Canada -
News Sections
U.S. downgrade fuels partisan sparring
CTV News Video
|
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
CTV News.ca Staff
Date: Sat. Aug. 6 2011 7:45 PM ET
Republicans and Democrats were quick to point fingers at one another after the United States' credit rating suffered its first-ever downgrade, a blow to the nation's delicate economic recovery.
The quarrel comes on the heels of Standard & Poor's decision to knock the U.S.'s top-shelf AAA rating down one notch to AA-plus after markets closed on Friday. The downgrade came four days after U.S. lawmakers agreed on a plan to reduce the nation's debt by more than $2 trillion.
In a statement, the agency cited "difficulties in bridging the gulf between political parties" as a major reason for the demotion. But Republicans and Democrats didn't hesitate to use S&P's report to attack one another.
House Speaker John Boehner pinned the downgrade on the Democratic Party, suggesting that it hasn't directly addressed the nation's debt problem.
"It is my hope this wake-up call will convince Washington Democrats that they can no longer afford to tinker around the edges of our long-term debt problem," Boehner said in a statement.
On the other side, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid avoided calling out the Republicans by name. Instead, he said that the credit downgrade proved the importance of the Democratic Party's approach to fiscal policy -- a mix of raising taxes and budget cuts.
S&P said it isn't confident that U.S. lawmakers can turn their recent debt-ceiling agreement into "a broader fiscal consolidation plan that stabilizes the government's debt dynamics anytime soon."
Political fodder
Early reaction from the White House on Saturday didn't refer to the downgrade directly. Instead, a prepared statement indicated that President Barack Obama thinks Washington "must do better" in tackling the nation's deficit.
Despite the careful response, sources in the Treasury Department told The Associated Press that the Obama administration was clearly angered by S&P's downgrade decision.
Administration sources, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, told AP that S&P's credit rating analysis was based on flawed calculations.
"A judgment flawed by a $2 trillion error speaks for itself," the Treasury said in a statement.
But S&P's decision has already been used as fuel by potential contenders in the U.S. 2012 presidential race.
Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann, a member of the so-called Tea Party wing of the Republican Party, immediately called on Obama to submit a plan to balance the U.S. budget, not just reduce deficits.
Meanwhile, Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney said the credit downgrade was the "latest casualty" in Obama's failed economic leadership.
Lack of leadership and partisan bickering should foot at least part of the blame for the U.S. credit downgrade and the resulting financial jitters, said Queens University political science professor Grant Amyot.
"There's been a lack of political will to put through the changes needed to address the deficit problem," Amyot told CTV News Channel on Saturday.
"This is very different from European countries like Greece whose economies are just too weak to bear the burden of debt that they've assumed," he said.
While the downgrade has added to U.S. economic tension, Amyot said it might be the jolt that lawmakers need to compromise and make decisions more efficiently.
Downgrade fallout
The downgrade, which S&P has been warning the U.S. about since April, arrived just after the U.S. Department of Labor announced that the country had added 117,000 jobs in July.
Any optimism from the announcement was eclipsed by S&P's credit report, which shook a nation that's been struggling to recover from financial turmoil since 2008.
Investors worldwide are already showing signs that they're hesitant to trade with the vulnerable U.S. greenback. The Dow Jones Industrial average fell 699 points this week, the most since the height of the financial crisis in October 2008.
Meanwhile, foreign holders of U.S. debt are calling upon the hyper-partisan nation to solve their financial woes. China demanded Saturday that America tighten its belt and confront its "addiction to debts" in a statement carried by the nation's state-run news agency.
China currently owns $1.2 trillion of U.S. Treasury debt, the largest stake of any central bank.
But some financial research groups say that the reaction to the U.S. downgrade must be carefully measured.
In a report released Friday, Capital Economics said that that U.S. credit downgrade will shock global markets but isn't a doomsday scenario.
The group predicts that any spike in Treasury yields or fall in the dollar should be short-lived.
"Once the dust settles, attention will turn back to the economic fundamentals, which are certainly consistent with low Treasury yields," Capital Economics said in the report.
Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard shares the opinion that investors shouldn't make hasty decisions in the wake of the U.S. downgrade.
In a Saturday news conference, Gillard emphasized that the U.S. has only been downgraded by one credit rating agency. The nation still retains its AAA rating with agencies like Moody's and Fitch.
"I think people just need to look at all the facts," she told reporters.
With files from The Associated Press
User Tools
Related Stories
Most Popular
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
It is about time - as a grandparent I have watched our kids (who were allowed to fail although I do remember some nagging on our part) learn, I have watched our children now micro-manage their children. A big part of it is the fact that there are predators out there and an extreme reluctance on the parents part to alllow freedom that might result in the children becoming victims.
Email
Comments are now closed for this story
barefoot guy
said
The problem with your argument is that governments are NOT the institutions that need to decide how to risk money that isn't theirs. And governments starting projects doesn't cure the real problem, which is getting government out of the way in order for people to take risks and start businesses that add real value, as determined by people spending money on goods/services of their choice. If governments were the solution (for jobs as you say) then we could easily get the government to hire all unemployed people to dig and refill ditches. We'd have 100% employment!
CD
said
Matt Miller
said
Sam C
said
Chris
said
Mimi2005
said
Redneck Albertan
said
Retired in Burlington
said
Jebus Widowmaker
said
Rob in Calgary
said
jimmer
said
Linda in Vancouver
said
Get Real
said
Concerned Canadian
said
CK
said
Joe from Montreal
said
KC BC
said
Doug ^^^ BC
said
Jack - AB
said
Simon S
said
Jack - AB
said
T Payne
said
dante v
said
Michael
said
Glenn in Winnipeg
said
Rob in Calgary
said
Marg
said
Mike
said
lynnees
said
Calvin
said
Jim - North Saanich, BC
said
Paul ~ Kitchener
said
Ryan, Guelph
said
RZ
said
race to the bottom
said
Just get a divorce already
said
Doug On
said
Mark
said
Bobby Gee
said
jimbo
said
sandy
said
TK
said
chel in the Peg
said
Ian in N.B.
said
Henry
said
Gerry from MB.but not NDP.
said
Mexican Gringo
said
Frankie, Guelph
said
MAE in Ontario
said
RGB Toronto
said
Rene
said
Prof. Pye Chartt
said
Don Fierro
said
Anthony
said
oh oh
said
leon de los reyes Jr
said
Paul
said
Dave
said