Canada -   

1
Shafia family verdict, Shafia family guilty, Mohammad Shafia, 58, his wife Tooba Yahya, 42, and their son Hamed, 21, were each found guilty of four counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of Shafia's three teenaged daughters and his first wife. Mohammad Shafia, centre, Tooba Yahya, right, and Hamed Shafia, left, arrive at the Frontenac County courthouse in Kingston, Ont., Sunday, Jan. 29, 2012. (Graham Hughes / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Mohammad Shafia, front, Tooba Yahya, left, and Hamed Shafia, centre, are led from the Frontenac County courthouse after being found guilty of first-degree murder in Kingston, Ont., Sunday, Jan. 29, 2012. (Graham Hughes / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Shafia family verdict, Shafia family guilty, Mohammad Shafia, 58, his wife Tooba Yahya, 42, and their son Hamed, 21, were each found guilty of four counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of Shafia's three teenaged daughters and his first wife.

Shafia lawyers expected to appeal murder conviction

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV National News: Honour killings on the radar
After an exhausting 10-week trial, the Shafia murder case has been closed, leaving Canada's Islamic community haunted by the act of violence committed. Danielle Hamamdjian reports.
CTV National News: Shafia verdict sparks debate
The Shafia verdict has sparked talk of honour killings right across the country, and in the wake of the massive attention placed on the trial there have been changes in the way the cases are handled. Genevieve Beauchmin reports.
CTV Calgary: Femicide and honour killings
A recent court decision is sparking debate across the country on femicide after the conviction of three people in connection with the deaths of four of their female family members. Kevin Rich reports.
CTV Toronto: Groups try to make sense of killings
There is disagreement on whether the Shafia family murders should be seen as so-called honour killings. Austin Delaney reports.
CTV Montreal: Tackling honour crimes
Muslims in Montreal say the revelations in the Shafia trial have shed light on problematic aspects of their culture and illuminated new ways to tackle the issues. Aphrodite Salas reports.
CTV Montreal: Experts discuss honour killings
Three important factors separate so-called honour killings from other crimes, and these factors need to be recognized to better protect future victims, said an expert. Caroline van Vlaardingen has this in-depth look.
Power Play: Honour crimes in Canada
Status of Women Minister Rona Ambrose speaks about the Shafia murder convictions, saying the trial was a wake-up call, allowing many Canadians to see that honour motivated violence does exist in this country.
CTV News Channel: Jury deliberation too short?
Edward Prutschi, a lawyer discusses the jury deliberation in the Shafia trial and whether he thinks the Shafia family will appeal the decision.
CTV News Channel: Femicide or honour killing?
Alia Hogben of the Canadian Council of Muslim Women says the Shafia murders should not be seen as honour killings, but rather the focus should be on femicide, which is the killing of women.
Canada AM: Insight into the captivating trial
Crime writer Rob Tripp says there was a mountain of evidence, much of which came out of the mouths of the convicted killers, at the Shafia murder trial. He also explains how there is much evidence the jurors did not hear.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (60) Facebook   

Shafia family verdict, Shafia family guilty, Mohammad Shafia, 58, his wife Tooba Yahya, 42, and their son Hamed, 21, were each found guilty of four counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of Shafia's three teenaged daughters and his first wife. Mohammad Shafia, centre, Tooba Yahya, right, and Hamed Shafia, left, arrive at the Frontenac County courthouse in Kingston, Ont., Sunday, Jan. 29, 2012. (Graham Hughes / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Mohammad Shafia, front, Tooba Yahya, left, and Hamed Shafia, centre, are led from the Frontenac County courthouse after being found guilty of first-degree murder in Kingston, Ont., Sunday, Jan. 29, 2012. (Graham Hughes / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Shafia family verdict, Shafia family guilty, Mohammad Shafia, 58, his wife Tooba Yahya, 42, and their son Hamed, 21, were each found guilty of four counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of Shafia's three teenaged daughters and his first wife.

Photos

Shafia family verdict, Shafia family guilty, Mohammad Shafia, 58, his wife Tooba Yahya, 42, and their son Hamed, 21, were each found guilty of four counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of Shafia's three teenaged daughters and his first wife.

View Larger Image

Date: Mon. Jan. 30 2012 9:01 AM ET

The lawyers of a Montreal couple and their son who were convicted on Sunday of murdering four female relatives are expected to appeal the decision.

A jury found Mohammad Shafia, 58, his wife Tooba Yahya, 42, and their son Hamed, 21, each guilty of four counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of Shafia's three teenaged daughters and his first wife.

A first-degree murder conviction carries an automatic life sentence with no chance of parole for 25 years.

Sisters Zainab, 19, Sahar, 17, and Geeti, 13, along with Shafia's other wife Rona Amir Mohammad, 52, were found dead on June 30, 2009 in a car at the bottom of a canal in Kingston, Ont.

On Sunday, after 15 hours of deliberation following the 10-week trial, jurors handed down their verdict.

"It was a very dramatic sceene inside the courtroom of course when the jurors stood up and said that all three accused were to be found guilty on all counts," said CTV's Montreal Bureau Chief Genevieve Beauchemin.

"Both the accused at the time -- now the convicted killers -- and jurors were very emotional."

In a rare move the defence lawyer asked each juror to stand up and say whether they agreed with the verdict. One female member of the jury said she did, but then sat down and immediately burst into tears, Beauchemin told CTV's Canada AM on Monday.

When asked by the judge whether they had anything to say, Mohammad, Tooba and Hamed all maintained their innocence -- a stance they took throughout the trial.

"We are not criminal, we are not murderers, we didn't commit the murder and this is unjust," Mohammad Shafia told the court through a translator.

"Your honourable justice, this is not just," Yahya said, also through an interpreter. "I am not a murderer, and I am a mother -- a mother!"

Hamed addressed the judge in English, saying: "Sir, I did not drown my sisters anywhere."

Hamed also leaned forward when the verdict was read, apparently upset, while his parents rubbed his back in an attempt to console their son.

After the verdicts were read out the crowd made its way outside to line up near a fence to catch one last glimpse of the convicted killers before they were taken away.

As Mohammad Shafia was led out, he loudly said: "Wrong," apparently in reference to the verdict.

Outside the courtroom, prosecutor Gerard Laarhuis said it was a good day for Canadian justice but also a sad day because it involved the death of four women.

"This jury found that four strong, viviacious and freedom-loving women were murdered by their own family in the most troubling of circumstances," he said.

Some onlookers in a crowd on the court steps cheered when Laarhuis spoke while others heckled the prosecutor.

"This verdict sends a very clear message about our Canadian values and the core principles of a free and democratic society that all Canadians enjoy and even visitors to Canada enjoy," Laarhuis said.

Also speaking outside the court, Shafia's lawyer Peter Kemp said he believes the jury was swayed by wiretap conversations in which his client called his dead daughters whores.

"He wasn't convicted for what he did," Kemp said. "He was convicted for what he said."

Hamed's lawyer, Patrick McCann, said his client will appeal. He believes Hamed's parents will do the same.

From the start of the trial in October, prosecutors argued these were "honour killings" -- the Afghan-Canadian family's answer to the young sisters' perceived shameful behaviour.

"It is difficult to conceive of a more despicable, more heinous, more honourless crime," Justice Robert Maranger said in court after the verdict was delivered Sunday.

"The apparent reason behind these cold-blooded, shameful murders was that the four completely innocent victims offended your completely twisted concept of honour...that has absolutely no place in any civilized society."

Prosecutors had argued that the young Shafia sisters had shamed the conservative Afghan family -- and especially its patriarch -- by wearing revealing clothing, refusing to don hijabs and having boyfriends.

The jury heard that Zainab had previously run away from home and was briefly married to a Pakistani man Shafia did not approve of. The marriage was annulled within 24 hours.

Sahar also had a forbidden boyfriend, while the youngest of the three, Geeti, told her teachers she wanted to be placed in foster care. Mohammad Shafia's first, infertile, wife had protected the girls, especially Sahar, whom she had been raising as her own, court heard.

Jurors reached the guilty verdict after a 10-week trial, 58 witnesses and 15 hours of deliberations.

Court also heard damning wiretapped conversations between the accused in which, at one point, Shafia said of his dead daughters: "God's curse on them … May the devil shit on their graves."

Teachers, child protection workers and police officers testified about reports from the girls that they were afraid of their father and brother and wanted to run away from home.

The Crown painted a picture of a highly dysfunctional polygamous family, with Shafia and Hamed exerting control over female members of the household and the two wives fighting for Shafia's affections.

Yahya and Shafia refuted the Crown's theory and evidence, saying they loved their children and would have never killed them. In interviews with police and on the stand, the couple maintained the deaths were a tragic accident.

Beauchemin said there will be no victim impact statement following the trial. She said that may be because relatives stood by the accused throughout the trial.

"Perhaps that's part of the issue here or perhaps simply all those people felt everything that needed to be said...had been said during the trial," Beauchemin said.

Comments are now closed for this story

LH
said

To all those bashing the lawyers, the lawyers are not the ones wanting to appeal, they speak for their clients. The client decides to appeal or not, the lawyer merely represents their wishes as that is how our justice system works. Everyone in Canada has the right to representation, meaning if a client wants to appeal, their lawyer is obligated to follow through on that. Lawyers more often than not try and get things settled out of court. People watch too much American television given their view of lawyers and how our legal system works. In this case, hopefully the conviction would stand, but I'm sure every one of you would appeal if you were found guilty of murder, what do you have to lose but money? If you don't appeal, you spend the rest of your life in jail. So right or wrong, if you have the money to pay for an appeal, why wouldn't you?


grandmother
said

To know these lovely girls were killed, just for trying to fit in with the norms of their adopted country, hurts. When people come to any new place to live they should adopt the new countries way of living, not expect to live by the rules of their former country. There was a reason they left!
These poor girls were just, by the sound of it, normal healthy young girls, wantings boyfriends, and fun, like other Canadian girls.
The first wife was trying her best to stand behind them.
There is no reason for an appeal. The system did its job.
BRAVO!!!!!!!!!!!!!


G
said

Saag: I would glady pay for criminals to stay in jail and away from my family, and community through taxes.


anita
said

I have been reading comments, about sending them back to their country, or they should have been tried in their own country where there is the death penalty. THANK GOD they were here. In their country and belief systems, honor killings are not only legal, but are justified. At least here they are punished. They would have been cheered for what they did and the innocent victims scorned. At least here, the murdered women are the ones who will be honored


Paul
said

I wish to extend my deepest appreciation to Police Officers that did a superb job...such a superb job that the Crown had an easy task to get a conviction.It is because of them that these individuals brought them to justice and ensured their incarceration for their manical thinking and actions.Maybe now, with what the Police did and the Crown did, the message will get out that you can not kill at whim...that this type of behaviour will nmot be tolerated in a CIVILIZED NATION, such as Canada.May all 4 Women rest in peace...with the small pleasure in knowing that those responsible for taking their lives have been brought to justice and exposed to all, for all to see.This is further proof that more needs to be done to protect Women and their rights.


geebee
said

Coldblooded,heartless individuals.


The Proud Albertan
said

After serving their sentence here, so we know it's carried out, these people should automatically be deported. We do not need garbage like this in my country.


ann
said

Shame ! Why are they even being allowed to appeal? For what? I certainly hope it doesnt. Would speak volumes of our dysfunctional law system for sure. The accused are not PEOPLE, but worse than animals. They dont belong to the Human Gene pool. Go back to your country and dont bother us and most importantly, waste our money for your evil crime. No matter what happens in the end - their fates were sealed by the acts they committed. Live by the sword, die by the sword in this world or the next....


I-Tunes
said

Please don't misguide your anger to the lawyers. They are simply performing the proper actions as dictated by the legal system. Your angry comments towards them have no basis and you should review how the justice system works. Without a defense, there is no justice.


Ottawa Javk
said

A tragic, unbelievable crime took place & justice was served when the verdict was rendered. Unfortunately, the only 'winners' in any appeal process will be the lawyers.The Canadian taxpayers will be footing the bills for time the criminals are in jail


saag
said

I hope this will persuade others no to repeat this actions. Just a question. who will pay for their stay in prison? i guess, us, tax payers. :-(


Donna
said

"Also speaking outside the court, Shafia's lawyer Peter Kemp said he believes the jury was swayed by wiretap conversations in which his client called his dead daughters whores."He wasn't convicted for what he did," Kemp said. "He was convicted for what he said."Cannot believe the idiotic statements from the defense lawyer. There is no clearer sign of guilt than Shafia's disgusting comment about his DAUGHTERS. Add to that, the evidence that his car pushed the other into the water? How dense is this lawyer to think Shafia had to be caught forcing the girls' heads under water for a clear picture to be drawn?


Erika
said

Put them in general population. Please. Do make the Canadian public pay for special care for these murders. As for appeals, go ahead. I hear they are wealthy. Let's get that cash into the Canadian system - even in the hands of a lawyer.


David (Ottawa)
said

I have trouble understanding Shafia's logic that by killing an individual you are eradicating the perceived evil of their daughters. It's the same demented logic that says to cut off the arm of a thief and in doing so you eliminate the evil. Not so. Evil is in the heart of man not in the body yet this family went out of their way to murder four members thinking they were somehow doing good and eliminating evil? That is utterly delusional and perhaps explains why they are so unrepentant in the face of the guilty verdict. I hope any application for appeal is found to be without any merit and that they just fade into obscurity to consider the insanity of their mindset. Unfortunately, Canadians have to foot the bill to incarcerate these three hardened individuals for the next quarter century.


JR
said

this is a case where there should be no appeal granted.....they are guilty and that is final......a jury of 12 people came to the conclusion and along with many other Canadians who would have done the same. How can you justify an appeal after all the evidents that shows they did the killing. The damaged rearend of the car the damaged front end of their other vehicle, the texts that were sent from areas that were from where the people said they were....and it goes on.


PBW
said

How many of those persons wishing to deny the convicted Shafias the right to appeal would feel the same way were they found guilty of a crime? How many objecting to Mr. Shafia's statement "wrong" would have their own right to express an opinion criticized? Our system of Justice provides for an appeal process, available to anyone who is convicted. Our Charter permits a person - within reasonable limits - to express an opinion. Only the final appeal at the SCC will determine if the trial was carried out correctly and prove Mr. Shafia's comment factual or otherwise.


lbjack
said

Murderers deserve death. That is what justice is. (Deterrence is anathema to justice for it separates the punishment from the crime.) There can be mitigation, but you start with the fact that murder deserves death.

There is not mitigation here. This case cries out for the death penalty. And yet, in enlightened Canada, the death penalty is abolished, because...well, because it isn't a nice thing to do. And Canadians are nothing if not nice.

But are they just? Well, that's another matter. The victims have NOT received justice, because Canada wants to be NICE.


Louisbourgboy
said

Immediately after the sentencing, they should have loaded their murderous carcasses onto a plane and shipped them right back to thier loser country of origin. Hopefully Mr Harper is reading the comments posted by real Canadians and takes action against immigrants who defile our Canadian way of life. Unless, things have changed, the official languages here are engligh and french. This is what our ancestors fought to maintain in Canada, not murder.


Tom - Kingston
said

So let me try to understand, they spent about 5 years in Australia and 5 years in Canada, were applying for citizenship and still can't speak English (or French) Oh right, with a large enough bank account you can become a "citizen of convenience" I find it disgusting how our Canadian passports are "for sale" However, if you are a true refugee from an impoverished country in Africa, you need not even apply without an official language. Perhaps, it is this attitude, that we don't truly value our country's standards and principles, that causes others to think that our principles have no real value.


A.E. from Montreal
said

I feel sorry for the remaining siblings. The 4 women can finally rest in peace because they got the justice they deserved. The ones who will really suffer for the rest of there lives are the younger siblings who truly lost everything. I hope they can get the help and support they need and break the cycle of violence and abuse.


Asherah
said

When people come to Canada, they must obey Canadian Laws.And, if they do not; they should be deported back to their own country.Barbaric and heinous actions by these/others can not be tolerated. All their assets should be seized and used to pay all the court cost.


ronnie from montreal
said

good luck with the appeal ,as it wont work !send them back to there country !


oddmerlin
said

They got what they deserved--toooo bad we do not have the death penalty---bring it back--are we paying for their lawyers?? nothing has been said about that in the news. I just hope they do not get the appeal--they should get 25 years for each of the people they killed- do not feel sorry for the son he is just like his father. the apple does not fall from the tree --they should serve there sentance in the country they came from not from our cushy jails, the father has a big mouth --his outburst should not have been allowed--


Exilda Searles
said

Re the Shaffia story ....thank God they are stopped from killing...however, the Canadaian Government is still going to be looking after them for 25 years at taxpayers expense. They should be sent back to their own country where they can abide by their own laws.


Gundula Baehre
said

I really don't want these lowlives deported. In their homeland, their crimes seem to be (even if officially illegal) quite acceptable to many. I demand that these murderous, inhumane monsters rot in jail for the REST of their lives (but NOT In isolation, or protective custody, but within the general prison population). They must be made to suffer and suffer badly, they must face the utmost in humiliation, and they must be made to feel and to realise that they are nothing but dishonourable, worthless minions of EVIL (and unfortunately, that would likely not happen, if they were to be deported back to their homeland).


Jim-Surrey
said

Defense lawyers are nothing but money sucking idiots!Too bad we don't have the death penalty cause that is what these 3 should have gotten.Time to go back to the eye for an eye system!!!!!


Tracye J
said

DEPORT THEM back to their country of origin. I dont give a d*mn if they are here legally or not (and a bigomist to boot - why was that allowed in Canada??) - if you commit a crime this horrible and are convicted - then you should be deported immediately to serve your time in jails of your origin country - and good luck with that. AND - never allowed back into Canada - ever.


clane
said

Put them in general population and with some luck, there will be no need for an appeal.


Eutectic Alloy
said

GREAT NEWS! Bravo to the Prosecutor’s, Judge and Jury, they did the right thing. Lock the scum bags up forever and throw away the key. May the Devil have no mercy on there filthy lying souls.


Highground
said

Appeals are also part of our justice system, just another perk about living in Canada vs Afghanistan. They came to canada for a better life, but brought along their customs and traditions from Afghanistan, therefore did they really come to canada for a better life.If by chance and a very slight chance they do win their appeal, they should be sent back to Afghaistan (deported) and any future chance of Canadian citizenship be revoked.A criminal act is criminal behaviour.There are four innocent persons that suffered for the actions and beliefs of others, I am sure no matter what the faith is, the day of reconning will come.


Merlin
said

Our courts system should not allow appeals unless the convicted can prove to a new judge that there misleading information or wrong doing in the first trial.


Ross
said

Shame on the lawyers for wanting to appeal this is a waste of tax payers money think twice do you really want to do all this again over the next few months. Move on to your next case please.


Dave Hays
said

Deport them and let them appeal from outside of Canada. Also, seize all their assests and monies. Use it to set up a help centre across Canada for other families who will and unfortunately are continuing to suffer under this dark age mentality.


R.
said

Too bad that we don't still have the Death Penalty as this is what would be the appropriate sentence for this trio. After 25 years, should they receive early release - then, they should be immediately deported!


DEMONDOOR
said

Justice worked this time, only us taxpayers must pay for the 3 so they could regain their "honor". I say liquidate all their leftover assets to help pay their Canadian stay in prison and when or if they are released, a plane ticket back to Afghanistan. We will not tolerate "honor" killings in Canada! If you don't like it go home!


joann
said

In 25 years they can APPLY for parole. The sentence is LIFE and if they don't admit their guilt they might never get out. The old man will be in his eighties by then. Hopefully they will have spent every penny they have hopelessly appealing the conviction.


Robb Weir
said

What do you think? All three of them should be deported..so no cost is brought to the people of Canada for their jail time. This should be done for all immigrant's with a Canadian or not!


raj
said

They can appeal or they want. The evidence is overwhelming, they are guilty.We know it , they know it.Enjoy the next 25 years! if it wre up to me, it would 25 years for each life you took


Ron S
said

Just what would the basis be for an appeal; I can find nothing.

In this case if the son's story is to be believed; what sort of human does not call for help or report what has happened. He simply drives back to Montreal to get a car that will not implicate them. There is no way any jury could possibly come in with a different verdict.

Let the laws be applied fully due to the nature of this pre-meditated crime.


Nora
said

Well done!!! But what i dont understand is bigamy allowed in Canada? How this man was accepted in canada with both wives?


John Wayne
said

A good day for justice . 25 years should be for each girl murdered however.

It was nice and caring how the parent's rubbed their "poor" son's back as the verdict was read. I bet they never once showed any time of affection for their poor daughters,they never did during the trial. The only person who will be rubbing his back now will be his cell mate, good riddance murderers.


Linda, Alexandria ON
said

The criminal justice system got it 25% right. Those people killed 4 women and got 1 life sentence. They should have got life x 4, and consecutive terms not concurrent. They should be eligible for parole after 100 (25x4) years.Four for the price of one. Discounted in death as in life.


LMK
said

Of course there will be appeals, there always are. The only one where I can see a remote - and I stress remote - chance is for the boy. At the time of the murder he was 18 years old, in a dependant life situation, brainwashed by his parents, willing to please. Even though he has also been found guilty one might have to consider the circumstances of his life. Shame on the parents for putting this young man in this position. As said already, he is the only one where an appeal may be successful in a legal sense. Very, very sad story indeed.


Tim
said

Justice finally served. May the victims now RIP.


Murrb
said

Sweet justice. We need to ensure immigrants to Canada do not subscribe to these barbaric beliefs. What kind of monster must you be to kill your own children in the name of "honor". Grotesque.


marib
said

The jurors will be relieved by their decision when they learn about the evidence that was not admitted into trial. Justice is served.


FB
said

Good ... now keep them locked up. Shafia was led out, he loudly said: "Wrong," sorry Shafia 'RIGHT'!


peggy.
said

I'm so glad these people were convicted. I am surprised that these people were ever let into our country, given the fact that our justice system does not support murder, and especially honour killings.


bonny
said

It is about time, we need justice for this corrupted people. When they come to Canada, they must follow our tradition and culture. It is not the case. They try to change in Canada our culture.

I hope Law make them pay for killing the four poor women, who were born in the wrong culture and religion.

School Board must inform to children Aid, when these girls talks about these kind abuses.


Prof. Pye Chartt
said

Lying murderers of their own beautiful family members. It feels good not to bite my tongue and be forced to presume their innocence anymore. They've always rubbed me the wrong way, and their story -- even as it morphed and changed to suit their defense -- always seemed like a complete crock from evil, deceitful minds. (The defense lawyer's notion that they were convicted based upon what Shafia said about his daughters while being wiretapped strikes me as wishful legal thinking. A truckload of evidence was heaped upon his clients. Their contrived version of what happened -- beginning with the prior purchase of the death car -- was nothing short of pathetic.) That these despicable people would still obnoxiously proclaim their innocence and aggressively seek an appeal isn't the least bit surprising. Good riddance.


willyb
said

They SHOULD get 25 years for EACH of the 4 people they killed, NOT one 25 year sentence! Canadian laws and the punishments that the courts give out is so mamby pamby, they are a joke! In the States they'd get 100 years at least. Every damn thing that came out of their mouths were lies, and the lies continue. Appeal NOTHING, they are guilty and should face 100 years each!!! The do not know the first thing about "honour", Their sick and twisted way of thinking has destroyed their family's life. The biggest lie was "I am a loving Father". There was no love in this family, just fear.


blaise
said

Why do lawyers never accept the truth?



STEVO
said

If appealed all the cost should come out of their pocket and nothing from the taxpayers.


Marlene
said

I hope that this will help other s that are living in this situation get away before it is to late.That is the great thing about Canada there is help for victims.It is tragic that the girls were unable to escape.


George V.
said

Why wouldn't they appeal, they have nothing to loose except additional thousands of dollars of lawyer fees and court costs.


Just Saying - Ottawa
said

So happy that these wicked 3 will go to prison and there should NOT be an appeal awarded. Go to the "pen" for the rest of your lives, you 3 deserve nothing more than going there.


Mexican Gringo
said

Appeal on what basis? Lawyers, scum of the earth.Of course, until you need one....


Anne
said

Of course they themselves believe they are innocenet, in their minds what they did was the correct action as determined by their religion. Maybe now they, and those like them, get the message loud and clear that you WILL NOT bring such despicable practices to Canada. Stay in your own country if you don't like our ways.


D. Fougere, Montreal
said

Re-established my faith in our Canadian Justice System. Suffer not the little children.


Canadian Justice For All
said

I would expect nothing more from some lawyers. I would hope that no appeal is granted and these lawyers take their pay and not look for more money from these people . Perhaps these lawyers should look at the pictures of the murdered and feel good that justice was served.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Canada Stories

Anne-Catherine Powers, Shakti Ramsurrun, Gatineau, Quebec

Estranged husband charged in Gatineau, Que., murders

More  2 Video(s) 2

Most Talked about Stories

I feel that if certain organs were in demand, less effort would be made to revive people. Am I being silly? Not really. I had a bad experience in hospital when my heart stopped, the doctors tried to revive me and failed. They stopped and said I was gone. I came around on my own when the nurse was giving a final BP reading of 'zero'. I heard her declare me dead! It was all I could do to shake my head but they never caught on til I was able to open my eyes. You should have seen them scramble then! I thought the nurse was going to faint. The thing is, I think we may write people off too soon when there is something of value to be gained from them.

me

Should all Canadians be automatically considered organ donors?