Canada -   

1

Poor are hit hardest by rising food prices: study

Vegetables Vegetables
Vegetables

View Larger Image

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (75) Facebook   

Date: Tuesday Dec. 21, 2010 4:55 PM ET

Although social assistance in Canada has more or less kept pace with inflation in recent years, it has not kept up with the speed at which food prices have increased, making it more and more expensive for poor Canadians to eat healthy.

A study from the Toronto-based Institute for Competitiveness and Prosperity released a report Tuesday looking at some of the major issues low-income Canadians face when grocery shopping.

The report found that many basic staples such as baked goods, dairy and meat have risen in price at a faster rate than inflation.

"The percentage of income needed to purchase a healthy basket of food for a single person on social assistance rose by 10 percentage points between 2005 and 2009 alone, highlighting the mounting pressure faced by social assistance recipients to afford a nutritious diet," the report states.

It's also often cheaper to purchase unhealthy foods. Two litres of pop, for example, is usually cheaper than one litre of milk.

It's an issue that can't be ignored, the report states.

"If almost 20 per cent of Ontarians living in poverty state that they cannot afford to eat fresh fruit and vegetables every day, this signals a failure to properly nourish our most vulnerable residents. Much needs to be done to overcome this problem."

The study looked mainly at food prices for the poor in Ontario, but the phenomenon has been noted in other parts of the country as well.

People living on Employment Insurance benefits and the Ontario Disability Support Program are in the same boat as those on Ontario Works, with food prices rising faster than their benefits.

The study found that fruit, vegetables and fish have actually increased at a rate slower than inflation.

But the poorest Canadians tend to live in neighbourhoods where those foods aren't always readily available.

The corner stores that often dominate poorer areas don't tend to stock as many healthy options as unhealthy ones, the report states.

According to the report, a family of four on Ontario Works would receive $2,045 in monthly income. Rent would cost an average of $850 and a nutritious food basked would cost $689, leaving about $500 for other expenses such as clothing or entertainment.

But for a single person the situation is dramatically worse.

An individual on Ontario Works would receive about $641 per month in assistance. Rent costs an average of $550 per month, and a healthy food basked it about $220 per month. But after rent is paid, that person only has $91 left for other expenses for the entire month.

"The cost of a nutritious basket of food, based on Health Canada's National Nutritious Food Basket (NNFB), is 34 per cent of their income before rent payments," the study says.

"However, since rent is an essential, yet 'indivisible' and 'inelastic' expenditure, people are often forced to compromise other expenses to meet their shelter needs -- this includes compromising on purchasing healthy food."

The report recommends governments consider helping poor people pay the rent, to ensure they have enough money left over to buy healthy food.

Governments should also come up with ways of encouraging large grocery stores to move into poor neighbourhoods.

The report also took aim at Canada's milk management system, saying dairy prices here are 46 per cent higher than average milk prices in other Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries.

"Domestically, Canada's (milk) price distortion has shown to be 30 per cent higher than they should be, placing a greater burden on the poor since they must spend a greater portion of their income to consume a healthy diet."

The report recommends Ottawa get rid of the supply management system that regulates the dairy industry, saying less regulation would result in lower prices for milk.

Comments are now closed for this story

DavidC.
said
0 0

You have $2.00 in your Pocket, it's all you got and your next paycheque isn't in until tomorrow when the mail comes. It's 4pm and you're not anywhere near home and you're starving.Do you ask someone for some cash till u get your check? or do you keep your pride and go buy a cheap McDonalds McDouble burger for $1.39 tax (under $2) to hold you over??Cause I'm pretty sure the healthier choice of having a sub from subway is gonna cost a minimum of $4.50 after taxes for a 6" sub. So you tell me?? what's cheaper?? healthy or fatty?


Charles Regina
said
0 0

Glenn, i like your post - you are absolutely right. That "switch" you speak of is only part of the problem...the other is that we are exploiting the WRONG CROPS. Too bad though...hemp contains more cellulose then any other plant on earth, and of that, 92% of it can be used for bio-diesel. I also forgot to mention hemp is the only plant that can yield up to 9-10 tons in about 4 months. These are hard facts. Henry Ford, Benjamin Franklin, and many others were not "pot smoking hippies", and favored this crop for a reason. Add the fact that it is illegal (in most states) to grow hemp and a dilemma is born. Read up on it! And fyi, i keep mentionning Hemp in CTV's articles because i believe in bio-diesel from hemp as a substainable form of UNLIMITED FUEL.


jason
said
0 0

Who would have thought that poor people have no money to buy things. This report was probably paid for by taxes levied on the poor. We need more reports like this, but let the poor people write them so they can be paid, but then there would be no need for these types of reports. All of this needs further study.


Greg
said
0 0

Soon there won't be a middle class. The rich keep getting richer and the poor are getting poorer. Soon there will not be a middle class. Start taxing the rich HARD, and lay off the poor.


Appleby
said
0 0

Where are these people shopping, that they spend $600 for a family of 4 on groceries????? What on earth are they buying?????I guarantee I can feed a family of four for a month, even if I don't get supplies from the USA (which I personally do, for half what they cost here) on $200. And if I didn't have to work for a living, I could do even better than that.


Senior
said
0 0

Society needs to learn to "cook" again from raw foods. The ready-made mixes for meals are costly and should be considered as "fast food" and unhealthy with the additives in them. I had a family of 5, worked full time, had aging parents, volunteered and made 'real' home cooked meals for my family. Am fortunate to have learnt to use real food to cook with and not the over priced ready mixes with additives. Used a slow cooker so my kids had real food to eat when they came home from school instead of chunk fillers.Hint: A low priced roast cut into small pieces, bundles of carrotts, celery,green pepper, garlic and herbs with tinned tomatos (cheaper than the fresh) costs about $25 to $30.


Glenn in Winnipeg
said
0 0

The rush to make Bio fuels several years ago has resulted in almost 60% of the corn grown in the US now dedicated to this industry rather than the food industry. There are other examples where food crops, like barley, have been diverted to making bio fuel for autos.Corn is used in many foods and is the staple food of the very poor in countries like Mexico. But it is used to make corn syrup which is used in the preparation of many other foods on the grocery shelf.Bio fuels themselves are not inexpensive and add to the transportation costs of importing foods.All these 'shifts' because someone thinks that the globe is warming and man can stop the warming trend by switching from fossil fuels. IMHO, that dog doesn't hunt. The numbers don't add up to support AGW. The bottom line is that the AGW side are responsible for the increase in food prices. Their tunnel vision has not considered collateral damages from the shift away from fossil fuels. Imagine the cries when the price of electricity in Ontario increases due to the closure of the coal fired power plants. Add that to the increase of the price of food.Who is considering the implcations of this massive switch? Who is planning the actions to alleviate the very negative consequences of the switch?No one is. Everyone involved and responsible is making billions on the switch and looking out for themselves. By doing so, masses will starve, thereby reducing the overall population. Perhaps reducing it to the point where there will be too few humans to cause AGW.


Vickie
said
0 0

Silly study. Instead of the poor struggling to afford food how about studying how the greed of companies are milking the middle class so quickly that soon there won't be a middle class. When a person who makes a decent wage has to struggle to put good healthy food on the table there is a problem. How is anyone suppose to save, plan for a child's future college expenses and still have enough to live off of. No wonder so many are on welfare and not working. It is easier, you stay home, don't waste gas, don't pay a sitter, don't have to do anything but collect a monthly cheque and then go out and get groceries. Hell, who would not want their lives easier. If the price of food and living expenses keep climbing there will be more and more on welfare, more and more declaring bankrupt and more and more crime. The tougher life is, the higher crime climbs. The less food the fatter people become (we are governed to store fat for days where we won't have any nourishment). Take the tax off of food and necesities (razor blades, personal products, detergent and toilet paper) that would be a good first step. This is a broken system and the bandage solutions are not working.


Bubba: Harper, and McTaxalot won't help.
said
0 0

Let's get some sanity here. It is terrible that many people need a Food Bank, or a place to sleep at night.

Like many people, I give as much as I can to help them, and I mean giving till it hurts. And I don't do it to sooth my soul, I do it to help those worse off than myself.

Regrettably, due to Hydro Rates rising, Gas Prices skyrocketing and due to the HST which made buying necessities of life more difficult, I cannot afford to give more. Here's the deal, the government helps me, and then I can afford to help other more.

@InAwe: Are you totally nuts? Closing the food banks to force the government to act! Listen to the ring of reality. Our provincial government and their leader Dalton McTaxalot added hundreds of thousands of people to those living below the poverty line. And our Federal Government can afford $2B for that stupid G20, but wouldn't lift a finger to give NORTEL Disability people a hand, but instead gave them the finger.

These are the guys you think will help??? Are you nuts?? Both Harper, and Dalton McTaxalot would rather put their own Mom's on the Soup line that help anybody.


cynicbyexp
said
0 0

URU - you are so right. The working poor are one thing, the chronic poor with 5 kids are a different group. We talk about health when alcohol and cigarettes are far more critical to them?Healthy food takes too long to prepare and the majority of them aren't exactly motivated. We will continue to have these chronic poor as long as we have a system to support them. The last time I checked, there were more than a handful of "help wanted" ads in the paper. Take off the rose-colored glasses people.


InAwe
said
0 0

Some of my favourites:

Pro sports teams with their multi-millionaire players (and spouses) asking for the "little people" to bring a donation to the food bank for the hungry, or winter coats for the less fortunate! Pathetic! A small percentage of the Leafs, Raptors and/or Blue Jays budgets and the whole city could be fed and kept warm!

IF I ran the foodbanks??? I would tell the Fed and Prov Govts that on a certain date - say Jan 1st, 2013 for example - there will be NO MORE FOOD BANKS....we are CLOSING DOWN! Now, the governments would HAVE to act! This gives them two years to figure it all out. I would start with FAIR and PROGRESSIVE taxes, but will they?

Dead, frozen bodies on the streets and rampant malnutition might bring the various political parties to their collective senses. As long as others are doing the "humanitarion work", the governments and big business gets off for free. Give them the responsibility....and make it known that folks starving to death, and freezing due to homelesness is THEIR fault! (Two years warning should be ample!)


Ronald
said
0 0

Hey were is Harper with all that money?, He rather waste it on his rich friends and imaginable lake and for security to protect him instead on the people of this country who are trying to survive day after day.

We have poor people sleeping in shelters and on cold floors while he scrooge Harper is sleeping at taxpayers expense in a nice warm bed and living like a king.


Gabor J. Barabas
said
0 0

One does not have to be a Marxist and/or a Leftist Socialist to completely disagree with Mr. Flathery's rejection to enhance the Canadian Taxpayers Contributed CPP monthly allowances.Previous Canadian Governments systematically shaved of little by little from the CPP allowance payments on none-transparent way since the mid 80's.Our Canada is or could be one of the richest Countries per Capita.Ontario is described as "Have-No-Province"!Where is Ottawa steering our Country's poor individuals' future with no proper food and shelter? Existing Canada's poor mainly due to their own choices, their substance abuse (mental conditions); exposed to POLITICALLY REVERSED DISCRIMINATIONS thus were not able to be part of the "have" groups, Government's "politically correct" bureaucrats on Municipal, Provincial and levels taxpayers' monies waste as that is their own . . . etc . . . etc.


Dayton
said
0 0

@Andrew, so if production is high then why are food prices high? It's middle men like you who are to blame not the consumer or the farmer. Whenever there is a spike and I use the word loosely then the bottom feeders show up and grab a little more. You raise inputs and scavenge off the top. It's sickening actually how some people make a living by taking food out of baby's mouths.


paulB
said
0 0

Air miles and groceries don't mix. Thank NDP for looking out for us and taking advantage of it yourself.


Brent
said
0 0

The gov't should regulate the price of junk food, i.e. put a tax on those products to the tune of 200% of the price. Also, make fresh fruits and vegetables both more affordable and more accessible to everyone. If we value health care, we need healthy Canadians; and eating fresh fruits and vegetables is the main way to do it.


Ray, Mississauga
said
0 0

Isn't science wonderful? First we have studies to tell us that it's cooler in the shade. Now we know that hungry people most feel the effects of lack of food. Wonderful. It does create employment for people who might not otherwise find a job.


Ryan in T.O.
said
0 0

I agree with Julian's comments. I don't know why we needed a study to tell us something we already know.

I understand that studies help push for funding and legislation, but, really, I'm sure some of our politicians pass at least a few homeless people on their way into Queen's Park.

Give me a few million dollars to write a study and I can prove that the sun rises in the East - and for free, I'll throw in how it sets in the West.


Sandusky
said
0 0

Who added the HST to fuel prices in Ontario thereby raising the cost of food transportation? Dalton McGuinty. Who raised hydro rates 10% and tacked an extra 13% HST on top of that thereby increasing food storage costs? Dalton McGuinty. Who raised personal income tax rates on every Ontarian thereby reducing everyone's take-home pay? Dalton McGuinty. Who therefore has contributed more to the "the poor get poorer" scenario than anyone else? Dalton McGuinty. Remember that at the ballot box in October Ontarians.


B. Kelley, Shaking head in Ontario
said
0 0

Geez! No *&^% Sherlock! Without the benefit of this study I never would have guessed that the poor would be hardest hit by rising food prices. What's the next great revelation? People who are rich have more money? And to think someone actually got paid for this kind of useless tripe.


Rozalyn, Burnaby
said
0 0

A study...Really? Who was the genius that recommended a study to figure out the obvious?


CYL
said
0 0

I do agree with this, however, it affects us all not just the poor. I have read some of the comments and most of them are so true as to the spending of govt assistance on things which are unnecessary personal items, may I add 'artificial nails', gold and makeup. I do like the idea of govt assistance in way of food stamps.I would take the food stamps !!!


Yan
said
0 0

Well said, Brian Fr Langley. Those people [who have a bed to sleep on, a home to shelter from the cold, and a job to go to every day] who say that they are poor are just out of reality. Working poor in Canada? They don’t know what the word ‘poor’ means. Poor means one is hungry but has no idea where is his meal coming from. Poor doesn’t mean one has to decide to pay for his TV cable bills or to pay for his internet bill first. To call one – a working poor – is absurd. Furthermore, if one is working, one can always pay for a university study and get a high paying job, n’est-ce pas, LorraineH? Why then are those ‘working poor’ complaining???


Prof. Pye Chartt
said
0 0

Aside from the contradictory ridiculousness of this study indicating that prices for fruit, vegetables, and fish (which form a principal part of a stellar diet) have increased at a rate "slower than inflation," and that such foods are difficult for poor people to obtain based upon their geographic location (which is laughable), this merely points to the increasing importance of making our welfare "system" more efficient and accountable. As one of the so-called "haves," I have no problem whatsoever with taking care of genuine "have-nots," to the tune of 100% (for a definite period of time, based upon circumstances). However, as a resident of Ontario, what I have a MAJOR problem with is that our social assistance complex (housing, food, benefits) is responsible for creating a "LIFESTYLE" for too many people (the chronically poor). In other words, too much money is being wasted upon those who don't fully deserve to be taken care of for an extended period of time, and these users/abusers of the system are doing nothing but ensuring that those who are truly in need get less. Every $100 that goes to an individual or family riding the welfare bus is $100 that can't be directed towards meeting the advancing needs of innocently poor people. Simply contributing MORE money to the social assistance complex isn't in the cards any more. We're all taxed to the max. It's time that the "system" get its own act together.


Mick
said
0 0

I agree with PVT. Give them food stamps. Do you really think that if you give them more money that they would actually spend that money on fresh fruit. I doubt it, atleast in a majority of cases.


URU
said
0 0

@PVT.....Giving food stamps doesn't mean it stops hunger or controls hunger. There will always be fmailies that will take advantage of the system even if they are able to afford it. Personally, any sort of welfare/food banks/charities create more laziness in people, IF people see that they don't need to work hard to get the things in life why should they when there are these types of services offered to them at no cost. Sorry but these types of sad stories don't make me give in any way, EVERYONE WORKS HARD FOR THEIR MONEY SO NO FREEBEES FOR ANYONE!!!!!


rvdinc
said
0 0

the cost of food is increasing like everything else, why? Cost of transport is going due to oil prices has doubled. lets cut transport cost buy growing locally not importing our food. As our citys grow, we loss are farm lands amd then rely on food from other parts of our country and other parts of world. Glow local, buy local, save your money.


Connie H
said
0 0

I find this topic very interesting and my husband and I have wondered why there isn't a "fat tax" to offset the cost of healthy food. It is disgusting that pop is cheaper than milk (which is good for you), that chips are cheaper than a loaf of high fibre bread and that mystery meat is cheaper than the real thing. It is ironic that the thing that takes the most to make costs less than the thing that doesn't require the same level of processing. There is an epidemic of obesity and a lot of it has to do with what it costs to eat. I personally will be growing my own garden this year and freezing what I can for the winter. We as a society have relied so heavily on someone else doing it for us that we have gotten away from the basics. I don't know of anyone who has a garden anymore as a part of the landscape of their backyard. Even the Farmers Market is kind of expensive compared to what it used to be. I don't think it has as much to do with government as it does with supply & demand. We as a society are no longer self sufficient and we rely on the need of the big grocery stores for the foods that we need & love. For those that don't have a dirt patch to grow anything in - start a community garden or something. If you want it bad enough you will find a way to get it and take care of things yourself. As the old story goes intead of giving the man the fish to feed his family - teach him how to fish


Raj
said
0 0

I think some folks need to be shown how to cook.Frozen vegetables are good, we dont always use fresh.A really cheap cut of meat, done slowly in the oven, is great. But i see some with a cart load of frozen dinners and pizza, and they tell me its pricey! I know its pricey


Charles Regina
said
0 0

Hey Dean, unpasturized is actually good for you...it was also a cure for lactose intolerance! That being said, I totally agree with you. As far as the article goes, the problem is actually energy, not food. If the governement helped fund the building of a non-profit solar energy plant, maybe everyone could have lower energy costs...The problem is greed. I don't care how much you abuse welfare, energy should be a right and if it were, we'd have a lot less problems in the world today. By "energy" i am refering to heat.


M.M.B. Ont
said
0 0

As stated in many comments here, the poor are receiving the help they need and if they are lacking, they just shout for more. Now how about us working poor? My husband's wages have not gone up a cent in over 5 years, however food prices are rising, hydro is skyrocketing here in Ontario. Home heating fuel has gone up as have gas prices. Now add to this the increase in car insurance and house insurance which our recent bill indicated. The same paycheck of 5 years ago now must stretch to meet all these increases and the increases are substantial. Our last home heating fuel had $80.00 tax added to it because of the HST. The Premiers want people to save for retirement but just how is the working person even suppose to find 2 nickles together to salt away after paying for the necessitiesof life and that excludes cell phones, entertainment and all the new gadgets out there.However McGuinty expects the working poor to keep on paying after he voted himself a $40,000 raise and froze wages. His raise is more than the average working person makes in a year. Time to protest higher prices especially in fuel and hydro and cut the HST!


Olivia
said
0 0

For all you people who are bashing the system today in regards to this article. I was one of until August of this year when I had to stop work due to medical reasons. No it was not of my choosing but of the medical professionals. Yes I agree there are people on these systems who bleed the system dry and should not be on the system.

I am a government worker and I have seen first hand how our government waste money, like hiring 8 managers to handle 23 people. Mangers earn why over 125,000 a year and the supervisors earn close to a hundred, the director earns 275,000 a year. New furniture which costs in the thousands for some, paid limos, conferences at resorts to Deer Hurst and other resorts here and over the world, Expense lunches like lobster and on and on.

As for myself I may never be able to work again and I hate it. Now my life is restoring to applying for a disability pension, and that can take months before I hear anything. In the mean time I have to live and at moment do not qualify for Ontario Works Assistance which only pays $562.00 a month. Any money you have in bank,RRSP'S and other investments have to be exhausted. So the people that have new furniture, fancy cars, electronic gadgets, take vactions, have designer clothes etc etc are lying and should be booted off the system in my eyes and heavily fined.

As for rent for a single person is just over $500 a month THE NORMAL RENT IS BETWEEN 800.OO TO 900.O0

Ontario Works is basing this rent for a single person on having someone living with them or moving back with Mom and Dad. I was told to do this.




john davis
said
0 0

Dalton McGuinty raised the minimum wage in Ontario from $6.85 to $10.25 over the course of a few years. How did he think companies would pay for their increased salary expenses?


Ian Ottawa
said
0 0

@Cheryl. The system in place is broken and needs to be fixed. The old saying of," Feed a man a Fish and he eats for a day. Teach a Man to fish and he eats for a lifetime." speaks volumes.I appreciate your view and obviously we see a different side. I reported a New Canadian from Iran who had Social housing which she sub-let in Ottawa. She claimed she was separated from her husband with her 4 children yet she lived with him in a 2600 sq.ft. double garage house only two years old.Yes I am aware of the systems success and failure.


PVT
said
0 0

Food stamps is the solution. Just give the poor food stamps that can only be used for food - nothing else.


Jess
said
0 0

@ Cheryl re: comment to Ian. Like it or not, he is right. The abuse I see of the system is over- whelming. While there are definately people who are on social assistance who are stand-up people using the system for what is meant for- a short term solution- there are a LOT of people who know how to take advantage of the sytem- as much as you may want to live in denial, or attack Ian's professional integrity, he is being real. A cell phone is not a neccessity. Neither is smoking, or alcohol, or cable, or driving a vehicle. And yet there are plenty of people on social assistance who have all of these things- but no food in their cupboards. The cost of food is absolutely something the Government needs to address. But there are even bigger issues that they need to address which should come in a reform to the social assistance program- cutting back their cheques isn't the solution- making it more difficult to get welfare isn'tt he solution- that punishes those who need it and does nothing to get the "lifers" off the system.


Dean from Toon Town
said
0 0

I'm getting sick & tired of seeing milk referred to as healthy. In spite of the dairy industy's propeganda, cow's milk does NOT do a body good. Sadly, we Canadians have been brainwashed over the generations to think that cow's milk is good for you and among other things, will reduce or cure osteoporosis. This is COMPLETELY UNTRUE! Science shows that cow's milk actually accelerates the onset of osteoporosis. Good luck trying to find anyone in the dairy industry to admit that one in public though.


Brian Fr Langley
said
0 0

Canadians live in both a historical and geographical bubble of plentiful food. Throughout most of human history and in much of todays world getting enough food to eat still entails spending 50 to 100% of your daily labour. As Canadians we really have no idea how incredibly fortunate we are. In the broadest context, if 100% of your labour goes towards food and food prices rise, guess what? You go hungry, and starve. At the end of the day all wealth really is, is simply more food than you need to eat. This is a good season to remember others less fortunate than yourself.


Julian
said
0 0

And they needed a study for this... why??

I wonder how much food the money for this study could have put in the food bank.

Sometimes I think these researchers are some of the least intelligent people among us.


Ed in Alberta
said
0 0

"Poor are hit hardest by rising food prices: study"OMG! NO! REALLY? Boy, I sure hope nobody paid a lot for THAT "study".


Munro - Brampton
said
0 0

For the last couple of years we have heard that inflation is something like 2%. Give me a break. Doesnt that include food ? I only have a part time job and carefully watch the prices at Sobey's and Price Chopper (and others). Cheese is a good example as it has gone up at least 25% in the last two years. Spagetti sauce is going up as well. It is getting so you have to buy when the stores have the big sales.


Lynn
said
0 0

It is not just those on assistance struggling to buy food- it is also those of us who work our behinds off to have a ridiculous amount of our money deducted to pay for those who are on assistance. I have to scrimp and scrape to put food on the table, pay the bills, the rent etc. etc. And yet, I watch my boyfriend's ex, who has been on assistance for almost 18 YEARS- sit in her geared-to-income home- where the Government deducts her rent off her check, and then hands her the rest as spending- and then calls every week to say she can't buy food- so on top of support we buy her groceries... my favourite: while she can't buy food, each one of her children has a cell phone, they have new living room furniture, and all the nice electronics. Never mind wasting the money on studies- hire staff who are responsible for helping people set up budgets- adn who monitor those budgets - people on social assistance need to be accountable for how they budget. Period. Or better yet- stop handing them cash and adopt the food stamp system. Then address the real problem: The average Canadian is struggling to pay utilities, to put gas in their vehicles to get back and forth to work, and to put food on their tables. The Government needs to cut back on their over spending, and give Canadians a tax break.


G. Gravelle
said
0 0

Anyone with brains would know that those with less income are hit the hardest with increases in prices such as food when compared to people with higher incomes. The only ones who benefited from this study are those who got paid to do it.


Can't afford to not cry over spilled milk
said
0 0

I paid $7.42 for 4 litres of milk at a Sobey's in rural NS when I went shopping on Saturday. I used to pay $4.99 somtimes at the 7-eleven in Winnipeg when I couldn't make the grocery store on time and feel ripped off, boy was I in the dark, lol. Stupid east coast dairy prices, maybe the cows are better out here??? Its a mystery!


bk1721
said
0 0

Cathy, your ignorance is apalling. Farmers duly and promptly pay taxes, just like everyone else. If your job depended on the indifference of nature, maybe you could understand what we go through. Maybe you should get out of your cozy little office in the big city, and go out into the country for a change. People put their heart and soul into this land, and your insults are an attack on an integral part of our country. Shame on you. Perhaps you should thank the farmers which feed you everyday.


W
said
0 0

@LorraineHWell said - it is so true. The "working poor" are always forgotten......


Rusty
said
0 0

Just wait 'til McGuinty's Green strategy kicks in and doubles or even triples energy costs. Maybe the Suzuki foundation can run a food bank - with government money of course.


Victorian Kate (86 years strong)
said
0 0

Catwoman, best got off the pot because food, water & shelter are only rights in socialist paradise. Everyone else has to work to pay thier way. I've worked my entire life and never received anything as a "right", and while I may not be rich, at least I have my self respect. And that's more than can be said for most of those who exist as part of the welfare state.


Cheryl
said
0 0

Ian, if you are up close & personal because you are involved in social work then a) you should find a new job because you're not doing anyone any good with your attitude, and because you're making assumptions on things you don't really know about, and if you don't work in that field then
b) you're making assumptions on things you know nothing about.
They aren't necessarily out of work, they just don't make enough to survive. For those of you who complain about reporting on obvious issues, while they may be obvious, if they aren't in the news we tend to ignore them, and the government never does anything to change them. It's easy to sit back and complain about studies and reporting on obvious issues when you're not affected by those issues. The poor they are talking about I'm sure see it differently.


CraigW
said
0 0

Who knew quitting school early would have a down side?


Ammes
said
0 0

Amazingly the garbage food that has to be worked on and processed is CHEAP and the natural food that takes nothing to do but serve it is EXPENSIVE. The Governments are corrupt and all about profitThe SPIRIT HAPPY website exposes all the nonsense of how the food makers and Governments rob the poor of health


Matt Ontario
said
0 0

Ugh, talk about a pointless study. So tired of seeing all these over educated, over paid, and out of touch nit wits conducting studys on issues such as this that we already clearly knew the answer too. Again, I wonder how much was spent on this pointless study that could have been used to help the hungry.


Ken S
said
0 0

Next study will show that gov't pensions - CPP, OAS and GIS don't keep up with the inflation rates of things pensioners require to live - food, heating fuels, hydro, rents or property taxes, etc. The costs of new housing, cars, appliances etc. are largely irrelevant, but act to hold down pension indices.


LorraineH
said
0 0

I agree with Quite Rhythm. Over the many years I worked there were plenty of times I had to decide which bill to pay so I could buy milk, bread, etc.

Living paycheque to paycheque is very stressful especially when you keep getting notes from school asking for money for field trips, etc. We are taxed to the hilt and usually have to pay more income tax in April. I thought I would be on 'easy' street if I could net my gross.

There was no help for me because I was working and just above their so-called 'poverty' line. We didn't have extras because essentials took every penny. There was many a payday morning where I had to run to the corner store at 6:00 to get milk for breakfast.

I feel sorry for those on Social Assistance but the 'working poor' get forgotten in all the statistics. While we suffer the same decisions between food, rent, hydro, etc. we also have to show up at work daily, with a smile on our face, and do our job.


thetruth1028
said
0 0

It is not just the poor...middle class families are affected too...I'm sure it is becoming difficult for the average family to afford healthy meals most night of the week. It is all too easy to settle for the faster cheaper less healthy option..


David in Sudbury
said
0 0

To those saying this study is a waste of time, you couldn't be more wrong. These studies are the only way of backing demands for improving the system. You need hard facts, not just assumptions (obvious as they may be). That's how govt works. Using the results, they can now make concrete recommendations. Now all that is missing is a study into how many recipients spend their money on cigarettes, alcohol and pot before rent and food for themselves and their kids. I know it isn't a large majority, but I've dealt with enough of them myself to know it isn't a small minority either.


SamC
said
0 0

Pop, cookies, potato chips and the like have always been cheaper than healthy alternatives. This is why there is an epidemic of obesity and now an obsession with health and fitness. At least this study lets me know that I must be poor because I can barely afford to make healthy choices at the grocery store either. My money only goes so far, just like everyone else's, so regardless of why prices are high I have to stretch it to the limit, which means I buy what I can afford for that week.


URU
said
0 0

That just means that they need to get a second or third job to eat. WE (poor/middle class/rich) ALL have to work for our money so it's not as if it was taken away from them.All these reports and stats usually come out during the holiday seasons because they know that people will give and give and give. It's getting to be a little repetitive and anoying. EVERYONE WORKS HARD FOR THEIR MONEY, IT'S NOT JUST THE POOR - IF YOU CAN'T FEED A FAMILY OF 4 OR 5 STOP HAVING KIDS AND FOCUS ON WHAT MAKES A BETTER FAMILY.


Catwoman 38
said
0 0

The problem is the poor need more healthier food at the food bank, and an affordable place to live.Food is a right.Same as water.Think about it, wouldn't be great to have farmers donate some of their food to the food bank, and the govt subsidizes them.Afterall, better off then wasting the food.And poor people get healthy food.For affordable housing, well write your MP.


Gareth Hitchings
said
0 0

We needed a study to figure that out? The Poor are hardest hit by everything, always, period. It's been that way since time began and it's why we need to work towards a richer more equal society.


RGBrook
said
0 0

@Cathy - Your comments towards farmers has to be one of the most uneducated answers I've ever seen on these comment boards. Without farmers you'd have no fruits, vegetables, meats, milk or eggs on your table. Farmers are not the ones who reap huge profits from their efforts. If you truly feel this way, perhaps you should grow your own food, milk your own cows, slaughter your own chickens, and learn what hard work really is. I'm no farmer, but I know that it's best to support our own whenever we can, and that means buying as much local produce, meat and dairy products that we can. Id rather pay more for Ontario produce in the winter than the pathetic chemically ripened crap we import from our "trading partners". Regarding the poor being hit hardest by rising costs, this is always the case and not something our governments should be proud of. It is shameful!


MacK
said
0 0

Really!? The poor are hardest hit when food prices rise? Wow, I have egg on my face. I thought only the rich payed when food prices rise. This is a huge eye opener for me. Tell me, which class pays more when fuel prices rise? I'm in suspense here. My money is on the rich paying more when electricity goes up. You'll have to do a follow up story.


Steve T
said
0 0

"Poor people are hit hardest by high food prices"Well, duh! This headline could be for anything. The poor are hit hardest by high prices for shelter, clothing, transportation, etc.. What is the point of this story, that hasn't been said before??


Marc -Toronto
said
0 0

Ok folks the bias in this "report is glaring. Meat dairy and baked good are going up faster than inflation. Yet Fruit, vegtables and fish is actually cheaper. Any nutrition guide i have ever read says baked goods are not that good for you and meat and dairy in moderation. Fresh fruti and vegtableas as well as fish are the healthiest, most nutrious items you can eat.To make thier report work they suggest fruit Veggies and fish are not readily available where the poor in Ontario live. What the poor evidently are all in Toronto and where in TO can't you get these items.So the healthiest food is actually cheaper and lets face it fruit and veggies and fish is available everywhere.How much more of this biased, studying must we endure. No issue here.


Ian Ottawa
said
0 0

As a person up close and personal in the Social Assistance World including Child and Family Services, the poor you are speaking of in the cases I actually see show;a.) They smoke.b.) They "all" have cell phonesc.) They work the system to an art.The average Canadian doesn't see, or hear the "demands" from the people bleeding the system.Check how many Foster homes are required over christmas so the so called parents don't have to buy presents or get sitters to watch the children as they party into the night.This would make a perfect study for a Social Worker going for a PhD.Tell these people what they need to hear and not what they want to hear.Like get a job and stop popping out "baby's for benefits"


Phil
said
0 0

Do we really need a study to inform us of this? The headline screams captain obvious. Why not title it 'Poor have less money than others'?


Andrew
said
0 0

Not so Dayton, I buy commodities and sell inputs, yes inputs have gone up but so has production levels. Prices today for grain are at historic highs. So when you calculate the increased production and the higher prices farmers are doing well.


KJ in Kingston Ontario
said
0 0

Every aspect of life is negatively impacted by poverty... Food is just one instance. Most of modern medicine involves prescriptions -- with low income they are simply not affordable, dental work is also very very expensive and effectively unaffordable with a low income come if you are retired or a member of the working poor. All the other good and services that can't be purchased obviously significantly diminish overall well-being.


Cathy
said
0 0

Please let's not get started farmers. When was the last time you ever paid taxes? You guys have more handouts than anyone I know. If it's not profitable get out, sell the farm and start paying taxes like the rest of us


QuietRhythm
said
0 0

How about some help for the working poor? You know the ones like me who are running paycheque to paycheque. I feel this group is 'slipping through the cracks'. Most of us work 40 hours a week sometimes more and yet we are faced with 'well I cant spend too much on groceries because I need to pay the hydro bill'. The only 'extra' I have is internet. I do not have cable, I have a very basic home phone plan, I dont even have call display. I agree the low income folks need help and maybe welfare needs to retool the system (lets not open that can of worms) But in the meantime, what about us, the working poor? What about your co-worker who works with you day in and day out but his house is an alley way, hopefully out of snow and cold tonight.


TEA in Sask
said
0 0

That's quite the 'think-tank' - maybe give them a Nobel Prize for their ground breaking research? Actually no, give me the prize for enduring such rubbish...I wonder how many meals the cost of the study would've provided?


rvdinc
said
0 0

how much money was spent on this study? really they needed to spend money on this to understand that the poor can not afford to buy enough food with the cost of food increasing. they could just asked anyone and given the money used on this to the local food bankl.


Richard Southam
said
0 0

Did we really need a study telling us that poor people are most affected when the price of something goes up?Really?


Dayton
said
0 0

For your information the price of wheat, barley, oats and canola has not risen for the farmer since the late 70's. However the input cost to produce, the equipt. and land has quadrupled since. Every time you hear the retailer say food has to go up because of the price of grain don't believe it. Once it rises it never falls. Not so for Joe farmer who continually has to either sell assets to survive or go out of business. For this reason the avg. age of a farmer is over 60 because he's the only one with equity to farm. There is a lot of inflation between the farmer and the consumer.


CMQ
said
0 0

My wife and I take a calculator with us to shop to try and stay within budget. Three years ago we had 6 in our home, we now have only 3. We spend as much now for 3 as we used to for 6 people. In the last year alone we have seen many items that used to be around the $2.00 range now closer to $4.00. Bread that used to cost $2.29 less than a year ago is now $3.19 and hamburger buns that were $2.39 now over $3.00 and this is just the basics. It is hard to make a living and pay bills, let alone save money when much of our income is spent on the basics. Canadian debt isn't just about low interests, it is for some, more than you think, used as a means to survive. It's time to lower some prices before people sink!


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Canada Stories

Double lung transplant recipient Helene Campbell appears on 'Ellen,' on Friday, May 25, 2012.

Campbell celebrates recovery with 'Ellen' appearance

More   13 Comments 13    10 Video(s) 10

Gatineau Quebec Police investigate an abandoned van that may be connected to a major crime scene that happened kilometer away were multiple bodies were found on Thursday May 24,2012 in Gatineau, Que. across the river from Ottawa. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Fred Chartrand

Estranged husband charged in Gatineau, Que., murders

More  1 Video(s) 1

Finance Minister Jim Flaherty holds a press conference in Toronto on Friday, May 25, 2012.

Federal deficit falling despite $9B spike in March

More  1 Video(s) 1

Most Talked about Stories

I feel that if certain organs were in demand, less effort would be made to revive people. Am I being silly? Not really. I had a bad experience in hospital when my heart stopped, the doctors tried to revive me and failed. They stopped and said I was gone. I came around on my own when the nurse was giving a final BP reading of 'zero'. I heard her declare me dead! It was all I could do to shake my head but they never caught on til I was able to open my eyes. You should have seen them scramble then! I thought the nurse was going to faint. The thing is, I think we may write people off too soon when there is something of value to be gained from them.

me

Should all Canadians be automatically considered organ donors?