Canada -   

1
A U.S. Park Police officer handcuffs and arrests a protestor over a proposed pipeline to bring tar sands oil to the U.S. from Canada, in front of the White House in Washington, Saturday, Aug. 20, 2011. (AP / Manuel Balce Ceneta) (AP /Manuel Balce Ceneta) Protesters over a proposed pipeline to bring tar sands oil to the U.S. from Canada, gather in front of the White House in Washington, Saturday, Aug. 20, 2011. (AP / Manuel Balce Ceneta) A U.S. Park Police officer handcuffs and arrests a protestor over a proposed pipeline to bring tar sands oil to the U.S. from Canada, in front of the White House in Washington, Saturday, Aug. 20, 2011. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta) In this Oct. 13, 2010, the sandhills near Mills in north central Nebraska, through which the Keystone XL pipeline is planned to be built, is shown. A man is arrested at the oil sands protest outside the White House in Washington Saturday, Aug. 20, 2011.

Arrests made at oilsands protest in Washington

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV News Channel: Jane Kleeb, activist
An environmental activist in Washington discusses the demonstrations that have been taking place outside the White House. She says the pipeline protest is a serious issue and is risking arrest to voice her opinion.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (49) Facebook   

A U.S. Park Police officer handcuffs and arrests a protestor over a proposed pipeline to bring tar sands oil to the U.S. from Canada, in front of the White House in Washington, Saturday, Aug. 20, 2011. (AP / Manuel Balce Ceneta) (AP /Manuel Balce Ceneta) Protesters over a proposed pipeline to bring tar sands oil to the U.S. from Canada, gather in front of the White House in Washington, Saturday, Aug. 20, 2011. (AP / Manuel Balce Ceneta) A U.S. Park Police officer handcuffs and arrests a protestor over a proposed pipeline to bring tar sands oil to the U.S. from Canada, in front of the White House in Washington, Saturday, Aug. 20, 2011. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta) In this Oct. 13, 2010, the sandhills near Mills in north central Nebraska, through which the Keystone XL pipeline is planned to be built, is shown. A man is arrested at the oil sands protest outside the White House in Washington Saturday, Aug. 20, 2011.

Photos

A U.S. Park Police officer handcuffs and arrests a protestor over a proposed pipeline to bring tar sands oil to the U.S. from Canada, in front of the White House in Washington, Saturday, Aug. 20, 2011. (AP / Manuel Balce Ceneta)

View Larger Image

Date: Sat. Aug. 20 2011 10:09 PM ET

Alberta's embattled oilsands are at the centre of a mass protest that began this weekend with arrests in front of the most prominent government building in the United States.

Crowds descended upon the White House early Saturday morning, prepared to spend two weeks hosting daily sit-ins to denounce a proposed pipeline that would transport oil from Alberta's oilsands to a refinery in Texas.

A young woman who travelled from Arkansas to attend the protest became the first demonstrator to be arrested as part of the protest at about 11:30 a.m., according to Tar Sands Action — the group that organized the protest. Further details about her arrest are not yet available.

By Saturday night, dozens of protestors were arrested, including outspoken environmentalist and protest organizer Bill McKibben and notable gay rights activist Dan Choi.

The demonstration, which is expected to run until Sept. 3, comes as the U.S. State Department prepares to release its final environmental analysis of the TransCanada's Keystone XL pipeline.

Protesters chanted "Hey-ho, Keystone XL has got to go," while U.S. Park Police and SWAT team officers handcuffed several demonstrators and removed them from the area. About 100 protesters were reportedly at the first sit-in on Saturday.

But Saturday's chants didn't reach the ears of U.S. President Barack Obama, who is currently on vacation with his family over 780 kilometres away in Martha's Vineyard. The Obama family is expected to return late next week.

Crude awakenings

Environmentalists have condemned the oilsands, accusing them of being the world's biggest emitter of carbon and responsible for so-called "dirty" oil.

Alberta Environment spokesman Mark Cooper has brushed off the suggestions that the oilsands emit excessive amounts of carbon, accusing the coal industry of being far dirtier.

In 2009, a single coal plant in China produced roughly the same greenhouse gas emissions as the entire oilsands industry, he said.

Supporters of the oil and gas industry also stress that the proposed pipeline project will create jobs and are a boon to the economy.

Alykhan Velshi, who runs EthicalOil.org, said that it's a contentious issue and one worth millions to the Canadian economy.

"The choice Americans have to make, is do they want to get their oil from ethical sources like Canada, or from conflict oil regimes like Saudi Arabia or Venezuala," Velshi told CTV Vancouver on Saturday night.

The U.S. State Department is tasked with making a decision on the pipeline because it crosses an international border. After it produces its assessment, President Obama will have 90 days to determine whether approving the pipeline is in his country's national interest.

Jane Kleeb, a member of Tar Sands Action, said the mass sit-ins are necessary to pressure Obama into squashing the $7-billion proposal.

"The pipeline is a dangerous threat to our land and water," she told CTV News Channel in a phone interview from Washington on Saturday.

"We need to be focused on American-made energy and sustainable energy and tarsands is not that at all," she said.

Organizers say some 1,500 names have been registered to participate in the Washington protests, some of which are big names in Hollywood.

Oscar-nominated actor Mark Ruffalo is asking people to get involved in the sit-ins.

In a YouTube clip posted earlier this week, Ruffalo calls on Americans to "put your principles into action" and join him in opposing the proposed pipeline.

Canadian-born actress Margot Kidder has said she'll also be involved with the protests. "Lethal Weapon" actor Danny Glover has voiced interest in the protests as well.

With files from CTV Vancouver's Sarah Galashan

Comments are now closed for this story

rosco in saskatoon
said
0 0

too bad these protestors don't have the guts to protest in places like china, where the real pollutors are.


My Own Anti-Con Drivel
said
0 0

Former Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff supported oilsands development, believed that it is an important Canadian natural resource, and felt that those who advocate shutting the industry down don't "live in the real world," as "green energy" remains inadequate at present, and modern society still demands and requires plenty of oil. He felt that oil would be a major necessity for some time, and that Canada's oilsands product should represent a key export for some time. Ultimately, to Mr. Ignatieff, it all came down to regulative impositions from Ottawa and the establishment of a formal, well-funded monitoring program. Wait. That's pretty much EXACTLY the current Conservative government's position. In fact, Harper & Company have already implemented those two requisites, and are committed to furthering efforts to mitigate the environmental impact of Alberta's oilsands industry. (Actually, the Premier of Alberta has been rather concerned that Harper & Company is crimping the province's commercial style, and should back off.) Oh, never mind. I just voided "my own opinion."


Louisestte Lanteigne
said
0 0

For generations the oil industry subsidies have used up more taxpayer money for years while externalizing the related health impacts onto Canadian Taxpayers. Wind, Solar, Geothermal don't make people sick like smog does. We can and must do better for the sake of our future. Investing in a pipe that will need to be replaced in 60 years or less is a waste. I support the protesters.


KA
said
0 0

We should just focus on Asia - and publicize it. Then we don't have to play games with the earth worshippers.


Reality Check
said
0 0

I'm no tree hugging environmentalist but the reality is the oil industry has a dismal environmental record in Alberta. Whenever environmental issues are brought up by the government or the public the oil industry immediately threatened the Alberta government with big oil industry job losses if stringent environmental regulations were adopted. The Alberta government would immediately fold like a cheap card table and cove to the Oil Industry. The problem now is that the oil indusry does not exert the same influence south of the border. If you need more proof of the oil industries indifference to the environment see if you can name any top Oil Executive who live downstream from a major Oil project. One other dirty little secret the oil industry doesn't want the public to know is the large number of top jobs like engineering, finance and geology that have been outsourced to places like India while the Oil Industry still takes handouts from the Alberta Government to supposedly save these same jobs for Alberta.


Freeman
said
0 0

In a warped way the protesters are right. We shouldn't ship our oil to Texas for refining. We should refine it here in Alberta and keep the jobs in Canada. We could also help the Chinese reduce their pollution by selling them our clean oil products to replace their poor quality coal. India is also starved for oil and the Middle East is very unstable.
No problem US enviro people we can refine our own and sell it elsewhere. You can use your so clean shale gas and Californicate crude.


Jarge From Krinkle Cove
said
0 0

I lived and grew up in Ft McMurray and I do not condone this catastrophe upon our environment either. I personally was a part of a Union working Pipe fitting at Suncor ) My Father Retired From) and seen atrocities that if were matched at the Scottsford, would have been considered mass environmental factors, instead people covered head to toe in mistakes like exploding pipes geysering Glycol 40 feet in the air and covering everything, including people. In Scottsford they would dig a hole 6 by 6 just for a small tiny leak for the seriousness of it and Syncrude and Suncor is miles from any eyes. THAT IS A FACT!
A Pamphlet of University degree was given to us and after studying it, I found recommendation for masks of 5 day a work week. We were their for weeks not stop, LIVING onsite with pollution that would decimate complete forests, only on one side of the trees. When I mentioned it and showed the facts, I was literally told to shut up and shunned if I tried to wear a mask by my own fellow employees, ignorance at this level is terrifying to me and the future of my family. I have seen for my own eyes and when questioned the evidence in front, the next documents on facts was 3 pages of gibberish. Please People for the Love of this Country, Stop and Think, you cannot eat MONEY!


B in Ottawa
said
0 0

The US would be stupid to reject this pipeline. They need Canadian oil. The protesters are saying that they are in favour of $2/litre gas, job losses in Canada and a further weakening of the North American economy. No sensible person would agree with those radical views. Put in the pipe and get on with life.


the gambler
said
0 0

If we have to transport the oil let's refine it here (lesser of evils), and the other part was that I lived in Japan in the early eighties and noticed that many private residences had solar panels ...in the early eighties ...solar panels! ...way back then! Shouldn't we be trying harder???


jayme
said
0 0

Lawbreakers!!!
You can't make a judgement call one way or the other by just the few pics.


the gambler
said
0 0

Oh yeah, one more thing. If it was only about money, why wouldn't we forget the pipeline, forget the protests, and save babies in Somalia?


Lawbreakers!!!
said
0 0

so much for the US constitution's freedoms of expression and free speech! Other than chanting the protesters appear not to be breaking any laws (at least none were indicated to have been broken in the news article). Wouldn't you think that would be the media's first question "what laws have they broken to be arrested?". Nope, not a whimper. Just plain old "rip and write" (originally rip it off the teletype and read it on the air but altered to reflect the print and online media)


David
said
0 0

These people should be barred from ever being able to purchase a petroleum product, for 2 years minimum; this includes plastics and making them walk to the jail house vs riding in the "paddy wagon". No, they couldn't use a battery powered car either after all the battery casing are made with plastic not to mention most of the car.


Johnny in Montreal
said
0 0

Throw the book at them and jail them for life. The clueless are always paranoid and protesting. The more idiots are jailed for life and off the streets, the better the world will function.


Ben, Edmonton
said
0 0

Unfortunate that mass misinformation disseminated by disgruntled environmentalists has caused so many people to waste their time.


Jayme
said
0 0

My own opinion
My issue is people say they should fight this yet very few say they should refuse oil from other countrys.


Syl
said
0 0

Let's make it really easy for our dear 'friends' in the good old USA and refuse to sell them any oil, or gas either for that matter. They would soon come begging. China I am sure, would not care too much if their oil came from wells, oil sands or even tar sands if came to that.


jayme
said
0 0

Bert
This would create a large amount of jobs in the states which is needed.As for green energy sure its nice but its not cheap and the states is not in good shape spending billions on green energy would not be best move now.


rick in a.b.
said
0 0

How much is this protest costing the city of washington tax payers,for policing.


mikel
said
0 0

oh well, China and India will be more than happy to buy it.


Telegram Sam
said
0 0

Folks - The reference "TAR SANDS" is incorrect Tar is a man made product. Oil sands is correct and I work smack dab in the middle of it! If you're going to protest and form sit ins at least educate yourselves and get all the facts straight.


mark
said
0 0

In the meantime, Americans continue to pay outrageously rising prices for oil and gas at the pumps, all while increasing the coffers of people who hate them and sponsor state terrorism (Saudi Arabia anyone?) that targets their citizens. All of this whilst next door to a northern neighbour with huge reserves and a strong ethical track record. How much longer can these lefties shoot themselves in the foot?


kiwi
said
0 0

america needs oil and have large oil producing countries shutting the door on them for reasonable priced oil, if they dont want the pipe line thats fine by me, im sick and tired of seeing our resources being sent across the border at a better rate then we canadians get it for, i say we save our oil and look for other countries that are not broke and can actually afford it and will pay the actual price and not discounted, plus the advances in clean fuel technology is happening here in canada more so then anywhere else in the world, smarten up america you need the fuel to get your arses out of the big deep debt hole your in


ALLAN
said
0 0

Those enviro-nuts protest just for the sake of protesting. They haven't got the foggiest idea of what is coming from the oil sands, let alone its value to themselves. Not only does our Bitumen create jobs for them (processing the raw product into fuels, etc), it also makes them less dependant on Mid East oil. Oh, one more thing---why don't you spend your resources on alternative energy sources that are really viable?


Mofichi
said
0 0

Since Ralph Kline and Steven Harper are icons of the Insatiable Need for Greed and expressed their traits by refusing to share Alberta's OilSand wealth with the rest of Canadians by offering all Canadians equal access to Canadian Resources, I think these iconic INFG dictators should have their John Warkinton's peeled like taters.


Dominic
said
0 0

I agree with some folks here. We SHOULD NEVER export a raw material like oil and ESPECIALLY bitumen that we can turn into oil and gas right here. Exporting bitumen is equivalent to exporting trees in my books and the Alberta government needs to strap on a set and say NO!! Upgrade it and refine it right here.


Bert
said
0 0

" Supporters of the oil and gas industry also stress that the proposed pipeline project will create jobs and are a boon to the economy." Here we go again. The all mighty dollar is more important then the environment. Typical human thinking. Why not create jobs with clean, renewable energy?


Dave in Courtenay
said
0 0

Any oil extracted will ultimately be burned, so why not burn it here in Canada to generate electricity. Export the surplus electric power at a far lower transmission construction and environmental risk than a pipeline.


trublmaker
said
0 0

Let's see now... all these protesters arrived by some mode of transportation that probably used an oil product of some sort. So go home and shut up


Jayme
said
0 0

Bob,Calgary,Alberta
I do find it odd there on the verge of a depression yet some are willing to say no to a project that would create 20,000 jobs.


cixcents
said
0 0

nothing worse than hearing vehemence from hypocritical Americans.Canada's oil is dirty?well try filling your SUV tank with some cheap soya milk and feel hearty about it.Most Americans are not hypocritical. Only a handful righteous few.


terry
said
0 0

It's longer overdue that Harper addresses the Americans... they (the Americans) live in this little world called me me me.... without having any knowledge of what they are protesting. I for one am sick and tired of hearing about it. Let's, as true patriotic Canadians, start refining from this end and ask them to pay the premium.


reidjr
said
0 0

American Pie
If the states was in good shape you could say yes go aginst this and invest in green energy that would be the right thing to do in many ways.How ever the states is not in good shape they really should not be spending money on green energy now so look at the jobs it will create now which are badley neede dint he states this is the right move.


American Pie
said
0 0

Most Americans do NOT want this going through our country! It's horrible and dangerous and the response time to any kind of mishap can be up to 6 hours, with an 800 number given for assistance. I dont think this is in America's best interest. It's dirty energy and we want NO part of it. yes we need jobs. Green, responsible jobs. The oil industry is a dirty business. No thank you.


BoSt
said
0 0

The Enbridge pipeline to the west coast is supposed to be built to let China ship bitumen out of the Alberta Tar Sands. This oil will be tankered down to the same refineries outside of New Orleans that handle the Venezuelan heavy oil right now, the same refineries that will be on the receiving end of the Keystone XL pipeline. China will demand a cut-rate on the price of the oil in order to do this.
Why doesn't Canada just refine this oil on-site at the Tar Sands? Seems like that would be less expensive overall and will keep permanent jobs (not just temporary construction jobs)in Canada.


BC in BC
said
0 0

A big plastic sign(oil), big bold letters(oil), sungalsses(oil)shoes, sandals, plastic bags,napsacks, cellphones. Hummmmmmmmm


john
said
0 0

The left wing envirokooks dont get and never will. Enough said


Nevin in Alberta
said
0 0

Yes, I'm sure they all arrived in Washington without the aid of any internal-combustion engine powered vehicles. They are all HYPOCRITES, these left-wing radicals!


Bob,Calgary,Alberta
said
0 0

So the hollywood bozos, many of whom never finished university, are out in force protesting about something they know nothing about, and the American people who worship the academy of pretty faces, follow along like little puppies to protest against a country and province they also know nothing about. There is something excessively stupid about the U.S. Their economy is on life support and they don't want a pipeline that will create thousands of jobs. They would rather support jobs in the auto industry that is responsible for the carbon bogeyman even more than the OIL SANDS. Stephen Harper must aggresively sell Canada to other countries so we can wean ourselves away from economic dependence on a country that is so misguided that they have caused one recession and appear about to cause another.


MikeInBC
said
0 0

Why build the pipeline? Refine the oil here and put Canadians to work then ship the finished product to the Far East.We don't need this and the oil sands workers will agree.


Redneck Albertan
said
0 0

I hope the US does refuse to allow the XL pipeline. That means in the long run, the raw product can be upgraded here, creating more employment. Then we can ship it to their market by whatever means they wish.


kev
said
0 0

Do they think their horizontal projects are any cleaner? There are several documentaries on how dirty the cutting pools are in the south. The tar sands are VERY clean compared to the size of the operations. These people are just following random notions, perhaps they should look for work before their crooked banks re-po their hummers and over-sized SUVs


Chad
said
0 0

I wonder how these celebrities are going to get to this protest. Are they flying, driving, taking the bus, oh they must be walking if they are so against oil production.


Pip
said
0 0

If they end up deciding they don't want our oil, I'm sure Japan and China would love it. Build the pipeline to out west coast. Hopefully saner heads will prevail and realize that Canadian oil, "dirty" or not is a secure supply. Then the US can benefit two ways - secure oil and thousands of jobs building and maintaining the pipeline.


Donna Jonas
said
0 0

This pipeline construction will only create 20,000 jobs. Hello??? The US has millions of people out of work. And, when the pipeline is built, those people will then be out of job. And, who will profit from it, the oil industry, the Republicans in the US Congress, you name it. Then when there is an oil spill in any of these states, who ends up losing, the common man of America.


Camwest
said
0 0

I wonder where the Tarsands Action Group received their funding from? China will do anything to disrupt the Americans. Coal is dirtier.


Saskmike
said
0 0

Maybe it's time to turn the tap off....OH wait, they'll just invade us...just kidding. The fact of the matter is that they need oil and these same people that protest didn't walk to this assembly, they took some form of transportation that uses oil. ELECTRICTY takes some form of energy to produce forward motion as well. Lets get together.


My own opinion
said
0 0

American's should be fighting this! All the power to them with this one. The oilsands are our pathetic environmental mess - complete with the blessing from our right honourable Prime Minister Harper and his ministerial jesters who just don't "get it" (and likely never will).


Art in Alberta
said
0 0

So American people will have to build / assemble the pipeline from their border to the Texas refinary. American workers will have added work in the refinary possibly adding to the refinary's workforce. All this in a time of horrific economic forecasts. Hmmm...what would I do if I were Obama. Of course the pipeline should pass approval. No oil is clean and the progress of the oilsands company regarding environmental concerns has drastically improved over the years.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Canada Stories

A Canadian Pacific Railway employee walks along the side of a locomotive in a marshalling yard in Calgary, Wednesday, May 16, 2012. (Jeff McIntosh / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Talks between CP, union stall; Raitt prepared to step in

More   38 Comments 38    2 Video(s) 2

Victoria Shachtay, 23, died in an explosion on Friday, Nov. 25, in an Innisfail townhouse.

Man charged in parcel blast that killed Alta. mother

More  2 Video(s) 2

Nova  Scotia, body, Hillside Road, Marion Bridge

Police identify humans remains found in hockey bag

More  1 Video(s) 1

Most Talked about Stories

It is about time - as a grandparent I have watched our kids (who were allowed to fail although I do remember some nagging on our part) learn, I have watched our children now micro-manage their children. A big part of it is the fact that there are predators out there and an extreme reluctance on the parents part to alllow freedom that might result in the children becoming victims.

Harvey

Parents must learn to stop meddling, author urges