Canada -   

1
Minister of Foreign Affairs Lawrence Cannon responds to a question during Question Period in the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, Tuesday, Nov. 16, 2010. (Adrian Wyld / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Canadian soldiers establish a checkpoint outside Haji Baba in the Panjwaii district of Kandahar province, Afghanistan, Oct. 19, 2010. (Jonathan Montpetit / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Royal 22nd Regiment soldiers line up in a drill hall as they leave for Afghanistan, at CFB Valcartier, Que., Monday, Nov. 15, 2010 (Jacques Boissinot / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Royal 22nd Regiment Capt. Martin Rheaume carries his seven-month-old son Alexis as he and his wife Marie-Noelle Laprise, right, walk to a drill hall before leaving for Afghanistan, Monday, November 15, 2010 at CFB Valcartier Que. (Jacques Boissinot / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Minister of Foreign Affairs Lawrence Cannon (centre), Minister of International Cooperation Bev Oda (right) listen to Minister of National Defence Peter MacKay answer a question on the military pullout from Afghanistan during a news conference in Ottawa, Tuesday, Nov. 16, 2010. (Adrian Wyld / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Canadian Forces navy Lt. Jennifer Martin, from the NATO Training Mission, helps mentor and advise the Afghan National Security Forces by assisting the small minority of female police within the Afghan Border Police, as seen in this image courtesy the U.S. Army. Defence minister Peter MacKay speaks at a news conference in Ottawa, Tuesday, Nov. 16, 2010.

Cannon says 'risk factor' remains for troops

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV National News: Roger Smith on the mission
Ottawa made it official Tuesday that nearly one thousand Canadian Military personnel will remain in Afghanistan post 2011. Their role however will change from soldiers to trainers. Prime Minister Stephen Harper pledges this will be a non-combative role.
CTV News: Ben O'Hara-Byrne, Afghanistan
While the all the talk about the Canadian military has been about the combat mission ending next summer, troops are focusing on the task at hand and how the last round of troops heading into Afghanistan will play a key role in operations south of Kandahar city.
Kamran Bokhari, expert
A Middle East expert says he does not believe Canada had a choice to not keep troops in Afghanistan. NATO is planning a three year drawdown strategy, but for this to occur Western forces need to hold the line and develop the capabilities of the Afghan forces.
Power Play: Lawrence Cannon, cabinet minister
Foreign Affairs Minister Lawrence Cannon says Ottawa confirms Canadian troops will be out of Kandahar, but some troops will remain in Afghanistan in a non-combative roll to train the Afghan national army and security forces.
Power Play: Saskatchewan Senator Pamela Wallin
Saskatchewan Senator Pamela Wallin says Canada has learned and accomplished a lot and shown Canada's ability to the world. She also says there is evidence that some soldiers do want to stay in Afghanistan to train.
Power Play: Strategists on the Afghan mission
Conservative strategist Geoff Norquay and Associate Professor Amir Attaran from the University of Ottawa discuss Ottawa's plans to have 950 Canadian Forces staff and soldiers stay in Afghanistan to train Afghan security forces after their combat mission.
CTV News Channel: Mark Sedra, senior fellow
A senior fellow with the Centre for International Governance gives his thoughts on Canada's non-combat role in Afghanistan. He believes this is a good plan and will make our NATO partners very happy and we are well suited for this position.
CTV News Channel: David Docherty, Wilfrid Laurier
A political science professor with Wilfrid Laurier University says Stephen Harper deciding to no bring the Afghanistan training mission to a vote in the House of Commons is a political gamble.
Question period: The NDP hammers the Tories
NDP Leader Jack Layton wonders if the prime minister knows the difference between a humanitarian mission in Haiti and war in Afghanistan. Layton demands to know why Stephen Harper broke his promise to bring our troops back home.
CTV News Channel: Canada's Afghan future, 1
Foreign Affairs Minister Lawrence Cannon and Defence Minister Peter MacKay speak at a news conference in Ottawa, where they outline the future of the post-combat mission in Afghanistan.
CTV News Channel: Canada's Afghan future, 2
International Cooperation Minister Beverly Oda speaks at a news conference in Ottawa. She explains how Canada will continue to develop humanitarian aid in the war torn country.
CTV News Channel: NDP reacts to the plan
NDP foreign affairs critic Paul Dewar and NDP defence critic Jack Harris say Prime Minister Stephen Harper is abusing Parliament and abandoning a promise that he would go to Parliament for an extension mission in Afghanistan.
CTV News Channel: Robert Fife on the plan
CTV's Ottawa bureau chief discusses the government's post-combat plan in Afghanistan. He says it was not Prime Minister Stephen Harper's preference to extend the mission past 2011, but he felt the pressure from Canada's allies to remain and continue helping the war torn country.
CTV News Channel: Roger Smith from Ottawa
Canadians are set to get details of the Tories plan to extend Canada's military's mission in Afghanistan. Sources say up to 950 Canadian soldiers will be in Afghanistan for three years starting next July.
Power Play: MPs on post 2011 Afghan mission
NDP Defence Critic Jack Harris, Parlement Secretary to Defence Minister Laurie Hawn, and Liberal B.C. Ujjal Dosanjh discuss the debate for Prime Minister Stephen Harper's need to go to parliament for a vote for Canadian troops to stay in Afghanistan.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (49) Facebook   

Minister of Foreign Affairs Lawrence Cannon responds to a question during Question Period in the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, Tuesday, Nov. 16, 2010. (Adrian Wyld / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Canadian soldiers establish a checkpoint outside Haji Baba in the Panjwaii district of Kandahar province, Afghanistan, Oct. 19, 2010. (Jonathan Montpetit / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Royal 22nd Regiment soldiers line up in a drill hall as they leave for Afghanistan, at CFB Valcartier, Que., Monday, Nov. 15, 2010 (Jacques Boissinot / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Royal 22nd Regiment Capt. Martin Rheaume carries his seven-month-old son Alexis as he and his wife Marie-Noelle Laprise, right, walk to a drill hall before leaving for Afghanistan, Monday, November 15, 2010 at CFB Valcartier Que. (Jacques Boissinot / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Minister of Foreign Affairs Lawrence Cannon (centre), Minister of International Cooperation Bev Oda (right) listen to Minister of National Defence Peter MacKay answer a question on the military pullout from Afghanistan during a news conference in Ottawa, Tuesday, Nov. 16, 2010. (Adrian Wyld / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Canadian Forces navy Lt. Jennifer Martin, from the NATO Training Mission, helps mentor and advise the Afghan National Security Forces by assisting the small minority of female police within the Afghan Border Police, as seen in this image courtesy the U.S. Army. Defence minister Peter MacKay speaks at a news conference in Ottawa, Tuesday, Nov. 16, 2010.

Photos

Minister of Foreign Affairs Lawrence Cannon responds to a question during Question Period in the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa, Tuesday, Nov. 16, 2010. (Adrian Wyld / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

View Larger Image

Date: Tue. Nov. 16 2010 9:17 PM ET

The Canadian government announced Tuesday that up to 950 Canadian Forces members will stay in Afghanistan until 2014 in a non-combat role, while offering more details on the new mission.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper told the House of Commons that the training mission does not authorize combat.

"Our soldiers will be training Afghan personnel on bases or in classrooms, we are very clear on that," Harper said.

Foreign Affairs Minister Lawrence Cannon announced at a news conference "up to 950 military trainers and support personnel" will remain in Afghanistan until March 2014.

Cannon said the "non-combat" troops will be based in the Kabul area.

However, Cannon admitted that soldiers would still be in danger, despite the relative security in Kabul compared to the current operation in Kandahar.

"I am not going to hide the fact that there is a risk factor," Cannon told CTV's Power Play. "(But) our people will not be mentoring in the field, they will be in classrooms."

Harper had been adamant that Canada's soldiers would leave after the July 2011 withdrawal update, but the government had been under intense pressure from its NATO allies to keep some presence in Afghanistan.

NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said he was pleased with Harper's decision, as it puts Canada in step with the organization 2014 withdrawal date for Afghanistan.

The government was supported by the Liberal opposition, who proposed the training mission earlier this summer.

"We think this is a tough decision, but it's the right decision as a matter of principle," Ignatieff said Tuesday.

"You can't have the Bloc (Quebecois) and the NDP coming out there and saying, 'Let's just walk away from Afghanistan and leave them a lot of fine words."

NDP Leader Jack Layton is calling for a vote to decide whether to keep troops in Afghanistan but Harper has said he won't hold the vote.

During question period Tuesday, Layton quoted former chief of defence staff Gen. Rick Hiller, who said combat is going to be involved if Canadian troops train the Afghan army and police.

"Can the prime minister tell us why he broke his promise to bring our troops home?" Layton asked.

Can combat be avoided?

Defence Minister Peter MacKay said that "the intention is that all combat will end" for the Canadian troops in Afghanistan as of July 2011.

But he said the details of how the Canadians will wind down their combat operations and transition to providing training for the Afghans are still being worked out.

"The reality is that 2011 is a full-stop date when it comes to combat," MacKay said at the news conference.

MacKay acknowledged that there are many challenges that come with training the Afghan soldiers and security forces. Many recruits are illiterate, which limits the ways in which they can be taught.

But the defence minister said Canadians, along with their other NATO allies, have already been providing training services and have made a world of difference.

"Canada, along with our international partners, has helped to train and mentor about 50,000 Afghans," said MacKay.

Bev Oda, the minister of international cooperation, said Canada will continue efforts to improve the health and education of Afghans. But it will be particularly focused on empowering and improving the lives of women.

"Canada will target women in all of its development work in Afghanistan," Oda said.

Oda said Ottawa will spend $30 million a year to improve the health of mothers and children in Afghanistan.

Cannon said the current mission in Afghanistan costs about $2 billion, but the training mission will reduce that cost to $750 million.

NDP foreign affairs critic Paul Dewar and NDP defence critic Jack Harris told reporters that even if the soldiers are put on non-combat duties, they will still be at risk because Afghanistan remains a country at war.

"This is a war zone, so no matter where you are in Afghanistan…there is a threat of being under fire," Dewar told reporters in Ottawa on Tuesday afternoon.

Steven Staples, president of the Ottawa-based Rideau Institute, likened the mission to teaching someone to swim without getting wet.

"Despite the government's assurances to the contrary, this new training mission will likely involve combat. As long as Canadian troops remain in Afghanistan, there will be pressure for Canada to lift its non-combat caveats, especially if the war worsens over the coming years," he said in a statement.

The federal government's announcement comes at the same time that a new poll suggests Canadians are split on the military's future in Afghanistan.

A Canadian Press Harris-Decima survey suggests that 48 per cent of the public wants the troops brought back when the combat mission ends next summer. Forty-two per cent want some troops to stay behind and help train their Afghan counterparts.

The Afghan mission has claimed the lives of 152 Canadian soldiers since it began in 2001.

With files from The Canadian Press

Comments are now closed for this story

PeopleParty
said
0 0

Thank you Canada for focusing military efforts on constructive aid, but let's understand the reality of foreign military presence in Afghanistan.History has proven time and again that Afghanistan is impossible to hold by force. It doesn't have enough resources to justify the expense of a professional army.The problems in Afghanistan are terrorism, extremism, human rights abuse, discrimination, etc. Solving these issues is a long-term process of education and economic growth, and involves both aid and protecting those in need.If finishing the job in Afghanistan means fixing any of these problems, then Canada will be involved in the Middle East long after 2011. These battles take decades, not years, to win. As long as countries are occupied by foreign military forces, and are not fairly governed and educated, this occupation will produce terrorism. If Canada and NATO's continued presence in Afghanistan is to go on regardless of a referendum, then the public would at least be more likely to swallow it if it were sold under the guise of peace-keeping. NATO's current combat role is a probably a bit too 'Americanized' for peace-loving Canadians.


Heather
said
0 0

My husband is currently serving in Kandahar as a mentor, and finds the work very rewarding. A difference is being made thanks to the men and women behind the wire. I applaud Mr. Harper's rather gutsy decision to extend the training mission. Leaving before the job is done would be an irresponsible waste of money and lives given the sacrifices of the last eight years. If my husband was asked to go back in a training capacity, I would stand behind him 100% in 2011, 2013 or 2020, as long as this good work is continuing.

Darrell Lough
said
0 0

One of our proudest traditions has been to stand up and fight the righteous fights. We have never turned and run and now is still not the time. Because of Canada's finest, I'm proud to be Canadian. My thanks to all who have made the sacrifices.


david
said
0 0

Armed forces personnel know well about the risks, and I believe they are all volunteers for Afghan service. NDP/Bloc morons keep whining that the forces will see combat---lets face it, if a base in Edmonton was attacked the soldiers will defend it to save their lives, and it will be no different in Kabul, they have the right to defend themselves. I am proud of the Canadian Armed Forces, they are professional.


Paul
said
0 0

The sooner that Jack Layton can find his own mute button, the better this country will become. I'm glad that Iggy isn't playing politics here and is actually doing the right thing when it comes to our troops and the people of Afghanistan. Maybe the NDP and the Bloc can start their own coalition since both are hell bent to destroy this country.


Stephen Toy
said
0 0

When I first heard of the extension and what the job is all I could think of is that they can do that here at home. Here is my idea, open a closed military base (money for our economy) Bring Afgan police/troops to that base to train, they will be away from the scary stress of Afghanistan – also away from the corruption. When finished they would be a solid unit and could be inserted in a region as a unit. Our training troops will be doing this in safety here at home. Then we do it again (rinse and repeat). That 1.5 billion could be spent here in Canada for the most part.


Ronald
said
0 0

I hope and pray that the families of the falling soldiers sue Harper and his dam gov., if one soldier gets killed when they were supose to return home in July of 2011. You made a promise so KEEP IT HARPER!!!! but why should you care is not your life that you are risking is the life a poor soldier who in most cases just wants to get mack to his or her family in Canada.


mike Clark
said
0 0

What other countrys have to stay there to be teachers ? there had better be more than just us if not I want some ancers as to why the UN is forcing canadians to be the only ones to do this as it has cost us over 150 canadian lives and billions of dollars in equipment and war pensions for the personal that were hurt or need medical care for the rest of there lives, and all this because of the libreal trash that put our people there.


mikey
said
0 0

Doesn't the Canadian forces have a policy about personnel commenting on these matters? I don't care about how military personnel feel. I care about the public policy implications. I care about the lives of military personnel that will be lost because of this exercise in futility.Most of the military no doubt support this mission, and they are entitled to their opinion. They aren't entitled to influence public opinion in a forum such as this. That is best left to the personal political realm.To hear military personnel state that this is what "they want" can I do that in my job? Uh no.It irks me that military personnel are pushing for this mission when WE the public should be deciding, in Parliament. Do we live in a democracy, or does the military dictate what we do? And don't roll out the "I'm not appreciative" because all it is a muzzling tool used by those who support this mission. How democratic.


Mike from CFB Petawawa
said
0 0

@J from SK, man you just don't get it, do you? All I can say to people like you is think back to 9/11. What it boils down to is this: FIGHT THEM OVER THERE or BE READY TO FIGHT THEM HERE. If we pull up stakes and run home then the terrorest will look at that as a war they won and then they will train people to come over here to kill again.


Frank Black
said
0 0

It is time for Harper and the Conservatives to go. They have done enough damage to Canada's reputation. We need an election. And I'm from Calgary.


Elias Nasrallah
said
0 0

I agree with Mr. Harper and yes, Mr. Iggy. The Conservatives laid out a plan and it is just what the Liberals wanted anyways. The only problem is that the Liberals cannot stand the fact that Mr. Harper is making a tough choice. Many people agree with leaving troops for training. I wish our Armed Forces all the best. Stay safe and stay low and thank you for your service. You make our country and our world safe.....WELL DONE!


babe
said
0 0

I have to say some of you are "thumbs down" to even the troops that are posting on hear SHAME ON YOU. This is in my opinon an insult to our HERO's and FALLEN HEROS.


Mike in NS
said
0 0

Training an Army is a lot more difficult than some would think. First, you train a soldier. The soldier gains experience and is then trained as a Corporal. After he gains some experience, he is ready to be trained as a Sargent. After he gains .....Same thing applies to the officer corps. If you are starting from scratch, it takes a long time before you have an Army.


GHW
said
0 0

Most soldiers can accept the risks or they wouldn’t have joined the military in the first place. Although in general I’m against sticking our noses in other country’s business, at this stage this is likely the honorable course of action. After all this is a more traditional role for us. I’m an independent centrist. Harper and his team still have my vote. They are the only grown-ups in parliament right now. Thank God others see this too.


JB in Ontario
said
0 0

It's time to get a moooove on!


RECON
said
0 0

As a serving member this is the right thing to do. I would prefer to stay in a combat role as would 95 per cent of my trade but it is what it is. Comments made by critics that have never set foot in the country and whom most likely couldn't locate Afghanistan on a map should be disregarded, honestly unless you've been there keep your mouth shut on the matter because you have NO idea what your talking about....


MCpl Arnold, Edmonton, AB
said
0 0

I'd just like to clear up one prevalent misconception the public seems to have about military deployments. While I can't speak for the entire Canadian Forces, I can speak for the infantry -- which most would agree is a pretty risky profession -- no one goes to Afghanistan if they don't want to. As I said in a previous post, I went in 2005 and 2007, and was supposed to go again in 2009, but I chose not to because my wife and I had a daughter. No one forces anyone to go. They place a warning order in front of you and you sign it if you want to go. If you don't want to go, you don't sign it. It's hard to believe that people would actually volunteer to go risk roadside bombs and enemy fire for six months, isn't it? That's because soldiers are a different breed. They feel they're on this planet to make a difference.


J from SK
said
0 0

@ Al in Orillia: Replacing one empire with another doesn't make it better, just because it's ours. It's condescending narrow-minded people who lead to foolish military actions like this. Like it or not, plastering our culture and societal structure over the Afghans doesn't make them free, it just removes one collar and attaches a slightly looser one.


kyle Plumadore
said
0 0

No sir it is I who thanks you! As for those members of our proud armed forces who are still in that area of the word I only say this; I thank you all! For allwho have anything other than positive things to say I say this; Canada love it or leave it!


Shame on Conservatives
said
0 0

So in a matter of days the goverment can decide to put troops in harm's way, but in 5 years they cannot fix Veteran's pensions? Role back to the 2005 Veterans System, stop stealing from our Vets!


Realist
said
0 0

Good news, heroin prices will remain low for another 3 or 4 years!!!


Colin
said
0 0

I serve with the CF and have been on 2 combat missions out in the Panjwai district and have seen my fair share. Kyle Plumadore you are right, I would vote to stay even if it is a non-combat role. We owe that at the least to my fallen brothers and sisters to see the job done.Pro Patria


J
said
0 0

As a current serving member, I have deployed twice to Afghanistan, including the very first deployment in 2002. It would be a shame to cut and run and leave the people of Afhganistan to fend for themselves at this time when they need us the most. I have seen a lot of improvements between my two deployments but they need help. It is no secret it will take several years, if not decades, but there have been vast improvements in the country since 2002. Thousands more children, including girls are going to school; wells have been dug; dams are being repaired; infrastructure is improving in villages where people did not live for years. Professionals including teachers, law makers, soldiers, police and healthcare professionals are being taught at home and abroad to help their country grow. This growth takes time and they need the international assistance to help get there. Knowledge is power and some posters need to educate themselves before they comment. I have lost several friends and colleagues in Afghanistan; to completely abandon the country now would not justify the lives we have lost or the physical and mental wounds of those who suffer through them today. To stay and train is the right thing to do. It is the humanitarian thing to do.


June Good
said
0 0

Jg Alberta: My Question is this. Will the Afgan people really ever help themselves to attain freedom??


Chris (MWO Ret'd)
said
0 0

Let me guess....Non-combat...= Non combat pay (danger pay) a loss to the soldier,, The other side doesnt care they will shoot them and blow them up no matter what..?? Hmmmm what wrong with this picture..???


Syl in Alberta
said
0 0

Same game just a different name.


JB in Ontario
said
0 0

To Not a Peacekeeper. My apologies. Yes you are soldiers, not Peacekeepers.


Scott (in Wild Rose Alliance Country)
said
0 0

Leave or stay, just make up your mind, but to actually believe that when we stay in-country that we won't be tied up in combat is extremely naive. As long as we're there, even in a supposed training role, the troops will always be in a combative environment...to believe otherwise if foolish.


Firinn
said
0 0

Always support our troops. I was one myself .War should be a last resort. Have you found Osama and his evil doers in a hole yet.? Just ask Saddam for directions , oh yah he stopped playing on our side and we sent him straight to Hades , noose and all.Don't worry people of Canada , the front is moving from Afgan to Iran anyways , whats another 20 years of war ! Then again, me think the third one is on NOW!Read between the lines lemmings .


larry from waterloo
said
0 0

What's with the NDP? I wouldn't want them to protect us from our enemies. If were in a war zone of course our soldiers are going to carry guns for protection while training the afgans. Its still a war against terror if we all leave that country would be taken over by terrorist and claim victory. Then it would go back to being a base for more terror planning against the west. Our past soldiers did not run from our enemies they went out and confronted them as we are doing there. If its still a war going on you just don't pack up and leave you finish the job. We owe it to our brave fallen heros. God bless them. Good decision to stay and help train. We cant leave them on their own, they need our help. Money shouldn't be an issue.


Gord. Robson, Nova Scotia
said
0 0

This is a good decision, it would be wrong to cut and run . We are proud of our Canadian men and women serving with the Canadian Forces.


Not a Peacekeeper
said
0 0

JB...we are soldiers not Peacekeepers. I did not join the Army as a peacekeeper, I joined as a soldier. Peacekeeping is a political sideline to make the Gov't of the day feel all gushy and warm about its good intentions.....WAKE UP!! There must be Peace for it to be kept! ..that is all


Redneck Vic
said
0 0

Dear Mr Smilin Jack (NDP BIG BOY) Mr. Jack can you tell me that if all we leave there completely all military and just the people to help rebuild this country will stay that no one will die with out having any protection???


Serving Soldier
said
0 0

Mr Ed, Really 8 years is enough? Do you know how long they have been at war? That is only a fraction of the amount of time that they have been at war As I sit in Afghanistan, training Afghan forces by the way, I realize how many people back home have no idea what has happened, is happening and will continue to happen if Canada (or others) leaves the country before we are complete our mission. There has been a slow and steady progress with their development which will stop completely if we pull out.As many other posts have stated, go talk to a soldier and ask them what they think, considering it is them that come here and risk everything and have the most to loses.Thanks to all who support the troops with positve comments, vice garbage political views.


MCpl Arnold, Edmonton, AB
said
0 0

I'd just like to reiterate what another serving member said in these comments. We want to be there. It's the right thing to do. Leaving in 2011 is not even an option. The job isn't done. I'm an infanteer and have been deployed to Afghanistan twice (2005, 2007), and we've lost too many good Canadians -- too many friends -- to just give up and leave. 48% of Canadians want us to do just that, but what have those 48% sacrificed? What say do they really have? The soldiers who are there WANT to be there to make a difference in the world. Those soldiers and their families are the only people who really have a say, because they are the only people who are willing to bleed for this country. The people who sit at home and want us to leave before the job is done simply because it's too upsetting to watch the news are people who would never join the military beacuse of that exact reason -- they don't have the will to fight, and sacrifice, for what they believe in. It stuns me that some people actually think "we've done our part, now let someone else do it" is an acceptable mindset. It's absolutely mind-boggling. Since when have Canadians not had the stomach to fight the good fight? If you support the troops, yet want to bring them home, perhaps you should actually talk to one sometime to get THEIR opinion.


Trisch in Ontario
said
0 0

Although my personal opinion is that they've already had our services in some fashion for the last 10 years (give or take) and they should be coming home, I understand that even the soldiers themselves believe they are doing better by staying. With that though, I do hope that the military at least gives every soldier the chance to actually make that choice. I hope they allow those that do not want to be there to come home and let those who do want to be there go over and do what they do well.


JB in Ontario
said
0 0

Great to hear that Canadian soldiers will be staying in Afghanistan beyond July 2011. A continuation of the extremely important work they are doing in Afghanistan makes Canadians proud! We have the best trained soldiers and Peacekeeping force in the world.


Al in Orillia
said
0 0

@J from SK, Since when are our goals in Afganistan Imperialistic or did you just learn a new word?The reason where there, is to prevent the expansionism of a regime that supports Islamist extremists and would joyfully see us all dead. Now that is Imperialism. There is no law that says that you have to post an opinion to a story if you have nothing constructive to say.


peter in MB
said
0 0

The afghan forces are militia at best, they need combat veterans to train them on how to fight the Taliban, and the Canadian forces are the best!!! Our troops need to train their solders so that Afghanistan will not fall back under the darkness of the Taliban


Greg
said
0 0

I would feel a lot better about having our troops stay there, if I thought the average Afghani appreciated the sacrifices made by our brave men and women.


kyle plumadore
said
0 0

All I am saying is that this is what most CF members I have spocken to feel is the right thing to do. Any simply put unless we are there or have been there, we civilians should leave this decision purely with the Executive branch of GVt and the military. Before you throw the whole it costs tax payers money, My argument is simple, do you have any idea how many Al-Qaida/ Taliban wanna be suicide bombers our people have sent to lead based death? I have no idea but let us just say alot an everyone makes the world a bit safer and I sleep a little more soundly at night knowing the right people are doing the right job!


Carl
said
0 0

Parliament does not have to vote on this, for two reasons: First, the deployment of troops is an executive decision, not a legislative decision. Second, the decision announced today is completely consistent with the motion that was adopted by parliament in 2007, which extended the mission in Kandahar until 2011. The motion says Canadian troops will be withdrawn from Kandahar, NOT from Afghanistan. The motion also states that the Government of Canada (NOT parliament), together with our allies and the government of Afghanistan, must set targets and timelines for the training of the Afghan National Army, the Afghan National Police, the judicial system and the correctional system. That is exactly was is being done.


Mr Ed
said
0 0

They've been there for 8 years are Afghan people this slow of learners & what are they going to teach? How to protect the opium fields & keep a war going year after year. Our people weren't taught to live by the rules of their land so what are they doing imposing our opinion. Harper must be hoping for the next UN vote. Well Steve they already told you that you didn't have anything to offer so quit wasting our tax dollars.


kyle plumadore
said
0 0

Dwayne, I on behlaf of all canadians thank you for your service. . As for the angery posts that are bound to be put on, Ask any member of the CF what they would prefer , "turn tail and run" or "stay until the Afghan people are able to help themselves" I am sure an overwhelming number will choose option 2.


marcel
said
0 0

An excellent move - second best to staying on the battlefield and finishing the job like we did in WW II - but a lot better than just pulling out and leaving 13 million Afghan women to the 'mercies' of the Taliban. Besides this humanitarian reason, there is a clear strategic reason to stay: if the Taliban take over, Afghanistan will inevitably once more become a base of operations against the West as it was in 9/11 and after. Never again can we allow Al Queda and affiliates to hide behind national sovereignty. The NDP and the Bloc can debate this all they want but now is the time for action, not yakking. Sometimes a country has to stand up and be counted. While there are other places also in need, Afghanistan is where the crisis is and where we need to be.


J from SK
said
0 0

Non-combat imperialism is still imperialism. Bring our troops home, safe and sound.


dwayne in da peg
said
0 0

As a currently serving member who has done 3 tours of duty in Afghanistan, it would be a slap in the face to all who have given their lives there to just up and leave. Staying to help train the Afghans is the right thing to do to try and ensure a safe and secure future for the Afghan people.


kyle plumadore
said
0 0

My best wishes go to men and women who are staying. My thoughts are with you as well as my prayers. I would ask that people show respect to soldiers and respect how difficult this decision must be for the Governement for sending them.I am a proud liberal but I support Harper in his decision in this matter.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

CTV News

Soldiers with the Canadian Army's 1st Battalion Royal 22nd Regiment return to base on their final operation Thursday, June 30, 2011 in the Panjwaii district of Kandahar province, Afghanistan. (AP Photo/David Goldman)

Canada in Afghanistan

The latest news, photos and interactives from Canada's mission in Afghanistan.

Canadian Soldiers were injured when a Light Armoured Vehicle (LAV) Turret struck an on coming vehicle, outside Kandahar City, causing it to rotate 360 degrees wounding the two Canadian soldiers. (Cpl. Robin Mugridge / Department of National Defence)

Invisible Wounds

Angela Mulholland: Scope of injury toll in Afghanistan largely a mystery

Brain injuries among soldiers are often overlooked.

Blast-Induced Injuries

Brain injuries among soldiers serving in Afghanistan are often overlooked.

Doctor Louis-Philippe Palerme, right, from Gatineau, Quebec, is assisted by a Danish doctor, Captain Sacha Soelbeck, during a surgery at R3 MMU in Afghanistan.

Medical Advances

Soldiers survived injuries that, even 10 years ago, would have been fatal.

Cpl. Chris Klodt sits in a race chair. Klodt was shot in the neck July 7, 2006 during a Taliban ambush outside Kanadhar. The bullet was lodged in his spinal cord.

Soldiers Overcome Injuries

Wounded soldiers use sports to overcome injuries, adjust to their new reality.

Janis Mackey Frayer in Sperwan Ghar, Afghanistan

Kandahar Journal

Janis Mackey Frayer recounts sombre process of notifying next of kin.

Interactive

War Zone Medics

Lessons Learned

A number of the medical innovations that we now take for granted were conceived and tested during wartime.

Bios and Pictures

Casualties

Canadian Casualties

We remember those who lost their lives in Afghanistan since the mission began in 2002.

In Pictures

Canada's Last Days in Afghanistan

Concluding Combat

50 Pictures: Canadian troops conclude Afghan combat tour after a decade.

Kandahar transfer ceremony

Transfer Ceremony

In Pictures: Canada transfers control of Kandahar region to the U.S

Harper in Afghanistan

Harper in Afghanistan

25 Pictures: Stephen Harper meets with soldiers on his fourth Afghan trip.

Canada in Kandahar

Canada in Kandahar

30 Pictures: New tasks tackled as combat mission nears its end.

Operation Topak Shkar

Operation Topak Shkar

Canadian troops take on the Taliban in Operation Topak Shkar.

Today's Canada Stories

Double lung transplant recipient Helene Campbell appears on 'Ellen,' on Friday, May 25, 2012.

Campbell celebrates recovery with 'Ellen' appearance

More   13 Comments 13    10 Video(s) 10

Gatineau Quebec Police investigate an abandoned van that may be connected to a major crime scene that happened kilometer away were multiple bodies were found on Thursday May 24,2012 in Gatineau, Que. across the river from Ottawa. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Fred Chartrand

Estranged husband charged in Gatineau, Que., murders

More  1 Video(s) 1

Finance Minister Jim Flaherty holds a press conference in Toronto on Friday, May 25, 2012.

Federal deficit falling despite $9B spike in March

More  1 Video(s) 1

Most Talked about Stories

I feel that if certain organs were in demand, less effort would be made to revive people. Am I being silly? Not really. I had a bad experience in hospital when my heart stopped, the doctors tried to revive me and failed. They stopped and said I was gone. I came around on my own when the nurse was giving a final BP reading of 'zero'. I heard her declare me dead! It was all I could do to shake my head but they never caught on til I was able to open my eyes. You should have seen them scramble then! I thought the nurse was going to faint. The thing is, I think we may write people off too soon when there is something of value to be gained from them.

me

Should all Canadians be automatically considered organ donors?