Canada -   

1

Health care the top priority for voters, poll reveals

Nursing
Nursing

View Larger Image

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (25) Facebook   

Date: Thursday Jun. 2, 2011 6:50 PM ET

Canadian voters want Prime Minister Stephen Harper's new majority government to place the priority on health care, a new poll reveals. But voters also want to see the deficit eliminated, taxes cut and jobs created.

Those are the findings of a new poll from Nanos Research and the Institute for Research on Public Policy (IRPP).

The telephone survey asked more than 1,200 Canadians to rate on a scale of 1 to 5 how highly they viewed nine possible priorities for this government. Here are the average scores each priority earned:

  • Working with the provinces on health care - 4.32
  • Creating jobs through training  - 4.01
  • Eliminating the deficit  -  3.98
  • Cutting taxes  -  3.69
  • Investing in research and development -  3.63
  • Getting tough on crime -  3.58
  • Focusing on new trade opportunities around the world -  3.48
  • Strengthening Canada's armed forces -  3.05
  • Reforming the Senate of Canada -  2.99

Almost 60 per cent of respondents gave a "5" rating to "working with the provinces on health care," meaning they wanted health care given high priority.

Committed federal Conservative supporters were most likely to score health care high on the priority scale – about as high as they scored eliminating the deficit.

In all, 44 per cent of respondents gave "eliminating the deficit" a score of 5, suggesting that many Canadians are also concerned about the country's books.

Getting tough on crime was a middle-of-the-road priority for Canadians – only 35 per cent scored it a 5 -- while Senate reform and strengthening Canada's Armed Forces were lower priorities, the poll found.

Pollster Nik Nanos says the research suggests a number of things. First, many Canadians may see Senate reform as a diversion from more important issues such as health care, the deficit, jobs and taxes.

Likewise, Canadians are not as concerned with strengthening Canada's Armed Forces if it interferes with plans to eliminate the deficit, but on the other hand, they may regard it more warmly if it means more job creation.

The debate about how to fund the military could become a political hot potato, Nanos suggested.

"One possible political flashpoint in the next parliament could revolve around defence spending. New Democrats are more likely to believe that strengthening Canada's Armed Forces is not a priority compared to both Conservatives and Liberals," he observed.

Priorities related to money issues appear to be important Canadians, the poll found.

"As we enter a period of multiple provincial elections where health care will be among the top provincial election issues, one can expect that Canadians may also examine Harper's strategy on managing the health care issue beyond the election commitment," Nanos said.

The Nanos/IRPP poll was conducted between May 24 and 29. The random telephone survey of 1,205 Canadians 18 years of age and older was accurate plus or minus 2.8 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.

Comments are now closed for this story

What A Mess - Ottawa
said
0 0

If the Ontario Liberal Party under McGuinty had not screwed up the Health Care in this Province we would be in pretty good shape. Millions have been spent and absolutely "nothing" has been done..now have others doing what was suppose to be done in the first place (and we taxpayers pay for their mistakes) consultants being paid thousands for doing nothing and walking away. The wait times are out of this world for the ordinary Canadian and no doubt as here in Ontario is the same in other Provinces...just poor poor managers...time for a change and get someone in there that knows what they are doing....


james
said
0 0

Anyone who thinks anything but a fully public healthcare system is the answer has no idea of the reality that our public healthcare system is one of the main reasons for Canada’s financial stability families and individuals will not be bankrupt by outrageous costs, and it makes Canada more attractive to companies to do business because of lower per employee cost because they don’t have to pay the same health costs for their employees. With public health care people won’t have to worry about covering the cost of taking care of their parents health cost as they age, parents won’t have to worry about selling everything because their child is sick, a young man or woman just staring out in life won’t have their future destroyed due to health care cost because of some sickness or accident beyond their control. Public health care was built by Canadian hands with the hard earned money of Canadians and then passed on as a gift to new generations and with that gift is the responsibility of protecting our public healthcare system. One of the things that has always made me so proud to be a Canadian is our spirit and how we stick together to take of those in need from the east coast taking in 40,000 stranded airline passengers after 9/11 to our consistently as a people continuing to give more per person to help other counties after disasters it is a part of who we are as a country and people and a big part of the reason we can proudly travel the world wearing our flag. I for one will always fight and stand for what makes this country truly a special place. So to sum up public healthcare Built by Canadians, Paid for By Canadians, Owned by Canadians


Public health care is a Ponzi scheme
said
0 0

Sorry folks, but once the Baby Boomer cohort chokes off what little resources are left for public health, the current system will be unsustainable. Like all government run Ponzi schemes (EI, CPP), public health requires a large number of fresh recruits pumping money in at the bottom in order to pay off those at the top. With the Middle Class having been replaced by the McJob Class, the tax base needed to support public health 20 years down the road isn't there. Sorry, but in our race to the bottom the NWO demands that all publicly funded social programs get the ax and public health will be the first to go.


Ella-Max
said
0 0

We could save a lot of money in Canada's healthcare system of they prioritize "dental" health and cover it as well. When the teeth go bad so does everything else in the body and that leads to new problems that require costly procedures/treatments/pharmaceuticals without addressing the issue "teeth" that are causing a lot of problems elsewhere. Dental coverage should be included. If Quebec can cover "free" IVF treatments costing between $10,000-$30,000.00 per case then dental should be a higher priority than a woman wanting to conceive a baby.


David
said
0 0

Health care should be a priority however it sure isn't. My own mother had a very scary spell 2 years ago that resembled a stroke. They told her at the time that it was "not" a stroke. However, she learned last week from her family doctor that she has kidney disease and the bad spell she had was indeed a stroke. Something sure is wrong with the health care system and its lack of priority, accountability and credibility in Canada. For too long we've been fed a lie that its the best system in the world. Maybe for some people high on the list (politicians and elites) but for the majority of Canadians its no better than "assembly line" cattle prod treatment. Unless you are you're own advocate in Canada you'll suffer care no better than a communist despot because those running/ruining our system just don't care.


Clansman
said
0 0

I read most of the statements on this comment board, most of them had intelligent imput. I have lived in other countries and have seen how other countries run their medical systems. The statement from John was very interesting, however, I disagree with him, I have seen what happens in countries that do not pay hospital employees good wages, the result is that these people go into the private sector , one way or another, I prefer having inteligent experienced people looking after me when I am very sick or injured, not paying people incentive wages means a lower qualified staff, as for Public Private Health Care , I agree with this idea also, and have seen it work in many countries.GIiving X-rays , blood tests and other tests that are not life threatening to the private sector can save governments millions of $ and speed up wait time in Provincial Hospitals , many of the costs of these exams and tests can also be supported through Private Health Care plans ...ie: **** Cross , even better the Federal Gov. could set up regulations allowing more Private Health Care companies to operate in Canada, as long are they are Canadian owned, this would create more jobs in Canada . Last the Federal Government should get into the Medical support of Canadian and create Federal Hospitals that treat special needs patients, such as Cancer patients , brain surgery, and organ transplants, and research.. These special hospitals could be put in every region of the country, thus insuring special needs patients the care needed as soon as possible . and where would the Gov. get this money ? take it directly off transfer payments given to the provinces..


RedneckVic1
said
0 0

The system as is, is not sustainable without the help of the biggest complainers (the doctors & nurses). Every year we give more money to the health care system without any checks and balances, it is time for the people in charge to start having a say in how the money is spent. Instead of complaining about the system then start coming up with solutions to fix the system. My idea is as follows; the provincial governments should build, own & operate old age homes with a minimum charge of $1,000.00 per month and they should be built in every city or town but they should only be built if the demand is there. they should also be able to care for a minimum of 250 to 500 patients at a time. This creates jobs for construction companies, catering companies, Locals to work within the facility & local cleaning companies & finally more positions for doctors & nurses in other words a win win for all in every province.


Paul ~ Kitchener
said
0 0

" HEALTH CARE " ~ this is not a Yea or Nay issue. We have a good health care system , but, it is "Broken Badly". For Canadians to have a Health System that works for all, is it must be a 2-Tier System ~ National Health Care Private Sector Health Care. The private sector will look to its own operations, and be free of any Government costs. The National Health program, can continue with direct taxation - (making many changes from the way it is now). Let the wealthy & privilidged enjoy their "Private health System" . We the general public can have a better system in the Federal Program as it will be less demanding with those that can afford it in their Private System.If a real house cleaning was done , in the existing Health System, we could save "Millions of Dollars" per year. There needs to be an honest full out effort made to clean up the system & set salary limits to all levels of supervision. Yes ! Health Care is a real concern, as I said in my opening comments, & must not be handed over to any private system, but, we must let the private system enter the ranks, and jointly work with each other, in providing the best health care to "All Canadians".


Doug ^^^ BC
said
0 0

LOL!!! Well stated "jack o Ottawa".You really have to laugh at these deisres.More health care.More funding or education,crime and justice,the military,and research.Bigger pensions and more welfare also are in demand,if memeory serves me correctly. All this while paying down debt,eliminating deficits,AND lowering taxes.Canadians,it seems to me,truly are living in fantasyland.If all this is to be done,reforestation programs had better include the planting of a whole lot of "money trees". This article has way more people demanding more "free" programs,and far to many people able to pay for them. And BTW,does anyone else notice that all this is about spending on ourselves,as opposed to spending to build infrastructure and industry that will serve the next generation of Canadians? Face it folks.We are a GREEDY lot.


Pam in Waterloo
said
0 0

In Ontario we already pay a Health Care premium (aka tax!) thanks the to McGuinty Liberals, and yet they will still try to tell you Health Care is Free!! (That's what an OHIP agent recently told me when we went to get my daughter's picture taken for her healthcard. I guess OHIP agents are exempt from paying taxes?). That premium adds up to over $2000 per year for my family. We already have private sector involvement in walk-in clinics, x-ray and ultrasound services, but we still use our health cards and don't get directly charged for the service. So what's wrong with private sector involvement in CT scans, or MRIs or any other service for that matter? Why should I care who owns the machine as long as I get the care I need promptly. I support universal access to healthcare, but it's not sustainable as it is now , so we need to look at alternatives that will sustain it in the long run.


Jarrett, Ottawa
said
0 0

The government only covers roughly 70% of the costs of our healthcare system as it stands, how much do you expect to move to the private sector. That is a slippery slope and will only benefit those that can afford their own healthcare. As it stands in the US they cover less than 10% of the healthcare costs (publicly funded that is) and they still pay more per capita than we do in Canada. So exactly how is privatising our healthcare system going to benefit Canadians?


Nick
said
0 0

The tax payers are dreamers. They want low taxes. They hate the HST.They want no deficit. But want lower taxes.They want more money spent on healthcare. They want lower taxes.They want more jobs to be created. If they want the govt. to create more jobs. That means more taxes and deficits.Someone is not doing the math correctly. If you believe that this govt. will give you everything you want and lower your taxes. Good luck. You will get lower taxes or something else, but not both.


Why Check?
said
0 0

Matt said "After EVERY polling company got the election results wrong, I'm suprised any of them still have the guts to put out polls." Once again, a CTV commenter spouts off without doing any research. If you'd checked, you'd see that Nanos was incredibly accurate on their polling - but why let facts sway your opinion?


Prof. Pye Chartt
said
0 0

When any politician (or intelligent businessperson) tables a sensible idea to "fix" our sliding universal healthcare system, and make it more efficient and effective, he/she gets hammered by all the frantic left-wing juveniles (aided by the media) who, firstly, are living in denial and don't believe that a critical evolving problem genuinely exists and, secondly, foolishly believe that the ONLY "fix" anyway is more, and more, and more public, taxpayer money. Too many Canadians would rather take shots at the American system (which only ranks a tad behind us internationally, and our overall relative standing is surprisingly poor) than engage in a mature discussion and debate dealing with the serious issues facing our healthcare system. It's a farcical equation that presently dooms us.


PAE: Hamilton
said
0 0

@TEA in SK: agreed! It is time for a hybrid of public/private health care. This is not to degrade the current level of care, but to do this with the nice full bank accounts of the wealthy: (1) ease those who can pay into other clinic type places, leaving less burden on the (my) public facilities, and (2) to get their money into the health care pot. Why should that cash be sitting in some bank when it could be in our hybrid healthcare bureaucracy? Simple math. Also, if the healthcare pros are truly in it for the best reasons, all sick people should be treated equally, or do they need special training for rich diseases, and less for diseases of the rest of us? Let's get that big bulge of cash into the system, and challenge the pros to keep us all at first-world standards of medical care. Money talks, so let it shout on this one!


Jim in Ottawa
said
0 0

I think if people do a better job of eating healthy, exercising and sleeping regularly, then your health really shouldn't be too much of a concern. Furthermore, health care is a provincial issue, so I don't think it's fair to including it as a federal government responsibility. I really think the federal government should stick to its core responsibilities such as law enforcement, military, border security, immigration, and international trade, and leave health care to the provinces.


John
said
0 0

Health care is a very high priority but that doesn't mean we have to be held ransom by unions. Health care workers are already overpaid. I'm a senior and live on a fixed income and it won't be long before the majority of seniors won't be able to afford the basic needs because of greedy unions wanting more and more for wages and benifits


Matt
said
0 0

After EVERY polling company got the election results wrong, I'm suprised any of them still have the guts to put out polls.


thetruth
said
0 0

If health care is top priority...then why on earth would you vote conservativeI have no desire to end up like The States...they have private health care but premiums/costs are twice as high as ours and it is still causing their Gov't debt.... so no thanks ...


Prof. Pye Chartt
said
0 0

We already have critical private-sector involvement in our Canadian universal healthcare system -- by necessity. (In Ontario, provincial funds for "cross-border-care" services utilizing American clinics and diagnostics have been increasing at a staggering rate.) In fact, most economists versed in the cost/revenue structure of our healthcare system, and compounding demographics, firmly believe that without greater private-sector "assistance," our public universal healthcare system is entirely doomed. (It's already failing.) Most countries throughout the world with successful universal healthcare models incorporate the private sector to some degree. Put aside the "Americanization" and "healthcare-for-the-wealthy-only" boogeymen. Canadians need to pull their head out of the sand, and drop the misguided, misplaced, and backwards-dragging fear (fueled by left-wing propagandists and socialist fear-mongers). The governing realities are upon us, and the solution is in evidence. Continued ignorance won't be blissful.


ML
said
0 0

Don't get me wrong, but this is a no brainer. The avg age of the population is increasing, so the demande will become more important. As for privatization, it exists already, not on a grand scale. (Think of physiotherapy clinics, anyone can walk in and get laser or ultrasound therapy for your shoulder). When you get older and the doctor says you can't drive or play golf, or take a walk with your granddaughter until that limb is fixed and there's a waiting period of 2 years, trust me you will pay whatever you have to get it treated so you can catch that 10 am tee-off.


Bob,Calgary
said
0 0

Canadians live in a "health care" dream world controlled by the public service hospital unions who absolutely want no changes except for more and more government funding. Here in Alberta the provincial PC party throws more money at Heallthcare, constantly reorganizes the bureaucracy, panders to the Nurses union, fires CEO s at will and generally screws things up. There is no competition for services so no incentive to improve or reduce costs. Canada is like a third world country where healthcare is concerned and I'm sure European countries with good healthcare systems laugh at us. We must move to a public/private model or eventually the system will implode. But in Canada "healthcare" is a type of religion with blind obedience and worship of the status quo. The first step to changing Healthcare, at least in Alberta, is to vote out the collection of fools in the PC party that govern this province.


Dummies
said
0 0

So Canadians want better healthcare, more jobs, less taxes, and our debt to be paid off. Well, no one can accuse the Canadian voters of being smart. There are lots of things lots of people want. Learning you can't have everything is part of life, something Canadian voters obviously don't understand. What we seem to be saying we want is a structural deficit. Why not look south to see how well that works...


jack o'Ottawa
said
0 0

Making HealthCare a top priority is a simple task. Unfortunately, paying for HealthCare is not quite so simple. Perhaps the question should be,' Are you willing to pay for an enhanced universal HealthCare program for all Canadians?'


TEA in SK
said
0 0

Health care is not sustainable in this country...to make it so, we need both private and public health care...


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Canada Stories

A Canadian Pacific Railway employee walks along the side of a locomotive in a marshalling yard in Calgary, Wednesday, May 16, 2012. (Jeff McIntosh / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Talks between CP, union stall; Raitt prepared to step in

More   38 Comments 38    2 Video(s) 2

Victoria Shachtay, 23, died in an explosion on Friday, Nov. 25, in an Innisfail townhouse.

Man charged in parcel blast that killed Alta. mother

More  2 Video(s) 2

Nova  Scotia, body, Hillside Road, Marion Bridge

Police identify humans remains found in hockey bag

More  1 Video(s) 1

Most Talked about Stories

It is about time - as a grandparent I have watched our kids (who were allowed to fail although I do remember some nagging on our part) learn, I have watched our children now micro-manage their children. A big part of it is the fact that there are predators out there and an extreme reluctance on the parents part to alllow freedom that might result in the children becoming victims.

Harvey

Parents must learn to stop meddling, author urges