Canada -
News Sections
House hearings begin on contempt accusations
CTV News Video
|
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
Selected Comment
Whoever triggers an election during these unsettled economic times, will only shoot himself in the foot.
George
Hearings could trigger contempt finding against gov't
talking about
House hearings begin on contempt accusations
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Wed. Mar. 16 2011 9:16 PM ET
With a possible election call in the balance, Opposition MPs began grilling Conservative cabinet ministers Wednesday over allegations the government had breached parliamentary privilege.
The government sent two senior ministers, backed up by a phalanx of top bureaucrats, to the House of Commons procedure and House affairs committee to answer accusations that it was in contempt of Parliament.
But Public Safety Minister Vic Toews and Justice Minister Rob Nicholson did not come empty handed: the ministers and their deputies wheeled in a stack of papers providing what they say are detailed cost estimates of the government's anti-crime bills.
Nicholson said the thick stacks of documents put the cost of anti-crime legislation at $631 million -- on top of $2.1 billion already announced for expanded prisons.
Speaking to CTV's Power Play, he said the documents give details to back up the government's earlier estimates of the cost of several pieces of law and order legislation.
"The speaker made a ruling, so we provided more info – so they have hundreds of pages today to have a look at. Hopefully, this satisfies them."
And he suggested that the opposition will never accept the government's cost estimates. "We've given them all that information … but if you don't like it, then you're never going to be satisfied with what we're going to tell you."
The move, which was quickly called a "document dump" by the Liberal and NDP MPs that dominate the committee, comes after last week's unprecedented rulings by Commons Speaker Peter Milliken.
Milliken ruled that the minority Conservatives breached parliamentary privilege by refusing to fully disclose full cost estimates for its justice agenda, corporate tax cuts, and plans to purchase stealth fighter jets.
He also ruled that International Co-operation Minister Bev Oda breached parliamentary privilege by misleading MPs about an altered government document.
Wednesday was the first of three days of hearings by the committee into whether the Harper government and Oda personally are in contempt of Parliament.
NDP committee member Pat Martin said at first glance, the thick sheaf of documents provided by the government today appears virtually useless.
"This is what got dumped on our laps today," he told Power Play host Don Martin. "You could use it I suppose as ballast in your boat but it's not a great deal of use to us. It's the same figures we got before just stretched out and expanded into 400 or 500 pages."
The release of the documents was seen by many as an attempt to derail opposition efforts to hold the government in contempt, a finding that CTV parliamentary correspondent Roger Smith said was almost unprecedented.
"Governments have been found in contempt only very rarely," Smith told CTV News Channel. "Of course, this is something that could happen during a minority Parliament because in a majority Parliament, obviously, the government would have the power to vote down any contempt measures."
It is widely expected, however, that the committee will find the Government in contempt, which will in turn shift the issue to the Commons.
Martin said the government appears determined to head into an election campaign sooner, rather than later.
"Those two ministers didn't do themselves any favours today, you'd think they were trying to provoke an election the way they came in with that attitude and with this document."
No federal government or cabinet minister has ever been found in contempt before. A contempt finding could carry a heavy penalty, including suspension from Parliament or even, theoretically, jail time.
The hearings began as all parties began preparations for an election that could be triggered as early as next week -- either over next Tuesday's budget or a Liberal confidence motion.
NDP leader Jack Layton said the contempt charges could be "a game changer" for the New Democrats.
Layton says next Tuesday's budget remains a decisive factor in whether his party will continue to keep the Conservatives in power, but said he believes the patience of voters is waning when it comes to Prime Minister Stephen Harper's lack of respect for the House of Commons.
"Any residual benefit of the doubt that people may have been willing to grant ... is rapidly running out," Layton said. "It's a bit of a game-changer that is unfolding now."
Minister of State for Finance Ted Menzies is due before the committee on Thursday, with Oda set to appear on Friday.
The committee has until March 21 to submit its recommendations to Parliament.With files from The Canadian Press
User Tools
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I feel that if certain organs were in demand, less effort would be made to revive people. Am I being silly? Not really. I had a bad experience in hospital when my heart stopped, the doctors tried to revive me and failed. They stopped and said I was gone. I came around on my own when the nurse was giving a final BP reading of 'zero'. I heard her declare me dead! It was all I could do to shake my head but they never caught on til I was able to open my eyes. You should have seen them scramble then! I thought the nurse was going to faint. The thing is, I think we may write people off too soon when there is something of value to be gained from them.
Email
Comments are now closed for this story
Colin Gee
said
Cix Cents
said
CJA
said
Charlotte
said
Will
said
Bill
said
MARG MM
said
danR
said
(Excuse the dots. It's an attempt to alleviate CTV's atrocious comment typesetting. You'd think it was a 19th century telegraph office.)
Plabo
said
ajspen
said
U.I> recipient
said
dante in Vancvouer
said
wayne in HRM
said
MARG MM
said
John
said
Dan, the Libs are pushing this fight, and there is an old saying becareful what you wish for you just might get it. Well your going to get an election, and at current polls with a Leader that is not quick on his feet, who will get destroyed in the debates from Gilles, Jack and Stephen yes the other 2 Leaders wont give Iggy a free pass. Your in a word Screwed. Bring it on Dan bring it on.
anonymous
said
billybob
said
Mitchy
said
mahanna ali
said
Geoff
said
Linda in Vancouver
said
Joyce
said
Mike in Pembroke
said
Dan Payment
said
Brendan
said
John Lethbridge
said
Dennis
said
Darrell In Calgary
said
Mike
said
Doug ( ^^^ )Surrey,BC
said
David
said
TheOtherLowellInBC
said
Judy Guelph
said
GHW
said
MAtt
said
Justin Observer
said
Dan
said
maximus
said
Dave
said
Dan
said
Bill
said
Dan
said
Mark from Kelowna
said
Namesh (GTA)
said
Wendy
said
Gord. Robson, Nova Scotia
said
Kate
said
Damon
said
Tim
said
Ken - Calgary
said
RJ
said
Truth about ads
said
Just the facts not the spin
said
Mr.Not a Pye Chart
said
liberal optimist
said
Michael (Ottawa)
said
Jay Glorieux, Leduc, AB
said
Yeah, Canada, welcome to Alberta, I wish you well!
Mark from Kelowna
said
Carl
said
Scottish Terror
said
Dilys
said
CMQ
said
Mike in Pembroke
said
Duncan Druhl
said
By adopting the relative morality of street urchins, the government (meaning previous ones in particular) becomes able to define "ethics" situationally, not based on strict standards. Given that scenario, whose "ethics" are better? The answer is the person holding the gavel. Now there is a democratic solution, eh?
J.C.
said
Tracy Dusome
said
Ontario History Teacher
said
John in ONT
said
Dean in NL
said
Joe Szentirmay
said
TM
said
[X] Ignatieff
Newf
said
I know where I stand and its NOT with the Canadian teabaggers..
jammin
said
Ray Douaire
said
Mr.Not a Pye Chart
said
Anti-Pye
said
Quebec hockey fan
said
T.F.
said
Andrew McInally
said
"Whoever triggers an election during these unsettled economic times, will only shoot himself in the foot.
"
If they're so unsettling then why go with the party at the helm all the way through it? We didn't come out of the '08 collpase because of wise or prudent action. Harper's response to the collpase before it destroyed 500,000 jobs in Canada and before dumping 60 Billion into Tory-held ridings, was limited to offering stock advice and gloating how good it was for Canadaian with a boat full of cash to invest. We came out better because we had proper regulation of our financal system and previous Governments (Liberal and PC) that didn't subject us or the system to the privitization and deregulation game.
If the Conservatives believe they can win an election by withholding information to Cabinet, on matters that will put us hundreds of Billions of dollars in debt for the next 25 years then you guys go do that.
Democracy is not harmed by elections and the economy is agnostic to that of our national politics. Sorry but we don't matter that much.
Max in Vancuver
said
Dante Rivera
said
Wayne in HRM
said
Chris in Long Sault
said
sick of Attack ads
said
Accountability in Ottawa
said
PEI Fella
said
Intelligent Liberal
said
Rene
said
Mike S.
said
Terry
said
Peter 1951
said
Dean in NL
said
George
said