Canada -
News Sections
Feds knew they'd lose data in census switch
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Monday Sep. 27, 2010 8:01 PM ET
The Conservative government recognized that changing the mandatory long-form census into a voluntary survey would make some data unusable for federal institutions, according to documents submitted Monday in Federal Court.
The documents were presented as evidence in a court challenge against the government led by a group that represents minority francophone communities across the country.
A lawyer representing the Federation of Francophone and Acadian Communities addressed a federal court in Ottawa on Monday, arguing that the switch violates the Official Languages Act.
The group wants the decision to be subject to a judicial review.
The document, obtained by the group for the court case, looks at how the voluntary survey will affect the data collected by Statistics Canada.
"It is recognized that the quality of the data collected by the voluntary (survey) will be lower than that of a mandatory survey," it reads.
Some survey data, "will not be useable for a range of objectives for which the census information would be needed," wrote Rosemary Bander, the assistant chief statistician.
The government tried to address some of the group's concerns by adding more questions about official languages in the mandatory short census, but the group said a simple headcount wouldn't suffice.
"The government must know what our needs are terms of health, of education, of everything, to know how to better deliver services and programs and respond to our needs," said the group's president, Marie-France Kenney.
"Our needs are very different from one end of the country to the next and often our communities are scattered and very small."
One of the many arguments against the Conservatives' plan is that a voluntary census won't accurately track the status of the French language in Canada.
The Official Languages Act directs the government to take actions that will help the development of linguistic minorities and enhance their vitality.
For his part, Prime Minister Stephen Harper and the Conservatives maintain that the mandatory long-form census is intrusive and the threat of jail time for non-compliance is unacceptable to Canadians.
The Conservatives' controversial plan has triggered opposition from groups across a wide political spectrum, including Statistics Canada. The former head of the agency stepped down from his role after the government claimed he had given his blessing for the move to a voluntary census.
The lawyer representing the francophone group on Monday said the first week of October would be the last opportunity for StatsCan to change its census process.
A number of groups are voicing their opinions on both sides of the argument, in relation to the long-form census issue.
The census debate also continues in Parliament.
The Liberals are expected to submit a private member's bill to write the long-form census into law by the end of the week. They also have an opposition day motion set for debate on Tuesday.
With files from The Canadian Press
User Tools
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I feel that if certain organs were in demand, less effort would be made to revive people. Am I being silly? Not really. I had a bad experience in hospital when my heart stopped, the doctors tried to revive me and failed. They stopped and said I was gone. I came around on my own when the nurse was giving a final BP reading of 'zero'. I heard her declare me dead! It was all I could do to shake my head but they never caught on til I was able to open my eyes. You should have seen them scramble then! I thought the nurse was going to faint. The thing is, I think we may write people off too soon when there is something of value to be gained from them.
Email
Comments are now closed for this story
Eric
said
First of all, surveys from credible sources are suppose to be conducted in an as random manner as possible. A voluntary "census" cannot even be considered a credible survey. It only has information from people who WANT to fill it out. This introduces incredible amount of bias into the data. Most likely, the people that need the most help will be the people that have their information left out from the data that leads to the decision making.
If the people that know the most about statistics in Canada (ie statcan) is opposed to the voluntary "census," then you know it is a bad idea.
VC
said
Alethia
said
How much would be lost?
Canadians accept Decima polls which are true 19/20 plus or minus one or two--all the time.
Considering we have 20 odd million respondents, are we losing 1/20,000,000 accuracy or 1/1,000,000 accuracy. Perhaps this is a question they don't want joe public to know... (stats can that is). I could live with accruacy of a millionth.
Is it possible no one knows?
Les Grossman
said
George V.
said
Gary McCowan
said
Sahib Reginawale
said
Nick in Gatineau
said
Ian K
said
shawbrooke
said
art
said
Ken
said
allan
said
Ian
said
Dan
said
Mark
said
Marcel a francophone
said
Doug
said
Harper has to go!
said
Pip
said
Will
said
gar
said
Danny Dinosaur
said
Gilbert in Ottawa
said
RK in MB
said
Keith in Brampton
said
Island Girl
said
Toronto Elite
said
peter in MB
said
Keith in Brampton
said
JJAYCEE
said
RealityCzech
said
roy
said
Ian K
said
Rob
said
1Don1
said
Havelock Heavy
said
Cam
said
bob beckwith
said
KJ in Kingston Ontario
said
stav from MTL
said
BGrigg
said
Pip
said
Albertaboy111
said
CYL
said
Al - Ottawa
said
Alexandria
said
Jacob in Edmonton
said