Canada -   

1
Construction crews tear up the University of Waterloo Warriors football field in Waterloo, Ontario, Monday, June 14, 2010. (Dave Chidley / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Carl Zender, former coach, appears on CTV's Canada AM on Tuesday, June 15, 2010. The doors to the University of Waterloo Warriors football facilities were locked after the school suspended its football program for a year, Monday, June 14, 2010. (Dave Chidley / THE CANADIAN PRESS) University of Waterloo's Waterloo Warriors logo. Waterloo

Waterloo suspension 'death' of football program: coach

Viewer

CTV News Video

Canada AM: Bob Copeland and Dustin Zender
The director of athletics at the Univ. of Waterloo says the program suspension is not a death knell for Waterloo football, while a football player on the team is upset the clean players are also being penalized by the suspension.
Canada AM: Carl Zender, former coach
A former University of Waterloo football coach who also has a son on the team says the decision to suspend the program is extremely unfair, as students were told they could move on if they were clean.
CTV National News: Scott Laurie reports
Officials for the University of Waterloo football team have decided not to play in any of the games for the up-and-coming 2010 season after a steroid scandal among players. This is the first time a Canadian school has made such a drastic decision.
CTV News Channel: Marg McGregor, CIS
The CEO of the Canadian Interuniversity Sport says the decision to sideline the entire team was a decision made by the University of Waterloo, but it is possible that those players unfairly affected by the suspension may be allowed to play for another University under special circumstances.
CTV News Channel: Joel Bowey in Waterloo
While the University of Waterloo suspends their football program, a CTV correspondent explains what led to the steroid investigation and the reaction of players who were affected by the suspension.
CTV Ottawa: Terry Marcotte on steroids and sports
A CTV Ottawa correspondent looks at the use of steroids in sports and the impact it has on the sports world and its players.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (50) Facebook   

Construction crews tear up the University of Waterloo Warriors football field in Waterloo, Ontario, Monday, June 14, 2010. (Dave Chidley / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Carl Zender, former coach, appears on CTV's Canada AM on Tuesday, June 15, 2010. The doors to the University of Waterloo Warriors football facilities were locked after the school suspended its football program for a year, Monday, June 14, 2010. (Dave Chidley / THE CANADIAN PRESS) University of Waterloo's Waterloo Warriors logo. Waterloo

Photos

Construction crews tear up the University of Waterloo Warriors football field in Waterloo, Ontario, Monday, June 14, 2010. (Dave Chidley / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

View Larger Image

Date: Tue. Jun. 15 2010 7:45 PM ET

A former coach with the University of Waterloo football said the university's decision to suspend the team for a year because of steroid use by a number of players is a "death knell" for the program.

"They've basically killed the program, make no bones about that, this is not a one-year suspension, this is a death knell to the program, you cannot field a team without your first-year players and your fifth-year players," former receivers coach Carl Zender told Canada AM Tuesday.

The suspension means high school graduates who committed to Waterloo for football this fall will not be able to play there and for players in their final year of eligibility going to Waterloo, their careers are over.

Zender resigned from the team on Saturday after learning of the university's decision.

The suspension comes after Waterloo Warriors receiver Nathan Zettler was arrested for possession and trafficking of anabolic steroids.

The school then ordered the entire sixty-man team to be tested, leading to nine potential anti-doping infractions. According to the Canadian Centre for Ethics in Sport (CCES), which conducted the tests, the infractions include four admissions of use, three positive tests and one refused test. The ninth case is under further investigation by police.

Zender said the university initially promised the players who tested clean that they would play football this season.

"It's extremely unfair," he said. "I know the details. The kids that were clean they were told, they would move forward. They were told by officials at the university they would play football this year."

Bob Copeland, the school's director of athletics, did not deny the claim during an interview with Canada AM.

But he denied that the suspension was a "death knell" to the program.

"It was a very difficult decision, but this was an eight game decision, there are a number of issues that are bigger than the sport of football," he said. "Our senior administration at the university . . . felt this was the right decision to affect change and really examine this issue."

Copeland added that the university was sending a message to athletes across the country about the dangers and consequences related to using performance-enhancing drugs.

Fourth-year wide receiver Dustin Zender said the university did not consider wider issues relating to the suspension of the program.

"I'm still in disbelief now. It's more than football, this is affecting friendship and family," he told Canada AM. "I'm still struggling to understand (the decision). I understand they wanted to make an example. They made an example when they tested everyone on the team, why are the punished everyone who is clean?"

He also expressed his disappointment in the way the team found out about the suspension.

Zender learned about the decision from his father, receivers coach Carl Zender, only hours before the university made the public announcement.

Dustin Zender said if he hadn't heard that way some on the team might have found out about the program's suspension on the news.

"We were told we would move forward with the guys who were clean and I wake up and find out a couple of hours before, that the season is done," he said.

Copeland, who was interviewed with Dustin Zender, said he understood how upset the players were.

"I feel terrible for Dustin and his teammates, it's a tough life lesson, I certainly understand where they are coming from," he said.

The team's head coach Dennis McPhee and assistant Marshall Bingeman have been placed on paid leave as the university conducts its own investigation.

The Canadian Centre for Ethics in Sport identified two players caught up in the scandal, including first-year linebacker Jordan Meredith, who tested positive for Tamoxifen.

Second-year linebacker Joe Surgenor confessed to using a steroid and will also be suspended for two years.

Comments are now closed for this story

Melissa
said
0 0

I must say that for the past two days I have been embarrassed to call myself a student at the University of Waterloo. The school says that they are taking a stand to teach a lesson. What lesson is that? Why are we punishing the whole team for the actions of a few. Most of the players I have heard about that were using didn't even play last year. The university should allow the season and come out strong and actually doing something to help fight the issue, not just canceling the program to hope that it will go away. I am proud to say that I bleed Black and Gold, and will back my team. Right now I am just not sure if I will back the University in the future.


MiggsVer2.0
said
0 0

Here's a bit of factual information for all the experts out there. Which profession has the highest incidence of steroid use amongst its members? Answer: Police Officers. Next highest Usage? Answer: Firemen Not that this has anything to do with Waterloo's football program but I just thought people may enjoy that tidbit of factual info. Now go on and continue to fling mud at a bunch of kids.


Jay
said
0 0

I had to comment on this one: LOL --- treating these guys like children. U of W is supposed to be one of Canada's top schools, drawing in some of the best that this nation has to offer, both athletically and academically. Where does this 'we're canceling the dance because we caught one student with alcohol' junior high mentality come from? Christ, they're even tearing up the field! What is the point of that other than to show that the faculty is nothing short of immature and incapable of rational decisions, themselves (not to mention it's an obvious waste of money). If I were one of the clean players, I'd be looking for an attorney. Who is the say that some of these guys weren't destined for the CFL or NFL? And, for the freshman, how is one year off football going to affect their opportunity to move forward with a professional career? I know that most of these guys don't end up playing football as a career. But, the fact of the matter is that this could affect their chances if the opportunity did exist. Associated U of W faculty, this is nothing short of irresponsible and shameful behavior. Much better decisions could have been made, such as at least running training for the entire season, or kicking the 8 1 off the team only (logical), or running a rehabilitation program concurrently with the program (since we ARE Canadian and we just love to help people get back on track). I hope the clean guys sue the *&%es off your school.


Mel Blake
said
0 0

Why does this coach still have a job at all? Are we supposed to believe the coaching staff was completely ignorant of the steroid use by players? These drugs have not only physical, but also psychological effects. There's no way the coaching staff didn't know. In any case, maybe now the university can make heroes of somebody else, like perhaps students who are at university to learn. The amazing thing is that athletes actually think that what they do on the field s important, fed by constant attention and glorification. If this were students cheating on an exam nobody would care and it would not be on the news.


Ed in Alberta
said
0 0

Perhaps "coach" should have thought of that when he noticed his players bulking up a bit more than they usually do!The ONLY way to stop the drug/steroid abuse is to make it absolutely clear that "if you get caught, find another line of work".


Beth
said
0 0

Please remember there are innocent players that through hard work and dedication secured a spot on that team only to now have their dreams shattered! My son was one of them! We are deeply disappointed by the university's decision!!


stevo
said
0 0

Universities are institutions of higher learning, first and foremost. Sports exist as a distraction at best and offer the chance for some students (but not all) who may not be worthy of the academic challenges to have meaningful existence in the halls of academia.Should the entire program be penalized for the idiocy of a few? Perhaps not, but football is taught as a team game. You win as a TEAM and you lose as a TEAM. Often the innocent pay for the actions of the guilty. Should GM employees lose their jobs due to the bad decisions of the bosses? In the 1990's should the entire Canadian Airborne regiment have been shut down by the military due to the actions of a few?Besides, if football is the only reason the players were at the University of Waterloo then they don't deserve to be there in the first place.


MAL of TO
said
0 0

If 14% of the student body fails to achieve the Ontario minimum standing in English or Mathematics the college could lose it's accreditation and rightfully so. 14% of the football team failed to meet acceptable standards so the program is gone. Correct call. This IS an institute of higher learning after all, not a tripleA league team for the Argos. If the clean players are so poorly done by, petition the Canadian University authorities to waive the one year no play rule on transfers... betcha no other University grabs any of these guys.


JJ
said
0 0

Now did the University actually outright lie? Maybe - just maybe, they had all intentions of letting the "clean" players play, but when they realized how many were in the wrong, it was determined AFTER the fact to suspend the team for a year. Everyone who is pointing the finger at the university think of that. The decision to suspend the team could have come AFTER all the testing was done. So really they didn't lie, but after analyzing the severity of the situation had to change their stand on it. 9 players is ALOT. and even though the 'clean' players chose not to do them, they still knew about it and said nothing. Doesn't that make you guilty by association? It is time that people are held accountable for their actions. I do believe the players who were dopping should be removed from the sport for more than one year like the 'clean' students. But serve this as a WAKEUP call. Doing steriods will NOT be tolerated. and by simply turning a blind eye to your teammates doing them is almost as bad as doing them yourself. Sorry - but boys take something and learn from it. Don't bycott the University for making this decision. Grow from it and become better people.


John, Ex-Waterloo
said
0 0

What an absurd decision.It takes many years to build a football program. An arbitrary decision like this is not some transient slap on the wrist - it is akin to using the death penalty. This situation does not appear to have been a systemic problem and should have been dealt with much more strategically. These young men are, as you say, 'STUDENTS', and therefore this was a learning opportunity missed. The only lesson from this is that power is absolute and should be used vindictively and callously. Really strange this same lesson didn't apply to UW's relationship with RIM when they were accused of patent infringement.Shame on the UW administration.


Steven Boucher
said
0 0

Well I am going to add my two cents here. As a former athletic therapist in both amateur and professional sports, I feel bad for the other players on the team. HOWEVER, do not tell me for one minute that the other players did not know. I've worked with teams long enough to know that when 1 athlete does something the other athletes know right away. You don't think they don't talk about who each one had sex with the night before? These are not children, these are adults. I can highly bet, and don't tell me otherwise, that the players did not know. They chose to stay silent as a team, well I'm sorry, then you suffer as a team. I worked with teams and I consulted one national sports association on medical issues and drug enhancing issues. I had one policy, you take drugs and I find out, you're done! I could care less what a coach thinks or feels. Oh yes, the coaches knew nothing, hogwash. Like I said, when 1 athlete does something EVERYONE knows, including the equipment guy. You cannot foster an ideal of silence when others are going to harm you. I said I feel bad for them, but they are not so innocent if they chose to stay silent!


GLENN C
said
0 0

I don't think that it is fair that everyone has to bepunished for a few making mistakes. I would urge the powers that be, re-think the order to kill the season! If you are guilty, take your punishment like a man, don't sit back and let others suffer because of you!


football program alumni
said
0 0

Canceling the program does more than set a dramatic example. It also shows the complete disregard for the dreams and effort of those who have dedicated their time and energy for the last few years trying to better themselves and their school community by doing the right things the right way. By canceling the team you only expose the total lack of value you have for those who’ve cared so much about Waterloo, ones who’ve sacrificed so much for so long in hopes of building something they and their families could be proud of. Now more than ever you should be celebrating the commitment of the innocent for sticking it out, despite all the adversity they’ve had to go through over the last few years. Instead, you’re spitting in their faces, shame on you.


Doug # BC
said
0 0

Call me old fashioned,but I am still living under the notion that punishing people who did nothing wrong,just to send a message to those who did break the rules,is blatantly wrong at almost every level. To that end,I agree with "Robert Brise".And to go even further,this is not the only bad decision to come out of the land of academia in very recent times.That,my friends,is proof to me that you can have all the fancy degrees that schools have to offer,and still not be very bright.When your philosopy or ideology recommends unjust solutions,or keeps you from seeing the forest for the trees,it's time to shut up and listen to the people who live in the real world,and do real work In case it is not cleasr,"thinking",in and of itself,is naot actually "doing".Which is why most people tasked with actually accomplishing difficult challenges are perfectly justified in saying that "those who can,do.Those who cannot do,teach". One again,the self rightous,pointy headed acaemics git this wrong.Scary,when you also see thast ther entire Supreme COurt of the USA is comprised of Yale and Harvard elitiists,and that we seem to be headed in the same direction.Politcal correctness and ideology will never,in a million years,be able to replace the pragmatism tht real people learn by living among the rest of us peons.Those of us who earn a living by doing something,rather than telling everyone else what they should be doing. We are so indignant when the legal system wants to impose sanctions of criminals,yet so very uncaring when the land of academia sees fit to punish the innocent.TskTsk.Only in Canada.


Melm BC
said
0 0

Soemthing that does not seem to have been taken into account. The season has not started. No games have been played. No medals won, no unfair advantage taken. When other teams were suspended, i.e. Duke Lacrosse, there had been team participation in the offending incident. I do think these young men have good reason to seek legal advice.


Westerner
said
0 0

Integrity, Honesty and Truth - Bottom Line people! If you play and you adjust the body for YOUR BENEFIT (to win at all costs and get major playing contracts offered) in Pro-sports then punishment should be noted. Heads up and stern actions at the beginning should of brought this under control WITH DRUG Testing noted BEFORE games - thus catching the offenders BEFORE games and benching them - thus letting the TRUE CLEAN players on the court. Also, all team players would of known as it's not hard to hide drug actions within a team - the non-offenders knew the risks and avoided it to save themselves.


George
said
0 0

To Mike:Nathan Zettler and Carl Zender are two complete different people that have no blood connection with each other. Maybe you should read the article thoroughly before you make such a bold statement


Nat
said
0 0

@ rmsbl4: That is an ignorant remark considering co-op students take 5 years. There are many reasons to take 5 years, not just sports. You just made yourself look bitter towards student athletes. Well done.


Marco D Ontario, Canada
said
0 0

Last time I checked, Football was a team sport and the team itself considers each other as being part of a family. I back the decision of the whole program being suspend. These students are around each other so much on and off the field. It is highly impossible that only the parties using steroids knew about it. The rest of the team, however many of them are clean must have known or had some idea, however small, that their teammates were using steroids. And if they knew then it was their responsibility to bring that to the attention of the proper people. If they didn't do so, then they should be punished as well. People, please don't blame anyone else but the students. Being in university, they have been taught right from wrong and all that "Say NO to Drugs" BS. They have to accept responsibility for their actions. Oh and please nobody use the excuse of" These kids are under a lot of pressure" to justify their actions. They committed a crime and should accept the punishment.


Not a bad thing
said
0 0

Who said life was fair ?It's about time an organization did the right thing. This is unfortunate for the 'clean' players, but they are a 'team' . Nine players is way too many. This is a clear message to all pro and amature athletics and I applaud this difficult decision the University is making. Maybe this will help bring integrity back to sports.


Joyce
said
0 0

Why do those players who are clean have to be punished for the wrong doings of those who used or sold illiegal substances. This is like saying that when someone commits a crime, other than those who do not, all of us have committed a crime, or if a professor commits a crime, all the professors are banned from teaching, because one has committed the crime. everyone else pays the piper.According to this, then we as citizens are all guilty regardless who has committed the crime.Where is the logic in this.


HG
said
0 0

I do not agree with the decision by the University to suspend the entire team's season. This was a possible 9 players out of 65 which is far from a majority not to mention you can still carry about a team and just find 9 clean players to replace the ones that are removed. These guys need this for their potential future and I am sick of penalizing everyone because of certain peoples bad choices. Who knows if the other players knew what was going on or not, but it doesnt make anyone stop to think about not doing it when the consequences are the same whether you do or DONT do it. Lets be fair here and do whats right, kick the 9 out and keep the rest and make them have faith in the system, how are these guys going to feel in real life thinking that even if they arent guilty they are treated as such.


Mike
said
0 0

Yeah, they bust this kid for steroids,ruin the program and everyone around it and Jaffer goes scott free and someone else recently got away with possession of coke.One rule for the rich and well connected and a completely different set of rules for everyone else.The regents were on a witch hunt and they have burned the whole village at the stake.Brutal and unnecessary.


Uncle Bill
said
0 0

Any Law students out there. Well I remember a little thing called our constitutionally protected rights. That is to say that we are all innocent until proven guilty. Here we have a case of individuals being striped of an opportunity to advance themselves through sports when they have been proven to be innocent of any illegal activity. What gives the university the right to punish innocent students and violate their constitutionally protected rights. A class action law suit should be filed on behalf of the team of innocent and clean players. No person or institution has the right to strip us of our legally protected rights. The university is relying on the fact that most people will not consult a lawyer and thereby get their way. Do not be intimidated. Get legal advise and fight for your legally protected rights. If these students learn anything it will be to stand up and fight for your rights. They always say that being part of the University faculty is being a team player, well when one of the faculty gets charged with illegal sex with a student they don't suspend the whole team do they. No, in fact they suspend only the individual charged and with pay I might add until the outcome of their trial due to the fact that they the teacher has the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. So please, someone..get a lawyer or better still get a law student to sink his teeth into this one. It will get their career off to a good start. ITS A CASE YOU CAN'T LOSE.... Good luck FIGHT TEAM FIGHT !!!!!!!!!!!!


MiggsVer2.0
said
0 0

Only 9 out of 62 players were juicing? Shocking quite truthfully; I would have thought it would have been substantially more. Good to see all the experts lining up to give their 2 cents on something they know absolutely nothing about.


RK in MB
said
0 0

One more thing, if a team in the Olympics wins a gold medal and just one player is found to have a positive test for banned substances, the gold medal is stripped from the team, not just the individual. Although the decision by the university seems harsh, it is in line with that thinking. The problem is the abusers, not the program.


Don't be playin no Fooze Ball
said
0 0

The hidden agenda that someone suggested to, is probably that the football program does not receive broad support from the student population. This is not suprising given the make up of the student body at Waterwoo. Copeland stated that it was a tough lesson to learn for the "clean" players. And what leason is that ? you might as well take steroids because you'll be punished regardless ?


Melm BC
said
0 0

Could these 'clean' students bring an against the university?


RK in MB
said
0 0

I heard this story and the first thing that came to mind is "Win as a team, lose as a team". The coaches should have noticed and the players should have noticed. Where were the team captains during this? I cannot believe that no one knew about this. People who are upset should point their anger at the right people. The school has now shown that this type of behaviour is strictly forbidden and that many will suffer for the actions of a few, which is the way society works. Maybe, from now on, players will speak up about this, either to the coaches or to the player himself. The decision is justified and I support those who made it.


annie
said
0 0

What a horrible message the univerity is teaching. So many innocent players with their dreams dashed for no reason what so ever. I'm ashamed for the leaders of that university.


Stephen
said
0 0

Knowledge of others breaking the rules on the team is different , but still not acceptable, than actually breaking them yourself.Suspending a full team is the correct action, especially when that many players are in violation.Telling them they would play if clean and then cancelling their season is also not acceptable and the clean players in this case should be allowed to play.Educational facilities accross the country should have a posted notice of the repercussions that will take place and all players should have to sign it regardless of the sport and in fact even if they are not in a sport.We do live in a free society but every institute, and for that matter business, should have the ability and responsibility to ensure that no one they are responsible for is taking drugs.


Spanky
said
0 0

If you read the entire article, it says that there are 9 potential anti-doping infractions in addition to the initial person dealing steroids. That means 15% of the team was potentially using banned substances. This isn't a situation of just one person ruining it for everyone...


Josh
said
0 0

I completely agree with Stephan's comments. This is a team sport, and while it may not be fair that those who played with good ethics, and not using performance-enhancing drugs to get an unfair, let along dangerous, advantage, are getting the rough end of the stick, the fact that 9 players have admitted or tested positive for steroid use is alarming, and frankly, quite disturbing. Sure, the university did a shoddy job by giving false hope to those innocent in this fiasco, but I still believe they did the right thing. Steroid use not only results in events like this, but it also tarnishes the sport as a whole; look what it did to baseball.


rmsbl4
said
0 0

I thought University was 4 yrs. Oh yea that's right sports makes it 5 years.


SaskGirl
said
0 0

How unfair! I know steroid use is controversial, but there is some merit to the argument that alcohol/smoking/poor eating habits could be worse for your health than steroids. I know they enhance performance, but really it's only in proportion to the amount of effort you put into it. It's not like they're taking steroids and sitting on the couch, looking more like Arnold every hour. I'm sure we would all be suprised to learn about the other performance enhancers that most athletes take that aren't illegal. It just doesn't seem fair.


Jason in Fredericton
said
0 0

While unfortunate this may be, and disapointing for those who are clean and wanted to play, I think this is more of sending a message across the CIS.If those clean players have an axe to grind, they should find those who used and distributed those drugs.


Adrian
said
0 0

This is NOT fair. I agree that life is not fair, however the students and upcoming students need to boycott the University. There are plenty of other places to go to school. Start up a smear campaign against the University of Waterloo on Facebook get the word out there. When you start affecting their pocket books you will ultimately get results. Food for thought.


Derek, Ottawa
said
0 0

Don't punish a whole team for the mistakes of a few. Let the program continue and see what happens, win - well done, loss - blame the few.Life is one big lesson to learn.Cheers


Ed Horton
said
0 0

It is about time that athletes, both professional and college learn about the ramifications of doing illegal activites. It is too been to long, that all the athletes think they are above the law. If there are any innocent team members, they bare the same responsibilities, as the quilty. So if a whole team must shut down for a year. So be it. Maybe the other players, on other teams will realize there is a bad side to their actions. Perhaps the pro teams should use this as a lesson as well.


Jackie Barrett
said
0 0

This is not the first time a university Football program was cancelled or suspended for a season due to drug abuse or other negative behaviour.For example, during the 2006 Football Season, McGill University suspended their program for the remainder of the season due to a major hazing scandal.While I agree with suspending players caught taking performance enhancing drugs, I don't agree with punishing an entire team, especially those who are clean. Bob Copeland should be ashamed of himself there.To add insult to injury, Canadian Interuniversity Sport is not making enough effort to ensure University of Waterloo players tested negative are allowed to play for other universities so that their eligibility rules are not effected from this decision.Too bad the players and coaches have not staged a protest or launch court action to help reverse the university's decision.


Bryn
said
0 0

If they can't run the program without the use of steroids, then it rightfully shouldn't continue.


Martin of NS
said
0 0

This is a dissapointment. I don't think the people who didn't partake in performance enhancers should be punished for those who did. Simply kick out the people who did and game on! Furthermore, I think the event will prevent people who play sports anywheres for university not to take any performance enhancing drugs. The attention that has been drawn to this situation is punishment in itself.


arnie williamson
said
0 0

Did the University lie to the players? If so we have a larger issue of honesty and integrity here of the very staff at the University that is supposed to be guarding the integrity and honesty of the place. Were the senior University staff knowing and willingly lying to their players? If so who would ever trust these people?If the players were lied to and the article leads me to believe they probably were, my advice is to tell everyone to send your kids to get educated at a different university where senior faculty can be trusted to tell the truth.


Blair Pope
said
0 0

As a former educator and coach, each year I gave my players the heads-up that use of illegal drugs would result in team suspension of play.In this case, it sounds like team administration told players only steroid users would be banned and the remainder of the team would participate. Then the university administration did not support this decision.This makes the university appear hypocritical. Coaches and administrators need to be united in respect of team expectations and consequences BEFORE such decisions are made, not afterwards. Such sanctions need to be addressed in policy and not a knee jerk reaction.


mike
said
0 0

You would have thought the receivers coach might have known about his receiver dealing and using steroids. He should have seen the change in him. So he should stop belly aching and should have resigned awhile ago. The university did make a mistake and should have allowed the kids that tested clean to continue playing.


Robert Brise
said
0 0

For the University to suspend everybody, this doesn't bode well for their intelligence!


Stephan
said
0 0

While I understand that the clean players are upset, they have reacted very poorly to this decision. They have yet to comprehend that Football is a team sport, where you win as a team, lose as a team, and should be disciplined as a team. This is especially true since there were 9 players allegedly using steroids. This is not just the case of one player trying to get an unfair edge, but rather rampant distribution between players. Where is the leadership among captains to accept any responsibility? The clean players had to know what was going on. They then threw the dirty players under the bus as opposed to taking an proactive actions. A 1 year suspension does kill a football program for a number of years. The university handled this poorly if they said the clean players would play this year. But that does not excuse the use of steroids by 1 in 7 players. Perhaps this "over-discipline" is exactly the wake-up call that is needed that will prove steroid use will not be tolerated. A team with more than a handful of dirty players, is not a clean team with some dirty players...but is rather a dirty team. This decision is clearly not just about punishment but also a form of prevention.


Happy Canadian
said
0 0

Once again, our "leaders" punish all for the infractions of a few.Yet one more example of take it all away and to bad for the ones that followed the rules.Kick out the offenders for life in all sports groups, punish them severe!There probably was a "behind the scenes" agenda to rid this school of the sports program and this just fed into it as a justification. The university should be working with other universities to transfer these clean individuals into their programs if the student wishes instead of leaving them hanging out there. These students are loosing their eligibility!Tough life lesson " Play clean, follow the rules, get screwed anyway!" Actually a true life lesson.


amy
said
0 0

I think the main problem is not that we do want to move towards notions of right and wrong and a sense of community responsibility for moral decisions made within our communities, but that university officials blind sided the presumed innocent players, almost making the crime not as bad as the punishment. This is a slippery one. ... Context matters.


Sam C
said
0 0

One question this raises is whether the players who were "clean" knew about the ones who were doping -- and whether they reported this to anyone in authority, or simply remained silent. One also wonders whether any of the coaches knew or suspected that some of the players were doping.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Canada Stories

Labour Minister Lisa Raitt appears on CTV's Question Period on Sunday, May 27, 2012.

Raitt: Ottawa prepared to step into CP Rail dispute

More   8 Comments 8    1 Video(s) 1

Pedro Gonzalez bangs his pot in support of the growing protest movement that started against tuition fee hikes in Montreal, Friday, May 25, 2012. (Ryan Remiorz / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Focus of Quebec protests swells beyond tuition hikes

More   11 Comments 11    1 Video(s) 1

O'Neil King is pictured in this undated handout photo from Peel Regional Police.

Brampton, Ont. man arrested on Canada-wide warrant

More

Most Talked about Stories

It is about time - as a grandparent I have watched our kids (who were allowed to fail although I do remember some nagging on our part) learn, I have watched our children now micro-manage their children. A big part of it is the fact that there are predators out there and an extreme reluctance on the parents part to alllow freedom that might result in the children becoming victims.

Harvey

Parents must learn to stop meddling, author urges