Canada -   

1
Tammy Marquardt speaks to the media in Oshawa, Ont., on Tuesday, June 7, 2011. Tammy Marquardt speaks to the media in Oshawa, Ont., on Tuesday, June 7, 2011.

Mom's 'nightmare' ends after murder charge dropped

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV National News: Scott Laurie on the charges
An Ontario woman is free after more than a decade. Prosecutors dropped all charges against Tammy Marquardt in the death of her two-year-old son, and the judge apologized for what he called a tragic miscarriage of justice.
CTV Toronto: Tamara Cherry on the exoneration
Tamara Cherry reports on the latest person to be released from prison after being convicted on testimony from Charles Smith.
CTV News Channel: Scott Laurie on the battle
A CTV National News correspondent says Tammy Marquardt is now fighting to rebuild her life after Crown prosecutors withdrew the second-degree murder charge she was convicted on.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (23) Facebook   

Tammy Marquardt speaks to the media in Oshawa, Ont., on Tuesday, June 7, 2011. Tammy Marquardt speaks to the media in Oshawa, Ont., on Tuesday, June 7, 2011.

Photos

Tammy Marquardt speaks to the media in Oshawa, Ont., on Tuesday, June 7, 2011.

View Larger Image

Date: Tue. Jun. 7 2011 9:52 PM ET

An Ontario mother says her "nightmare is finally over" after Crown prosecutors withdrew a second-degree murder charge Tuesday and a judge acknowledged the damage that a disgraced pathologist's testimony had done to her life.

Tammy Marquardt was previously tried and convicted in the death of her son, Kenneth Wynne, who was only two years old when he died in 1993.

But as the years went by, it became clear that the unreliable testimony of disgraced pathologist Dr. Charles Smith had helped put Marquardt behind bars in what the Ontario Court of Appeal would later describe as a miscarriage of justice.

After Justice Michael Brown agreed to remove the charge against Marquardt on Tuesday, he told her that he wished wished to offer his "deepest expression of regret" about what she had been through.

Brown said it was tragic that it took so long to discover the "flawed pathology" that Smith once offered in court during Marquardt's own trial and others.

Outside court, Marquardt said her son could now rest in peace, now that her conviction has been overturned and the second-degree murder charge thrown out.

"My nightmare is finally over. The one thing that never should have happened has ended," she told reporters Tuesday.

At Marquardt's 1995 trial, Smith, who was then a respected pathologist, testified that the Ontario woman had either strangled or suffocated her young son.

Other experts have since said it was not possible to determine the cause of the boy's death, though Marquardt's lawyer previously argued her son was epileptic and could have died from a seizure.

The Ontario Court of Appeal quashed Marquardt's conviction earlier this year and a new trial was ordered.

But the Crown said Tuesday that it would not proceed with a new trial because of the flawed evidence from Smith and the fact that too much time has passed.

Marquardt's lawyer, James Lockyer, indicated to reporters Tuesday that his client intends to seek compensation from the province for what has happened to her since her son's death.

Lockyer has also represented William Mullins-Johnson, a Sault Ste. Marie, Ont., man who spent 12 years in prison after being wrongfully convicted of killing his young niece.

Like Marquardt, Mullins-Johnson was convicted in a 1994 trial in which Smith's testimony was a key factor.

In Mullins-Johnson's trial, Smith testified that his niece had been sodomized and asphyxiated. In actual fact, she died of natural causes.

In 2007, Mullins-Johnson was acquitted and last fall he was awarded $4.25 million in compensation from the Ontario government.

With files from The Canadian Press and a report from CTV Toronto's Tamara Cherry

Comments are now closed for this story

KJ in Kingston Ontario
said

I think it is only fair that Smith should serve as much time in jail as all those he wrongfully caused to convicted. And fined the tens of millions he cost the tax payers.


Chuck l
said

We are ready to sentence people who fake of having cancer and defrauld many of millions and rightly so, so why is this scum bag Smith not in Jail? Come on where is the justice here?


Thomas
said

I am glad to hear these people having these great wrongs committed against them BY THE PROVINCE for a legal system established BY THE PROVINCE that allowed this criminal Smith to run amuck and hurt/ruin so many people's lives. I certainly hope he is behind bars for the rest of his natural life, where he belongs....


Howard in Brampton
said

I agree with the post from "Too much amateur lawyering" in that the Crown Counsel, Police, and Judges proceeded with what they thought was a valid professional opinion. That being said, now whenever expert evidence is tendered, the so called forensic expert will no doubt be carefully examined as to their competence, education and training. Also independent verification with true blind forensic lab proficiency testing to provide accreditation and certification, will be called for by any competent defense lawyer. This will be horrendously expensive but I think a heck of a lot cheaper than paying out large compensation amounts for those wrongly convicted. We have only ourselves to blame for not demanding that the resources relied upon by the Crown for prosecutorial evidence evaluation be independently accredited, and certified. Without that, then nothing they produce can have any reasonable chance of being believed.


M. Yates
said

I'm glad this woman was acquitted...what disturbs me is that the province (our taxes) will pay compensation to these people....what about the pathologist paying to compensate...4.5 million is alot of money...and the province had nothing to do with it...by the way...the woman will have a very difficult time getting her life back...her reputation...money can't buy that back.


Greg
said

For the gentleman who used the handle "Too much amateur lawyering"... did you bother to research why the man is disgraced? I just did, and it only took a few minutes. He wasn't making mistakes, and I wouldn';t even say he was incompitent. After researching some of the cases he was involved in, he was being down-right evil and making concious decisions to ruin peoples lives. "Why?" is the question.


Fred
said

How excatly do the provincial prosecutors not notice that everytime this guy dealt with a suspicious death he determined the parents did it? Isn't that a little bit out of the ordinary ? Or a little against the norm statistically? Or were they just happy to pad their conviction rate? They are just as incompetent at thier jobs as Smith himself and should be held accountable.


David from Edmonton
said

It's a travesty of justice that Smith is not in jail.


Marley
said

Another example of why Canada should NEVER re-instate the death penalty.


Evan in Athabasca
said

Time to make all folks who are "Justice system experts" put part of their salary on the line to pay for these errors. But not through subsidized raises to compensate for what they owe the system.


Katie
said

In reading these stories where many parents were basically accused of killing their children by this pathologists findings, everyone always talks about this guy being incompetent. I think this guy was not just incompetent, he had a frightening vendetta of some kind in which he very deliberately destroyed the lives and reputations of innocent people. I've never seen this discussed in a news story.


Too much amateur lawyering
said

Being wrong is not a crime and unless someone can prove Charles Smith had criminal intent (good luck!), there's no way he can be "held accountable". As for police, the Crown, lawyers and judges...what do they have to do with it? Nothing. The police had nothing to do with this woman's conviction. The Crown proceeded with a charge based on the faulty conclusions of the investigation of Charles Smith. To say that everybody involved should pay some form of restitution is asinine. Really, please get a clue before commenting. What happened to this woman is tragic and she deserves a big pay day but to say everybody who puts on a uniform or is involved with criminal law is at fault is way off base. The sole fault is with Charles Smith and he's been dealt with.


Don13
said

And meanwhile, Dr. Charles Smith is walking around a free man. I hope this sad specimen of humanity sleeps well at night, considering the many lives he has ruined as a result of his incompetent actions. One can only hope he faces criminal charges as a result. However, don't hold your breath - professional societies look after their own.


Linda, Toronto
said

Why, why, why isn't this man in jail!?!?!?!!! This is crazy!


TaDa
said

This is one reason the death penalty should never be enacted, anywhere.


Ian Ottawa
said

The worst part is that guilty people will also walk because of this disgraced pathologist. What a shame for the victims, I can't understand that in this day and age we can't come up with a lie detector test that is 100% reliable.


Brent
said

Make a fund built from lawyers, judges, pathologists and policemen to pay for these types of claims.


David Williams in Vancouver
said

I hope she gets at least as much as Mullins-Johnson. It's the very least the Province can do.


Sober
said

This is very hard. Of course she needs to be compensated, probably at the tax payers' expense. The Government must ensure that they use only qualified "experts" with verified track records to work for them. This little oversight turns out to be very costly. I believe the doctor in question should help with the compensation of his victims.


bikerborz
said

So, are these people going to restore her life and reputation? Is her name and history cleared? The damage done by a number of these so-called "experts" (including law enforcement -- what about the number of bogus "confessions" wrought by police investigators?) is beyond calculation. One wonders why these "experts" are not more thoroughly examined or cross-examined during trial...


Anita
said

Yes, WHY isn't Smith being held accountable for his actions? All of the falsely accused/incarcerated people deserve that, at least, don't they?


Aaron in Toronto
said

Why is that disgrace Charles Smith not in jail??? I wonder how much this case will cost Ontarian even though she deserves to get compensation for the ordeal.


JT From Calgary
said

Here's another case that makes it clear that there needs to be some serious accountability when finding someone guilty. I'm guessing we will be hearing about her case against the crown and rightly so.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Canada Stories

A Canadian Pacific Railway employee walks along the side of a locomotive in a marshalling yard in Calgary, Wednesday, May 16, 2012. (Jeff McIntosh / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Talks between CP, union stall; Raitt prepared to step in

More   38 Comments 38    2 Video(s) 2

Victoria Shachtay, 23, died in an explosion on Friday, Nov. 25, in an Innisfail townhouse.

Man charged in parcel blast that killed Alta. mother

More  2 Video(s) 2

Nova  Scotia, body, Hillside Road, Marion Bridge

Police identify humans remains found in hockey bag

More  1 Video(s) 1

Most Talked about Stories

It is about time - as a grandparent I have watched our kids (who were allowed to fail although I do remember some nagging on our part) learn, I have watched our children now micro-manage their children. A big part of it is the fact that there are predators out there and an extreme reluctance on the parents part to alllow freedom that might result in the children becoming victims.

Harvey

Parents must learn to stop meddling, author urges