Canada -   

1

Baird swaps celebrated paintings with image of Queen

A portrait of the Queen hangs on the Sovereign's Wall at the entrance to the Department of Foreign Affairs building in Ottawa, Tuesday, July 26, 2011. (Adrian Wyld / THE CANADIAN PRESS) (Sean Kilpatrick/THE CANADIAN PRESS)
A portrait of the Queen hangs on the Sovereign's Wall at the entrance to the Department of Foreign Affairs building in Ottawa, Tuesday, July 26, 2011. (Adrian Wyld / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

View Larger Image

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (15) Facebook   

Selected Comment

I'm a monarchist, but I think this is a silly move. The current portrait of the Queen is mediocre at best. The monarchy is best for Canada because it just works, precisely because it is tucked away most of the time. That being said, put the Queen's portrait in airports and ports of entry, where visitors to our country will actually see it.

John in TO

Baird swaps celebrated paintings with image of Queen

talking about
Baird swaps celebrated paintings with image of Queen

Date: Tuesday Jul. 26, 2011 9:34 PM ET

OTTAWA — Foreign service staff and art lovers are grumbling about new Minister John Baird's decorating tastes inside the lobby of his department.

A pair of historic paintings by Quebec modern master Alfred Pellan were removed from their decades-old spot and replaced by a 2002 photo portrait of the Queen late last month.

The change was ordered before the visit of Prince William and Kate in late June, and took some staff by surprise when they entered the Lester B. Pearson Building after the long weekend.

The large, brightly-coloured Pellan paintings, called "Canada West Canada East," show two coasts -- one with details such as totem poles and the Coastal Mountains, the other featuring fishermen, moose and sailboats.

They have hung in the spot above the reception desk since the Queen opened the building in 1973, and the faint outlines of the works are still visible on the brown stone wall around her newly-hung photograph.

The Pellans were originally commissioned for the first Canadian mission in Brazil for its opening in 1944. Pellan had just fled Paris and the Second World War to return to his native Quebec.

Foreign service officers who spoke on condition of anonymity said the decision was taken quickly, and with little consultation with the department beforehand. They griped about the optics of removing a quintessentially Canadian piece that greeted foreign visitors, and replacing it with an photo image of the monarch.

Chris Day, a spokesman for Baird, said his boss was a "huge fan" of Canadian art but that the wall has a new designation.

"The Sovereign's Wall is a tribute that befits our head of state, Queen Elizabeth II, in recognition of her upcoming diamond jubilee in 2012," Day said in an email. "It was also established as a recognition of the visit of the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge to the Pearson Building on July 1."

Robert Finch, dominion chairman of the Monarchist League of Canada, applauded the move, saying there haven't been nearly enough portraits of the Queen visible in Canadian government buildings -- including the Governor General's residence at Rideau Hall.

This particular portrait was taken during her Golden Jubilee visit to Canada in 2002, and shows her standing before a Canadian flag and wearing Canadian insignia.

"To have a portrait of the Queen in a public building reinforces subtly, or explicitly frankly, the fact that the Queen is the head of state, the fact that the Queen is really the person who personifies the Canadian government," Finch said.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper's Conservative government has emphasized respect for traditional Canadian symbols, including the military, the monarchy, and the North.

The Pellan paintings are in storage, but Day said they would be displayed elsewhere in the future, "as there is great demand and competing interest for them across government."

Pellan is regarded as one of Canada's most important, pioneering modern artists. Since his death in 1988, he's had a federal riding named after him as well as several public spaces in Quebec. Commuters in Montreal's Place des Arts Metro station might be familiar with his large stained glass mural, and another is visible to the public at the National Library of Canada.

Pellan biographer Germain Lefebvre called it "crazy" that Pellan's paintings had been taken down and replaced with a photograph that can be seen elsewhere.

"Alfred Pellan is the man who brought modernity in art to Quebec and Canada, when he returned from Paris in 1940," Lefebvre said.

"We were still in the Group of Seven period during those years, and he arrived with all this background in European modernism, with surrealism, with cubism, with all the influences of Matisse and Cezanne and all the great European painters. That was almost unknown here."

Fellow Pellan historian Reesa Greenberg said she worries about the direction the Department of Foreign Affairs has taken in recent years away from cultural diplomacy. The Conservatives have eliminated two programs to promote Canadian artists abroad, PromArt and Trade Routes.

She said Pellan had been an excellent choice for the reception area of the department.

"He's long been involved with federal projects, and that is of course what distinguishes him from Paul-Emile Borduas, who is another major Quebec artists of the 1940s. Borduas was a separatist and Pellan was a deep, deep federalist," said Greenberg.

"The appeal of Pellan I would think for the government was, here was an artist who had lived in Paris for over a decade, and came back as a result of World War II, and he was very much representative of an internationalist style when he came back to Canada, so in some ways an ideal choice for an international presence."

Finch of the Monarchist League said Canadian art has plenty of other venues, and the portrait of the Queen is refreshing.

"At the end of the day, it's not an art gallery," Finch said. "As much as some people may prefer to see pictures from various artists, we have lots of galleries and museums right across the country."

Comments are now closed for this story

John Shearer
said
0 0

Paul Emile Borduas was not a separatist. While the manifesto that Borduas and a group of Quebec artists and intellectuals wrote gave impetus to the “Quiet Revolution” , Borduas considered himself a Canadian. Borduas said “..after my first trip to Europe, more Canadian than French merely Canadian just like my compatriots”. Francois-Marc Gagnon, the leading expert on Borduas discusses this in a 1977 article ( Vangaurd #6 p. 3-5 ). Borduas felt Quebec must make a new future for itself in North America. He also wrote to Claude Gauvreau that “A French future is no longer possible....as I see it the die is cast” ( translated in “ Paul Emile Borduas Writings 1942-1958” by Francois-Marc Gagnon, p. 155.


chuck perry
said
0 0

This is a step backwards in our countries independence. Why have great Canadian symbolism snuffed out in favor of an archaic monarchist institution which currently plays a traditionalist role in our country at best. Lets move forward and grow as an independent nation. No more wallowing in past tradition. Lets establish new icons of greatness that are uniquely Canadian.


devil's advocate
said
0 0

The one thing you can bank on is that in the petty moronic world of politics, if "party A" put it up "party B" will tear it down, stomp on it and replace it with something they like better. Don't waste time looking for reasons or meaning in the move, that would bely some actual thought went into the process vs knee-jerk, in-your-face partisan nonsense.


Guelph Observer
said
0 0

I'm disappointed that Mr. Baird has nothing better to do in his important portfolio than to swap paintings in the lobby. But, typical of a NeoCon - avoid substance and focus on style...


Prof. Pye Chartt
said
0 0

I've been sitting in my wood-paneled study for some time now, having loosened my cravat, smoked my menthol pipe, enjoyed an imported liqueur, and quietly pontificated over this very issue of "art." My judgmental conclusion is that I don't give a damn. The monarchy makes me nauseous, but, Queen Elizabeth is our grand dame. The works in question will find another governmental home, and all will be good in this fair land. Let the anti-Conservative nibs and the artsie-fartsies (with their unsurprising proclamations of "importance") blow a gasket. I bid you, thus, a gracious good evening.


J.C.
said
0 0

The Queen's picture should be there, and I'm sure there must be room in the building for the art that they moved. Maybe it could be on another wall in the same room. I wonder why this article does not state where the other art was moved to!!


Charlie in NS
said
0 0

If the reverse had happened, would the media even have bothered to report it? A reality check is in order here & I'm willing to bet that a large percentage of Canadians don't care. Do a poll on it. You don't need elections for polls.


Alexandria
said
0 0

I wonder why this French Canadian artist did not stay in France and join the freedom fighters of France? He lived in their country for a decade surely he owed them something.His painting could be hung in the Museum of Man which is a Federal Building in Hull Quebec.I like to see the Queen's picture in all our federal Buildings and in Provincial building too.


pasquinel
said
0 0

Mention the name John BAIRD, and the left hemorrages. How funny is that


raj
said
0 0

I dont see the problem. I love the Queen, and didn't we just have 9 media filled days of her grandson and his wife?whats he problem again


Niagara George
said
0 0

I'm surprised Baird didn't put up a picture of himself.


Ry in the Hammer
said
0 0

I completely agree with this. As our Head of State, that should be the first picture anyone sees. It's no different walking into a building in the United States (seeing Obama's picture) or in Australia, New Zealand or the UK (seeing the Queen's picture). If at minimum the Queen's portrait is prominently displayed in the lobby of our City Hall, why would her portrait not appear in the lobby of a building and department that accredits foreign mission heads in HER name?


United kingdom of CANADA?
said
0 0

Something serious is going on with CON servative government. It seems they do not have any respect for Canada. They bow before the queen of another country.


John in TO
said
0 0

I'm a monarchist, but I think this is a silly move. The current portrait of the Queen is mediocre at best. The monarchy is best for Canada because it just works, precisely because it is tucked away most of the time. That being said, put the Queen's portrait in airports and ports of entry, where visitors to our country will actually see it.

Dave in Edmonton
said
0 0

How about we put the Canadian pictures on our money and replace the image of the queen?


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Canada Stories

Two prominent Cardiologists in Montreal are disciplinary hearings before the Quebec College of Physicians over allegations they took money from a patient in exchange for future medical services.

Mtl. cardiologists under investigation for payments

More  1 Video(s) 1

Graham James is seen exiting the courthouse in Winnipeg, Wednesday, Feb. 22. 2012.

Graham James apologizes to victims, hockey community

More  3 Video(s) 3