Canada -
News Sections
Troubled StatsCan facing $7M in cuts
The Canadian Press
Date: Monday Oct. 11, 2010 4:38 PM ET
OTTAWA Statistics Canada, already reeling from the long-form census debacle, is chopping at least five surveys after being ordered to find $7 million in savings.
The beleaguered agency plans to drop a pair of environmental surveys, a health report and two sets of business statistics, along with other measures to meet budgetary demands from the Conservative government.
"If we keep going down this path ... we are at serious risk of eroding the quality of our statistics to unacceptable levels," Munir Sheikh, then chief statistician, warned in a May 31 letter to Treasury Board weeks before he quit his post over the long-form census controversy.
"Our collections systems are becoming outdated, we have less than optimal levels of automation of our processes and we suffer from a lack of proper documentation that can be risky."
The dropped surveys, as well as cuts in the amount of analysis conducted by the world-renowned agency, have already trimmed more than $1 million, but the bulk of the savings will come in the following two years.
Sheikh said the agency for too long has dealt with budgetary pressures by carrying out work more efficiently rather than eliminating work altogether.
"Eliminating less important programs, we have not been successful at all," he wrote to Michelle d'Auray, secretary of the Treasury Board. "This is because every time such an item is identified, we come under pressure to reverse our decision."
The letter, along with other documents outlining the StatsCan budget crunch, were obtained by The Canadian Press under the Access to Information Act.
The agency's money woes deepened last week when Treasury Board President Stockwell Day announced a government-wide deal with the Public Service Alliance of Canada for wage increases of 5.3 per cent over the next three years.
The deal with several of PSAC's bargaining units still must be ratified. But all departments and agencies -- including StatsCan -- have been told to find room within existing budgets to pay for wage increases rather than expect additional funds.
The agency also bargains directly with 1,750 interviewers it employs. The deal with this PSAC unit expires in December next year and one background document from StatsCan says "we hope to negotiate wage rate increases of 0%."
Agency spokesman Peter Frayne, however, denied there was any such negotiating strategy.
Chopping the five surveys is expected to trim some $4 million, while cutting the amount of analysis is worth another $1.5 million. Frayne cautioned that if outside funds become available, the work might be revived.
"At this point, no alternative sources of funding have been confirmed that would offset any of the proposed analytical or survey program reductions, although this remains a possibility," he said in an email.
The ditched surveys are: the Industrial Pollutant Release Survey, and the Quarterly Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Survey, both pilot projects; the National Population Health Survey; the Survey of the Suppliers of Business Financing; and the Survey on Financing of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises.
Sheikh's letter said the two environmental surveys lack support from Environment Canada, and the rest are covered to a certain extent by other data.
Matthew Bramley of the Pembina Institute said he was not yet aware of the pilot environmental surveys, but said the agency might have been trying to respond to criticisms that a similar Environment Canada survey contained unreliable data.
The agency was dealt a blow this year when cabinet decided to dump the mandatory long-form census scheduled for next year, replacing it with a voluntary survey. Tony Clement, the minister responsible for Statistics Canada, said the long-form was an unnecessary invasion of privacy and that many ordinary Canadians object to it -- though no clear evidence for the claim has yet been produced.
The census is StatsCan's most important project, and Sheikh chafed at erroneous claims by Clement that the agency viewed the survey as nearly equivalent to the mandatory census.
"I want to take this opportunity to comment on a technical statistical issue which has become the subject of media discussion ... the question of whether a voluntary survey can become a substitute for a mandatory census," Sheikh wrote in his resignation letter July 21. "It can not."
Statistics Canada was originally given $630 million to carry out the May 2011 census, including the mandatory short and long forms. After cancellation of the mandatory long-form census, that budget was split -- $550 million for the short-form and $80 million for the voluntary National Household Survey, which a broad range of critics say will produce unreliable data, and under-represent the poor and marginal.
To alleviate those concerns, Industry Canada officials said StatsCan would receive an additional $30 million for helping to improve the response rate. But the agency says it has not received any extra money.
"The government has not approved additional funding at this time," Frayne said.
Officials at Industry Canada were not immediately available for comment.
Statistics Canada's 2010-2011 budget, not including the special census fund and money from selling its data, is $407 million. The agency earns about $100 million each year from sales.
User Tools
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I feel that if certain organs were in demand, less effort would be made to revive people. Am I being silly? Not really. I had a bad experience in hospital when my heart stopped, the doctors tried to revive me and failed. They stopped and said I was gone. I came around on my own when the nurse was giving a final BP reading of 'zero'. I heard her declare me dead! It was all I could do to shake my head but they never caught on til I was able to open my eyes. You should have seen them scramble then! I thought the nurse was going to faint. The thing is, I think we may write people off too soon when there is something of value to be gained from them.
Email
Comments are now closed for this story
reece
said
Hal
said
Alethia
said
viral venus
said
Scott_G
said
---
The bigger and bigger they could make it, the more jobs they could create that do almost nothing, but water down our productivity and raise our cost of living.
---
If we could cut out the waste and let people get real jobs making good product, we could have more money in our pockets, lower taxes and be able to afford to buy an electric car.
---
CUT the waste please.
Jerry in Calgary
said
LDM
said
CMQ
said
Steve G
said
Bob,Calgary
said
Stats Canada BS
said
jim from manitoba
said
Tryon
said
Prof. Pye Chartt
said
Gary in Alberta
said
After being harassed by this agency for over a year, he was finally able to speak to a supervisor and he told them to stop calling. StatsCan can NOT force you to take part in these surveys, but they will continue to demand that you do. It took another 3 more calls to supervisors before they finally gave up.
Doing bullying tactics and demanding information and saying you are required to comply, when you are NOT required to comply, is an abuse of process by this agency. It's about time it got cleaned up and the huge waste of taxpayer dollars is eliminated.
JayRoc
said
Shaun
said
GHW
said
dcg
said
Peter in MB
said
Brina
said
Dean in Abby
said
Mike Grant
said
Will
said
billwjames
said
IslandMan
said
Big A
said
Ed in Alberta
said
Shane
said
Martin Ouellette
said
Bert
said
Collin
said
Arne
said
terryjan100
said
Spence in Ontario
said
David - Ottawa
said
Richard in New Brunswick
said
Ken Durham
said