Canada -   

1

Nearly 2,700 tax files downloaded on missing laptop

A laptop containing 2,700 confidential tax files has gone missing, a Canadian Press investigation has revealed.
A laptop containing 2,700 confidential tax files has gone missing, a Canadian Press investigation has revealed.

View Larger Image

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (34) Facebook   

Date: Sunday Nov. 6, 2011 9:57 PM ET

OTTAWA — The confidential tax files of almost 2,700 Canadians are missing after a Canada Revenue Agency worker took them home and let a friend download them onto a laptop.

The laptop has disappeared, the agency is scrambling to rewrite its security protocols and the privacy commissioner is asking why no one alerted her to the breach in confidentiality.

"Our office was not informed about this incident," said Anne-Marie Hayden, spokeswoman for Jennifer Stoddart, privacy commissioner of Canada. "We will be following up with CRA for further information on the issue."

The investigation report, along with related documents, was obtained by The Canadian Press under the Access to Information Act.

The major breach occurred in early 2006, when an auditor in the agency's Toronto office asked a government computer technician to download 37,488 of her emails and 776 documents onto 16 CDs. The confidential material covered the years 2000 to 2006, and was not encrypted as required by agency rules.

The woman took the CDs home, and allowed a male friend to copy at least one of them to a laptop.

The breach only came to light when the woman produced the CDs during a grievance hearing before the Public Service Labour Relations Board in 2008. She wanted the panel to read a key 2005 email on one of the CDs, in support of her grievance that the CRA had not accommodated her health problems.

"She was upfront at the hearing that the CDs contained taxpayer information and advised (CRA senior official) Tracey O'Brien to safeguard the information," says an internal report into the privacy breach. "This caused a disruption in the hearing."

The woman employee, who suffers from fibromyalgia which causes chronic body pain, eventually won her grievance and was awarded $6,000 for pain and suffering. Two of her supervisors were required to take training in how to accommodate workers with disabilities.

But the privacy breach uncovered at the hearing triggered a wide-ranging internal probe into why the confidential material was poorly safeguarded -- and whether it could be retrieved. The woman was sent a letter in early 2009, asking her to produce the friend's laptop.

"He (the friend) told her that he would not provide the laptop and was unco-operative," says the investigation report.

The agency eventually recovered the 16 CDs from the employee, but still has not recovered the laptop.

"The laptop was the property of a private company and was no longer available at the time of the administrative investigation," CRA spokesman Philippe Brideau said when asked about the incident.

"However, the facts gathered during the investigation determined reasonable grounds to believe that the information copied to the laptop had been erased in such a way that an average user could not access through a normal operating system."

Brideau confirmed the agency's policy requires that personal information copied onto CDs or any other removable storage device must be encrypted, but there was a "gap in awareness training and procedures."

He said CRA is currently drafting a guideline to prevent further breaches in confidentiality.

The internal probe found at least 2,660 instances of confidential taxpayer information on the single CD that the employee said she had given to her friend to download. All 16 CDs contained much more confidential information, but the investigation did not indicate how many more taxpayers were involved.

The heavily censored report notes, however, that "a limited number of taxpayer accounts was reviewed. At that point, there did not appear to be any income tax implications such as requested adjustments or unusual refunds."

Treasury Board policy "strongly" recommends that institutions inform the privacy commissioner soon after learning of any breach if it "involves sensitive personal data such as financial ... information." The CRA probe determined that the CDs contained exactly such financial information.

But Brideau said the incident was judged to be "low risk," and the decision taken not to inform the privacy commissioner.

He added that he could not comment on any sanctions taken against the offending employee because of privacy rules.

"All CRA employees are subject to a strict Code of Ethics and Conduct," he said. "The CRA takes all allegations concerning the conduct of its employees very seriously and takes immediate action to have all allegations investigated."

"Any employee who violates this code may face disciplinary action up to and including termination of employment."

The laptop incident is among dozens in which tax agency workers have breached security rules, many of them snooping on other Canadians, including ex-spouses, mothers-in-law, creditors and others by reading confidential tax files.

Comments are now closed for this story

Elle
said
0 0

Employees take laptops home where God knows what happens or leave them in restaurants, they get stolen out of vehicles - the government and businesses seriously need to teach classes on common sense.


Jagators63
said
0 0

this worker should never be allowed to take laptop home at all period !!


ian
said
0 0

To Monique, your example of what is going on in the construction industry in Laval is obviously related to the impending enquiry into the corruption in that industry in Quebec. I'm surpised the building wasn't burned down.


Dan
said
0 0

Yes people, it makes perfect sense to me. PM Harper has planted Conservative spies in all the government agencies to steal our personal information. That's why he wanted to get rid of the long census form which is an invasion of our privacy, and that's why he wants to get rid of the long gun registry because of course he and his party want to keep private information about Canadians. If your claims about this being the doing of the Conservatives wasn't so sad it would be funny. The government in power haas about as little power of the federal civil service as I do. Civil servants don't work for the party they work for the paricular department. People should read a little once in awhile.


Frank Buchan
said
0 0

If a private citizen stole that data, they would be charged with a myriad of crimes. Based upon the general incompetence that allowed it to happen the very least that should occur is that they should fire her, the IT personnel who actually did this, and every supervisor who was aware of it, or suspected it. They should also charge her friend with identity theft, which could be committed with a tax record, maybe 2,700 odd counts...and, for good measure, they should charge the company whose laptop it was with the same criminal activity. The fact is this happens frequently enough to seriously question the ability of CRA to be trusted. And that nothing will be done to anyone involved is a disgusting example of why government is so untrustworthy.


rob
said
0 0

sure, have you ever tried to get as federal unionized civil servant fired in Canada? Usually they get a leave with pay.


Elizabeth, Ontario
said
0 0

Totally unacceptable. This person should be fired. Her supervisor should also be fired. All taxpayers, who had their private information compromised, should be notified and sue the CRA for this breach of privacy. Like Paul, another concern of mine when I read this article is the long gun registry. The information contained in the long gun registry needs to be destroyed before some civil servant decides to share it with boyfriends. Heads need to roll over this CRA breach.


Stewie
said
0 0

This government hides everything it does from the public and just throws our confidential information out for everyone to see. It doesn't matter much this government is giving all our personal information to the US government. None of us will soon have any privacy, thanks to PU Steve.


Spike
said
0 0

RE: "I've worked for government for over 20 years, and my average, sent and received, is over 60 emails a day."Oh, so that is how government works, that's why nothing gets done.


Hugh
said
0 0

I certainly hope this woman was fired.


Ted from Toronto
said
0 0

Being a union member with a grievance is more important than being a honorable civil servant. Nice to know the price to sell out your personal ethics is only $6000


Ask Questions
said
0 0

Great. I'm legally obligated to provide personal information to a body that doesn't have a clue about how to protect it.


Mike is in BC
said
0 0

@Taiser: Do some math. Over a six year period, 37,488 emails averages about 26 a day, assuming a 5 day work week and 4 weeks of vacation. I've worked for government for over 20 years, and my average, sent and received, is over 60 emails a day.


Jacklyn
said
0 0

IT's probably the same person that stole my social insurance number and then applied for OSAP with it, I never received compensation for that! And I had to jump through hoops to prove who I was nor was it ever investigated!!!!!!


Carl
said
0 0

It is an outrage that this woman's privacy is safeguarded after she compromised that of thousands of taxpayers. She is supposed to be a public servant, and she should be accountable to the public she betrayed. We should be told what discipline, if any, she received. In my view, she should be fired and subjected to a very significant fine. (Something more than the settlement she received for the claim which she supported with stolen information.)


Cambob in Toronto
said
0 0

I believe this civil servant deliberately sold my financial information. If she is not fired and her pension revoked, then I have no choice but to withhold my taxes and all other personal information from the government. The only way these civil servants will obey the law is if we, the taxpayers, force them to be accountable.


Cambob in Toronto
said
0 0

Clearly, civil servants can not be trusted with our privacy or our financial records. I suggest we withhold our taxes until a transparent investigation is made public and those accountable for this breach are fined/jailed. The taxpayers of Canada can't be "Mr. Nice Guy" anymore with these civil servants.


Paul
said
0 0

....and keeping the gun registry is a good idea why?


ticked off
said
0 0

So here we go again! Not that many years ago I was advised by our dear CRA that my records have been compromise in a laptop theft. One would think they would have learned since the. No one compensated me for my troubles to 'renew' my identity. Way to go!


Gorg
said
0 0

This kind of action certainly compromises confidentiality beyond all comprehension! What kind of a decision was that to remove information from a CRA office? Obviously gross stupidity. I think it's bad enough the government by randomly snooping around knows more about me than I do, but to download onto somebody else's laptop!?!? Sorry, lady, you should be fired! No severence or anything like that. This bothers me. So now who the hell else knows?? STUPID!!!!!


William in Ajax Ont
said
0 0

Wow, this just boggles the mind.So many un-politicaly-correct questions to be asked.How is it her friend won't co-operate in retrieving the data, why did he "only" end up with 2700 taxpayers info?Why has he NOT been charged with something?Who are the 2700?, Bet, their all conservative?A thorough investigation should have ..But, will NEVER happen.This woman has damaged the reputations of all disabled people, as she is PROOF positive (afirmative action) is pie in the sky fantasy ideology.The incompetance is flabbergasting!!!


Had enough
said
0 0

No citizen's personal information should be allowed to leave a government office. PERIOD. How many times do we have to keep hearing about employees screwing up and exposing citizens to identity theft through the employees careless/stupid or purposeful actions. A full name and address, with or without a SIN number, is enough to allow identity theft. In this case, the woman should be fired for allowing anyone else to see, let alone copy, the information that she had taken from her place of employment. She should not only be fired, but also criminally charged for willfully violating citizens' privacy and exposing thousands to identity theft. As for the friend, he should be charged with stealing. Unbelievable that the government threw up its hands and basically said it couldn't touch him because his laptop was a "private" computer. What!!! That computer contained stolen government information and, therefore, he should have been charged and jailed until he returned it and proved he didn't sell that information or pass it on to a third party. Gee, I guess if you steal something and store it in your "private" house, you can't be charged with a crime or have the stolen item confiscated. Finally, the CRA employee should also have her name published nationally Not only is she unfit for the job given her lack of intelligence/caring, but also her arrogance in seeking compensation after knowingly violating citizens' privacy and putting them at risk. As she is not an employee to be trusted, all potential future employers should be aware of her name so as to be able to make an informed decision as to whether to employ her or not.


David2013
said
0 0

What's going to happen if the people who have all the info used it to get credit? I mean if they have a sin number, date of birth and name, they can apply for credits, EI, Welfare. Thanks for putting so many Canadians at high risk of getting victim of Identity Theft. CRA should be sued big time for this. Outrageous.


confuscan
said
0 0

First, why does the government always hide behind "privacy rules" when asked how the employee was disciplined? They can remain anonymous but we do want to know if there were any (however unlikely it is) consequences.Second, follows from the first. Fire this person! This person handles your and my tax/personal information. I think McDonalds is more appropriate for her.


Camille Toews
said
0 0

So - no charges laid against this person for theft of this information?No mention of her name, her "boyfriend's" name or the company which owned the laptop?And no proof that the information was erased?Are there two sets of laws in Canada by any chance? Why were no charges laid, or the people repsonsible named?


Michael from Toronto
said
0 0

This is the most bizarre story. Firstly, why would any computer-literate person need someone else to download files to a CD? She should have been able to do that herself, with ease. Even if she were somehow justified to ask for help, why ask a non-authorized 3rd party instead of approved ministry staff? Looks to me these people are not qualified to work with such materials. Is she even computer literate to begin with? I used to perform contract work for ministries, and the staff there would literally beg me to fix their PCs and unfathomable MS Windows problems. Part of the problem was the crappy PCs and crappy software thay handed out to their staff.


PBW
said
0 0

Why is any government employee EVER permitted to remove confidential information from a (presumably) secure government office? We, as taxpayers, pay billions for the government to operate, and expect that the information we are obliged to supply be kept confidential. Heads should roll in this matter: not just the employees concerned but also the supervisor who permitted the information to be copied to CD.


Taiser
said
0 0

37,488 e-mails?!?!?! What th...?? I work for a MAJOR government agency and I have NEVER heard of ANYONE getting that many e-mails!!! And why does this include possibly MY tax information?? I say let her keep her award and kick her butt to the curb... we don't need this kind of incompetence with such sensitive information!!


WILLI
said
0 0

Sure makes you wonder just how safe our personal data files are with Mr. Harper and his cornies.... Another instance with NO PAPER TRAIL?????


Highground
said
0 0

My question is, why does this employee of the Federal Government still have their job .... this keeps on happening and a slap on the wrists is all that takes place ..... maybe a nice $25,000 fine and jail time per offence would drive the message home and a criminal record to set it all straight ... but nahhhh that will never happen, they are protected.


john in kingston
said
0 0

Treasury Board policy "strongly" recommends that institutions inform the privacy commissioner soon after learning of any breach if it "involves sensitive personal data such as financial ... information." Unfortunately strongly recommends doesn't mean must do. I work in information security and can tell you that this is happening way more than is being reported. Until the recommendations and policies become laws that have teeth, it will continue. Educating those who hold our information and putting in place security personnel who can advise, monitor and control information movement out of an organization is also key. My question in this case would be how did this person get permission to copy all this confidential information from a government system and remove it from the premises, encrypted or otherwise? That should never have happened and shows the total lack of control in CRA over our sensitive data.


Monique, Laval, Quebec
said
0 0

One again has forgotten this incident in 2006 and by the way i was not in the construction industry , this is not acceptable !!!!!!!!A database on 120,000 Canadians was stolenfrom a Laval federal tax officeIn case you were concerned about the security of all the personalinformation you are required to send to federal tax offices,your worst fears may have been realized, especially if you arein the construction industry. This past week a Laval federal revenueoffice was once again the target of a smash and grab robbery. In the most recent break-in, thieves smashed a windowwith a rock around 2:30 a.m. on Sept. 4, and grabbed four laptopsand two desktop computers close to the window. The mostdisturbing concern is that a laptop server containing confidentialinformation on 120,000 contractors and sub-contractors inthe construction industry was one of the six computers stolen. Whether this was just a simple computer burglary or a moresinister identity theft plot is not clear. Though Laval police aretreating it like a simple burglary the RCMP role will be towatch out for identity theft.


sarah M
said
0 0

sheesh.... this woman sounds like the type who is a royal pain in the butt to everyone; Incompetent and probably a terrible coworker to boot...but I'm sure she'll still get a generous pension and government benefits that us in the private sector could only dream of. If I did the same thing? Fired on the spot the same day.


Craig from NS
said
0 0

Two questions: Is this person still employeed anywhere with the federal government? Were the 2700 affected Canadian's informed of the security breach?


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Canada Stories

A Canadian Pacific Railway employee walks along the side of a locomotive in a marshalling yard in Calgary, Wednesday, May 16, 2012. (Jeff McIntosh / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Talks between CP, union stall; Raitt prepared to step in

More   40 Comments 40    3 Video(s) 3

Victoria Shachtay, 23, died in an explosion on Friday, Nov. 25, in an Innisfail townhouse.

Man charged in parcel blast that killed Alta. mother

More  2 Video(s) 2

Nova  Scotia, body, Hillside Road, Marion Bridge

Police identify humans remains found in hockey bag

More  1 Video(s) 1

Most Talked about Stories

It is about time - as a grandparent I have watched our kids (who were allowed to fail although I do remember some nagging on our part) learn, I have watched our children now micro-manage their children. A big part of it is the fact that there are predators out there and an extreme reluctance on the parents part to alllow freedom that might result in the children becoming victims.

Harvey

Parents must learn to stop meddling, author urges