Canada -   

1
The Larsen Ice Shelf on the Antarctic Peninsula has experienced an unprecedented series of collapses. (Ted Scambos / NSIDC) They're among the most prominent and majestic features of Canada's Arctic North - but now they're disappearing at an alarming rate. Derek Mueller, a researcher and assistant professor with Carleton University appears on Canada AM, Wednesday, Sept. 28, 2011. Researchers say Canadian ice shelves are breaking up and vanishing rapidly - with a 50 per cent loss in the last six years alone They're among the most prominent and majestic features of Canada's Arctic North - but now they're disappearing at an alarming rate.

Ice shelves in Arctic disappearing faster than expected

Viewer

CTV News Video

Canada AM: Derek Mueller, Carleton University
A researcher and assistant professor with Carleton University says warmer summers, winters and open waters are the main factors related to the shrinking ice shelves, and explains why disappearing ice shelves is so concerning.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (20) Facebook   

The Larsen Ice Shelf on the Antarctic Peninsula has experienced an unprecedented series of collapses. (Ted Scambos / NSIDC) They're among the most prominent and majestic features of Canada's Arctic North - but now they're disappearing at an alarming rate. Derek Mueller, a researcher and assistant professor with Carleton University appears on Canada AM, Wednesday, Sept. 28, 2011. Researchers say Canadian ice shelves are breaking up and vanishing rapidly - with a 50 per cent loss in the last six years alone They're among the most prominent and majestic features of Canada's Arctic North - but now they're disappearing at an alarming rate.

Photos

The Larsen Ice Shelf on the Antarctic Peninsula has experienced an unprecedented series of collapses. (Ted Scambos / NSIDC)

View Larger Image

Date: Wed. Sep. 28 2011 8:46 AM ET

Canadian Arctic ice shelves have lost almost half their volume in the past six years, as part of an astonishing deterioration that an Ottawa researcher says is likely irreversible.

Derek Mueller, an assistant professor in Carleton University's Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, says the ice shelves are going through an unprecedented period of change.

"Really on a human timescale, six years is actually a long time," Mueller told CTV's Canada AM during a telephone interview from Ottawa on Wednesday morning.

"But on the scale of the thousands of years that these ice shelves are thought to have been in place, it is a massive change."

This summer alone, Canada's largest ice shelf split into two pieces and another is now nearly gone, tearing away some three billion tonnes of ice from the northern coastline.

Mueller said that researchers discovered the Arctic ice shelves more than 100 years ago, at a time when they were much larger than they are today.

While the ice shelves have faced warmer and cooler periods in the decades since, Mueller said they are now breaking down faster than ever before.

"This is a one-way process, it's already well underway. I fear that these ice shelves are basically gone," Mueller said.

Mueller said a warmer climate has helped create open water in portions of the ice shelves in recent years, which has contributed to their rapid decline.

He said the ice shelves are a natural wonder, which form a unique part of Canada's landscape.

"Beautiful rolling topography, beautiful meltwater lakes and unfortunately, it's on the way out," said Mueller.

Comments are now closed for this story

Biff
said
0 0

Love it. "...Ottawa researcher says it is likely irreversible.""Likely" based on what evidence? The melt is cyclical and is a normal feature. Imagine if this 'climatrologist' discovers that the Northern Hemisphere was once under a mile of ice. That would definitely be irreversible.Thankfully that ice won’t melt no matter how many Hummers the cave people drive. I would love to be a climatastrologist. No need to support any claim and pay cheque in the mail.


Slush
said
0 0

I think when you combine the northern lights, ice bergs and aliens then there is definitely some kind of ice-cap being sucked into the galaxy, eh? Then factor in the fact the Tim Horton's and the like have been increasing their offering of ice drinks. I think you've got it right there, eh? Big corporation taking the ice right from beneath our noses and we're paying for it. At least the Titanic 2 won't have to worry.


Mike
said
0 0

I really do get tired of this global warming nonsense. If it is happening.........fine! If it is not happening..........that's fine to! If we think that as humans we are actually creating what is happening, than I believe we are a little to high on ourselves. At best, we might slightly accelerate or decelerate something that is happening on it's own.Our sea levels rise and fall all by themselves over 150 meters during perfectly natural occurring events that we have zero control or influence over. Why is it then that we had CO2 back in the Jurassic day that was 5 times higher than now..........dinosaur farts? Where did it go? Our planet changes!! Some of you may not like that. I would suggest you spend your time becoming accustom to that fact instead of fighting it. It would be far more productive.


ahesk
said
0 0

Why is it then the dinosaur's roamed northern BC and Alberta? The valley that we live in today was formed by glaciers thousands of years ago. Where are they now? Maybe we are going back to the way it once was!! Who really knows. Yes there is a change happening, but maybe it is the way it was suppose to be. Who really knows. What we need is another ice age. But then you would need fuel to stay warm? We cannot win in either case.


rosie
said
0 0

In the geological timescale of the Earth, i believe it is only in the last few million years that there has been ice cover on the planet. Also, melting ice becomes cool water that will in turn cool the oceans,causing changes in the weather patterns globally. So how can we predict what will happen if there are so many variables for weather on the earth as well as from outside our atmosphere (cosmic rays etc)? Articles like this are purely political , masquerading as science. Its fun to read the comments though as I watch the ice cube melt in my drink making it cool and refreshing.


TheOtherLowellInBC
said
0 0

In this age of austerity budgets, conservative governments especially see environmental costs as a good place to cut. Nowhere is that more evident than in the republican party. Every last one of the leadership candidates are pushing the less environmental controls and less money spent on enviornmental regulation. Definitely not seeing the forest from the trees.


JP
said
0 0

The climate is SUPPOSED to be changing. It is SUPPOSED to change from human actions. Not that there is actually any proof the Arctic IS changing due to human influences.... it changes all the time. There is no stasis in nature.


Tim
said
0 0

Wait. So... if nearly half of the Arctic ice shelves have vanished, why haven't the sea levels risen? I thought coastal regions the world over would be flooded and millions of people displaced, yet with half of the ice gone there haven't been any mass displacements. In fact, I haven't heard (has anyone?) of any rise in sea levels at all. Anyone?


John (Red Deer, Alberta)
said
0 0

What's unusual is releasing carbon that took millions of years to sequester and dumping it back into the atmosphere in several hundred years. And as it's happening, the earth's ability to sequester carbon diminishes (acidic oceans, deforestation, etc).God basically said it's our responsibility to take care of this planet, so it's really surprising to see how many "christians" are against fixing our pollution problems. It's amazing how many "christians" pass the buck to other countries and refuse to take responsibility for themselves. It's amazing how many people call themselves "christian", yet act like the very same selfish individuals that Jesus Christ was against. He didn't sacrifice himself for our sins, just so we could keep on sinning you know.


mining guy Jim
said
0 0

Well said Jim. Nothing one-way about it. During the Jurassic Period, between 200 and 145 million years ago, the atmospheric CO2 level was more than 5 times higher than it is today. I wonder how much ice there was then? How do we know that? Look it up yourself. Start with "fluid inclusions."


Jon in London ON
said
0 0

@ One Canadian - could you send that cheque to me, made out to 'cash'? Three zeros after the number of your choice is good. It will go a long way to alleviate your guilt, trust me.


enough is enough
said
0 0

"one canadian"... Watch what you say. Most of your enviromental heros, ie Gore, Suzuki, and many others are living in there massive energy guzzling houses right now ALONG THE COAST.


Whiskey Tango Foxtrot
said
0 0

How is this a news story? The arctic ice shelf is melting, and as everybody is aware, Mr. Mueller lies, saying we have a warming climate, when truthfully there has been no increase in global temperature since 1998. One more indicator of what? Canary in a coal mine singing the same song? What song? Canaries in coal mines do not sing, they drop dead because the atmosphere is posion. Did someone die? What is a near complete loss? So microbes on the ice are in danger. These microbes spend most of the year frozen - eeking out a living. Then the shot of Bev, playing with her hair. So anyway, turns out, it doesn't really affect the polar bears. The ice flows and icebergs are travelling toward Alaska, where if they meet an oil drilling platform, there would be no contest. However, there are no oil platforms in that particular area of the planet. And Seamus almost goes into the 'proof of global warming' tangent, talking about an unrelated visit to Newfoundland, the Titanic, (he's really reaching now), but wistfully sighs...'can anything be done?- no chance of preserving them?' Are you kidding?Bottom line this researcher's lab is melting and he is terrified he won't have a job next summer taking facebook pic of himself.


Conservatives couldn't care any less
said
0 0

And the Conservative team will continue to deny that this reality is in desperate need of responsible action, and their supporters (especially one childish ranter) will take this opportunity to once again trash non-conservatives and misdirect attention away from the obvious - that being that Harper and company are genuinely not committed to the environment, global warming or alternate energy source research and action.


JB in Ontario
said
0 0

This is not a pretty picture. It does not surprise me. Losing ice shelves in the Arctic is probably going to continue with more research, boat traffic in the area and global warming. We are watching the world fall to decline with this global warming.


eddytoronto
said
0 0

With active encouragement from the Government, whole generations have now had the apocalyptic threat of climate change pushed down their throats .....Please note The Earth is hurdling in space with the Sun/Solar Winds are a constantly hitting the Earth....Eyebrows should be raised since hacked emails exposed that the science data had been manipulated to fit the theory. Alarm bells should go off when we learn that, as Vice President, Gore designed the proposed Cap and Trade system with Enrons CEO Ken Kenny Boy Lay years before the global warming theory had been introduced to the public.....Goverments are not designed or intended to protect you or the environment from global warming....Its all about them and there power over us .....


bikerborz
said
0 0

"This is a one-way process...", Muller said. I wish these people would go away. When I was going to school in the 1970s, the fear at that time was global COOLING, and the coming ice age. Moreover, if these people would look more than 50 years back, (like, say, 400 years or more), they would find documented records of such warmth here on the earth that there was citrus (lemons, limes, oranges, etc) being grown in BRITAIN! There were thriving settlements on the WEST coast of GREENLAND. Since that was the case, so long ago, how thin (or even existent) were the ice sheets then? This is a non-issue.


Kevin
said
0 0

Look, these are cycles that this part of the world has gone through in that past. I have read of diaries of sailors over 150 years ago who have travelled through these waters; and I have read of recent discoveries of ships stuck in the ice from over a century ago, which all means this is a cycle. The same sentiment was expressed of corale reefs being lost, only to find that they grow again; maybe not exactly as before but hey, volcanic eruptions, mudslides, earthquakes, hurricanes, etc change the landscape all the time. Why should the Arctic be any different?


One Canadian
said
0 0

To all those who don't believe in Global Warming, and believe that it's all a hoax... I hope your living near the ocean, your about to get a reality check!!


Jim Cripwell
said
0 0

What Dr. Mueller did not expalin was that, if the warming trend reverses and global temperatures start to decrease, the Arctic will slowly return to what it has always been in the past. The current rise of global temperatures is quite normal, and cyclical patterns have been the norm for centuries. Nothing unusual is happening.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Canada Stories

Two prominent Cardiologists in Montreal are disciplinary hearings before the Quebec College of Physicians over allegations they took money from a patient in exchange for future medical services.

Mtl. cardiologists under investigation for payments

More  1 Video(s) 1

Graham James is seen exiting the courthouse in Winnipeg, Wednesday, Feb. 22. 2012.

Graham James apologizes to victims, hockey community

More  3 Video(s) 3