobs aren't easy ones.


Greg Orbman
said

The taxpayers are paying the bill for the even larger cost of advertising the Conservative ideology. The Government advertisements for the Conservative Economic Action Plan cost taxpayers Millions. The Conservatives kill the per vote subsidies for political party; but the Conservatives spend Millions of taxpayer dollars on government advertisements. These advertisements are Conservative propaganda.


DMan
said

While on the surface it seems that they are cutting down on travel costs from previous years, what they dont say is how much more they are using government aircraft to get around instead as I'm sure that isn't included in the figures. I'm sure that has cost us all a LOT more than the apparent savings over previous years.


Jim
said

Gee, the last paragraph is the real story, isn't it? Costs are going down, not up. I guess that doesn't make as eye-catching a headline...


Prof. Pye Chartt
said

Nothing to be outraged about, unless, of course, you're an anti-Conservative hairpuller, in which case, this merely serves as another delightful opportunity to slam Harper & Company with the hypocritical indignation that assumes the frugality of a PCO serving the Liberals. (Former PM Martin ballooned the staff and serving budget of the PCO.) The bottom line in this story is quite literally, as it stands, the bottom line of the news article: travel costs for the PCO have been markedly declining, as required by the PMO, for the past 3 years. Keep track of those nickels in your partisan zeal, anti-Conservatives, while the dollars continue to slide past you. (If I was a Liberal or NDP MP concerned about government spending, I never would have formally okayed $1.1B for the G8/G20 summits and $62B for the federal stimulus program. Doing so doesn't leave you with a lot of credible "lecture" room.


Alan
said

No story here. These people are flying business class as one would expect and these rates are comparable. What they are doing is the norm for the private sector involving international travel other than to the US.


richard robinson
said

People out doing their job of representing their constituents. That would be a startling situation for the left wing members to understand.


albertan liberal
said

while I definitely do not support the cons, with one exception, all of the trips are the cost of doing business"Return airfare to Great Britain cost taxpayers $6,855 for Rennie Marcoux, assistant secretary to cabinet, to attend a week-long "cyber" conference in London last October"-- travel to a cyber conference?? Why not stay in plush office in Ottawa and LOG ON TO THE INTERNET for a freaking CYBER CONFERENCE. Perhaps the cons should wake up to 21 century technology (and thinking)...or maybe the internet is faster in London than Ottawa and the trip was justified?


Mark in YOW
said

Don't see the big deal. Unless you stay over a Saturday night these are normal prices for European flights. As they are likely only flying in for short period 3-4 days, staying longer incurs additional cost in meals, hotels, salary (including overtime). There are established policies and providing they are following them, this is a non issue.


Northern Princess
said

CTV and Canadian Press: Me thinks that this story is pretty one-sided. If you're going to compare business with costs, how about comparing Chretien's farewell tours at the end of his political career or what about Martin at the end of his? Ensure that you do a thorough search as well for all the Senators and business men that accompanied them on their tours as well. Its one thing to try to get people outraged over one person or party's airfares and its quite another to actually report facts. Make sure that your reporting is not biased. You are supposed to be impartial, show it.I've flown economy and I've flown business and there is no way that a person can discuss business or work on laptops, etc, comfortably in economy. People getting up, babies crying, some snoring, time for meals or drinks, etc. Its much quieter in business and I woudn't expect our Prime Minister to fly economy, regardless of who is the Prime Minister. So people who condemn our Prime Minister are not using common sense at all, just knee-jerk reaction.Business people in the public sector are no different than people working in the private sector. For business, they fly business, especially if they do a lot of it. Many in the private sector rent out private planes to do it too. Enough with the drama or the need to create outrage. Report all the facts and compare with other Prime Ministers and their parties, I'll make my own decisions, thank you very much.


Otasawian
said

So just what are our politicians supposed to do - paddle in a canoe to their all their meetings, that would certainly be Canadian but not very smart - they would miss every important meeting, but would have great upper body strength. Canada is a rich country and we need to have some expenses in order to run the government. I'm not a huge fan of the conservatives but we elected them to run the country for a while and in doing so they sometimes actually have to travel long distances to do so - Planes make the most sense when this has to happen.


Bob in Chatham
said

Most parliamentarians don't live in the same world as the rest of us. Like their US counterparts, they are very wealthy, so think nothing of spending $6000 for airfare while the rest of us fly " cattle class " for around $900 ! If we are to follow by example, they really are poor leaders !


Ontario Taxpayer
said

Oh ya....3 weeks ago I flew to Vancouver last minute on government business, Ottawa to Vancouver and a stop for 6 hours in Edmonton on the way back. Total cost of the tickets, flying economy, was a little over 5K. I am am no executive, just a victim of our restrictive airline competition in this country.


Ontario Taxpayer
said

The tinfoil hat crowd are up and at it early today. Yes, we all personally received a coded and secure phone cal from Harper himself and he directly gave us all our talking points. As you know, there is a great Conservative government conspiracy in this nation and all of us (except you) are part of it. I suggest you all just take your tinfoil hats off and get a life!


ontario Taxpayer
said

Come on mannnn. Get it together. Guess what I just did? I went to Air Canada and planned out a four city trip to Australia and NZ. The best deal I got flying economy because of the use of their Star Alliance partners was in the 11K. So on this particular trip they could have saved us taxpayers 3K...not much but still 3K.


dan
said

No problem paying for them to travel. We will just take the money from o.a.s. account. Seniors are not smart enough to figure that out.


JD, Ontario
said

Identify the concern and expect the government to review policies and reduce costs. Monitor the outcome in context with other efforts to reduce the costs of government. This is not a political partisan issue. Savings can be found in many ways other than laying people off and reducing services to the public. Arbitrary % cuts just don't work but that is inevitably how governments and corporations approach cutbacks.


Terry (Moncton, NB)
said

Hi everyone,I worked for Fisheries and Oceans. As a public servant, I am not allowed to fly business class. In fact, I will be flying to Victoria, BC in March. That's over 5 000 km and I must fly economy class. If the government wants to set an example, they should do the same as most public servants - fly economy class.


Wes Sask.
said

Looks like the lefty oppostion is just out to make one the best Prime Ministers, that we have had in a long time, look bad.I wonder if the same people would do the same if the PM was from their own party?


Skitty
said

Yes, of course, first class all the way. I am a retired CEO and I frequently flew to Europe in business - comfy with near sleeper seats but not ostentatius. When business was overbooked I was frequently upgraded to First. Most passengers in First were upgrades since few were dumb enough to pay $10,000 for an Atlantic crossing. Well, I guess some were dumb enough - it's your money foks!


LDL in ONT
said

Please, Let me save everyone a lot of time. Harper Haters will say, " Waste of money on corrupt politicians, blah, blah, blah". .....and Harperites will say, " Worth every penny on an invaluable trade trip, blah, blah, blah". There, it has all been covered, now everyone go enjoy your Sunday !


Barry O'Regan
said

Let's be fair now to Prime Minister Harper and the Conservatives, regardless of any political party, airlines charge a premium to government travel departments. Most government departments have a travel section staffer who handles travel. Travel companies bid on standing offers for air travel and unless you know where you are going 30 days (most government travel is not) in advance don't expect a deal as all airlines know a lucrative golden goose egg will charge you beaucoup de bucks. Canadians and like Government staffers cannot just pick up a phone and say "Book me a flight tomorrow or next week" and expect a smoking hot deal! It has never worked that way. On the other hand do you expect airlines to hold off selling seats to the rest of us in the hopes a government staffer may call to reserve that seat? Government regulations forbid government employees (and rightly so) from calling just any travel agent to book a flight in order to weed out the "My family own a travel agency,airline,hotel etc).


Senior taxpayer
said

Wait until Tony Clement hears about this...


Lz in Edmonton
said

Those rates are actually pretty reasonable. I don't expect people that carry on the business of government to be sitting next to screaming children and being in a tight spot and then being jet lagged for a week. Then flying to Australia and the far east for over $10,000. Yah, thats the going rate. If I remember the liberals, they had their own jet airplanes and spent millions on golf balls. Two totally different things.


RMB
said

At a time when the government is crying that there is not money, that in 10 years they will stick it to the seniors, particularly the single senior, we see the bureaucrats wasting money. I am sorry, there is something wrong with this picture. The government needs to realize they are in effect our employees - we pay their wages, benefits, etc, with our taxes. Many are living at the poverty line, with absolutely no benefits, but still pay their taxes. Perhaps we need to start a taxpayer revolt - maybe they will listen when the money dries up.


Anthony
said

Life is very good for politicians and their inner circle in Canada. They live in the world of their own, on other people's money. Nothing will ever change here !


Will
said

Yeah, no bias in this story at all. Reporter concentrated on "Harper bureaucrats" instead of stating the facts that these people traveled as part of their duties as senior members of the public service of Canada. In fact, if the reporter was responsible there would have been some sort of comparison (using adjusted dollars accounting for inflation) with previous governments. That would have shown that costs were down from the past, but then to do so would have required setting aside the "gotcha" mentality of todays media.


Debbie
said

We've come to expect hypocrisy and waste from the Conservatives so while it's disappointing to be sure it isn't a surprise. Belt-tightening is for the 99% and excess is for the 1%...at least until the next election. They should be cutting costs where they are able at least to give the optics of frugality.


Paul
said

What's wrong with these prices. Most of these guys travel to these destinations for business and they don't have 2-3 days to recover for jet lag. So if they fly business that's perfect and they can even work on their flights.We are not an african country the last time I checked. Canada needs to do business and that's the cost of doing business.


Norman
said

Looks like the conservative response memo went out early this morning to the Harper supporters on this site. FYI, it's my money that they are p***ing away. And I wouldn't be as upset about if they didn't rack up the national debt, (of which is going to cost me and my family more than $750 more per year in debt financing charges by 2014). They have no shame.


Nelson
said

I am with everyone who has commented that this is NOT a story. I am the first to complain about wasteful government spending and the last to defend anything that the Harper government may do but this is simply good business practice (flying business class for longer trips.)


Greg
said

Just another way or trying to make Harper look bad. Anyone look up what the Liberals spent on the same thing? It was way worse. Harper is the best leader this country has had in a long long time. Stop bashing him.


brenda51
said

was that all inclusive, room and meals...if so, it's a good deal!


libertarian
said

Our economy is weakening, we're in the hole significantly and we muse about cutting back OAS for the least able. IF nothing else, the government should at least make the effort to fly more reasonably. Just because the government "rules" say it's ok, in the real world of 2011, it's not.


Len
said

Know that they all do/did it for a long time (all parties). But, Harper promised transparency and a government that would cut waste. Sure doesn't look like that. Sounds like a number of other 'Mackay' helicopter rescues in NFLD!


Jim in Ontario
said

I am sure prices are not looked at when bookings are made. No one cares as they are not footing the bill.


Weyoutwest
said

"all of the pricey fares were booked according to government rules, which allow business-class fares for executives iif the distance travelled, is at least 850 kilometers". Then change the d## rules, that's ridiculous ...out here on the praires, people have driven that far to a meeting. This government is talking about cutting the OAS to seniors and then you read this, thanks for spoiling my morning !! I starting to feel sick, yuk !!!! Oh I know, rather then correctting this graft, we will have our party hacks blame another party, because they did it also. That makes real sense (sarcasim). Good governing is about making proper decisions, you be the judge.


Mark
said

This is news? Wow, is the media just figuring out that government is about waste? Is it only now they find out that it costs lots for government? Could it be they want to put a negative spin on this government for doing what EVERY government does? No, never...


Dave
said

Once again the media party performs the job of the opposition parties. Perhaps they would rather snivel servants didn't attend meetings and stayed home doing nothing.


Nolan
said

I am tired of these types of reports...These people have a job to do and have a requirement to obtain qualifications and stay current by means of courses, certain user confs etc...and to keep hammering everytime they have to go somewhere to get it is ridiculous...THERE ARE CLEAR RULES for travel and they are posted on line...quit reporting BS, ALL GOVT PERS have travelled as apart of their business requirements and they will continue to do so...IT'S NOT FREE!


Gord
said

No sweat if you fly on your employer's business in businesss class. Our representatives travelling abroad do not represent some rag tag corrupt nation living high on the hog while the folks back home live in grass shacks We are Canadians and represent a very successful nation when we are abroad. Anytime I'm out of the country I'm proud to be recognized as a Canadian and I want our representatives to look prosperous. And no I'm not a civil servant.I'm just a humble taxpayer.


P Laou
said

The "law of air ticket" price: If you stay over Saturday night, a round-trip to Europe is about 700-800$. If not, e.g. leave Tues and back on Fri or Sat, the same ticket costs more than 2.1K$, all economy class. I don't know why. Other factor, if the business oversee lasts only a few days, a choice is between paying the person high fare to come home right after, or paying a few more hotel nights, foods, to make up for the Sat night stay, and not to mention the person is likely less effective not in his/her office.


get real
said

What do we want them to walk to meetings, OK PM assitance there is a meeting you have to attend in Edmonton we want you to walk there or hitch hike, can you swim over to England and make Canada look like a real player on the world stage. Whoever keeps reporting this Sh*t what do you expect it takes money to travel get over it.


NO Surprise
said

As a small biz owner, I fly to Europe all the time in coach or reg class. If it came out of their pocket they would fly coach for between $600 and $900 same plane, same flight. Shame on the government, no surprise. Wasting 6 to 8 times the cost of a ticket, balance a budget not on 10 lifetimes if ever. The again do as your told not as we do, try leading by example and more may listen....what a joke!


pigbone
said

Is this anything new all governments are the same, Chretien was no different , this is just the media trying once again to try and make the Harper gov't look bad, and I'm getting sick and tired of it, and probably the reason why I rarely watch CTV and CBC and I'm starting to watch Sun News.


william1217
said

They all need to be in inspiring settings even when flying to these places.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Canada Stories

Striking Canadian Pacific Rail workers picket outside the company's Port Coquitlam yard east of Vancouver, B.C., on Wednesday, May 23, 2012. (Darryl Dyck / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Talks between CP, union stall; Raitt prepared to step in

More   43 Comments 43    3 Video(s) 3

Victoria Shachtay, 23, died in an explosion on Friday, Nov. 25, in an Innisfail townhouse.

Man charged in parcel blast that killed Alta. mother

More  3 Video(s) 3

Nova  Scotia, body, Hillside Road, Marion Bridge

Police identify humans remains found in hockey bag

More  1 Video(s) 1

Most Talked about Stories

It is about time - as a grandparent I have watched our kids (who were allowed to fail although I do remember some nagging on our part) learn, I have watched our children now micro-manage their children. A big part of it is the fact that there are predators out there and an extreme reluctance on the parents part to alllow freedom that might result in the children becoming victims.

Harvey

Parents must learn to stop meddling, author urges