Canada -   

1

Dogs killed because they were 'not adoptable'

A sled dog rests after returning from a tour run by Whistler Outdoor Adventures in the Soo Valley north of Whistler, B.C., on Monday January 31, 2011.(Darryl Dyck / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Recent postings by a man calling himself Robert Fawcett are seen from this screen grab from a military site for people suffering from post-traumatic stress, Jan. 6, 2011. Ken Bailey, from Outdoor Adventures Whistler, speaks to CTV British Columbia reporter Sarah Galashan, Wednesday, Feb. 2, 2011. SPCA cruelty investigators converged on dog sled kennels operated by Outdoor Adventures Whistler on Tuesday, Feb. 1, 2011. The B.C. SPCA is investigating reports that Outdoor Adventures Whistler slaughtered at least 100 sled dogs and dumped their bodies in a mass grave. (adventureswhistler.com) Ken Bailey, from Outdoor Adventures Whistler, speaks to CTV British Columbia reporter Sarah Galashan, Wednesday, Feb. 2, 2011.
A sled dog rests after returning from a tour run by Whistler Outdoor Adventures in the Soo Valley north of Whistler, B.C., on Monday January 31, 2011.(Darryl Dyck / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

View Larger Image

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (20) Facebook   

Date: Thursday Feb. 3, 2011 10:54 PM ET

One hundred sled dogs were slaughtered because many were "not adoptable" and either old or sick, according to the former business owner at the centre of a controversial cull.

The killings have made headlines across Canada and even internationally, and the controversy has resulted in an investigation by the RCMP and SPCA. The incident prompted B.C. Premier Gordon Campbell to call for the creation of a task force to probe the deaths.

But former Howling Dog Tours owner Robert Fawcett, who sold his sled dog business to another company called Outdoor Adventures, said that euthanizing the animals was the only choice.

"These dogs live to run and were not able to do so and would have had to be kept in cages with the result that they would have had very poor or virtually no quality of life," Fawcett said in a joint statement with Outdoor Adventures.

Fawcett had been general manager of Howling Dog Tours but had contracted the animals out to Outdoor Adventures, which also had financial share in the company. However, Outdoor Adventures has stated that it didn't take over control of Howling Dog Tours until a month after the cull, which occurred in April of 2010.

WorkSafe BC documents allege that up to 100 dogs were killed. The documents contain vivid details about the killings. The documents were made after the employee was given workplace compensation relating to post-traumatic stress linked to the cull.

The documents also allege that the dogs were shot and then dumped into a grave following the collapse of the business after the 2010 Winter Games.

Still, the statement from Fawcett doesn't mention 100 dogs. Instead, it only mentions 50 which the company said had to be put down.

There have been suggestions that there was pressure to get rid of some of the dogs, according to the WorkSafe reports.

The statement also says that there had been "considerable" effort to get the dogs adopted, but "the efforts at adoption were not as successful as hoped."

The statement goes on to say that no explicit instructions were given on how to kill the dogs.

Fawcett had served a board that oversees voluntary guidelines for the industry. He has since been removed from the board.

"We're not assigning any guilt on him and we certainly don't have any more information than anyone else," said Karen Ramstead, president of Mush with Pride.

"We just felt that our bylaws allowed for this if a board member was bringing unwanted attention to Mush with Pride, which is what we felt this situation was doing. It was not portraying Mush with Pride in the light that we felt was going to further our cause."

With files from The Canadian Press

Comments are now closed for this story

Mark
said
0 0

This guy is full of it and should be jailed for a long time for animal cruelty and banned for life from ever owning or dealing with any animal. As the proud owner of a German Shepherd and a dog lover I find it disgusting and sickening what was done here and don't tell me that all of these poor & defenseless dogs were very sick and old, if that was the case this guy would not have been able to use them for the purpose he was and in any event there were much better routes he could have taken through many adoption agencies, media campaigns, humane societies etc.. Dogs are better than allot of humans in that they are loyal, caring, protective and love their owners and families unconditionally.


Trisch
said
0 0

This isn't just about the dogs. This is about the overall treatment of animals in our country that were not bred specifically for food purposes. No these dogs probably would not have moved on as house pets very well, but shooting them in the face was not the appropriate way to handle this. These animals were living creatures that were 100% dependent on us to protect them and once again our lack of laws for animal abuse and mistreatment has failed again. ~~ That's great that BC wants to change the rules on sled dogs, but I think they need to go bigger with this to protect other species as well.


Steve
said
0 0

I am not condoning the action taken with regards to the ending of these dogs lives... However, recently I had to make the decision after spending several thousand dollars at the vet to have my dog laid to rest. That too cost several hundred dollars here in Calgary, fees, disposal etc. Im not surprised that for the price of a bullet that the owners sought this as an alternative vs a vet. And FYI, animal shelters are not interested in having 100 dogs dumped off for adoption, the shelter will be ultimately carrying the cost of the dogs demise. Reality folks, its about money as usual. Thank God laws are in place for humans, lest we be put to rest by a bullet.


Natasha
said
0 0

For those of you who think this is no longer news, or that they were "just" dogs, you are a disgrace. These dogs deserve justice and there are hundreds of people that do care and see how horrific this was. It's not just a matter of them being killed. It is how it was carried out. The only way to stop this from happening again is to stand up for what is right. Not to ignore it. If you don't care about it, stop it!


Glenn C
said
0 0

Too old and sick, Yeh! right, now there's a good reason! B.S. if they were old then they should have been retired, if they were sick then they should have been treated!!! Saying that just makes you look worse, how about they truth and some decent treatment?


thomasinacat
said
0 0

When animals are used for our entertainment and amusement, they always suffer because it is all about profit. Regulation doesn't help it should just be banned. When race horse is done running or studding they end up waiting with no food or water for as long as it takes. We've seen horses with their eyeballs popped out hanging down to their knees while waiting to be slaughtered.


URU
said
0 0

The dogs are gone, lets move on to other news.


done
said
0 0

Hey Fact Check: Sarah Palin is a leader OF time? She isn't a Time Lord..in fact, I doubt she can even tell time, even on a digital clock. As for inspirational, the only thing she inspires me to do is have my tubes tied before I start naming children after drywall and weapons.As for the dogs, let it go people! They are not children and anyone who compares them to children is either barren or just completely insane.


KD
said
0 0

If in fact these animals really were to sick/old to perform their "job" anymore, and if in fact efforts were made to have them adopted as claimed, (which I find hard to believe: I am sure the local SPCA would have taken charge of them and if they did not have enough room to house them all, would have made arrangements for other SPCA's to take etc), euthanising (which should have been the last resort) can be done HUMANELY. This breaks my heart.


Pat Simonson
said
0 0

Further to George's comment. In a couple of stories I read that a vet was approached to put them down but he refused. He said he would not put down that many HEALTHY animals.Killing these animals is like killing children and babies: both are helpless,defenceless and dependant on people.

SK Hunter
said
0 0

The issue here isn't whether or not the dogs should've been euthanized, the issue is the manner in which it was done...I don't believe for a second that any effort was made to find alternative homes for them...and their eventual fate was no different that than the Jews were were lined up and shot by the Einsatzgruppen in 1941...it's called respect for life (and death) ...if you don't get that, you are not human...


Mandosa
said
0 0

In other news, a barn containing 20,000 chickens were mercilessly slaughtered in an Ontario food processing plant. Sources say they may eventually be consumed as food products by humanoids.


George V.
said
0 0

Too old and sick.? Now that the slaughter of these poor animals has made the national news, they all of a sudden became old and sick.( Never was there any mention of that before). I think the Brooklin bridge is still for sale.


lauriah
said
0 0

Were these animals examined by a vet to see which ones were too old or sick or injured to perform the duties required of them? What type of advertising was done to adopt out all of these dogs?


Ashley
said
0 0

@ BettyPAINLESS??? Did you not read the account (in previous articles on this subject) that one of the dogs was shot, and yet crawled away with his head blown apart and eye hanging out of his head? Doesn't sound "painless" to me....


Rand in the Peg
said
0 0

Had they been 100 skunks would anyone have cared...besides the tree huggers out there?


Betty V in Lethbridge
said
0 0

People get a life they were dogs. The owner was not Michael Vick the NFL football player that raised dogs for fighting who was jailed for years. He was a caring owner and to shoot them is painless. The country is full of people fighting cancer etc. Forget the dogs.


Mr. Nguyen Vancouver
said
0 0

I like the big dog. They could give some of those dogs to me. Even in Veitnam where we ate dog at time, dog was love and put to sleep with exhaust peacefully.


FACT CHECK
said
0 0

Sarah Paulin the most inspirational leader of time from Alaska always treated dogs with kindness and respect, There is no reason this operator could not of done the same.


Sleighdog
said
0 0

too old and too sick to be given away but not too old to pull a sleigh full of people for a long time of period. wow, that makes sense.

Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Canada Stories

Double lung transplant recipient Helene Campbell appears on 'Ellen,' on Friday, May 25, 2012.

Campbell celebrates recovery with 'Ellen' appearance

More   13 Comments 13    10 Video(s) 10

Gatineau Quebec Police investigate an abandoned van that may be connected to a major crime scene that happened kilometer away were multiple bodies were found on Thursday May 24,2012 in Gatineau, Que. across the river from Ottawa. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Fred Chartrand

Estranged husband charged in Gatineau, Que., murders

More  1 Video(s) 1

Finance Minister Jim Flaherty holds a press conference in Toronto on Friday, May 25, 2012.

Federal deficit falling despite $9B spike in March

More  1 Video(s) 1

Most Talked about Stories

I feel that if certain organs were in demand, less effort would be made to revive people. Am I being silly? Not really. I had a bad experience in hospital when my heart stopped, the doctors tried to revive me and failed. They stopped and said I was gone. I came around on my own when the nurse was giving a final BP reading of 'zero'. I heard her declare me dead! It was all I could do to shake my head but they never caught on til I was able to open my eyes. You should have seen them scramble then! I thought the nurse was going to faint. The thing is, I think we may write people off too soon when there is something of value to be gained from them.

me

Should all Canadians be automatically considered organ donors?