Canada -   

1
A Royal Bank of Canada sign is seen in Toronto's financial district on Thursday, Feb. 26, 2009. (Nathan Denette / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Royal Bank third-quarter profit falls 18 per cent

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV News Channel: BNN's Michael Kane explains
The latest earning numbers for the Royal Bank are disappointing. With the stock market not performing well, trading revenue for the big banks is down. Strategists say the Royal Bank is the most vulnerable to the market softness.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (16) Facebook   

A Royal Bank of Canada sign is seen in Toronto's financial district on Thursday, Feb. 26, 2009. (Nathan Denette / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Photos

A Royal Bank of Canada sign is seen in Toronto's financial district on Thursday, Feb. 26, 2009. (Nathan Denette / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

View Larger Image

Date: Thu. Aug. 26 2010 10:53 AM ET

TORONTO — Royal Bank of Canada (TSX:RY) shares tumbled nearly three per cent on Thursday after its third-quarter earnings fell 18 per cent, affected by a major drop in profits from its capital markets division.

Stock in Canada's largest bank slipped $1.49 to $49.20 on the Toronto Stock Exchange shortly after the opening bell.

Royal said it earned $1.28 billion in the three months ended July 31, down from a record $1.56 billion last year.

Diluted earnings per share dropped to 84 cents from $1.05, while return on equity -- a broad measure of bank efficiency -- fell to 14.3 per cent from 19.4 per cent.

The bank reported cash earnings of 87 cents per share, falling short of analyst estimates for a profit of $1.02 per share, according to Thomson Reuters.

Royal is one of four big banks to report third-quarter earnings this week. Bank of Montreal (TSX:BMO) missed expectations on Tuesday, while CIBC (TSX:CM) outperformed analyst estimates Wednesday.

National Bank also announced third-quarter results Thursday, reporting net profit fell to $271 million from $303 million for the same period last year. The Montreal bank says it earned $1.56 a diluted share for the third quarter ended July 31, down from $1.78.

All the banks have revealed erosion at their capital markets divisions, which trade and invest in bonds and stocks and help underwrite company financings, mergers and other transactions.

At Royal, the bank's capital markets net income fell to $201 million from $562 million a year ago, largely reflecting a decline in trading revenue from record levels last year.

Skittish investors have kept stock market trading restrained in recent months as economic uncertainty -- particularly in Europe -- wore down their confidence and often left returns at a minimum.

President and CEO Gord Nixon told analysts in a conference call Thursday that the bank's broad operations and strong retail banking presence helped offset weaker capital markets businesses, but that lower trading margins -- particularly in Europe -- weighed on results.

"If you go back to 2009 and the early part of 2010 there were exceptional positives with respect to trading revenues," he said, noting that on the flip side the past quarter experienced "exceptional volatility."

He suggested the capital markets business will right itself, rather than sink back to the dismal levels seen last year.

"I think from a run-rate perspective we're quite comfortable that it's not likely to be where we (were) in 2009 but it certainly feels better, and should feel better, than where we are this quarter," Nixon said.

In Royal's other divisions, profits from Canadian retail banking jumped 14 per cent to $766 million, driven by strong volume growth and lower provision for credit losses.

The wealth management division's net income rose 10 per cent to $185 million, while insurance profits fell eight per cent to $153 million.

Meanwhile, the net loss from international banking tightened to $76 million in the quarter from $95 million last year, reflecting improved credit losses at its U.S. banking division in the southeastern U.S. states.

Barclays Capital analyst John Aiken wrote in a note that despite declining provisions for credit losses and a strong performance in Royal's domestic retail banking, the erosion of capital markets profits is his focus.

"Needless to say this came in well below our expectations and will likely still be a surprise to the market, even after BMO's poor results," Aiken wrote.

"While we believe that much of the lost trading revenues will be recovered in future quarters at a higher run-rate, this will mean little in the near term."

Royal Bank is the country's largest bank by assets and market capitalization, and has 77,000 employees serving more than 18 million personal, business, public sector and institutional clients. The bank has operations across North America and 52 other countries.

Comments are now closed for this story

Doug # BC
said
0 0

I can relate to what "Toby" said.But "Al" is not far fronm the truth.People whine about how little interst they get on their savings,but alos whine on how much they pay for a mortgage.The two are linked.You don't get higher rates on savings unless you pay more for what you borrow. The banks are a bit like government,in that they have little money of their own.What government spends is taken from taxpayers.What banks lend out are the savings of other depositors.I doubt there are many depositors who would want their banks to lend their money to people who either don't want to pay for the use of it,or who will be unlikely to pay it back. As to the "excess" profits. The articvle says the shares trade just shy of $50.00,and that the dividend on that share is just over $1.00.I find that hard to describe as an excessive rate of return to the investor. Yes.The numbers are big.But when you boil it all down to a rate of return on investment,it's hardly over the top.You will never get rich buying bak shares.You can,on the other hand,use the fact that Canadian banks are very safe to your advantage.You can build your savings by not losing your investment while you accumulate modest dividends. One thing is clear.You will never accumulate assets by accumulating debt.THAT is the current problem in Canada.To much consumer debt means consumers with no disposable cash to either invest,or live on.And all that at a time when most of Canada's export markets are drying up under the burden of,you guessed it,high debt.


reece
said
0 0

The shareholders who received the dividend cheques are of course none to happy. Don't worry, some lobbyist is promising Harper some nice contribution if only he would open the flood gates to immigration. The more people, the more money and spending and bigger dividends.


Sue
said
0 0

I expect future reports to show even smaller profits. Year over year bankruptcies are up 5.1%, from historically high bankruptcies, to even higher bankruptcies. If you google Canadian bankruptcies there's a chart that show bankruptcies have gone almost straight up in the past three years. I smell a housing bubble that's ready to burst.


Toby
said
0 0

To Al - the middle class which is shrinking rapidly has nothing left over to invest in Bank shares!


Al
said
0 0

A bank and its profit cannot be compared to a person. Look at the number of employees. It has to make billions or it would not be able to compete. RBC and other banks are companies with thousands of shareholders. The shareholders "own" the companies. Many are average citizens like you or your neighbour. The more the profit, the better the return on investment. These people are taking a risk and investing their money. So rather than complaining about how much banks are ripping you off, buy some of their stock and enjoy the dividends they pay you. That way you will get back some of what they "took" from you in service charges.


KAY
said
0 0

MY CROCODILE TEARS ARE FALLING
RBC MADE BUT A BILLION YOU SAY
THEY'LL RAISE BANKING FEES QUICKLY
AND LIVE FOR ANOTHER DAY!!!



Poohbear
said
0 0

If everyone is so worried about paying more bank fees, do the smart thing and switch to PC Financial and pay no fees.


SA
said
0 0

The short of the story is Banks profits are going down and Bankers will need to make it up somehow. Wait for it.....I predict a significant raise in fees coming to the nearest bank near you.


Van
said
0 0

I think it's sad that we as customers will probably see hikes in our banking fees, etc. because some greedy bank didn't exceed it's record of 1.56 billion and only took in 1.28 billion. So sad for the investors, eh? So very very greedy of the bank on the back's of the Canadian worker who is the one providing that profit.


Marilyn
said
0 0

Poor bank - guess the fees will have to rise AGAIN!


Earthwatcher
said
0 0

They break my heart, poor little muffins. If they lived in the real world they would understand how little we care if they only make a small profit. Year after year they reap huge rewards from gouging consumers and paying out penny ante interest on personal investments.My heart bleeds...


Mr. Hope and Change
said
0 0

In his daily briefing to investors Tuesday, Gluskin Sheff economist David Rosenberg replaced the R-word with the D-word.The "current economic malaise" is a "depression, and not just some garden-variety recession," said Rosenberg in a note to clients today. Rosenberg, who's been issuing warnings about a double-dip recession, was formerly the chief economist at Merrill Lynch. Yet, the tidbits of good news are the same kind of fluff that gave our 1930s predecessors a false sense of optimism amidst unsustainable growth, Rosenberg argues. This current US adminstration is a FAIL.


KJ in Kingston Ontario
said
0 0

Guess 'someone' is trying to sell them some new technology, but it would also help if they were not so big that they quit even pretending that they gave a damn about your business. Average Canadians should go to credit unions. They may not be much better off -- but they might be appreciated just a little bit and generate some potential competition... Banks are like the phone companies in Canada: bloated, exploitive, greedy, powerful and monopolistic.


Paul
said
0 0

Poor RBC, they only made 1.25 B I L L I O N! And we all know that is AFTER paying their preferred shares out. How much did they really make? Ecomony down everywhere, everyone loosing money, everyone out of work and based on a 40 hour work week, they profit $250,000 per hour of operation. Gee, I wish I could make $670 per second in profit.


Max
said
0 0

Yes, the retail sector did it again. It is easy to profit when next to nothing is paid on deposits and instead of being nickle and dimed to death, it is now loonie & toonied. For years now the big 5 have profited at the retail level in order to compensate for their incompetence in running up huge loses in the international markets.We do want to see them make profits, not losses, just not continually on the backs of Canadian consumers & small/medium business.


M.W.
said
0 0

RBC needs to not charge as much for their RBC DI transactions across the board and alter their trading platform so as to incorporate level II as standard for all investors, add market maker data and an better assortment of T/A predictive helps to make them better investors. As it is they are falling behind other platforms which have more complete access to data and faster servers. Little wonder their Capital Markets profits are down.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Canada Stories

Labour Minister Lisa Raitt appears on CTV's Question Period on Sunday, May 27, 2012.

Raitt: Ottawa prepared to step into CP Rail dispute

More   22 Comments 22    1 Video(s) 1

Kathy Dunderdale, premier of Newfoundland and Labrador, appears on CTV's Question Period on May 27, 2012.

EI changes unfair to N.L., Dunderdale says

More    Comments    1 Video(s) 1

Pedro Gonzalez bangs his pot in support of the growing protest movement that started against tuition fee hikes in Montreal, Friday, May 25, 2012. (Ryan Remiorz / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Focus of Quebec protests swells beyond tuition hikes

More   11 Comments 11    1 Video(s) 1

Most Talked about Stories

It is about time - as a grandparent I have watched our kids (who were allowed to fail although I do remember some nagging on our part) learn, I have watched our children now micro-manage their children. A big part of it is the fact that there are predators out there and an extreme reluctance on the parents part to alllow freedom that might result in the children becoming victims.

Harvey

Parents must learn to stop meddling, author urges