Canada -   

1
German Chancellor Angela Merkel, Vice-Chancellor Philipp Roesler and Environment Minister Norbert Roettgen, from right, adress the media about the future of German nuclear power in Berlin, Germany, Monday, May 30, 2011. (AP / Michael Sohn) German Chancellor Angela Merkel, centre, speaks before she receives a report of the government-mandated commission on the ethics of nuclear power by chairman Klaus Toepfer, left, in Berlin, Germany, Monday, May 30, 2011. (AP / Michael Sohn) A March 15, 2011 file photo shows the nuclear plant of Neckarwestheim, southern Germany. (AP Photo/Michael Probst/file) Germany plant

Germany to shut down nuclear power plants by 2022

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV National News: Robert Fife on the plan
Germany is phasing out all of its nuclear power plants, as the world reels from the aftermath of Japan's ruined reactors.
CTV News Channel: Gordon Edwards, president
The president of the Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility says Germany has installed a significant amount of alternative power in order to accommodate the country's nuclear shutdown in 2022.
CTV News Channel: Kevin Pegg, Energy Alternatives
The president of Energy Alternatives says Germany is showing international leadership with their planned 2022 nuclear shutdown, which will open up new opportunities for alternative forms of energy to be developed.
CTV News Channel: John Berwick, journalist
A correspondent with DW-TV says with the job of phasing out nuclear reactors, Germany will have to invest in renewable energy and make the country self-reliant in a short amount of time.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (28) Facebook   

German Chancellor Angela Merkel, Vice-Chancellor Philipp Roesler and Environment Minister Norbert Roettgen, from right, adress the media about the future of German nuclear power in Berlin, Germany, Monday, May 30, 2011. (AP / Michael Sohn) German Chancellor Angela Merkel, centre, speaks before she receives a report of the government-mandated commission on the ethics of nuclear power by chairman Klaus Toepfer, left, in Berlin, Germany, Monday, May 30, 2011. (AP / Michael Sohn) A March 15, 2011 file photo shows the nuclear plant of Neckarwestheim, southern Germany. (AP Photo/Michael Probst/file) Germany plant

Photos

German Chancellor Angela Merkel, Vice-Chancellor Philipp Roesler and Environment Minister Norbert Roettgen, from right, adress the media about the future of German nuclear power in Berlin, Germany, Monday, May 30, 2011. (AP / Michael Sohn)

View Larger Image

Selected Comment

All Germany needs to do is cover the country in solar panels and windmills to safely make up the power loss...or, cross its fingers that a wondrous new technology will emerge pretty soon. Sounds practical and intelligent.

Prof. Pye Chartt

Germany to shut down all nuclear power plants by 2022

talking about
Germany to shut down nuclear power plants by 2022

Date: Mon. May. 30 2011 6:57 PM ET

Concerned by the disaster in Japan, Germany has decided to put an end to its nuclear power program -- the first major industrialized nation in years to do so.

Germany's governing coalition said Monday it will shut down all its nuclear power plants by 2022. The decision still requires parliamentary approval.

It also completes a remarkable about-face for Chancellor Angela Merkel's centre-right government, which only late last year had pushed through a plan to extend the life span of the country's 17 reactors -- with the last scheduled to go offline in 2036.

But Merkel says the Fukushima disaster in Japan has made her rethink the risks of the technology.

"We want the electricity of the future to be safe, reliable and economically viable," Chancellor Angela Merkel told reporters on Monday following overnight negotiations among the governing parties. "We have to follow a new path."

Among other G8 members, only Italy has abandoned nuclear power. It was phased out following a referendum after the 1986 Chernobyl disaster.

Germany, which is Europe's largest economy, had long planned to abandon nuclear energy eventually and replace it with renewable energy sources. But Monday's decision dramatically speeds up that process.

Of Germany's 17 reactors, eight are currently off the electricity grid. One has been mothballed for years, but seven others were taken off the grid in March for safety inspections, following the catastrophe at Fukushima.

Monday's decision comes after the environment ministers from all 16 German regional states called on Friday for the temporary order on the seven plants to be made permanent.

Germany plans to replace its nuclear power with renewable energy sources. Wind, solar and hydroelectric power currently produces about 17 per cent of the country's electricity. The government aims to boost its share to around 50 per cent in the coming decades.

Many Germans have been vehemently opposed to nuclear power for years. Tens of thousands of people repeatedly took to the streets after Fukushima to urge the government to shut all reactors quickly.

Sigmar Gabriel, the leader of the opposition Social Democrats, called the decision "a great day of relief for all opponents of nuclear energy in Germany."

"Today, our political opponents are forced ... to accept our policies," he said.

Environmental groups welcome decision

Shawn-Patrick Stensil, a Greenpeace nuclear analyst, said the German announcement is a sign that a major industrial nation can shut down its reactors and continue to grow its economy.

"I think the industry's ready," he told CTV's Power Play, adding that renewable energy sources in Germany already produce more electricity than nuclear ones do in Ontario.

But he warned that Canada could get left behind, considering that the Ontario government is moving to ramp up nuclear power generation. In fact, he said a plan to get 50 per cent of Ontario's power from nuclear reactors puts a hard cap on renewable energies.

However, according to Duane Bratt, an energy policy expert from Calgary's Mount Royal University, Germany is "really gambling with their electricity supply."

"You're going to see a real devastation to the German economy," Bratt predicted, adding that Canada is moving in the opposite direction, with both Ontario and Saskatchewan moving forward on nuclear projects.

Kevin Pegg, president of the renewable energy company Energy Alternatives, said the German announcement shows that the country is willing to take on an international leadership role on the energy file.

In terms of the domestic response, Pegg told CTV News Channel that Canada is at an interesting crux, given the large, "untapped" sources of renewable energy across the country.

Pegg talked about solar, geo-thermal and wind as possible alternatives that could be a big boost here and elsewhere in the wake of the German transition.

Meanwhile, Green Leader Elizabeth May said that the German government had wanted to renege on a plan to ditch nuclear power use, but had to revisit that plan because of public opinion.

"The public in Germany did not like her decision to continue with nuclear, so they're back to a decision they've had for some time: a nuclear phase-out."

Comments are now closed for this story

CraigW
said
0 0

Thank goodness for kneejerk reactions. The messes they create give people plenty of work in the future fixing the problems created by the lack of foresight.


pjr
said
0 0

As a Canadian living in Germany, I can only say that they are decades ahead of their nearest competition in terms of research and development on renewable energy sources and eons ahead of us here in Canada. Maybe we should take a hint from this industrious and clever economic giant.


Paul
said
0 0

Nuclear power is the answer, but NOT fission. We need to research and develop fusion. And in that R&D we need to make it intrinsically safe. The problem with the current "green" energy is that it isn't really green, and is totally dependent on local weather. It is nonsense to generate power when we are not using it. The only other option is to develop energy storage, and make it cheap, functional and intrinsically safe.


ouifyg
said
0 0

Must be nice to live in such a forward thinking country that actually has a plan for the future.....


John
said
0 0

Germany can do this because they've spent untold billions over the past 15 years subsidizing solar panels for every rooftop in the country.

I exaggerate, but not by much.




alex kr
said
0 0

Agree with previous comment. Nuclear is not the way to go at all. There may have only been three notable accidents in the past few decades (Chernobyl, Three Mile Island, and Fukishima) but the scale of damage is enormous. We can't even comprehend the damage which is the sad part. If something happens a reactor, it's not like you can just turn it off and the problem is solved. It's dangerous not to have that kind of control especially with radioactive material that can pollute waterways, our food supply and our bodies. And it's not a clean energy. It may not produce GHG or carbon emission at the nuclear plant but mining and refining uranium is very carbon-intensive. We are also accumulating radioactive waste that no one in the world knows what to do with (yet apparently it seems logical to keep creating it). Most importantly, it's extremely expensive and not economically sustainable for anyone. Insurance companies won't even insure nuclear plants (citizens do) because an accident could cost billions. Germany is making the right choice by trying to phase out nuclear. They have a reasonable timeline as well, a decade. Why people are so reluctant to embrace renewable energies and create a healthier world is a complete mystery. (And to the person who suggested shipping nuclear waste off to space, that would be incredibly dangerous going through the atmosphere and even more dangerous if it came back down to shower the earth with nuclear waste.)


Chris in Ottawa
said
0 0

I didn't think Germans spooked that easily. How odd.I'd like to know where they plan to get reliable power once they mothball the reactors. They don't really have any more significant rivers to dam, and solar/wind/biomass isn't reliable. Natgas- or coal-fired plants will just add to the pollution problems -- and respiratory illnesses and deaths. But I guess their thinking is that a few actual deaths everyday ad infinitum is better than a few thousand possible deaths once in a generation.


getreal
said
0 0

Another vote grabbing move to appease the far left nut jobs.


dede
said
0 0

Germany is a very savy country. I wish more countries would follow suit. I don't want that crap dumped in my back yard and there are too many ifs about it. Solar, water and wind are the answers. Let's not mess up the planet anymore than it is.


Jean en Quebec
said
0 0

Like the Volkswagen Beetle, nuclear power in Germany will be back. You can't keep a good thing down.


Damon
said
0 0

There are other future energy sources beyond wind and solar. Tidal generators for example. That being said, there are MANY places Solars and Wind can be placed that are effective while not taking "natural space". Solars can be mounted on unused roofs across the country, homes and businesses. I personally am signing up for micro fit and covering my roof in them. In places like the US, they have deserts that are just begging to be used for solar power. For wind generation, there are water options as well as more elevated areas that can't be used for crops that would be highly effective for wind power.


Dave in Calgary
said
0 0

I am pro nuclear and think that if reactors are built in stable locations to code, they are not a problem. The next step is to develop reactors that can use the waste from current systems for fuel. The materials have a far greater half life and I don't understand why they only want to make bombs or stockpiles with the useful material.
Then too, I'm well enough educated to understand some atomic physics and not paranoid.


JB in Ontario
said
0 0

Glad to see Germany taking steps towards a Greener economy and shutting down the nuclear reactors it has. Solar and wind power seems like the way to go.We as people of this planet cannot afford another nuclear catastrophe. Way to go Germany!


d. bourette
said
0 0

It's quite comical to read these comments of people professing how safe reactors are, it is obvious they are not. All the dangerous waste they produce
is stock piled for a later disaster. It was a poor decision to build them in the first place and they would sooner pollute the planet and kill everything on it than admit they made a mistake.


Prof. Pye Chartt
said
0 0

@ The Future! Today!: I agree that solar panels (and windmills, for that matter) are a glorious and aesthetically pleasing addition to our natural landscape, and beautify every natural space that they occupy. (They make trees look like eyesores.) Let's blanket our countryside in them, and reap our guilt-free power!


Jim in Montreal
said
0 0

Atomic is the way to go. We are just kidding ourselves if we think solar, oil and gas will provide enough. Build more reactors and shoot the waste into space far far far away. Would be cheaper and giva Nasa a new purpose in life.Imagine if we used our limited natural resources, natural gas, oil, how long would that last and the polution ?? Send it out of our solar system the waste. No carbon foot print ever.


John Savard
said
0 0

Solar and wind power may be warm and fuzzy, but they're not reliable. Nuclear power has a compact footprint, it doesn't add to global warming, and it is one of the safest methods of power production if handled with the proper care.

Abandon nuclear, and the choice is between dependence on fossil fuels, or a future of crippling energy constraints.


Doug
said
0 0

Common sense would suggest you have an alternative before making a political statement. Solar and windmills are only supplements to a solid and reliable power supply.


The Future! Today!
said
0 0

@SteveinTO, further to your comments, Germany has been investing heavily in solar for many years now. Stretches of the autobahn are lined with solar panels. If only Canada had the same foresight.


Prof. Pye Chartt
said
0 0

All Germany needs to do is cover the country in solar panels and windmills to safely make up the power loss...or, cross its fingers that a wondrous new technology will emerge pretty soon. Sounds practical and intelligent.


Forward
said
0 0

Europeans are far more advanced and progressive in their thinking than we are in North America.


Think before acting
said
0 0

Well this is a dumb idea, fortunately I don't live in Germany anymore. For anyone who believes this anti-nuclear movement is something big in Germany is horribly mistaken, every country has their extremist groups and whether they are over the top pro something or anti something the wisest course of action is to ignore these people, if they get the power they seek well... I can shamefully admit of a one National Socialist party which ended up as a blight in our past, but I am a Canadian now.However if the fact that uneducated people acting out of fear from something they don't understand such as nuclear power generation doesn't convince people to ignore these fanatical lunatics, perhaps this little bit of information could shake some common sense... Germany and many other European countries boast about 50% of their power comes from renewable energy sources with the operating capacity of 60% so that’s 30% reliable energy from wind, solar, tidal power. Can anyone guess where the other 70% comes from? Russia! And what does Russia use? Nuclear power much like that Chernobyl reactor they are basing their fear on.Canadians don't make the same foolish mistake as Europe, our CANDU Reactors are far better and safer than our American counterparts which we'll have to purchase energy from if we listen to these anti-nuclear nut cases.


Peter in MB
said
0 0

It’s pretty foolish and narrow minded for Germany to abandon the cleanest form of renewable energy just because of 1986 Chernobyl disaster and the resent Japanese earth quake. The Germans are renowned for their high engineering quality and safety. Certainly with today’s technology they could design and build newer and safer modern day reactors then the substandard designs of the Old Russian reactors built back in the 60’s and 70’s


Unknown
said
0 0

If the Germans are able to provide all of their electrical power needs without the use of nuclear energy, it will be a breakthrough in energy management.


SteveinTO
said
0 0

Paul in SD. They have 10 years to make advances and it's this type of mandate that spurs technology forward. It may be because of this decision that an new, safe, renewable source of energy may be discovered. In 1961, President Kennedy said, "by the end of this decade, we aim to put a man on the moon and return him safely to the Earth." In 1969, Armstrong walked on the moon. Advances have become far and few between lately as companies and governments do not want to spend the money required for research and development. It's more important to pay the shareholders huge dividends rather than paying humanity with the next major advancement. I agree, wind and solar just doesn't have the strength to replace nuclear power, but I don't think it will have to.


David
said
0 0

A country that finally has realized nuclear power costs, and uses, 10 TIMES more money and energy than it ever could return; not to mention environmental costs involved with concentrated radium after being used.


Paul in SJ
said
0 0

That's great.......because fossil fuels are SOOOOO much better......Wind, solar, etc...are NOT up to the challenge. Right now they are so incredibly inefficient as to be laughable.I hope Germans enjoy darkness, thanks to their government they will be experiencing lots of it.


barmon777
said
0 0

Ontario's calculations for nuclear electricity may be grossly understated. The new accounting rules require that decommissioning and environmental costs be estimated annually and amortized over the expected life of the asset. They need to be added in to the cost and included on each monthly bill.Decommissioning a nuclear plant and disposing the waste could double the cost. Any accidents or "spillage" could double the cost again - through litigation and remediation. These things cost billions per plant.Germany is the one western nation able to manufacture and export in spite of competition from emerging economies. They also use more clean energy than any other significant economy. Obviously, what they do is working.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Canada Stories

Two prominent Cardiologists in Montreal are disciplinary hearings before the Quebec College of Physicians over allegations they took money from a patient in exchange for future medical services.

Mtl. cardiologists under investigation for payments

More  1 Video(s) 1

Graham James is seen exiting the courthouse in Winnipeg, Wednesday, Feb. 22. 2012.

Graham James apologizes to victims, hockey community

More  3 Video(s) 3