Canada -   

1

Redford wants united front on energy strategy

Alison Redford, pipeline, Alberta Alberta Premier Alison Redford is seen meeting with Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty in his office on Nov. 16, 2011
Alison Redford, pipeline, Alberta

View Larger Image

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (22) Facebook   

Date: Wednesday Nov. 16, 2011 9:06 PM ET

TORONTO — Alberta's premier is calling on the provinces and Ottawa to form a united front on oil, gas and other forms of Canadian-produced energy as the country looks to expand the market for its oil and gas beyond the United States.

Alison Redford said in a speech Wednesday in Toronto that the troubles surrounding development of the Keystone pipeline in the U.S. are an example of why Canada needs to look to energy-hungry markets in Asia and elsewhere.

"I think the indecision around the Keystone XL pipeline demonstrates the necessity of looking to new markets," she said of the U.S. government delay of a decision on whether TransCanada Corp. can build a massive pipeline south of the border.

However, she told reporters after the speech to the Economic Club of Canada that she is not seeking a policy shift away from the U.S., the country's primary trading partner -- rather, she wants to open up to new markets such as China and India as well.

Her remarks came during a flood of activity in the oil pipeline industry as companies look for ways to move growing supplies from the oilsands to market.

Earlier Wednesday, Enbridge Inc. (TSX:ENB) said it would pay US$1.15 billion for a half-stake in an existing pipeline from the Gulf Coast and reverse its flow to relieve a build-up of oil storage in Cushing, Okla.

Enbridge rival TransCanada Corp. (TSX:TRP), meanwhile, said it may be possible to build the southern leg of its Alberta-to-Texas Keystone XL pipeline as early as next year in a move also designed to drain supplies from Cushing.

Redford said both of those developments were encouraging.

She said TransCanada's move to build the southern leg will demonstrate that it is possible to build pipeline infrastructure that is environmentally sustainable.

Enbridge's move is an example of the innovations coming out of Alberta in terms of looking for options to expand its influence, she added.

The premier said she wants to play a more prominent role in forming a national energy strategy, adding she is acutely aware that her language, and that of all Canadian politicians on energy, is being watched south of the border.

"From an Alberta perspective, we're in a position where we can take a role in leading that conversation," she said.

"It may be that Canadians don't have the perspective that we've done that in the past, but it's very much what I would like to do now, and we will do it in the future."

But Redford added that all of the provinces have a role to play in the successful export of Canadian oil and gas and other forms of energy.

She said she'd like to see an open cross-country dialogue on issues such as innovation and environmental sustainability.

"Canada is rare in being energy-rich and innovative, with a skilled workforce capable of expanding production in an environmentally, socially conscious and economically sustainable manner," she said in the speech.

"Our energy is therefore not just a profitable resource, but a strategic one."

When later asked to elaborate on her meaning of "strategic" -- because the designation can mean the resource is not open for foreign investment -- she said it is strategic because jurisdictions around the world need it.

Redford met with Ontario premier Dalton McGuinty earlier Wednesday as part of a whirlwind tour that also stopped in Washington and New York.

She said they talked about the Keystone pipeline a little, but only in terms of Canada's energy strategy to build international markets. She said they "didn't disagree on anything" and instead talked about how Alberta could help Ontario develop its interest in renewable power.

"I think as (McGuinty) moves forward with his plans around renewables that there's opportunity for technical partnerships, academic exchanges and for private sector partnerships," she told reporters.

"And that was one of the things that I left him with at the end of the meeting-- let's see if we can pursue some of those possibilities."

Redford said her mission is not to "sell" the oilsands, but unlike her predecessors she is prepared to engage in a rational conversation with critics to work out their concerns.

"If they have concerns that are not based on facts, then let's get the facts right, we still may agree to disagree," she said.

"But I think there's an awful lot of back and forth right now, a lot of language, a lot of emotion, that isn't getting us to an outcome."

Redford will meet with Prime Minister Stephen Harper Thursday in what will be the longest conversation they've had since she became premier of his home province.

She said they will discuss what they've learned with respect to the roadblocks in the Keystone pipeline process, as well as progress on environmental and water monitoring in the province.

Also on Wednesday, a senior official with the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers said those involved in the the oil and gas sector risk damaging their reputations if they don't meet their critics head on.

Janet Annesley, CAPP's vice-president of communications, told a business audience in Calgary that she's had discussions with those in the industry, including those working in the oil sands, and told them getting the facts out doesn't always make things right.

"The advent of new media, social media, the Internet has made people realize that perception is reality," she said. "That regulators only take decisions they can defend and it is in a company's best interest to tell their side of the story and do so very proactively."

Annesley said there will always be those who won't like the oil and gas sector no matter what is done but it is important not to shy away from tough questions from the public.

Comments are now closed for this story

randy
said

I would be carefull when playing with our neighbours don,t put them in a corner we all have to work toggether if they don,t want our oil thats fine no hard feelings don,t worry they will be back no problem. in the mean time we exspand to other countries when the us comes back we will sell the all the oil they want if we have any to sell just simple buisness we should not depend on anyone customer anyways.


Brent McGillis
said

Geez, I guess this means their monthly kickback cheques are "not" coming from Houston. Ahhh, boohoo! Listen don't pee off Cheney, alright he has his retirement investment fund known as Halliburton working overtime on this stuff, O.K.? I guess he is just going to have to "YANK" those Alberta Progressive Conservative puppet strings a little harder. Thank god for All the Moaning & Crying coming from Alberta every day, otherwise what in the hell would the corporate Media have to report on? There would not be any Canadian news to report.


Linda in Vancouver
said

Good luck getting Ontario and Quebec to support this.The last time we had a major oil industry issue,Trudeau essentially moved to confiscate the oil of producing provinces.Not a lot has really changed since them.The political left is getting funding from environmental groups in Canada,who,it appears,are getting their money from the good old USA. This has been a major area of concern out west for several years.The main opponents in Alberta oil protests,are AMERICANS.Now the NDP is headed to Washingtom to explain to the American Democrats,how they have failed to secure Canadian oil,for the exclusive use of Americans. You doubt that? Google Vivian Krause and read what she has uncovered.If only half of what she has found out is true,the politcal left in Canada has a lot of explaining to do. There are,I do believe,several foxes in Canada's hen house.Now we just have to identify a few of them,and ask them what the h** they think they are doing.


Dave
said

Governments don't build refineries, Oil companies do. Try convincing them to build new refineries in Alberta when they already have extra capacity in Texas.


Brian
said

Why are we only talking about oil? We should be talking about Wind, Hydro, oil, Natural gas and all other types of energy. The west has a lot of oil, while the east has a lot of renewable power. We send out excess electricity and oil south while the east imports Crude from the middle east and Central canada builds coal/nuclear plants. If we are going to discuss a national strategy these problems need to be addressed.


John Lethbridge
said

The government of Canada doesn't refine oil, nor are they putting out the cash for the pipeline. Shipping crude is much safer more economically viable than shipping refined product. Think about it... separate pipelines for gas, premium gas, diesel, motor oil, asphalt cement, varsol, etc. would be out of the question. A crude oil pipeline breach would be infinitely less of an environmental disaster than say a breach of a large scale pipeline that transports gasoline as gasoline will enter aquifers, etc much more readily than crude. It is also much more explosive than crude oil. We do have refineries in Canada, numerous refineries. More would be better in order to improve local supply, and with increased demand of product in Canada more refineries will probably be constructed. Beyond this, I very much appreciate that Redford is trying to create dialogue between provinces to support better export of oil and gas and other energy. In a time of ecomonic uncertainty, this is Canada's lifeline.


Doug ^^^ BC
said

I'm liking the comments about how we can help Alberta get the best bang for the buck,and how all of Canada has so much prosperity to gain by the careful exploitation of this resource. I also agree with those who say Canada needs another refinery.Maybe even more than one.But here is my take on the value added idea,which, by the way was expressed by PM Harper more that a year ago. As I have been told,people who want to buy Alberta bitumen,want to refine it into many different products.And what I've been told by people who know more about oil and refing than I ever could,is that each refinery is set up to produce one product,from one specific kind of oil. If that is so,we would need a whole bunch of separate refineries to refine Alberta bitumen into many different products. In short,refining ALL that bitumen sounds like a good idea,but it may not be as simple as it sounds. Still,refining enough of it to meet the demands of all Canadians,seems like a no brainer to this non expert on the refining process. This is a HUGE deal for Canada,and for all of us.Let's make sure we make the right decisons for Canada first.Americans are estimating that there are tens of trillions of dollars worth of oil in the oil sands.It may come with some risks,but the vast amount of wealth involved could pay for our past sins by paying down debt,fuel taxes on our domestic fuel,and helping to build more competetive industries in Canada,so our children and grand children will have jobs when they want to raise families of their own. Oppose it if you must.But please,do so ONLY after carefully considering all the implications.I mean ALL of them.


Alberta or Canada
said

If they don't want it, sell it to someone else. Everyone who drives and uses any form of transportation should have a say and yes checking with the environment is also vital to everyone in the long run, or we are just digging ourselves into a grave.


Sens/Habs Fan - Ottawa
said

Here you have the Federal NDP off to Washington going against the pipeline from Alberta to Texas...most NDP members come from Quebec and Quebec must remember that being a "have not province" that the transfer payments to their Province come from Alberta...as a matter of fact Ontario is now a "have not province" for the first time .. funny why the USA and those fighting this don't seem to mind the ships going across the Ocean bring oil to their beloved Country...what could be worse...anything could happen ...anxious to hear how this pans out....


Too Bee
said

Is that Come by Chance refinery still around? We could build a pipeline to NFLD for Fort McMurray oil. The boys from the Rock fly back and for from Deer Lake to Ft. Mak Monee all the time so why not complete the loop and refine Canadian oil for export froman east coast refinery?.


Freeman
said

All energy exported from Canada, be it oil, gas, electricity, uranium or coal should have an environmental exit tax. This tax shall then be spent on making these energy resources energy efficient delivery systems as well as carbon neutral and eco friendly. This tax would also be used for development of cost effective alternate energy sources. Because we currently export our energy to the US I'm sure they would be happy to pay such a tax to help make our resources cleaner than their Californicated LaBraea Tarpits oil, frac'd shale oil and numerous high sulfur coal fired electricity generation plants. The percentage of this tax could of course be revised downwards when offshore export terminals come on line.
It would be appropriate for GreenPeace and the NPD to propose this before Christmas. Sorry Winter Festival.


Briand
said

I'm not 100% sure about this but I think that once you refine oil into gas and Diesel does it not start to degrade? You only have so long to use it up before the quality starts to degrade below quality standards . I know on the farm here that gas in a storage tank is good for about a month or so before you start to notice some performance loss in farm equipment.


Jay in Stoon
said

Building oil refineries is NOT progressive - it's REgressive. Whether the oil is refined and burned in OUR atmosphere or in China's...it still ends up in the air we breathe. I don't really care about global warming - I care that the air we breathe and the water we drink are free from carcinogens. We would be much better suited for the future encouraging renewable energy sources researched, developed and build right here in Canada.


bob
said

we should have a moratorium on the export of non renewable resources. are we giving any thought to what we are leaving for our grandchildren? Resources or bare holes in the ground?Any resources we do export should be value added. e.g. refined petroleum products rather than crude and shipped directly from Canada to the world market


DANIEL H
said

And they also need to encourage that those exports be refined products so that we have jobs here instead of exporting just cude and letting jobs go to Asia. That means encouraging building new refineries. The capability of refining in Canada is poor.


dalton
said

1% of the population works in this sector yet to listen to government and media you would think this was are only means of survival.Hey Dalton how about reminding the Albertan a inflated loonie because of the tar sands is destroying Ontario manufacturing! Sick and tired of the 1% dictating to the 99% whether they are bankers,oil barons or any of the other monopolies that exist under the globalism model.


Bill Wiggins
said

We pay high prices for fuel and these prices jump when a "threat" to the supply occurs. As an instance, the price of fuel jumped rapidly when the Gulf of Mexsico was threatened by a huricane. Houston, the destination for the XL Pipeline is on the Texas shore of the Gulf of Mexico and gets hit by hurricanes. Last hurricane in Edmonton was in........There never was one! Why when the price jumps weeks before a threat do the oil companies need two weeks after the threat to use up the expensive oil? It didn't take two weeks to use up the cheap oil!!


Len
said

Just don't agree with the concept of selling our oil and other energy sources to China. Know they will pay big bucks for it but they also are buying up so much of our natural resourses and selling the finished products back to us. Sounds okay but they gain, we lose. Keep our resources for our own use. I the long run we'd be better off - bit the bullet today to gain more tomorrow.


Ivan
said

Why is no politician talking about refining Canada's oil in Canada? The public are certainly talking about it. Enough with exporting our raw materials for other countries to benefit from the value added jobs.


John
said

I agree with PBW, we should be spending the billions on refineries and not on pipelines for the crude. Also, its hard to just ask the provinces to be on side when the NDP is against everything progressive and try to stall or stop everything


M
said

- Build a pipeline across BC to the coast and the oil can be sold the anyone Alberta chooses.

- Don't ask for input from the other Provinces when it comes to Alberta's oil, particularly Ontario. They give you their option whether you asked for it or not most of the time - and it's not positive either. They don't want to hear about the dirty oil only the transfer payments to their provinces coming from the dirty oil!


PBW
said

"Canada can guarantee national prosperity for a long time to come by supplying rapidly growing Asia with the energy it needs." I can agree with this - so long as we export a value added product and not just crude. If that means billions spent on new refineries as well as on pipelines and port infrastructure, then so be it. We need at least one new refinery anyway if we are to prevent major shortages, as with the recent diesel shortage. When a part of a single refinery is closed and causes that much problem, we obviously are too close to the line, as with relying on a single source for medical isotopes. To make money and create jobs, you have to spend money: free wishes are fine for new moons and wells - nothing else.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Canada Stories

A Canadian Pacific Railway employee walks along the side of a locomotive in a marshalling yard in Calgary, Wednesday, May 16, 2012. (Jeff McIntosh / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Talks between CP, union stall; Raitt prepared to step in

More   40 Comments 40    3 Video(s) 3

Victoria Shachtay, 23, died in an explosion on Friday, Nov. 25, in an Innisfail townhouse.

Man charged in parcel blast that killed Alta. mother

More  2 Video(s) 2

Nova  Scotia, body, Hillside Road, Marion Bridge

Police identify humans remains found in hockey bag

More  1 Video(s) 1

Most Talked about Stories

It is about time - as a grandparent I have watched our kids (who were allowed to fail although I do remember some nagging on our part) learn, I have watched our children now micro-manage their children. A big part of it is the fact that there are predators out there and an extreme reluctance on the parents part to alllow freedom that might result in the children becoming victims.

Harvey

Parents must learn to stop meddling, author urges