Canada -   

1
(Graham Hughes/The CANADIAN PRESS) The Champlain Bridge spans the Saint Lawerence river in Montreal, Friday, March 18, 2011. (The CANADIAN PRESS/Graham Hughes) Liberal leader Bob Rae says the government needs to replace the Champlain Bridge (July 14, 2011) Champlain Bridge

Liberals want Montreal's Champlain Bridge replaced

Viewer

CTV News Video

Canada AM: Robert Fife in Ottawa
CTV's Ottawa bureau chief says it has been learned that to replace the bridge it would cost 1.3 billion, and explains how there are questions as to why there was no action during stimulus program.
CTV National News: Genevieve Beauchemin
The Champlain Bridge is a fundamental route in Montreal and has been around for five decades. To keep the bridge from falling, Ottawa has gone public with the high costs.
CTV Montreal: Cindy Sherwin on the bridge
Interim Liberal Leader Bob Rae and his Quebec lieutenant Denis Coderre slammed the federal government's report on the Champlain Bridge as being incomplete. Cindy Sherwin reports.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (63) Facebook   

(Graham Hughes/The CANADIAN PRESS) The Champlain Bridge spans the Saint Lawerence river in Montreal, Friday, March 18, 2011. (The CANADIAN PRESS/Graham Hughes) Liberal leader Bob Rae says the government needs to replace the Champlain Bridge (July 14, 2011) Champlain Bridge

Photos

(Graham Hughes/The CANADIAN PRESS)

View Larger Image

Date: Thu. Jul. 14 2011 6:19 PM ET

Liberal MPs are demanding the federal government immediately begin the process needed to replace the degrading Champlain Bridge near Montreal.

The party's interim leader Bob Rae says the Harper government has spent five years dithering instead of getting the aging bridge on a fast-track to being replaced.

The bridge, which crosses the Saint Lawrence River and the Saint Lawrence Seaway canal system, has been a source of public concern since the release this spring of a report that warned it's at risk of collapse.

This week, federal Transport Minister Denis Lebel refused to release another report analyzing the safety of the Bridge, saying he didn't want the public to worry unnecessarily. But his comments had the opposite effect: His remarks further fed local concern.

So on Wednesday, in a surprise about-face, the government decided to release the Pre-feasibility Study Concerning the Replacement of the Existing Champlain Bridge, written in February 2011.

The report says it would cost as much as $25 million per year over the next decade simply to prolong the life of the bridge. It said even with that amount of annual maintenance, it wouldn't be enough to improve "the level of seismic performance" or rehabilitate the bridge deck.

Rae and Quebec MP Denis Coderre, who is the Liberal party's Transport, Infrastructure and Communities critic say the time to get started on a process to replace the 49-year-old bridge is now.

"The question is not whether or not a new bridge is needed, but rather when the working group's proposals will be submitted," Rae said in a statement Thursday.

Later, he told reporters that the government has other reports that have not been made public.

"Even now we do not have all the information which is at the base of these reports," said Rae. "...The fact remains that we have wasted five years -- five years in which work has not been done."

Coderre said even if the government were to decide today to replace the span, it would take years to complete mandatory environmental impact studies before construction actually began.

With about 160,000 crossings a day, the Champlain Bridge is the busiest bridge in Canada. Rae says those who use the bridge need to be assured it's safe.

"Champlain Bridge users have had enough," concluded Rae. "They have the right to know the condition of the infrastructure they use every day, if the road they travel every morning and evening is safe and, above all, they have the right to know the government's time frame for finally building a new Champlain Bridge."

A new bridge is expected cost about $1.3 billion. An alternate plan, to build a tunnel under the rivers and canal would cost $1.9 billion. Both estimates include the $155-million cost of demolishing the existing span.

Comments are now closed for this story

SF Thomas
said

This is actually a smart thing for the liberals to go after. While I'm from Eastern Ontario, I went to Montreal about a year ago and saw the shape that bridge was in. It needs to be replaced badly. It is a major issue for traffic in general and given the importance of the bridge there are economic repercussions for other parts of Canada as well. Major infrastructure projects like this often have multilateral funding agreements. While the most recent election is gone and the topic of the status quo, the economy and deficits seemed to dominate (it is still dubious if the debt will be paid down within the conservative's timeline) infrastructure funding is likely going to be a topic which will start making its way back into federal politics in the next few years. We have an infrastructure deficit in this country and no major plan to deal with it. It is a good issue to start focusing on right now.


Mark
said

@ Wes in Sask. Because the bridge belongs to the Federal government smarty pants.


geebee
said

Well, if the Liberals want it fixed, just what steps did they take when they were in power? Chretien, the three-peat wonder, Martin, both from Quebec and both possessing hefty majorities appear to have done squat. Are the Canadian public so naive as to believe this 'problem' cropped up overnight? Lets see structural and engineering reports from when the Grits were "naturally governing"..or trying to.


Don
said

With a majority government in place,the thirty some Liberal MPs are a force to reckon with..


Dave H. Cornwall, Ontario
said

If Quebec wants it they will get it---right away. Wonder about the 155 million tear down cost. At 40 dollars per hour, 155 million dollars will employ almost 25,000 employees for 3 years. Since it will be federal money will anybody in Ontario get a crack at it ? - doubt that.


Stephen Harper
said

Perhaps in 2015 before the next election. Until then you'll have to live with your decision to vote NDP...good luck with that!


ML
said

If a bridge crosses country borders then the Feds pay for it. In this case both ends of the bridge are in Quebec, therefore a provincial expense. This is simply Liberal positioning so that they can gain lost trust in the province.


Robert Martin
said

Well now we know how and where the Liberals plan to build. Buy votes in Quebec. You can't blame them it worked in the past. Unfortunately they will not win a seat west of the Quebec. What a bunch of bozos!!


Realist
said

The country pays for all bridges over national waters. This bridge in Quebec is under Federal ownership, like Bridges in Ottawa and Cornwall. That is the beauty of the Dominion. Costs are shared amongst everyone, therefore impacting the few to a much lesser degree. That is the Basiss on The Dominion of Canada. I live in Ontario, by the way.


Jonathan from Saskatoon
said

Wes, this bridge crosses the St Lawrence canal, that makes it federal jurisdiction since it is used for international trade. I'm sure the city and province will pick up part of the tab, just like Saskatoon's south bridge is cost shared between city, province, & fed. Or Regina's new rail terminal.


Ian Ottawa
said

Liberal's demanding. What a joke. We demanded they become extinct in the past election along with the Bloc but they changed Party Rules to use an interim leader like Rae. If Quebec wants a new bridge then they should foot the Bill for it. All this talk about separation makes me not want to put another cent into the place until they change and stop the demanding and the double standards in favour of their heritage.


Don in N.S.
said

What the NDP not demanding Ottawa pay for this bridge. Jack, me boy, your letting your voters in Quebec down by not pounding the desk and demanding the Canadian governmnet pay to replace this bridge in Quebec!


Michael
said

Fine, if the Liberal Party of Canada wants this bridge replaced then the Liberal Party can belly up to the table and dig into the parties pockets and help the Quebec government and the City of Montreal pay for it. Why should Canada tax payers pay for a bridge in Montreal?


Mitch, WPG
said

Last time I checked Highways come under Provincial jurisdiction (including the Trans Canada Highway thru each province)...So Province of Quebec you pay for the bridge if it's that important.


Bill
said

i don't understand why this bridge is a federal problem, shouldn't the City and the Province cover the replacement cost?


Helene
said

Quebec...the moneypit of Canada.Would be interesting to know when the poor condition of the bridge first time came up in a report; years back there were reports that dealt with the poor condition of Quebec infrastructure.Where were the concerned Liberals then ?


Steve in Vancouver
said

Why does the Canadian taxpayer have to pay to replace the bridge? We in BC are replacing the Port Mann bridge that serves the number 1 highway and BC is paying for that. Lets have a little equality here. Those idiots in Quebec elected a lot of socialist NDP members let them pay for it along with their province. It would be interesting to hear how the NDP sits with this. Maybe someone can enlighten me in regards to who is responsible for paying for these structures.


ouifyg
said

Wes, the feds need to pony up the dough for this bridge because for the past 49 years it has been administered by Jacques Cartier and Champlain Bridges Incorporated (JCCBI), a federal agency which is a fully owned subsidiary of the Federal Bridge Corporation Limited. They own it so they replace it.


M.Yates
said

Who cares what Liberals want. No federal tax dollars should go Quebec for such capital projects.


Bryn
said

Gee, wasn't it the Liberals who kept stalling every proposal the Conservatives made, and now they say it should have been started 5 years ago.Now that's assinine, even for Bob Rae. He needs to accept his part of the responsibility for it as well. Let's be realistic here, and acknowledge that the Conservatives held a minority up until recently, and couldn't get anything done because of the Liberals. Shut up Bob.


Hal
said

Quebec should pay for it!We are tired of giving money to Quebec!Maybe if they had of voted Conservative rather than Taliban Jack they might have a voice in Ottawa,Better yet they should seperate and take your Billingualism with you! (and Jack)


Acorn127
said

The province and the city should pay for it. It is the Libs trying to gain some seats back in Quebec.


chris
said

I don't seethis as being a federal issue. Let Quebecer's pay for it since they are the ones that use it.


W
said

Why is this a federal infrastructure project? At the most would this not be a shared cost item between the municipality, the province and the federal government? The TTC subway extension program in Canada's largest city was agreed upon as a three party shared program why would it not be the same in Quebec?


Paul ~ Kitchener
said

The Government knows the ins and outs of the status of this bridge. The proper departments will do what is needed, to see the traffic still flows daily. The likes of Bob Rae, as an advisor, telling the Government what should be done, is like the "Easter Bunny advising Santa Claus on Christmas" ! Anything for Quebec be it right or wrong the Liberals will jump on it and give forth useless rhetoric (their normal fashion). Quebec could spend its own money if they want a new bridge. Ottawa will do what is under their Federal mandate, otherwise its up to Quebec ~ end of debate.


Have Quebec pay for bridge
said

If the bridge needs to be replaced, it should be the city of Montreal and/or the Quebec government who will pay for it, not the Federal government. Do not have the federal government put any money towards this bridge at all.


geoff Richards
said

Why the hell should the whole of Canda have to fork out hard earned dollars when Quebec should bear the price


Lew Banelis
said

This bridge is a gateway for many, many people tovisit Canada. It also permits access to Montreal tomany Canadians from the other provinces. All Canadians derive some sort of benefit from bridgesthat open access to points across Canada. I gladlypay tolls for access to bridges in my country andin Canada.


Trevor
said

I though Roads, Bridges, etc are a provincial responsibility, not Federal?


Paul
said

At 1.3 Billion with 160,000 daily crossings, just set up a $5 toll and she will be paid for in five years. The rest of Canada should not have to pay for it. Nobody paid for the bridge in Kelowna, why should we pay for the bridge in Montreal?


clayton
said

The how country has to pay because Quebec is a welfare state


John Lethbridge
said

$1.3 BILLION (aka, $2 billion) to be paid for by every Canadian other than those in the province of Quebec...? What, are they going to put gold plating on the new bridge? Evidently Bob Rae has no problem spending your money on this. I suggest they start charging toll on this bridge crossing immediately, $2 a pop at 50 million crossings a year will pay for the new bridge in twenty years. You use the bridge, you pay for the new bridge. The returns are almost high enough to privatize the entire venture. We have our own bridge problems to pay for.


Me
said

What's a liberal MP?


Mark Smith (Montreal, PQ)
said

The federal government owns the bridge, which is why it will require funding from them but yes, all levels of government need to contribute to replacing this bridge, as long as it's not built by corrupt quebec construction workers.


F. Gray
said

I agree. If the Federal Govt. does this for Montreal then it should do it for every bridge in the country. Why is Montreal so special? Montreal should receive some Federal assistance in the project BUT the Feds should not foot the entire bill. How about 33% Prov, 33% Municipal and 33% Federal?


Heather in Calgary
said

I agree with Wes in Sask. Why is the federal government obligated to pay for bridge repairs or replacement in Quebec? It would seem logical that it's the responsibility of the city, the county and the province to pay for it. That's how it works in Alberta. Believe me, in Calgary we know all about paying for bridges, having forked out $26 million on an unnecessary pedestrian bridge that is now 7 months overdue.


Robert
said

Why am I not shocked that Quebec wants English Canada to pay for anything and everything they want? And of course the Lie-brals trying to make it a political thing. I hope the PM tells Bob Rae to stuff it, and Quebec to replace it themselves.


Raymond
said

What's a Liberal?


Kebecnick
said

The hole country has to pay because bridges are federally run, so we pay for every other provinces bridges too.


dennis
said

All bridges are federal jurisdiction.


Mais oui, Gaston !!
said

Liberals can "want" all they want. It comes down to cost and Montrealers benefit so tax the good people of Montreal for a new bridge they alone will use. Perhaps if they drove more prudently, their bridges and roads would last a little longer non?


Money saver
said

Let's see, Quebec voted for the NDP not the Conservatives. So, the NDP and the people of Quebec should pay for their bridge. If they put into place a toll booth, say $1.00 a car the bridge would be paid off in no time and then the cost will be burdened by those that use it.


Diane
said

Because it's Quebec, I suspect.


Peter in MB
said

This article should be Titled… “The Liberals Try to Brown Nose Quebec again for support”.


Dr Bear
said

Why does the whole country have to pay? Because the bridge is Federal property. Like any other infastructure that is owned by the Federal government we all pay for it (same reason why Montrealers have to pay for Calgary's airport or Halifax harbour).


Alan
said

I am not sure why the local and provincial governments have not played a greater role in this. It seems to have caught everyone sleeping. They have just spent huge amounts on infrastructure for local bridges and roads and projects why wasn't this on the radar. Gotta love BRae jumping to the forefront. This is Jack's territory. Missed opportunity.


Ted from Toronto
said

It was a toll bridge until 1990. 21 years of free rides when they should have been looking to the future replacement twin cost.


Evan in Athabasca
said

Unfortunately it is a government of Canada bridge for some odd ball reason. We don't have any of those out west.... must be nice...


Ted from Toronto
said

How about having Quebec build their own bridge and charging a toll to pay for it? I'll happily pay it whenever I go there and use it. Since Expo67 and the '76 Olympic building, the province has neglected it's own infrastructure while taxing everything at the highest levels in the country. Seems everyone there becomes a federalist when the bill comes to the table. They can use the same engineers who built the Olympic almost-retractable-dome.


I hate bridges
said

Montreal and Quebec are supposed to contribute, but the reason the Federal is being brought up is because it was the Federal government who first commissioned and built the bridge and people feel (not saying whether rightly or wrongly) that it's their mistake for the flawed design (cause they chose something new and cheaper as opposed to a design that was proven to work at the time).


Colin
said

If Bob rae speaks and no one cares does he still make a sound?


G
said

Why is this a federal issue or concern? Should this not be a provincial and municipal project? should this not have been identified as a priority project and included as part of the stimulus spending. If yes, why was it overlooked by the municipality?The roads in edmonton are a disgrace, the management of infrastructure projects the laughing stock of the nation. Nobody here is asking the feds to step in!!! Oh wait, we haven't threatened to leave.


André from Mtl
said

They should do like the Laval bridge. Have an independent contractor build it and charge users a monthy fee.Why spend tax dollars on a bridge that could pay itself. Fix our main roads instead


FCS
said

Ohhh the Liberal caucus has spoken. Of course you have to listen really hard since there is like only 5 of them. Let the NDP loving Quebecers pay for their own bridge.


Brian
said

If the Fiberals see this as so important, why didn't they do it when they were in power or make it an issue during the minority days. Hypocrits.


Mike
said

Why is this a federal responsibility? The new Port Mann bridge will be tolled to pay for it.


Catherine from Laval
said

To Wes in Sask:According to the Champlain Bridge website:The Jacques Cartier and Champlain Bridges Incorporated (JCCBI) is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Federal Bridge Corporation Limited (FBCL), a crown corporation reporting to Transport Canada.


Mario
said

...a typical western answer. You read the part about being Canada's busiest bridge?!? It's not Montreal's fault it's an island...Canada should flick this bill BEFORE people die when it colapses.


Intelligent Liberal
said

Enough is E-Nough! Harper needs to replace the Champlain Bridge right now! If he doesn't, Quebec voters will have no choice but to vote for Prime Minister Bob Rae next election, since only the Liberal Party Red Tent will invest in Quebec and Quebec voters.


Bob,Calgary,Alberta
said

I was born and raised in Montreal and have driven across the Champlain Bridge numerous times. Even tho I do not like the extent of Federal funds that pour into Quebec I do believe that the bridge should be replaced (preferably by a tunnel). It seems highly unlikely that Davie shipbuilding will get the contract for the new ship program from the Feds so why not soften the pain by agreeing to replace the bridge. This way Quebec gets it's share of the Federal pogey and it eases the pain of losing the shipbuilding contract. Of course Quebec politicians like Charest,Marois and Coderre will scream blue murder whatever happens but that's par for the course.Just a thought to keep the peace in this regionally divided country.


Bryan
said

Liberals sucking up to Quebec...mmmm..what next "Liberal's Demand Canada Dance to Quebec's Tune or Else...Separation". Kiss me where the sun don't shine "Fiberals"!


grizz
said

it makes you wonder how they build things these days. there are bridges in montreal far older than the champlain, but i don't remember hearing about them being ready to fall down. unless i've missed something? (it's many years since i lived in montreal)


Wes in Sask.
said

The City of Montreal & the Province of Quebec should pay for the bridge. Why does the whole country have to pay for this bridge?


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Canada Stories

A Canadian Pacific Railway employee walks along the side of a locomotive in a marshalling yard in Calgary, Wednesday, May 16, 2012. (Jeff McIntosh / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Talks between CP, union stall; Raitt prepared to step in

More   38 Comments 38    2 Video(s) 2

Victoria Shachtay, 23, died in an explosion on Friday, Nov. 25, in an Innisfail townhouse.

Man charged in parcel blast that killed Alta. mother

More  2 Video(s) 2

Nova  Scotia, body, Hillside Road, Marion Bridge

Police identify humans remains found in hockey bag

More  1 Video(s) 1

Most Talked about Stories

It is about time - as a grandparent I have watched our kids (who were allowed to fail although I do remember some nagging on our part) learn, I have watched our children now micro-manage their children. A big part of it is the fact that there are predators out there and an extreme reluctance on the parents part to alllow freedom that might result in the children becoming victims.

Harvey

Parents must learn to stop meddling, author urges