Canada -   

1
Canada population

Index finds inequalities in Canadians' quality of life

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV National News: Index of wellbeing created
Authors of a new study say gross national product is only one way to measure a country's health, so they've developed the index of wellbeing. CTV's Roger Smith explains how Canada stacks up.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (24) Facebook   

Canada population

Photos

Canada population

View Larger Image

More on this topic

Date: Thu. Oct. 20 2011 7:53 AM ET

OTTAWA — A generation of solid economic growth has meant little in the everyday lives of most Canadians, according to a new index of wellbeing.

The finding is a yellow light for decision-makers that social unrest is just around the corner unless deep changes are made, warns Roy Romanow, the advisory board chairman of the University of Waterloo group that created the index.

The index suggests the middle class, in particular, is eroding.

"There are some very, very troubling signs," Romanow said in an interview.

"I think if we continue on this trajectory we're going to have bigger and bigger disparities. You can never build a solid political, social and economic community with wide disparities."

The Canadian Index of Wellbeing is meant to be GDP's alter ego, measuring the quality of life in society in ways gross domestic product does not.

The index has been years in the making, pulling together 64 indicators to track progress in areas such as community spirit, education, health, environment, leisure and democratic engagement.

While GDP measures what companies and government produce, the wellbeing index measures how Canada and its people are faring.

It shows that between 1994 and 2008, wellbeing improved by just 11 per cent. The economy over that period grew by 31 per cent.

So while investment and corporate activity were ticking along at a decent pace, Canadian households saw only minor improvements in their lifestyle.

"The divergence in the (index of wellbeing) and GDP tells us emphatically that we have not been making the right investments in our people and in our communities. And we have not been doing it for a long time," the report on the index says.

The index's subcomponents show that quality of life actually deteriorated over that time frame in areas such as the environment, leisure and culture, and time use.

Researchers noted that metal reserves are at rock-bottom, species abundance has declined, greenhouse-gas emissions have soared, and ground ozone has risen.

When it comes to leisure, Canadians are working out more and taking longer vacations, but they spend less time engaged in arts and culture.

Health care saw a slight gain -- we're smoking less and getting our flu shots, but diabetes and depression were on the rise. Wealthier people had better health status.

Living standards rose 26.4 per cent, but at the expense of income inequality. The rich took the lion's share.

While parents are reading more to their young children and signing them up for all sorts of classes, kids are also spending more time in front of screens. And seniors are seeing less of their families.

In other words, a typical household is now working harder and longer to keep on track financially, at the expense of having free time with family and friends, enjoying arts and culture, and volunteering.

"Many Canadians are simply too caught up in a time crunch to enjoy leisure and culture activities in the company of friends and family. The question raised by the results of this domain: Is that progress?" the study asks.

On the positive side, the index also revealed that Canadians feel safer than in the 1990s, and feel a stronger sense of belonging to their community. The "community vitality" index rose 20.7 per cent over the 15 years.

Education has improved, especially with university graduation rates soaring. But our international rating has declined in literacy, math and science.

While Romanow, the former NDP premier of Saskatchewan, is the face of the new index, he says the work put into the index is far from political or ideological. Rather, the data is taken from Statistics Canada and elsewhere, collected and crunched by a wide variety experts in their field. The work is recognized by the Organization for Economic Co-operation as leading edge.

The policy prescriptions, however, point to failures at every level of government over the past couple of decades, Romanow says -- adding that he, too, carries some of the blame.

"We all wear some of this."

Instead of focusing on redistributing wealth and building programs that improve quality of life for Canadians, governments are obsessed with juicing GDP, he said.

The result has been to whittle away at the vibrancy of the middle class, and undermine core Canadian values that encourage individual effort, in part, through redistribution of wealth, Romanow said.

"I think this is a yellow light. A cautionary light," he added. "We want to be able to make sure that ... our societal values are not diminished here."

Comments are now closed for this story

Grow-up
said
0 0

Waah! Waah! Waah! The rich get richer, I have nothing because it's everyone else's fault. I don't like to work hard or try to better myself so I will just cry and blame someone else. Maybe if people got off their butts and started to try to better themselves and looked in the mirror for some of their problems they would be a lot better off. I get so sick and tired of evryone out there expecting to make huge sums of money for nothing. I make huge dollars but I also work 27 days a month. And Yes, I do find time to spend with my family. It's called being responsible and getting off your butt. My mother always taught me, It's not how much you make, but rather how much you save. People, if you make 20,000 dollars a month, but spend 21000, your going broke.QUIT BUYING UNNESESSARY ITEMS, It's that simple. If there are no good jobs or it's too expensive where you live, then move.


E
said
0 0

Why should I pay for gov workers to have pentions and deluxe medical plans when I don't have it myself?


Mary
said
0 0

The sad part of this whole issue is that working harder does not make thing better for you. I hold down two jobs but by the time everyone takes their portion of my paycheque, I do not have the time, energy or money for entertainment. Cost of living keeps increasing but paycheques do not. How is this progress???



Lianne
said
0 0

@Clive, well in that case, be glad they are driving a Buick, and not a $60,000 diesel truck... and I don't think volunteer fire fighters are "part of the problem..."


KJ in Kingston Ontario
said
0 0

When you factor in the pension losses of 2008 and current "growth" in retirement savings of between 1% to 1.5% at an inflation rate of around 4% -- the future for those without civil service indexed pensions will be far below "middle class" in this country. The basic Canadian pension of $14,000 / year doesn't pay much of the property taxes, electricity, food, heat and insurance costs...... Most defined contribution pension plans don't even have a payment increase mechanism unless the return is better than 5% or 6% -- and that sort of return could be a decades away.


Doug from BC
said
0 0

Interesting reading. No one has polled me about this. I saw my income increase by 333% since 1994, when I got out of a government funded position. My life has improved each and every year, albeit through hard work.


Brian Fr Langley
said
0 0

By definition anything that offers incentives will create disparity. Alas some of us are just better educated, better trained, stronger, or just luckier. Any system that does not offer incentives causes only poverty. Why be better educated, smarter, or work harder if there is no benefit. If you wish to see true egalitarianism in action. It's in North Korea, (every one is starving equally) I also note how many folks in these protests are carrying signs saying "down with greed" Yet decrying their lower standard of living. That is they want more money. Since that's the same desire by those they hold to be "greedy" I guess what they mean is, it's common sense they should want more money, "greed" if it's someone else. The real problem here is the Government is wasting way to much money on "non productive, politically correct, nonsense, sucking the life out of the middle class. The solution is not to tax the rich. (even if you took all there money it would barely make a dent in the national wage average, and then who would be left to give us jobs) The solution is to incent the middleclass. The more money we get to keep (and spend) from producing, the better off we'll all be. Government is NOT the answer, the middle class is.


Debbie
said
0 0

Clive: they're driving Buicks because they can't afford good cars!


amir
said
0 0

The rich is getting richer, the poor is getting poorer. News at 11.


PEI Fella
said
0 0

I certainly hope that the government will do something to help the average Canadian out. I really think if they'd like to stimulate the economy and help young people get on their feet they should consider paying off the 4 Billion in Government Student Loans which would help so many young Canadians drowning in debt. They would in turn be able to take lower paying jobs and be able to start buying homes and making investments in their future. Hey it would also increase this government's popularity with this government.


Clive
said
0 0

@Lianne - I choose NOT to become part of the problem but thanks for the suggestion. BTW OFD plates are registered to the fire dept not a private person... food for thought eh?


Change is needed
said
0 0

With an estimated 1/3rd of Canadian workers in one way or another on a government payroll is it any wonder that "Joe Canuck" is being squeezed? If we don't get a grip on common sense we will implode economically like Greece. It is commonly known that in Ottawa civil 'servants' are overpaid by 30% compared to the private sector. Time for a serious head shake at what politicians are doing by allowing such discrepancies by catering to the demands of these public sector unions led by people like Nicole Turmel. Entitlement mentality?


James
said
0 0

@Clive: Civil servant aristocracy? Really? Government pay scales are all available online and while I'm sure those are princely salaries somewhere like Somalia you're blowing this way out of proportion. Were these civil servants the ones taking the lion's share of the wealth mentioned in the article? Not even close. What we have here is an example of Karl Marx's idea of a false consciousness; everyone but the upper class is being exploited but they choose to blame convenient straw men (those evil government workers) or they choose to support the people taking advantage of them. Wait for the decidedly middle class commenters to read this story and post "this is a good thing. What are you, a communist?"


Gumpy
said
0 0

This generation needs to learn how really well off they are. We have lost what the true definition of "need" is and have completely redefined "wants". We do not need a 2400 square foot house for a family of 3, we want it. We do not need all the gadgits that are available, we want them. We do not need designer cloths, we want them. This is why people are in trouble or are feeling like they are in need. Cell phones for everyone in the family are not needed, they are wanted. Think about it. My husband and I live on one income. When we want something new, we save for it. We pay for our needs, save for our wants and live debt free on one income (and we are just barely middle income with a mortgage, two cars - both paid for), one kid in university (who we are teaching to get through debt free), one kid grown up and two kids still at home.


Samantha
said
0 0

Maybe this will help give the occupy protests some legitimacy to the nay-sayers. They may not be articulating things this well, but they are saying everything pointed out in this article.


mark
said
0 0

If it's a university group led by romanow, you can read between the lines to understand that this is probably a left-wing group, and thus these results should be interpreted with caution.


Lianne
said
0 0

Clive, you are making a lot of assumptions there... I agree that the middle class is eroding, and that that is a serious problem that we are all experiencing on a daily basis, but a fanatical attack on the public service probably isn't the best course of action when forming an argument about social unrest (although it is a common one). As someone who just moved from a private sector job to a public sector position, I'm personally very excited that I can finally start paying back my student loans (despite substantial scholarships) and maybe get a safe vehicle to drive. I know a few people on social assistance driving brand-new Buicks - at least be fair in your attack. Maybe that firefighter is married to a high-paid lawyer, or surgeon, or lives in a one bedroom apartment so that he can afford a nice vehicle... or inherited a ton of money when his dad died last year. I'd LOVE to have a real discussion about these findings, but I know better than to think that will happen on a news comment feed. At least 14 people like your argument though... it's clearly easier to blame the public service, but we have to blame the private sector and its low-paid retail job status-quo too. Maybe you should run for council, or join your local volunteer fire department...


Sums it up
said
0 0

"The rich took the lion's share."What else needs to be said?


Disgusted
said
0 0

Canada is one of the most corrupt countries in the world. Don't expect things to change anytime soon.


n@whitby
said
0 0

The occupy demonstrators are well informed people trying to educate the general public about the reality of our self destructive system. The system works, just not very well and it doesn't represent the majority of the people and is therefore undemocratic. Kind of like a dictatorship, they (occupiers) are fighting for democracy, they are true heroes. I work 2 jobs to pay the rent and feed my kids. I survive I don't live. We need strong unions, stop looking with envy at people who have fought to get fare wages. Corporations will constantly try to lower their costs they're not evil that's there job. It's up to the people and government to keep corporations socially accountable for their actions.


Ron
said
0 0

A great deal of the disparity in the middle class is due to unions opting for a percentage increase as opposed to a monetary increase. Let's face it - 3% of the workers wage is a lot less than 3% of managements wage. This is causing the gap to grow with each contract. If you were to give $0.15/hr the gap would remain relatively constant.


Will
said
0 0

Quality of Life is a relative thing - something the people who wrote this forgot. A poor person can have an excellent quality of life if they are happy and a rich per can have a horrid QOL if they are miserable. In and of itself, this finding is meaningless without context. Just pot stirring by those who feel the need to create controversy. And for the record, I worked hard my entire life having started with nothing; now my family has things they would never have recieved otherwise-a work ethic, the ability to take pride in all our accomplishments no matter how small or large, and an abiding choice to contribute instead of being a drain on society - intangibles that trump any material gains sought by protesters or closeted theorists in a university backroom


concernedcitizen
said
0 0

Clive why do you think society deems it acceptable for some pro-athlete, lawyer or CEO to drive a Buick but get offended when someone who saves lives for a living drives a Buick? Shouldn't we hold people who's job is directly linked to the betterment of their communities (like firemen, cops, nurses, social workers, teachers etc) in higher esteem than those who's job is to increase profits of some mega-corporation? For way too long our society has had it's priorities backwards. We need to emphasize community service and not corporate greed.


Clive chmes in..
said
0 0

"A generation of solid economic growth has meant little in the everyday lives of most Canadians..." Do you suppose the authors have been watching the "Occupy" protests? If you are a civil servant, a cop, a fireman or public service union member you're doing great. The rest of us are paying for this new civil servant aristocracy in Canada. Yesterday I saw a new Buick Lacrosse with the plate OFD 8 (Ottawa Fire Dept) driving around. Since when do firemen drive Buicks? Over the top entitlements and out of control city councillors who spend our money on the frivolous to pamper themselves at our expense. This has to stop.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Canada Stories

A Canadian Pacific Railway employee walks along the side of a locomotive in a marshalling yard in Calgary, Wednesday, May 16, 2012. (Jeff McIntosh / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Talks between CP, union stall; Raitt prepared to step in

More   40 Comments 40    3 Video(s) 3

Victoria Shachtay, 23, died in an explosion on Friday, Nov. 25, in an Innisfail townhouse.

Man charged in parcel blast that killed Alta. mother

More  2 Video(s) 2

Nova  Scotia, body, Hillside Road, Marion Bridge

Police identify humans remains found in hockey bag

More  1 Video(s) 1

Most Talked about Stories

It is about time - as a grandparent I have watched our kids (who were allowed to fail although I do remember some nagging on our part) learn, I have watched our children now micro-manage their children. A big part of it is the fact that there are predators out there and an extreme reluctance on the parents part to alllow freedom that might result in the children becoming victims.

Harvey

Parents must learn to stop meddling, author urges