Canada -   

1
The damaged Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear facility in Japan is shown on Monday, March 14, 2011. (AP / DigitalGlobe) A Red Cross rescue worker, in red, is scanned for signs of radiation upon returning from Fukushima to his hospital in Nagahama, Shiga Prefecture, Monday, March 14, 2011. (AP / Kyodo News) Smoke ascends from the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant's Unit 3 in Okumamachi, Fukushima Prefecture, northern Japan, Monday, March 14, 2011. This November 2009 photo provided by GeoEye shows the Fukushima-Daiichi nuclear complex in Japan. Japanese Economy, Trade and Industry Ministry's official Hidehiko Nishiyama speaks at a press conference at the ministry in Tokyo Monday, March 14, 2011 after the second hydrogen explosion in three days rocked Japan's stricken Fukushima Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant. (Kyodo News) In this combination of photos, the No. 1 reactor of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant, is seen before, left, and after an explosion that blew out the walls of the unit, in Okumamachi, Fukushima Prefecture in Japan.  The photo at left was taken Oct. 3, 2008, and the photo at right was released by the Tokyo Power Electric Co. March 12, 2011, following the explosion. (AP Photo/ Kyodo News and Tokyo Power Electric Co.) Smoke ascends from the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant's Unit 3 in Okumamachi, Fukushima Prefecture, northern Japan, Monday, March 14, 2011.

Explosion, fire at Japanese nuclear plant; workers leave

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV National News: Lisa LaFlamme in Narita
Fears and concerns grow over the possibility a reactor could have damaged the containment units, which keeps radiation from leaking out in large amounts.
Extended: Explosion at Fukushima nuclear plant
Monday: A second explosion in three days rocked Japan's stricken Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant Monday morning, sending a massive column of smoke into the air.
CTV National News: Avis Favaro on radiation
CTV's medical specialist explains the effects high level of radiation could have on our bodies.
CTV British Columbia: Lisa Rossington reports
The radiation that's leaked from the disabled reactors at Japan's earthquake-damaged nuclear power stations does not pose a health risk to Canadians on the Pacific coast, officials say.
CTV Toronto: Japan struggles for control of plants
Paul Bliss takes a look at Japan's nuclear situation as the country struggles to avoid a devastating outcome.
CTV News Channel: Dan Ayotte, technician
A Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant employee who returned home to Youngs Point, Ont., Sunday, says he was working when the quake hit. He says they thought nothing of it at first but quickly realized it was serious. Ayotte says he was evacuated on Saturday.
CTV News Channel: Mycle Schneider, analyst
A nuclear analyst explains how nuclear officials in Japan are working to contain radiation, including purposely releasing radioactivity to relieve pressure.
CTV News Channel: Norm Rubin, director
The director of nuclear research with the Energy Probe Research Foundation weighs in on whether the nuclear rector was unprepared to handle a tsunami and what implications the explosion will have on the industry.
CTV Toronto: Worst disaster since Chernobyl
A third reactor is now overheating and technicians are frantically working to prevent another explosion in what is being called the worst nuclear disaster since Chernobyl. Zuraidah Alman and Lisa LaFlamme report.
CTV News Channel: Avis Favaro on the dangers
CTV's medical specialist says it is unknown what levels of radiation people in Japan have been exposed to and how widespread the dangers are. She says there is concern over what the effects of the exposure will do down the road.
CTV News Channel: Tom Walters in Tokyo
A CTV News correspondent says the aftermath of the quake is not getting any easier to deal with, as there is a major concern over the operating unit at a power plant.
CTV Montreal: Dominic Ryan, McGill physicist
McGill University physicist Dominic Ryan speaks with Todd van der Heyden on the threat of a nuclear disaster in Japan.
CTV News Channel: Gordon Edwards, president
The president of the Canadian Coalition for Nuclear Responsibility says there is a worry there can be an all-out meltdown if the core of the plant cannot be cooled.
Canada AM: Christian Cote in Fukushima
A Canadian working as a teacher in Japan explains how he and others in his school are coping with the threat of a nuclear meltdown.
CTV National News: Omar Sachedina reports
Sunday: The Japanese government admitted Sunday that radiation levels outside the damaged power plant have exceeded the legal limit. Officials still insist there's no need to be alarmed, but many more outside of Japan are saying they should be.
Extended: Explosion at a nuclear power station
Saturday: An explosion at a nuclear plant north of Tokyo raises fears of a meltdown. The plant was damaged during Friday's 8.9 magnitude earthquake.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (120) Facebook   

The damaged Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear facility in Japan is shown on Monday, March 14, 2011. (AP / DigitalGlobe) A Red Cross rescue worker, in red, is scanned for signs of radiation upon returning from Fukushima to his hospital in Nagahama, Shiga Prefecture, Monday, March 14, 2011. (AP / Kyodo News) Smoke ascends from the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant's Unit 3 in Okumamachi, Fukushima Prefecture, northern Japan, Monday, March 14, 2011. This November 2009 photo provided by GeoEye shows the Fukushima-Daiichi nuclear complex in Japan. Japanese Economy, Trade and Industry Ministry's official Hidehiko Nishiyama speaks at a press conference at the ministry in Tokyo Monday, March 14, 2011 after the second hydrogen explosion in three days rocked Japan's stricken Fukushima Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant. (Kyodo News) In this combination of photos, the No. 1 reactor of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant, is seen before, left, and after an explosion that blew out the walls of the unit, in Okumamachi, Fukushima Prefecture in Japan.  The photo at left was taken Oct. 3, 2008, and the photo at right was released by the Tokyo Power Electric Co. March 12, 2011, following the explosion. (AP Photo/ Kyodo News and Tokyo Power Electric Co.) Smoke ascends from the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant's Unit 3 in Okumamachi, Fukushima Prefecture, northern Japan, Monday, March 14, 2011.

Photos

The damaged Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear facility in Japan is shown on Monday, March 14, 2011. (AP / DigitalGlobe)

View Larger Image

Date: Mon. Mar. 14 2011 11:59 PM ET

An explosion at Japan's stricken Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant has caused further damage to the Unit 2 reactor, while a fire has broken out at Unit 4, worsening an already harrowing crisis and forcing emergency workers to leave the site.

Radiation levels around the plant Tuesday were measured at 8,217 microsieverts an hour -- more than 7,000 above the legal limit. Anyone less than 20 kilometres of the reactors was urged to leave the area, while anyone within 20 to 30 km was told to stay inside.

A blast was heard at the Unit 2 reactor at the plant at 6:14 a.m. local time, officials with the plant's operator, the Tokyo Electric Power Co., told a news conference on Tuesday.

That was followed by a fire at the Unit 4 reactor, which had escaped the same level of critical damage suffered by the other three reactors at the plant. Reports said the fire was later extinguished. 

The Unit 2 explosion is the third to hit the plant since last Friday's 9.0-magnitude earthquake. The Dai-ichi complex sits just off the Pacific coast and was badly hammered by the subsequent tsunami.

The blast was heard near the suppression pool in the reactor's containment vessel, which is the last line of defence before radiation is released into the outside air, the TEPCO representatives said.

Company officials told reporters that pressure had fallen in the suppression pool, indicating that it had sustained some damage in the blast.

Engineers have been pumping sea water into the reactors in an effort to keep them cool after the normal cooling systems were knocked out when the quake cut power to the plant.

An official with the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency told reporters Tuesday that in the overnight hours, water levels dropped dramatically in the No 2 reactor, leaving the upper parts of the white-hot nuclear fuel rods exposed. A valve that keeps pressure in the suppression pool down had also partially closed.

The official said water levels have since started to recover.

TEPCO officials also said radiation level readings around the reactor had gone up after the blast, and so all non-essential staff had been evacuated from the area. Broadcaster NHK reported Tuesday that officials measured radiation levels three times greater than what the average person would be exposed to in one year.

But the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency official said that while radiation levels had spiked, they quickly fell, meaning there was likely little threat to human health.

The latest bad news from the plant came shortly after Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan announced a new response headquarters to help the plant's operator manage the ongoing crisis.

Kan told reporters early Tuesday that he will direct operations at the headquarters, which will be a joint venture with TEPCO.

Engineers at the plant have been struggling to keep the nuclear fuel rods inside all three of the most troubled reactors cool, and officials said Tuesday they can't deny the possibility that the fuel rods are in fact melting.

On Monday, the level of coolant water dropped precipitously inside the Unit 3 reactor, leaving the uranium fuel rods completely exposed just hours after it was rocked by a hydrogen explosion.

The explosion sent a towering cloud of smoke into the air and injured 11 workers.

A similar hydrogen blast occurred Saturday at the Unit 1 reactor, injuring four people.

Plant workers' efforts to pump in sea water will make the reactors forever unusable. Officials said Tuesday those efforts will continue.

Normally, the series of metal rods containing pellets of uranium fuel inside a nuclear reactor's core are kept cool with purified water that is pumped between the pipes. The resulting steam then drives an electricity-generating turbine, and the heat is then removed by coolant pumps.

But those pumps at the Fukushima plant, as well as back-up power supply, were knocked out by Friday's earthquake and tsunami.

A partial meltdown may be occurring inside the Unit 2 reactor itself, which is fuelling concerns for the worst-case scenario: the reactor's uranium core eats through its steel-reinforced containment vessel, resulting in a massive leak of dangerous levels of radiation.

Experts say crisis is ‘uncharted territory'

The series of accidents that have followed the worst nuclear crisis since the 1986 Chernobyl disaster in Ukraine sparked criticism that authorities were ill-prepared.

Norm Rubin, director of nuclear power research at Energy Probe, said the engineers and staff at the plant "are scrambling and doing Hail Mary passes to try to keep the fuel rods inside those reactors cool enough that they don't run dry, fail and melt."

"That's the worst case scenario at this point," he told CTV News Channel.

Rubin said as much as three-quarters of the 3.7-metre high bundles of nuclear fuel rods were completely exposed when the coolant leaked away, allowing them to heat to almost unimaginable temperatures.

"That's a serious no-no, because unless this material is cooled it is generating enough heat … an amazing amount of heat," he said. "And if you don't take that heat away the stuff that's producing the heat overheats: it just keeps getting hotter."

He added: "Something has to take this heat away or else things go very badly …

Rubin said that this is the first time so many reactors in one place have threatened to melt down at the same time, adding another layer of danger to the equation.

"This is uncharted territory … we've never been in a situation where more than one reactor is in crisis at the same time at the same facility. This is new."

Rubin said the Dai-ichi plant is almost 40 years old and had only been designed to withstand a quake of 6.5 magnitude.

"In hindsight, a few days after an 8.9 earthquake, that really seems like cutting corners … it seems nuts."

Yukiya Amano, the head of the UN nuclear watchdog and a veteran Japanese diplomat, said Japan has now responded to the International Atomic Energy Agency's offer to assist with the crippled nuclear plants and said his staff are working "around the clock" to help.

"Japan and all our member states can be assured that all resources put at our disposal are fully mobilised. That will remain the case until this crisis has been resolved."

If there is a partial or total meltdown, it could become impossible to remove the fuel. That's what happened in 1979 at Three Mile Island, which remains sealed off to this day.

Japanese officials have evacuated 180,000 people from the around the Dai-ishi plant in recent days. It is believed that as many as 190 people may have been exposed to elevated radiation levels.

CTV's Lisa LaFlamme reported from Japan early Tuesday local time that in addition to the evacuations, other residents in nearby communities have been instructed to remain indoors, despite assurances that levels of leaked radiation were low.

"The latest is that the authorities are suggesting that the radiation that leaked from that second explosion was at such a low level, they say within legal limits," LaFlamme told CTV's Power Play. "But for anybody living within breathing distance that's small comfort."

Dan Ayotte, a Canadian employee at the plant who has since returned home to Ontario, was in an office just outside the plant when the earthquake struck on Friday.

"We had filing cabinets falling down and the building was moaning and groaning," Ayotte told News Channel. "And the earthquake, you wouldn't believe the noise it makes. It's like a freight train, it just rumbles."

Ayotte and his colleagues were tested for radiation exposure, but readings indicated he did not suffer exposure beyond the acceptable levels he expects with his job.

On Saturday, local fire officials evacuated the town in which Ayotte was living, just south of the plant, and so he began the journey to Tokyo and then on home to Canada.

According to Ayotte, the fact that workers are pumping seawater into the reactors means it is "just about the end of the line for as far as salvaging anything. I think they're looking at, ‘We can't save the reactor but we can save the people.'"

With files from The Associated Press

Comments are now closed for this story

Dr. Lee
said

Folks, let's get a grip here. Nuclear and coal are not the only solutions. Are we really such a small-minded species that we believe we have no other options out there? Scientists have already developed cutting edge solutions for a greener world that are affordable and available to us right now. Try to broaden your scope of thinking and have a little faith in human innovation and our ability to evolve and come up with better science and new solutions.

shane
said

All i can say is why were the back up generators not put up somewhere high so a wave couldnt reach them and have weeks of fuel to run them? makes cense to me no?the structures withstood the wave why not put them up there?what about nitrogen to cool them?


Marg in Calgary
said

I don't know anything about nuclear reactors, but you'd think the people who do would know better than to pump sea water into it. Apparently this is the worst thing for it.

Did they not see the "MacGyver" episode where MacGyver stopped a nuclear disaster with chocolate? Come on, Mac and his duct tape and swiss army knife were never wrong!!

All kidding aside, I really hope that now that Japan has accepted help, this situation will get under control quickly. Everytime, there seems to be a different report - first there is no meltdown, then there is a partial, then there is no radiation leakage, then there is...we need to have some actual facts here, not cover-ups.


Inquire
said

I would like the Canadian Government to respond and adequately inform the residents of the west coast of what the possibilities are in this disaster. So far it has been a non issue, with recent events a nuclear catastrophe is possible.....come on people step up and speak!!!


Jas
said

There is no such thing as a safe plant in a major earth quake. Yes they are down playing this. Who was the nut that put the diesel back up generators at sea level?


Adeptus
said

For those saying "the ONLY enviro-friendly power options are wind, solar, & hydro", you're forgetting geothermal. It can only be done where the conditions are right (don't know if Japan is a candidate) but it does supply power 24/7.


Mike in ontario
said

Hey Sleepless in Seattle, you want to shut down the nuke plants and start burning coal, lots and lots of coal. Have you seen any video of people in Japan wearing masks over their nose and mouth. Do you know why they wear the mask? It is because of smog over there and you want to burn coal, lots and lots of coal. Sure lets do that and pollute the air even more. Make it even harder to breath in Japan. Not very smart to my way of thinking! Maybe you should try to come up with a better solution before you get all nuclear palnts shut down.


Barbara Purdy
said

If there is a major radiation leak, it will only take 36 hours to reach California, Seattle and British Colombia. Airborne radiation would work its way into the jet stream and reach the United States & west coast of Canada in less than 36 hours. Jet streams flow from west to east in the upper portion of the troposphere. Why is no one reporting this very possible outcome? I'll tell you why...it may be perceived as fear mongering. The other side of that we certainly wouldn't want to tarnish the image nuclear power has in the eyes of the general public. I am sure the word smiths have been very busy trying to quell all of this, and if you believe the United States, they will tell you it only rates a 3 compared to 3 mile island being a 4. Well, perhaps they spoke too soon. Very sad that we have to resort to one of the most dangerous materials imaginable for power. Nuclear power is anything but green.


Deb in Vancouver
said

My heart goes out to all of those in Japan. They are such a concientious people. Of all people, they will have sacrificed much to try to control the nuclear meltdowns. Such a huge tragedy for those in Japan, in so many ways. I can only hope that at least they know the world is watching, trying to help, we care, and we will do all we can to help rebuild Japan.


B. Kelley, Ontario
said

The Chicken Little environmentalists are an amusing lot. They spend their days throwing rocks with their keyboards while they convince themselves that they alone, as the legions of all that is good and pure, stand between our world and the Apocalypse. When they become weary they lie down on their plywood beds and lull themselves to sleep with visions of doomsday conspiracies dancing through their heads. Once, just once, I would love to hear a practical, workable, cost-effective alternate idea come out of their ranks. I'm sure that they view this situation in Japan as their big chance to kill nuclear power generation forever. Sorry boys and girls, it just isn't going to happen. Get used to it because there nothing else that can take its place. Kumbaya anyone?


Flange
said

How do you like the oilsands now? Seems like a pretty safe, secure form of energy to me. 1000 dead ducks won't look so bad if Canada gets blanketed by radiation from these reactors.


Jolly Roger
said

The spent fuel rods are stored above the reactor core. If you look for a diagram of the facility, you'll see a tank where the spent fuel rods are stored. This is where the explosion occurred. The spent fuel rods are actually quite dangerous because they contain radioactive fission waste products that have both short half-lives and long half-lives.


Romes
said

If you take a look at the actual footage of the explosion. The smoke is red colour at the top and white yellowish at the bottom. This indicates a leakage already present.


Romes
said

All nations with Nuclean Power Plants should learn a major lesson from this disaster. If it can happen in Japan it could happen anywhere else.Are we prepared? Are we ready for such disasters? Take for instance the Pickering Power Plan in Ontario god forbid such thing happen here. I don't think the Canadian government nor its public is prepared for such a disaster.Preperation is a MUST before its too late.


Mike McGillivray
said

Anti Nuk, Why don't you try a little common sense before you type. It is technology that has doubled our life expectancy, and allowed us to have our lifestyle. Yes, we can get rid of nuclear reactors, but there is no viable alternative. Japan -could- import coal from Quebec. Oops, I forgot Quebec's coal has traces of Uranium in it, and Quebec's coal electrical plants spew more radiation into the atmosphere than all of the nuclear reactor accidents combined.


Jennifer
said

Given that seawater is being used to flood these 'containment units' , what are the environmental implications with respect to the wastewater (which is presumably carrying pollutants) that is spilling back into the ocean?


joe
said

Canada should send heavy water from Candu reactors to Japan to cool down their reactors rods - sea water cannot stop the heating for much longer


KJ in Kingston Ontario
said

Even when you look at the "worse case" side of this -- it may not even come close to the approaching Greenhouse gas produced doomsday scenario for civilization -- which is an added tragedy, since this isn't going to help the other problem one bit... But it sure isn't that famous "energy too cheap to meter" scenario from the 1950's is it....


Captain Obvious
said

I think "downplay" was a great word to describe this situation. unfortunately this doesn't look like its going to get better as it seems to get worse everyday . but if you told the population of japan that it was going to be very bad, i think you would have mass panic and probably mass instability. so the saying goes ... do you want me to tell you what you want to hear or tell you the truth. nevermind its better i tell you what you want to hear, unfortunately.


Kman
said

I am furious at how ignorant people are being in this situation. If it weren't for people like you panicking there would be no such things as mobs or riots!. Just reading the comment posted by Dave Shelter shows me how dangerous a bit of information can be. The entire post is false, non factual, pure fiction. Worst of all it credits the information to a half rate crack pot conspiracy website and presents it as fact. (PS Dave, the graphite in an RBMK are moderator that thermalise neutrons and allow them to fission other U235 atoms causing a chain reaction, but I am sure a bit more reacding may have led you to this FACT) Aside from that, the number of people posting ridiculous claims and un credited hearsay as fact is staggering. Please, if you don't know what you are talking about then please keep your opinion to yourself.


JC
said

I see again these people coming out a closet and calling to scrap nuclear power.
These people should do mathematics first before even thinking of arguing.
Take the wind power.
The generating capacity of a large wind power generator is 2 MW if you have a big one. The Darlington NGS in Ontario has a capacity of 3500MW from four reactors. If you replace the station with the wind power, you would need 1750 huge wind towers.
Where do you put all these? In Lake Ontario? Think of the capital cost of construction. In addition to the nightmare of construction and maintenance, I am quite sure people would object. AND you are lucky if you get 3500MW from all these. Some day it will be zero. Some day it will be 50% of it. You will be lucky if you get 3500MW for a short time. How can you maintain all 1750 towers in the best condition all time? It is similar to other renewable energy sources. So, please, do your mathematics first before you come out here.
The nuclear power generates reliable steady 3500MW 24 hours 7 days a week from a rather small complex. It is not a perfect technology. We are playing with a fire in a sort. But with a careful design and care it is a safe technology. Also, the CANDU design would not release the radioactive steam. It has an added barrier to contain. I will explain if someone wishes.



Rick from SJ
said

and it's the armchair scientists like antinuk that keep up these shinanigans of conspiracies and downplaying all that is bad.I'm sorry but i'll believe the experts...you didn't go to school for years and years like these guys have. They have it under control as best as they can and if there is anything at all likely of a catastrophe the proper channels and decisions will be made. When you have their credentials, then i'll listen to you, otherwise keep off the kool-aid.


Dan in Quebec
said

This years Darwin award goes out to the Japanese government for placing volatile nuclear fuel and reactors on one of the worlds most volatile earthquake/ volcano zones. But then again, where there is a demand, someone needs to step in to supply at any cost to the environment and the detriment of the population. Anyone here saying that they did not see this coming needs to have their head examined. Nuclear energy is NOT clean. Need proof, go move to a town next to a Japanese nuclear reactor after what has happened and let me know how you sleep at night.


Doug
said

I am about as much a "non expert" as all of those who have much more to say.So all I can wish for is what we will probably not get. . . the truth!


Real Info
said

Perhaps instead of listening to the fear mongering organics who think that the world can run on oatmeal and windpower. Try going to the IAEA website or Tokyo power for actual information about the reactor status.

PBW
said

JB inOntario: You propose Japan close down all its nuclear generating capability: How do you propose they replace it? They do not have hydro capable rivers like Canada, and suitable land is at a premium for living and agriculture, let alone wind - or solar-power farms. The alternatives are coal-fired plants (do we really want acid rain from Japan on our boreal forest?) or oil-fuelled (they have to import all their oil, an increasingly expensive commodity). Please keep your comments both sensible and reasonable.


Cara B, NS
said

Seriously, people, get a bit of a grip. If you are that worried about the (nuclear) fallout from these plants in Japan, then get off your computer, go spend the day with your loved ones and enjoy life. If this were really your last day, would you honestly spend it on the internet???


A in C
said

I love these comments of no nukes, I also love the fact that these folks can argue against them but have no solution to replace them. There you go environmentalists, come up with a solution and then we will not have to worry about nuclear energy again. This lead of comments seems to be ignoring the fact that there are a great many people effected by what happened and that they need help, please donate to the Red Cross whatever your feelings about nuclear energy.


Sleepless in Seattle
said

Japan needs power, then shutdown all thier nukes and start burning coal, lots and lots of coal. China's got lots of coal, they can buy coal from them. Its' cheaper, it doesn't spew out radiation and make the neighbourhood uninhabitable for thousands of years, so burn lots and lots of coal. I'm sure that will tick off a few environmentalists.


Do you want the Stone Ages
said

For the alarmists who suggest that we stop using Nuclear power, what is their alternative. Do you want the air black from Coal generators? You don't want the wind turbines in your own back yard and don't want to pay double for your hydro to convert to solar. So what is it people...no electricity?


Murray
said

They should have used the CANDU reactor design. None of this would be happening if they were.


Anti Nuk
said

The spin doctors who call themselves experts in nuclear energy are trying their best to downplay the catastrophic disaster of the exploding reactors on the news. They keep spinning the news that all is well!
Well folks be prepared for the worst disaster yet for people all around the world. Are the Japanese circulating contaminated water back into the sea? Did the explosions contaminate the air, what's coming next????
It's the educated experts that are killing us with their dangerous inventions.





Bob
said

Those against building a nuclear plant in Peace River Alberta are very ignorant in the design of American reactors and Canadian reactors. They are having a knee jerk reaction comparing it to one built here in Canada. Japan is on the circle of fire, major fault lines in the earths crust. In Peace River it woud be built on the Canadian Shield, very solid, very secure, no fault lines. If an earth quake was too happen then there are bigger fish to fry. Get with the science people.


Will
said

Far too many scare-mongers here. For crying out loud, people, will you at least learn a little something on the topic that doesn't come straight from the anti-nuke playbook!? This is a serious event but the world is not going to come to an end over it. Enough with the horror show.


Ron
said

What everyone here doesn't realize is, this was an 8.9 magnitude earthquake. In the structural world you can design for a 7.0 tops. after that you might as well encase it in concrete. I grew up in an earthquake zone. For every point on the richter scale it is 100 times stronger. Nothing could've prevented this. As for not building on a fault line, it has to be built there becuase Japan needs to be self-sufficient. Everyone needs electricity for their hybrid cars. Think about that.


rfaolwen
said

what is happening in japan happened in Windscale in the 50's. during the reprocessing of fuel, the process went out of control and eventually ended in a major fire. the result was a discharge of radioactive material over the north west of england. even to tis day there are pockets of highly radioactive spots in the Lake's. so where is the sea water going from these reactors going. is it all going up in steam or being poured back in to the sea, thus causing radiactive pollution to spread ?


JB in Ontario
said

The Japanese need to phase out nuclear energy as their energy source. After cleaning up this disaster, they need to close down the reactors and dispose of the nuclear energy rods safely. They need to find a way to do that. Having nuclear energy plants in Japan is a catastrophe waiting to happen. They are prone to Earthquakes and tsunamis and it doesn't matter how safe the Japanese think it is, nuclear energy will be a problem down the road.


Grant
said

Just to set some things straight. There are only a few places in the world where wind and solar power are at all viable in any real way. Japan is not one of them. People also have to realize that the power generated by wind and solar stop when the wind stops blowing and the sun stops shining like at night. Efficient power storage technologies do not yet exist. Therefore in the near future, wind and solar can only be supplementary to continuous power generating systems like hydro, nuclear and fossil fuel. Hydro is also a limited resource, so for now we have to choose between nuclear and fossil fuel as our primary power generating systems. Fossil fuel plants are a major cause of global warming which will ultimately cause global flooding. Nuclear plants if designed properly are extremely safe. Unfortunately, it is almost impossible to protect any system against an 8.9 earthquake like the recent one in Japan. This quake ranks as one of the 4 worst earthquakes in recorded history and must be put in the proper perspective before condemning the safety of nuclear power.


MiggsVer2.0
said

There's lots of Nuke-Huggers coming out of the woodwork. I wouldn't trust a nuke-hugger to give me the truth on nuclear power or the curent situation in Japan any more than I'd trust a tree-hugger to give me the honest scoop on global warming.


msamson
said

MiggsVer2.0...i have so much to say but will keep it to this...you misguided minds...to awnser your question...the water is evaporating as quickly, or faster than it is pumped in, in essense, its turned to steam...which is then compressed within the walls of the chamber....either to be vented..or not..if vented well then it could explode the outer walls from the massive amount of pressure...through a bottle of cold water on your wood stove in the winter...same thing...


JP in Ontario
said

Attention Crackpots!!! At this point in the conversation, I feel the need to point out that there is a terrible amount of misinformation being passed on as fact. There are numerous sources of information out there, your public library for example, which are unbiased, and will provide you with a useful source of knowledge. Take advantage of this. Chernobyl and Three Mile Island have, as yet, been properly labelled as worse disasters. The sudden increase in reactor power due to human error, and shutting off cooling at Chernobyl let to the expansion of steam and the following explosion at Chernobyl, this lifted the lid off the containment vessel, exposing the graphite core to air where it caught on fire, as the lid crashed down, the contents of the core were expelled. TMI-2 was more similar to Japan in design, but not the same. The extent of the reactor damage is not known in Japan yet, so hold off your declarations of disaster. The explosions you all refer to at Fukushima Dai'ichi 1 and 3 were hydrogen building up in the outer building, a result of the core material reacting with cold water, this can happen in any reactor in the world, and is why they all have hydrogen ignitor systems. FD1/3 have no electricity left to run these systems. No reactor design is perfect, but they are all run by a global network of people who take this kind of thing very seriously. Real people like you and me. People, who in this case, are carrying on with superhuman effort, despite the loss of friends and family outside, carrying on to keep whats left of their country safe. Please, take time to educate yourselves.


Stevo
said

"I would also be interested to know how well an wind-power farm would survive an earthquake of that magnitude, ditto a solar farm. I suspect both would be just as incapacitated."

The Orwellian nature of the nuclear lobby is such that its impossible to be certain that this guy isn't serious.

I'm pretty sure this guy isn't joking, for example - "Please report the news that actually matters."

Once stupidity gets to a certain level it gets sort of beyond criticism.


Mike in Pembroke
said

@eddytoronto, boy you are just full of doom and gloom arn't you. Anyone listening to you will think the world is about to end. Yes, Japan has a major problem but spewing all your BS is not going to help. The rest of the world will get its act together and come to Japans aid. When they had the nuclear melt down in Russia several years ago I remeber people just like eddytoronto spouting off how this would kill everyone on earth when the radoactive cloud circled the earth. Guess what, the human race is still here. There is a major nuclear problem rightt now in Japan but it will be cleaned up and life will go on. Lets not panic but keep a clear head and help anyway you can.


Calv
said

Fukushima Nuclear explosion was manmade disaster 22. The main cause of Fukushima was due to its nuclear fuel rod fell into the reactor during the earthquake, resulting complete fuel rod expose at the chamber, at the same time, power failure causes the coolant to stop circulation. Due to the fuel rod exposure, nuclear reaction hits the dangerously melting temperature at the core without coolant, as a result, the water in its core vaporized to extreme pressure. Due to inefficiency of government to make prompt decision to recover its power failure (for 2 days!) the fuel rod melted from inside.To ease the pressure from inside out, the worker at the facilities had to release off the radioactive vapor from the core to the open air. This was another suicidal mistake. Government official have to evacuate people of the 10km radius. This however, does not resolve the issue of burning fuel rod from the core. They have to make sacrifices to human life, by sending military to suicidal mission, entering into the core and inject absorbent liquid into the core. And hence result of 4 death (and a few missing.. com'on, the facilities is not much of a place to be missing.)Seriously, no one knows what happen in the core now. Should the core punctures, there will be large quantity of vaporized steam release off, as the last round, having reaction to the open air forming hydrogen explosion, we can redraw the entire map of Japan.


Sergy
said

I have to comment on the "Japan worshipping" that's going on -- the "if the Japanese can't run a safe plant who can" idea.

This is not a nation full of nothing but brilliant, logical scientists. It's a nation of people, like any other. And they have the same weakesses, failings, and superstitions as people anywhere.

This nuclear plant's parent company has been found guilty of falsifying safety records in the past. They pay staff as little as they can get away with. It's hard to fire incompetent staff, just as it is in North America (unionized or not). And money is tight for improvements and upgrades because of the "bottom line."

The Japanese are no worse than we are -- but they're no better, either.


Calv
said

Fukushima Nuclear explosion was manmade disaster 11. The incidentExplosion at nuclear facilities occurs on the old reactor built in 1971, such design would have been retired in its 40 years of life span. What drives the old facilities to continue operate by Tokyo Power despite numerous poor maintenance record was solely profit. In fact, not only they reluctant to give up the facilities, they had earlier hoping that it would extend the use of these facilities for another 20 years.It was obvious that instead of using a more effective approach (seal with boric acid) that could permanently disable the reactor's core when first warning strike, Tokyo Electric Power uses some conventional method to cool off the reactor by pumping sea water directly into the reactor, until the situation ran out of control.The fuel used in Fukushima Nuclear power plant is MOX (mixed oxide, blending plutonium and uranium), in which would cost around 2-3 times more than the standard uranium. Using boric acid to disable the core, would result in its weapon grade plutonium by product, unusable.


Phil in Finland
said

Yeah, Scared Canada, I'm with you! Space 1999: think about it people! I mean, since we blew the moon out of orbit and sent it off to encounter space aliens and stuff, what do you think would happen if those explosions occured here on earth? When will "man" ever learn?


Dave Shelter
said

The Fukushima reactor is a boiling water reactor. Chernobyl was a graphite reactor. Graphite absorbs the neutrons quelling the reaction, but can burn at higher temperatures, Fukushima uses just plain water zirconium casing, the fuel is in pellet form. There are two types of fission reactors at fukushima, standard fission and Plutonium MOX. The P-MOx reactor is the most dangerous. If the reactor gets to hot and the zirconium casing melt the nuclear fuel pellets will be exposed with no neutron absorbing material, this would be a China syndrome. If they do not get the reactor under control it can melt right through the floor of the plant into the water table. They are mixing Boron into the water to absorb more neutrons in hope of cooling the reaction even more. Just ones mans input..http://shelter101.com/fukushima-nuclear-plant-emergency.html


Buck
said

Nuke is still the safest, cleanest and cheapest way to generate power when compared to coal and oil.
Far more lives have been lost and greater catastrophes have occurred from other sources. Check out coal ash spills, refinery explosions/fires, and the list goes on and on.
The outputs of solar, wind and geothermal aren't comparable.



Cambob in Toronto
said

I wonder if the folks who say "No more nuclear power" realize that the internet they are using is partially powered by nuclear energy... Horse energy is no where near as dangerous as automobile energy, yet we still have plenty of cars.


Albertaboy111
said

So very sad. I wish the people of Japan all the best, and I hope these reactors are brought under control. The fact that things like fire pumps that provide cooling water running out of fuel are happening indicates more is going on here than we know. They are obviously running low on the resources required to contain this situation. I hope for the best....


Nick
said

Some of the people on this site seem to forget that Japan is a very small country with a high population density when compared to USA or Russia, or the old USSR including Ukraine, .

An accident in Japan of the scale of Chernobyl would make, for a period of time at least, the Tokyo Yokahama district uninhabitable and imply the resettling of tens of millions of people.

If you think of that, then consider the seriousness of this event. Thank God that so far no-one is suggesting that this could be as serious as Chernobyl. If it were the consequences would be extraordinarily far-reaching, not least in terms of the effect on the world economy.


mike
said

To all those making comments either for or against nuclear, how much education or training do you actually have in the field? How much of what you "know" is from questionable sources. Until you do the research do not present opinion as fact.


gawel37
said

But if the top of the reactor has been bown off, then all that steam and smoke released to the air is a great risk already.
If there is partial or complete meltdown inside then I suspect it will boil for a long time and releasing radioactivity into the air.
How is that for containment?




Al - Ottawa
said

Wow, there's lots of uneducated opinions out there. Most of the blame goes to the media which almost purposefully leave out details so the stories get higher ratings. Nuclear reactors are not all the same. For example, in the case of the CANDU reactors used in Canada, this kind of "meltdown" as in Japan can't happen because of the way it is designed. The rods are pull up out of the water during operation. In case of an emergency the rods are dropped into the water. Not to mentioned the additional safeguards, the last of which is the vacuum chamber.Again, just so you don't sound like a dumb*ss, do a bit of research before blabbing.


Steve in Vancouver
said

l listened to a news story on the reactors on CTV two days ago. The commentator was trying to pin down the expert on the reality that this situation was under control. He was insisting that it was under control, that plans where in place to cover any event. That there was nothing that could happen that we had to worry about he said. l could see that the commentator Jacki was still skeptical in spite of his assistance that there was no real need to worry. It now looks like the skepticism of the commentator Jacki was well grounded. We have a problem.


PBW
said

"But those pumps at the Fukushima plant, as well as back-up power supply, were knocked out by Friday's earthquake and tsunami". I guess it doesn't matter how many redundant systems you have if a) they are damaged by an earthquake and b) it is not possible to keep diesel generators going because the refinery supplying the fuel is also knocked out by the earthquake. I would also be interested to know how well an wind-power farm would survive an earthquake of that magnitude, ditto a solar farm. I suspect both would be just as incapacitated. It is easy to pontificate on ideals from eight thousand miles away from any event, infinitely more difficult to cope with a major disaster.


Steve
said

Could everyone please educate themselves on nuclear power before commenting. If you read what happed at Chernobyl and three mile island, you would understand worst case scenario. I wonder how many people here actually know what happed there. before you criticize something have the decency to learn about it first.


MiggsVer2.0
said

So where do you suppose the Japanese are pumping all of the radioactive sea water that they've pumped through the reactors to cool them? Are they storing the millions upon millions of gallons of radioactive cooling water in containment vessels? Or do you suppose they're pumping the radioactive discharge into the sea?


br
said

I say this is proof that a safe nuclear reactor cannot be built. If any people in the world had the skill, ability and especially the motivation to build a safe reactor, it is Japan. Who else on the planet could have or would have done a better job? Yet, it failed.


Bruisah
said

Why is the media fixated on a very minor result of the earthquake and tsunami?

The nuclear situation is minor, and well under control. How about focussing on the real issues - general loss of life, environmental impact from refinery fires, economic and financial stability of the region...

The reactors are damaged, but the only real cost is to the plant owners.

The explosions were external to the containment (a result of venting superheated steam where the H2 and O disassociated, resulting in a hydrogen explosion). The reactors have all been off-line since the start of the original quake. There is essentially no risk to the public outside of the bounds of the plant itself. Why all the excitement?

Please report the news that actually matters.



Drew
said

I have always been in favor of nuclear power, but there are big risks. Like someone said, this is a worst case scenario and looks like it will end up not being much. These are top of the line reactors, unlike the Chernobyl reactors that were basically garage shop models.
The thing with energy is that we need a way to store it. Wind and solar could provide much of the power if we could store that energy and not rely on immediate need production. This is why power plants are so inefficient, they can only produce energy now and if it doesn't get used it's wasted. There are new strides being made on this and hopefully will be the answer.


AreasonableVoice
said

Nukedude said "There are extremely thick concrete and steel containment walls built around the reactors to keep any radiation leaks contained inside in the event of a meltdown. Chernobyl DID NOT have these containment walls for their reactors."

This is ignorance at best.
"keep any radiation leaks contained inside" ? No, ensures the leak (unstoppable explosive leak) goes straight up. In the explosion of the SECOND plant to go now, you can see many parts of the radioactive fuel rods thrown out the top of the dust explosion cloud !
That said the explosion rocks the ground and can damage other reactor around it as well.

Get real people - having nuclear plants in fault zones is INSANE.


anonymous
said

What's wrong with Wind and Solar power energy?

Nothing at all, if human beings could become accustomed to electricity rationing. That is an inconvenience, but not as difficult as many people think.






Dave
said

It's disturbing to hear the nuke proponents comment that alternative methods and lifestyles don't work. Do they really believe that nuclear energy "works" long term? After looking at the picture in this article, it's hard to imagine any level of acceptable risk. The people that designed and built these reactors were supposedly the best and the brightest but they put them right on top of a time bomb, and did so knowingly. I can only assume that these people do not have children.

"Obviously, any time you have an incident at a nuclear plant that involves any kind of damage or an explosion, it's not good," said Mitch Singer, spokesman for the Nuclear Energy Institute, the industry's lobbying arm. "But in the scheme of things, is it a disaster? We don't think so."


Scared Canada
said

Man developed nuclear power, have no way to control it and no where to store nuclear waste.
It's the road to catastrophic disaster. It's easy to predict the eventual end of the world if all nuclear plants are not shut down now!


Peter in MB
said

@DMW…side (What's so wrong with Wind and Solar power anyway?) Nothing except you cant rely on them 100% of the time. solar only works when the sun shins and wind only works when the wind blows. Hydro is the safest


Worried in Suburbia
said

These tragedies are unspeakable. I've always felt eerie about nuclear power and now there's proof as to why (as if chernobyl wasn't enough.) I live in the Chicago area and am surrounded by 6 plants that house 12 reactors total. Illinois has the most plants in the country. It is a known fact that the Mississippi river is a plate boundary and earthquakes have been experienced in the past around here. Not to mention the plant in Braidwood that was fined for leaking tritium into lakes and groundwater....there are toxic waste dumps around in small towns and suburbs. Human lives are not worth this unstable source of energy; and we better get on this quick before it gets out of control.


DMW
said

What's so wrong with Wind and Solar power anyway?

The amount of space that they consume.


Phil Cooper
said

To stewart and Scott - Reports yesterday indicated the Diesel backup power source started up after the quake caused the nuclear reactors to go off-line, but then quit about an hour later. It's not clear why, but the Diesel generators may have been damaged by the tsunami. Elsewhere, someone who commented on the matter and seemed knowledgeable about nuclear power said that reactors of the size at the Fukushima facility need about 1 cubic metre of cooling water per second, a task that is simply beyond the capability of batteries. Without another working reactor, backup Diesel power or connection to the grid — all damaged or eliminated by the tsunami — the operators were left in a bind. It's an extreme event, an Act of God, that was beyond the design limits of the plant.


don h.
said

with this disaster,maybe it is time for the people of the world to rethink their life style and thirst for power. have a look in your home and count all the needless electrical appliances, extra computers,tvs,etc etc. that you have.
every month there are new electrical appliances and electronics flogged on the market suppositly to make your life easier. until our attitude changes there will be no hope, and the problems will continue around the world.
my heart felt sympothy goes out to the people and the country of japan,


Canada Ontario
said

Sadly Clean energy does not work. The only clean energy that works was invented in 1895 that was 116 years ago using water at Niagra falls. Nothing has ever worked since that is natural. Solar panels of today don't make the grade. Power output is way to low for Air and Solar.

With that I am sorry for what is happening over in Japan. They have my best wishes.


anonymous
said

In a place like Japan Solar and Wind energy do not produce enough energy. Nuclear energy provides alot of energy as well as its efficient so its a viable option. They worked great until a natural disaster but really what does work smoothly in light of an unpredictable natural disaster


Keith Jones
said

The problem with Wind and Solar power is that it cannot come anywhere near in providing the energy for the world's needs. And as far as I know, the Japanese reactors are still intacy and containing what they're supposed to be containing so they have withstood the shock and more!


Electron-Don
said

And now the Zukites spew there ignorant uneducated propaganda. Stupid and uninformed comments like they should build oil and Coal fires plants. Hey nimrods, Japan sort of lacks those items and has to import enough already (think of big $ bills that your Daddy will not pay for). As for Wind and Solar, as anyone that stayed awake is school and managed to learn things instead of just feeling good about being illiterate would know, are supplemental, load sharing power sources to main stream generation. Hmmm, to complicated for your Eco brains? Lets try it this way, no wind, cloudy day = not enough electricity for you to down load your daily dose of Porn and spam.


John Kennard
said

World Citizen: You can't corporatize, centralize (cartelize/monopolize) and price-gouge wind and solar powers, that's what's wrong with them!


patrick
said

The main issue here is that it is time for the Japan government to stop being so tight lipped or to worry about what secrets will be exposed. It's time to focus on the 13 million plus people that this reactor will affect upon.


GHP
said

Maybe it's time to have a serious look at our "needs" vs our "wants". Do we need to drive a SUV so big it badly fits in the lane. Do we need to fly all over the planet for business meetings that could be done by video conference? Do we need a 3,000 sq ft house? Do we need a new cell phone every year? The list goes on and on. Let's face it most North Americans are energy "pigs" - if we all could change our "wants" just a little we could start to reduce our energy consumption and be come a little less reliant on all forms of energy, nuclear or other.


Danny in Halifax
said

If only wind or solar could supply electricity in the quantities nuclear energy does. We are realizing now that beside taking up massive amounts of landscape, wind generation is only an additional source at best. Solar might be the answer some day but at the current technology, it simply does not supply the levels of electricty we need. The answer is something else - we just haven't found it yet.Nuclear generation that is not occuring on an earthquake prone fault is safe with the standards we have in place today. No one could seriously deny what is happening in Japan was going to happen eventually just as it will on the North American west coast some day. They should be looking at deactivation the reactors in California and moving them further inland. The price of transmissions lines now will be a lot less than the cleanup then.As a race, humanity does not learn its lessons very well.


Ron
said

Certain people say Alberta's oils sands plants produce dirty oil. If it's dirty oil it compares like a fart in the wind compared to one nuclear power plant. How many power plants are there in the world.
All the nuclear power generators should be shut down immediately. They have the capacity to destroy the earth.


Zee
said

I think the number one lesson here from all the events unfolding, including continuing quakes over 7.0, shifting the earth's axis, moving Countries 2 to 3 meters is MOTHER NATURE'S WAY of saying she will have her way no matter what we do. Nothing is bigger nor better, NOTHING. It's been said time and again that there is no return on investment in nuclear power. I know many people within the industry and basically they are all living in a fantasy or theoretical environment. The only money being made off nuclear power are the people who work there. Personally a demon has been created and human nature being human nature and NOT MOTHER NATURE, well there will be ramifications from both the good guys and the bad guys. DON'T MESS WITH MOTHER NATURE, she gave us wind, water and fire, time to make life and lives simpler.


Mark
said

Yeah, they were built in a country that sits on more than one fault line, so the risk is there. But look at California, more than 35 million people live on the wrong side of a fault line, heck everyone up the west coast of North American (including Canada) have been told for years that the big one is coming, but life goes on. People, we can't just stop living because we are afraid that the world will end at any moment, life has to be lived. We can't stop living and hunker down and wait for certain death to arrive. What has happened in Japan is a tragedy and from we have seen on TV and the internet has certainly struck a chord with all of us, but the bottom line is we must keep living life to the fullest. For those of us who can, we can give to help those in the quake ravaged area of Japan, that is all we can do to help.


Joe
said

Ok folks.Who out there really thinks we can sustain our society on green energy???Wind mills don't produce enough power to comply with the demand. Would you like one in build your back yard???Solar power is clean until you have to replace batteries than what, does anybody realize what an environmental night mare batteries really are??? How they are produced and what it takes to recycle them???Hydro is already tapped-out, there are no more rivers to pluck from.So what do we have left.......NUKES like it or hate it that is what does the job right now.Before we start bashing the nuclear industry ask your self…..What do I really know about reactors???? Do some reading, look it up see how reactors operate, what safety systems are put in place don’t let the media force feed you, they need to sell news and reading or hearing about POSSIBLE REACTOR MELTDOWN sure sells news.


Lucas
said

What's so wrong with Wind and Solar power anyway?

IT is simply NOT ENOUGH

The amount of power we use is staggering we could not afford the style of life we live without nuclear and oil energy


WorldCitizen
said

What's so wrong with Wind and Solar power anyway? Seriously...Why are we always so keen to jump all over such dangerous methods of energy? Sure Nuclear energy is safe, until something goes wrong...what dangers are there from solar and wind power? They certainly don't compare to nuclear dangers. C'mon people, start writing to you Member of Leglisative Assembly, and Members of Parliament. Let's make this a mandate for a cleaner world!


URU
said

If Made In Japan is suppose to be the best than it has failed its citizens and the world. The Nuclear couldn't withstand the shock even with claims that Japan and the US keeps claiming that it has the best techology and now its deadly waste is leaking and soon to pollute the environment. Sometimes, claiming to have the best and being the best turns out to be false when it cannot even protect its peoiple and the environment.If there are changes to the environment when this all started Japan should be held responsibled for its Nuclear meltdown and NOT developing nations. The Japanese Gov't already knows the effect BUT are trying to calm its people and the world for its failures.


Canadian
said

The governments does not expose certain facts about radiations leakage from these nuclear facilities. I think something big is coming out of that and it is not going to be pretty.I personally suggest that right measures are put into place in British Columbia, in fact the entire west coast to avoid further disasters. This is not a game of recovery and sending medical teams to deal with the issue. The nuclear reactor has already exploded. What more do people want to see?I know that thousands of people died and it was a horrible thing. But sitting here and crying about it is not going to prevent us from protecting the next thousands to be killed by the radiations.There are worst disasters coming our way which will make these disasters look like a robery in a small community.We must put the right measures in place to protect people from another Chornobyl disaster. It is still not too late to do so.


Concerned
said

Terrible Tragedy that happened in Japan. However, we cannot change the past, but we can change the future. Iran is building numerous nuclear reactors to create bombs to use against the West. This will be an extreme amount of radiation released much closer to home than the comparably 'minor' accident in Japan. Time to speak up. Time to demand that IAEA has full access to the Iranian reactors to prevent another catastrophe


Intelligent Environmentalist
said

I agree with those who question why use deadly nuclear power when there are more environmentally friendly sources of power? How many Japanese need to die from radition before the point is made. Remember Hiroshima nuclear deaths, also Chenoybl? Building death traps on fault lines is mot very good idea. Thank you.


Kevin in Oshawa
said

@RichardThe power plant itself cannot power the pumps used to cool the units if the units are not running. Just like how your car will not start if your battery is dead.The fuel rods ARE inserted in the simple way that you described, but the part that you do not understand is that the rods get HOT. They need time to cool before they can be safely removed and even if they are removed, they are highly radioactive. If the proper equipment is not used to contain these spent or partially spent rods, then you would have a major radiation leakage. If that happened, one wonders how much you would complain then.


Lorne
said

I don't believe that the real extent of the damage is known at this time. If it is, then we are not being told the truth. There's that saying " believe only half of what you hear."When one sees a radioactive cloud floating overhead, then it's time to worry.In the meantime there is nothing we can do about it - the damage is evidently done.Go with the flow and enjoy the remainder of your life.


Brent
said

Coal and gas fired power plants really are a lot safer and there is plenty of fuel in the ground too. Now, even if we do dismantle the nuke plants, what do we do with all of the fuel rods? Ship 'em to the moon.


lc
said

Think maybe people will get the spell of consumerism we have been under for decades,which means a never ending search for more energy, is not good for long term survival?Not likely and even if they due reversing the globalism monster that has put the 2 largest populations in the world on the materialism course will be a hard train to stop.Talk about creating a Frankenstein.


Kman
said

Really? Okay ... I know a good deal about our nuclear plants ... I have, lets just say, first hand knowledge. The comments on here are ridiculous, absurd and based on no facts or knowledge. "I kow a guy swho said he read something on the internet that shows these things are dangerous!!!" suddenly everyone who has read some half baked article that fear mongers the dangers of nuclear power weighs in. "Its built on a fault line!!!!" "that aircraft carrier was 160km away!!!!!" "these things cost too much and we get no benefit"

David J
said

@J.S.... fortunately, CANDU reactors are less prone to the type of catastrophic failure that the Japanese reactors are experiencing. The design of the fuel rod bundles, and use of heavy water make it much less likely to experience a melt-down situation. The danger is not "zero," but it is much less than other reactors around the world.


Nukedude
said

Those people that keep comparing this nuclear crisis in Japan to that of Chernobyl need to read further into the situation and learn more about the reactors in Japan. EVERYTHING in Japan is built to withstand an earthquake including its nuclear reactors. There are extremely thick concrete and steel containment walls built around the reactors to keep any radiation leaks contained inside in the event of a meltdown. Chernobyl DID NOT have these containment walls for their reactors. The 2 hydrogen explosions that have occured only destroyed the outer walls of the building that house the reactors. It has been reported that the thick concrete and steel containment wall was NOT damaged in the explosions. The radiation levels went up in the area only because engineers allowed steam to escape in an attempt to cool the reactors. Nuclear power is the most efficient way to produce power known to man. Damning rivers, creating windfarms, and layering the earths surface with solar panels is highly ineffecient and not very cost effective nor would it produce enough power to supply us. If a damn thats producing electricity breaks way and floods an entire town below it are we going to start questioning how safe they are? Nothing is 100% fail safe. Hopefully the world can learn from Japans experience and we can guard against a disaster like this from happening again.


Richard in New Brunswick
said

Along with Stewart I am profoundly puzzled by explanations of what's going wrong at these plants. You'd think a nuclear power plant could continue to supply it's own power which would be used to run the coolant pumps and any other ancillary services required. I'm no nuclear physicist so help me out here. Aren't these radioactive "rods" INSERTED and REMOVED from the reactor much like if you had a fistful of drinking straws which you lower into and remove from a liquid? If so, why don't they just withdraw the rods the same as if they were going to replace them with new ones? I don't get the problem here.


mace
said

this is the worst thing ever to hit the world japan is a second home to me i can`t bear to see this happen


Kman
said

To any one that is wondering ... NEW is not just a cute name but short for Nuclear Energy Worker. This person is right, and yes .... CANDU plants have battery operated uniterupted power supplies. Secondary to that are fuel fired emergency backup generators, gravity fed emergency cooling water and a vacuum building designed to absorb the overpressure that is causing the issues in Japan. Our reactors are nothing like any other in the world except they use uranium to heat water. Anti Nuclear rhetoric is just that ... baseless and factless scaremongering, and if you want to know why I know that just think about how I know what NEW stands for.


Kyle
said

I am in favor of nuclear power, that said I am also starting to doubt it. Why? because of the IAEA. They list this disaster below 3 mile Island and Chernobyl. It is clearly well above the 3 mile island disaster at this point. The IAEA needs to address this appropriately, low balling the severity of it. you cant have an agency over seeing something that it also promotes.


PreachJohn
said

The Chicken Littles of this world wax noisy on all the perceived faults of nuclear power. To compare primitive Chernobyl technology or lack of it to the Japanese or especially world leader Candu, is a cheap shot. In terms of all the legitimate points that stand to be made on the issue.The problems of this scenario is that the back up cooling systems failed. They were not as earthquake proof as the unprecedented 9 could dish out. This sadly seen only in hindsight. This critical problem needs to be addressed, or yes, maybe we need to cap nuclear power plants. But no, 'John's' comment on fission vs. fusion bears promise. Very worthy thinking 'John'.


Zee
said

This massive trajedy continues to unfold. The Japanese are perhaps the most prepared and structurally sound of the entire world and it is just not able to fight nature at its worst.I fear that there will be more serious nuclear events. They just spawned a new volcano, the entire Japanese Islands has been been moved at least 3 meters eastward, there have been over 100 shocks of 5 and over 30 of 3 . How much more can they take.I am insulted by our nuclear community standing firm that this could never happen here. The truth is NATURE RULES. I don't have a high regard for people in the nuclear energy field, I know many and I feel they live in a fantasy world. For sure this is going to happen somewhere, sometime, someplace. Right now it is Japan, where next, or next after that?My thoughts are for the Japanese people. If anyone can survive this chain of events, it is them.


J.S.
said

One of Canada's nuclear plants sits atop a fault line and we are told that this is safe. I am sorry but I disagree. One does not control a fault line and it was a mistake to build in this location. Further, I was once speaking with a seismologist and was told that scientists don't even know where all the fault lines are. My heart breaks for the people of Japan. What they are enduring is incomprehensible. It is as if several horrific science fiction movies have suddenly become a horrific reality.


eddytoronto
said

The Pentagon was expected to announce that the aircraft carrier Ronald Reagan, which is sailing in the Pacific, passed through a radioactive cloud from stricken nuclear reactors in Japan, causing crew members on deck to receive a months or two worth of radiation in about an hour..Japan is teetering on the brink of nuclear catastrophe I cant understand why everyone isnt being evacuated NOW....Duh...a radioactive cloud or coulds will envelop Tokyos 13 million residents if this thing goes which it probably will. This is why Canadian rescue planners are on standby and NOT allowed to leave...At least someone here has some brains...That cloud or clouds will come here eventually... The Brits were told to avoid the capital as it was feared a SECOND nuclear reactor was heading for meltdown. Japans crippled Fukushima nuclear power plant has experienced a second explosion a hydrogen explosion occurred at the facilitys Unit 3. Mondays (todays)explosion felt 25 miles away. Officials continue to insist the two breached containment vessels and the exposure of the nuclear core at the plant do not pose a risk to the public..Lol....Insured losses from Japan quake could hit $35 billion....Saudi Arabia ready to invade Bahrain after day of protests...Police Kill 5, Wound 100 in Yemen Protests ...Chancellor Merkel agreed to boost the regions bailout fund...The Financial Crisis continues..


Zee
said

This ongoing tragedy is going to continue for some time. To get supplies into these areas to remedy the nuclear plant damage is almost impossible at this time. I fear much more. Earthquake, Tsunami, over 100 after shocks of ove 5, over 30 of over 7, a volcano has now erupted and the entire Japanese Islands have moved more than 3 meters east.I am really insulted that our nuclear specialist say that this could not happen here. If anyone has the preparedness and the safety building standards of Japan (and I doubt anyone does!) they still can't say it won't happen here. Its inevitable that it is going to happen some where or some wheres. We as mere mortal man are no worthy opponent to the nature of nature.Nuclear plants shouldn't be allowed ANYWHERE! The nuclear physicists need them to justify their jobs and extremely high salaries. Of course they are going to say "it CAN'T happen here"! They treat us as if we are stupid and ignorant of the facts. SHAME SHAME. Positive thoughts go out for the Japanese. This is nowhere near over.


cost/benefit
said

The evolving story from the nuclear proponents crowd getting more ludicrous by the day.The cost benefit of nuclear has never been there and despite billions spent to convince the population the opposite it appears the vast majority are not buying it.Aside from the promise of "fail safe nuclear reactor", a fail safe anything is a impossibility,there is the problem of storing the waste from these monsters, the health effects of depleted uranium being used in "smart weapons",one shudders to think of deformities to come from the offspring of Iraqis and Afghans not to mention the service men who handled the weapons of mass destruction.Cost/benefit nuclear a big time loser!


PG
said

If the situation is under control and Canada is safe why the Ronald Reagan carrier left the area it was situated 160 Km away from the power plants????? If this radiation reaches the upper levels of the atmosphere all west coast is in potential danger. Better to be prepared than pretend that everything is "cool" and then cry for victms.


Pilotdrew@hotmail.com
said

Mandosa / Capt Nuclear,If nuclear power is so safe then all CEO's from the power companies responsible should have their homes built next door to the plants. As wells as on top of the Nuclear waste dumps. Then maybe people will believe it’s safe. Solar power, wind are a start the more its used the better the tech will get. I would rather scale back on use than put my children’s safety and future at risk! I guess you would not. You sell out at the cost of civilian lives and that sickens me. Even when the evidence now with this new accident proves this is not a safe way to produce power. What is it going to take to stop it?? The destruction of an entire country?? The loss of life is too great and it may already be too late. For one I don't want people making money saying it’s safe and then have no responsibility if it goes wrong. I am sure when these were built they told the people living near there that its almost imposible to have a meltdown even close to earth quake proof.


Gilbert in Orleans
said

Feel really sorry for Japan, but hopefully it will be an eye opener for the rest of the world...including Ontario. Why in the world would we have nuclear plants in Ontario? It's dangerous, creates nuclear waste and is costly to build and operate. We are fortunate in Canada and Ontario to have rivers just as they do in Quebec. Harverst the rivers with dams, much safer, low maintenance costs, no nuclear waste ... and free and environmentally fuel: WATER!


John
said

I can say that nuclear energy from atoms fision, its far away from a safe method of produce energy, its dirty as create toxic nuclear waste that has to be guarded by hundreds of years, the design of the nuclear plants made them unsafe to these kind of disasters, and terrorist attacks, its an unstable procedure by definition, only controled if all goes well, fusion its the only way to produce nuclear energy safe for us the citizens, electryc industry only thinks in their beneficts, not in our health.I say NO to fision!


Joe
said

To StewartThe nuclear stations all have back up power just in case of emergency, but just like set of batteries in your TV remote they will only last so long before they are depleted and without the main system being restored during that time you need to figure out a different option. Usually another running unit would be used to supply power, but with all the reactors shut down because of safety systems that tripped remaining units do to the earth quake you need to seek other avenues to keep things cool. The other thing, its hard to tell from here what systems were damaged during the earthquake so if your back up power systems got damaged you need to get to them and then fix them, but that also takes time and that is one thing you do not have in a bad situation.


Stan
said

Terrible what happened in Japan. With regards to Nuclear produced electricity. The plants were obviously physically well engineered. What they needed though were Candu Reactors. Canadian design and built, the Candu uses heavy water and natural uranium (not enriched uranium). The heavy water is not only a coolant but it's also a "moderator" controlling the reaction. If you lose the Heavy Water, the nuclear reaction "stops". There are also more layers of safety, including layers of cooling systems. In a Candu design system, if all else failed, with regards to cooling, there are huge pools or tanks of water that can be manually fed, using gravity which hasn't failed us yet! to keep the core covered for cooling purposes. Most importantly, though, is that the Canadian design STOPS the reaction by using regular Uranium vs Enriched Uranium and Heavy Water. Unfortunately the American design, due to lower costs and world politics won much of the world. Safety came second!


Mandosa
said

Our resident power expert from Toronto Drew tells us: "Nuclear power is to dangerous and is not needed there are other sources of power we can use". Oh really? I suppose we could replace them with dozens of coal plants, as long as we put them in your stinky town. Or I suppose you're thinking of wind/solar which can produce a mere fraction of what nuclear can produce, and work oh so well at night and when there's no wind.


NEW
said

To ScottTo answer your question.Nuclear plants do have a back up power (batteries) but you only have certain amount of time before they run out and if you don't restore your main power supply within that time well, then you need to consider other options....(stand by gen).The reactors also have numerous shut down systems these are usually quick acting neutron absorbers. Reactor can be safely shut down within seconds but you still need to cool them after the shut-down, to get rid of decay heat.These places are very well design, they are not the same design as the Russian units that were built tofor millitary purpose.


JP in Ontario
said

stewart, ordinarily an operating nuclear unit will supply its own electrical needs. However, in an emergency, the reaction is reduced, power dropped, and the generator is taken off line, therefore no more electricity. Batteries are for emergencies, but they run out. Connection to the grid usually maintains the supply, or back up diesal generators, but these were both knocked out by the tsunami, thus no power at all for the pumps.


odysseus
said

"There needs to be more compassion for the tsunami and earthquake victims, better perspective on the issues, and less incrimination, rage and hot toxic air from the so called activists." First of all compassion is born in the infinite well of the human heart, it does not need to be compartmentalized and divided according to the source of the particular tragedy. I am sure that no one is trying to greedily divide their compassion and ignore the victim of one tragedy in order to focus on another. Compassion doesn't work that way. You might want to examine your own comment however, since you are turning a tragic situation into an opportunity to rant against an imagined group of activists. As a resident of Europe that was blanketed in a toxic cloud following Chernobyl, a cloud that was not reported by the media until YEARS later, I can assure you that concerns about an escalating situation at a Nuclear power plant are not simply toxic hot air ravings of activists. These are substantial, significant, ongoing concerns that involve compassionate beings everywhere as well as those who may not have yet connected with their own compassion but are deserved of it nonetheless. As far as better perspective on the issues go, I can only hope that you are referring to the need for A) Full disclosure rather than a system trying to protect its interests B) A perspective that is grounded in compassion with the sole intention of protecting and serving public and environmental health C) A perspective that doesn't hold on to no longer valid concepts of what is safe based on either financial or political stances, conservative or liberal views.


Tom
said

As I understand it, the secondary containment that was missing at chernobyl IS the walls, roof and such that blew up in reactors 1 and 3. Thus we now have the potential for a Chernobyl-type of situation at this plant because there is only the primary containment remaining. If that blows too then we have another Chernobyl, it seems they are being able to control the pressure inside for the moment, let's hope they can continue to do that.


Stewart
said

The plant survived the quake and tsunami intact, they just couldn't keep power going to the water pumps right ? One question ... why don't the reactors power their own pumps ? Running them on batteries ?? In a NUCLEAR POWER PLANT ? Maybe I'm just too stoned, but this seems utterly illogical to me :)


Drew from T.O
said

Ok why has no one come to the conclusion that a potential fallout will hit the west coast of Canada?The prevailing westerly’s will blow the fall out and debris to our west coast contaminating Canada. Anyone remember Chernobyl nuclear meltdown? That explosion sent debris into our Arctic and radiation levels are still high up there. This is a world disaster. When will we learn not to play with this? Nuclear power is to dangerous and is not needed there are other sources of power we can use. Enough is enough!


clear-headed about nukes in Ontario
said

A tragic, tragic even for the people, the country of Japan.Not to soapbox, but...Once again we see how the CANDU system would have been - and is far superior to every other reactor design. Even in the face of these massive natural events it's unlikely a release event or loss of control would ever occur. The defaults by design for CANDU just wont allow it. The real wild card would be the labourers used to actually build our CANDUs. Now there's something I've heard horror stories about.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Earthquake in Japan

Courtesy of DigitalGlobe

Fukushima Timeline

What happened to set off the nuclear crisis underway at Fukushima.

Canine Comfort in Crisis

Canine Comfort in Crisis

In Pictures: Four-legged friends offer comfort for Japanese quake victims.

Shelter Life

Shelter Life

50 Pictures: Quake victims and evacuees cope with living in shelters.

Mass Exodus

Mass Exodus

25 Pictures: Residents and foreigners use any means available to flee Japan.

The Nuclear Crisis

The Nuclear Crisis

A reactor-by-reactor breakdown of the troubled Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Station.

How Canadians Can Help

How Canadians Can Help

Government of Canada advice on helping Japan, with tips on what's needed, list of aid groups.

Radiation Levels

Radiation Levels

Worried about radiation spreading to your part of the world? Don't be.

Radiation Sickness

Radiation Sickness

Exposure to radiation can lead to thyroid cancer, among other illnesses.

Infographic

Infographic

A map showing location of reactors involved in Japan's nuclear crisis

The 8.9-magnitude quake moved Japan's main island by more than two metres, in addition to shifting Earth on its axis and briefly speeding up its rotation.

Seismic Shift

Quake shifted Japan's main island and sped up the Earth's rotation.

Quake Storified

Quake Storified

Online reaction in the wake of the 8.9 magnitude earthquake.

Tsunami Speed

Tsunami Speed

The tsunami roared through the Pacific at speeds comparable to a jumbo jet.

Today's Canada Stories

Double lung transplant recipient Helene Campbell appears on 'Ellen,' on Friday, May 25, 2012.

Campbell celebrates recovery with 'Ellen' appearance

More   15 Comments 15    10 Video(s) 10

Gatineau Quebec Police investigate an abandoned van that may be connected to a major crime scene that happened kilometer away were multiple bodies were found on Thursday May 24,2012 in Gatineau, Que. across the river from Ottawa. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Fred Chartrand

Estranged husband charged in Gatineau, Que., murders

More  1 Video(s) 1

The Transportation Safety Board of Canada has confirmed that a small plane has  crashed near Cochrane, Ont. on Friday, May 25, 2012.

2 dead in northern Ontario plane crash

More

Most Talked about Stories

I feel that if certain organs were in demand, less effort would be made to revive people. Am I being silly? Not really. I had a bad experience in hospital when my heart stopped, the doctors tried to revive me and failed. They stopped and said I was gone. I came around on my own when the nurse was giving a final BP reading of 'zero'. I heard her declare me dead! It was all I could do to shake my head but they never caught on til I was able to open my eyes. You should have seen them scramble then! I thought the nurse was going to faint. The thing is, I think we may write people off too soon when there is something of value to be gained from them.

me

Should all Canadians be automatically considered organ donors?